Pilsner Urquell | Plzeňský Prazdroj

1,419 Reviews
Read the review
For Trade:
Pilsner UrquellPilsner Urquell

Brewed by:
Plzeňský Prazdroj
Czech Republic | website

Style: Czech Pilsener

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.40%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by Bitterbill on 09-10-2000

User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
Reviews: 1,419 | Ratings: 3,551
Photo of CBFanWish
3.97/5  rDev +9.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Though Pilsners aern't my favorite, I have to say that this is about as good as the style can get. It has a full rich flavour with a definate taste of saaz hops. Well balanced and easy to drink. I know it's changed a lot over the years, but it's still a good beer in a pinch.

 275 characters

Photo of bignick
3.88/5  rDev +6.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I like this beer. It pours a beautiful golden color with enough lace. The smell is grainy and grassy. The taste is crisp, and the flavors, while not overwhelming, shine through. The taste is a bit grainy, with a combination of hops and malt. It is medium bodied, and moderately carbonated. Overall, this pilsner is quite refreshing.

 332 characters

Photo of DrJay
3.27/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Clear golden colour. Fizzy head that disappeared soon after pouring and yielded no lace. Very mild floral hop aroma. Faint smell of grains. Light sweetness with quite a strong hop bitterness. Fairly crisp, with plenty of carbonation. Medium body, medium smoothness. Dry finish with plenty of residual hop bitterness.

500 mL can with best before date on the bottom.

 367 characters

Photo of TongoRad
4.18/5  rDev +15.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

It should be noted that this sample was taken from a closed case.

This is a gorgeous beer- a beautiful saturated yellow topped by a dense creamy head. Hops and malt are evident in the nose, almost a sweet grassiness. The texture hits a perfect balance between rounded and crisp. Hops linger in the finish- clean flavors all around. It's a wonderful beer when fresh.

 368 characters

Photo of Jacobob10
3.5/5  rDev -3.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3

On-tap @ The Squealing Pig in Boston, MA.

Pours out golden colored with a medium sized head. Lots of aroma, but hard to detect exactly what it is. Somewhat fruity. Same thing with the taste. Very smooth, coats your mouth extremely well, but the flavor is mysterious. Not a bad brew. I would recommend it just for people to try, but i don't think i would drink these all night long. Taste for yourself and draw your own conclusions.

 434 characters

Photo of nortmand
4.23/5  rDev +16.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

On tap at Claddagh in Lansing.
Great looking pour, further humiliates American macro "pilsners." Pours tawny amber, with ample off-white head.
Very malty smell, with a solid backbone of hops.
Sweet taste is rounded out by a subtle hop bitterness, very nice.
Smooth drinking with the perfect amount of carbonation, an absolute dream of a pilsner on tap.

 357 characters

Photo of elmocoso
4.33/5  rDev +19.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

You first notice the blooming head. A good three fingers thick on a rough pour. Very white, falling into a mallow-like surface, pocked with larger sized bubbles.

Beautiful gold with a slight beading.

Nice hop driven nose, especially for a pilsner, but the malt does not bow out. It is present and good.

Nice hop front in the mouth, but well balanced. It ends on a better note, but the middle seems all malt.

A very refreshing bier.

Nice smooth mouthfeel, great drinkability.

 490 characters

Photo of noclue
3.03/5  rDev -16.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Nice golden "classic" pilser appearance. High foamy white head that dissipates rather quickly. Not very lacy, it seems to leave an oily-like residue in the glass.

The only thing I could smell in this brew was a grassy/grainy type aroma. The taste was a little more impressive, with a hint of lemon added to the grass, grain, and slight malty hoppiness.

I enjoyed the extremely dry finish of this brew, as I found it quite odd. Easy beer to drink. Not a bad brew.

 470 characters

Photo of beertaster13
3.86/5  rDev +6.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Hands down the best pilsner I have had. Pours a nice clear with sunlight gold/yellow and a medium sized head that lasted farely long. Lacing is not bad for the style. Smell of earth tones, and nice hop aroma, roasted grains brings a nice aroma to the beer, hints of lime/lemon zest. Taste is a nice refreshing crisp beer, you get a nice combo of roasted grain and lemon herbs. A strong bittersweet aftertaste (lemon/apple) A medium bodied pilsner that goes down well, probably the staple if you want a pilsner.

 510 characters

Photo of AllThingsNinja
3.83/5  rDev +5.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

This deep golden brew forms a nice, lacy white head as its poured. The head disapates, but does cling a bit to the glass as the lager is consumed. The aroma is of grains and grass, with some pleasant complexity. The flavor is bold, yet crisp and refreshing. I noticed olive-like notes in addition to yeast, grain, and grass flavors. The dry finish was pleasant, but not quite as crisp as I'd like. For a grocery store beer, this was quite drinkable.

 449 characters

Photo of Trentonator
1.12/5  rDev -69.1%
look: 3 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

OK, so maybe I got a skunked version of this beer, but drinking this was truly a nauseating experience. It had really bad skunky aroma, the taste was bitter and the mouthfeel made me want to puke. I would re-review this if I got a decent example, but I am not sure I ever want to lay eyes on another one of these nasty brews again. If the beer was spoiled in transit, then maybe the brewers want to rethink their bottling/distributorship/label dating. This was an awful, awful beer.

 482 characters

Photo of JohnW
3.9/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Was interested in reading others reports on this pilsner - which vary wildly! Maybe it does not travel well across from Europe in bottles, and not sure how you get it in the US on tap. For me, this is one of the best Pilners available, typical nutty sharp aroma, clean crisp taste, very refreshing, and better than the Czech Budvar (or Czechvar as I think it is labelled in US) To have it on tap in a bar in the Czech Republic is wonderful....and a great way to spend an evening! I know everyone has different tastes, and what one likes another may not, but I was suprised at the unfavourable reports in here...one comparing it to Miller Lite ..huh ??!!!! I know a lot of beers here in US are very different to European beers, and I guess it's what we get used too...but for me, Urquel Pilsner is a true example of Czech/European pils - wonderful.

However, from the UK Camra monthly magazine recently there was a report that some changes may have been made to the brewing process (reasons of economy...dread the thought) and maybe some change in its quality...but I hope not. I have not had a bottle in the last 12 months, will have try it again.

Post script to my comments above! Just bought bottle of this (August 2004) and tried it again. I have to say that this is (was!) one of my favorite pilsner beers from Czech, but was disappointed. Either my taste has changed, or, as has been suggested, the brewing process has been wrecked by cost cutting. It still has the same sharp 'nose' but seemed more bitter than I remembered it, rather thin and not much character or depth in the after-taste. I still like the style, but it is no longer one of my top ten favourites.

John W

 1,687 characters

Photo of ChrisBowers
2.03/5  rDev -44.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I don't know what the big deal about this beer is. Its slightly above Miller Light, but why bother? Pours a fizzy yellow with a wet hay/corn smell to it. Not much to the taste... fizzy tasteless pilsner. Zero character. Why pay $5 for this at the bar?

 251 characters

Photo of Phyl21ca
3.12/5  rDev -14%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottle: Poured a golden beer with a standard head with more or less retention. Carbonation is quite standard. Aroma is a bit floral with some malt coming out also. Taste is also floral with some note of malt. This is a very light and refreshing beer. The beer might have been a bit skunked, which seems to be a recurrent problem with the Urquell; they don’t seem to stand the long trip from Europe to America very well. I find that the can version usually preserve itself better the the bottle version.

 503 characters

Photo of Sammy
2.5/5  rDev -31.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

First sip a classic pilsner and then some malt, and then.. Then all downhill, like tasting rusty metal, and not even in a can. Strong burning aftertaste of bitterness and attacking carbonation. Impossible to finish. Perhaps skunked, but I can pass on a next time.

 263 characters

Photo of kbub6f
3.75/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours with a fairly big head: slightly cream-colored, coarse, noisy and frothy. The beer is a clear, deep gold with lots of carbonation. Sticky clumps of lacing grab the glass. A tangy nose shows plenty of that sweet pils fonk. Some corn syrup in there too that blooms through the front to a full, fruity middle. Very bitter in the finish, with some honey and well-toasted grains. A very good pils. Clean and delicious.

 419 characters

Photo of garymuchow
3.88/5  rDev +6.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This is from the duty free shop of the Prague airport. Date good through September '04. Thanks to my brother John for picking this up for me.
The head added a soapy quality to the aroma, but the aroma later brings on a hop quality with bitterness and freshness. Faint malt notes too.
Huge off white head, medium gold, clear.
Hop bitterness dominates flavor but a nice firm malt foundation too. Flowery taste quality middle to finish. Middle also has a light fruity taste. Long, somewhat dry bitter finish.
Feel of a good refreshing lager.
This sample seems somewhat different than samples I've purchased in the states. This bottle was less hoppy and more fruity. Nice fresh taste.

 686 characters

Photo of anders36
3.63/5  rDev 0%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A nice golden colour, with a nice white fluffy head. The head disappears fast though. It has a distictly smell of hops and some smell of fudge too. The taste is bitter and a bit dry, with some nice mouthfeel of hops and fudge. It has a long bitter aftertaste. This is a nice beer and a beer i choose when i want to drink a pilsener.

 332 characters

Photo of SeanChouffe
3.75/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Golden color, light carbonation and a light white head. Nice sticky lacing. Aroma is a little skunky with hops and some background malt. Flavor is light, slightly sweet with a crisp pilsner hop finish. Mouthfeel is light bodied and effervescent.
I am not a big fan of pilsners, but this one is quite drinkable -- not overly dry.

 329 characters

Photo of jvajda
3.9/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Had a yard of this at Sunset in Allston. Very nice, but it gets awkward near the bottom of the glass.

Appearance: Light golden color with a standard head.
Smell: Grassy and very slightly hoppy.
Taste: Hops are crisp and easy-going. This is a refreshing brew good for hot days. Very grassy and only slighty malty.
Mouthfeel: Light on the mouth.
Drinkability: A good fall back beer when you can't get much else, but nothing incredibly special about this beer.

 464 characters

Photo of gentlebubbles
2.55/5  rDev -29.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

on tap at Redbone's

By the fate of the beer wheel was I awarded a chill amber pint with no head and no smell. It didn't seem so bad at first, but the fusty backtaste grew steadily harsher until it was slowly overwhelmed by syrupy nastiness.

I think I would have preferred the PBR.

 286 characters

Photo of jed
4.13/5  rDev +13.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Presentation: 30 cl on tap at Bohemia Bagel in Prague. Served in a Pilsner Urquell glass.

Appearance: Beautiful, golden yellow color with even strings of bubbles rising up. Nice big two finger head with a very light, cake-like texture; excellent head retention. As the head disappears, it leaves behind a trail of very thick lacing.

Smell: A nice, clean-smlling mix of piney hops and sweet, bready yeast notes.

Taste: Bitter nose that breaks into sweet, bready flavors and pine hop notes. Fewer citrus flavors than I expected for a pilsner, but I'm not that familiar with the style. More raw grain flavors as the beer warms. Very dry finish from the hops with some lingering bitterness and more sweet grain in the aftertaste.

Mouthfeel: Very clean, slightly dry mouthfeel. This beer is almost perfectly carbonated, which makes it very smooth.

Drinkability: Good flavor and a good mouthfeel give this one near-perfect drinkability. Would make an excellent session beer, as evidenced by the high level of alcohol consumption in the Czech Republic.

Not surprisingly, you can get Pilser Urquell almost everywhere in Prague, usually for less than $1.00. While I hear that the U.S. version is weaker or watered down, the original version is a seminal example of the pilsner style. The original and still one of the best … na zdravi!

 1,346 characters

Photo of brewQ
3.23/5  rDev -11%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This "draft" was poured a dark gold with a puffy white head.
I couldn't discern the hop subtleties in the bar environment.

The flavor had a hint of sweetness and then finished abruptly.
Likely fine with the style but not my favorite profile.
Certainly had marks of quality and certainly drinkable.

I can't help but wonder if this delicate brew will suffer as it is pushed into more distribution. The corporate marketing boys will dummy this profile into extinction.

 474 characters

Photo of granger10
3.05/5  rDev -16%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Did there used to be more to this beer? I just don't see how it is such a well-known and popular beer. I guess it could be a gateway pilsner for macro drinkers but not much more. Seems a bit watered down and the flavors seem a little weak. Still its easy to drink. I noticed a floral hoppiness mixed with a cereal grainy flavor. Not bad but not good enough either. Even though I had this one on-tap it might not have been the freshest sample. I've had many better pilsners than this.

 483 characters

Photo of soper2000
3.6/5  rDev -0.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Ah the legend that is Pilsner Urquell. I've been drinking this beer on and off for over a year now but i've never taken any notes so I picked up a single on my last beer run. I will be the first to admit that i normally don't enjoy pilsners that much unless i'm in the right environment/mood. With that being said here is my review:

Appearance: Poured a crisp, clear, slighty dark golden color with a white head.

Smell: Hmm, These Saaz hops certainly have an interesting smell. Very floral in aroma, a decent smell, just not my favorite.

Taste: Huge floral notes to this beer. Those hops sure are something special, I was just expecting to find something a little bit cleaner and smoother from this beer.

Mouthfeel: Good, nothing out of the ordinary, nothing special.

Drinkability: Very good, could be a decent session beer

In the end this is just not my style, i can see how it could be good, even great, for some. It just doesn't cut it for me though.

 973 characters

Pilsner Urquell from Plzeňský Prazdroj
82 out of 100 based on 1,419 ratings.