1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Left Coast Hop Juice - Left Coast Brewing Company

Left Coast Hop JuiceLeft Coast Hop Juice

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
81
good

558 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 558
Reviews: 232
rAvg: 3.58
pDev: 15.36%


Brewed by:
Left Coast Brewing Company visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  9.70% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: tonistruth on 09-05-2007)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 558 | Reviews: 232 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of ccrida
ccrida

Oregon

1.3/5  rDev -63.7%
look: 4 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

Appearance is hazy, dark strawberry blonde with an off-white head with long last, leaving nice lace. Nice color.

Smell is citrus hops and then very dirty, cheap vodka like alcohol.

Taste is similar - very sweet, dry, fusally hoppy beer - like an IPA fortified with cheap vodka. So bad, it's a bit nauseating, which is very disappointing with a tempting name like hop juice from a cali brewery, that I now realize why I've never heard of...

Mouthfeel is dry and slick.

Drinkability is terrible. A very poorly executed beer, in spite of the tempting name and story about being one of the original DIPAs. If this is what it tasted like then, they've really failed to evolve. Total drain pour, I had maybe 3 oz. of this bomber. Probably my lowest rated beer every (I think a Left Hand RIS was similarly plagued by dirty booze).

Serving type: bottle

04-16-2010 04:00:32 | More by ccrida
Photo of ggroller
ggroller

Pennsylvania

1.35/5  rDev -62.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Looks good in the glass. Plenty of foamy/ rocky head. No hops in the nose. None. Zero. Smell of dirty feet instead. Took a sip and I can't taste any hops either. Maybe it's an old bottle but I don't think so. It's super hot/ boozy. I can hardly get this one down. What a huge disappointment.

Serving type: bottle

05-08-2010 23:07:44 | More by ggroller
Photo of RonfromJersey
RonfromJersey

New Jersey

1.85/5  rDev -48.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

Slightly tarnished yelow gold body. Some haziness. Level two fingers of white tight foam.

Pleasant grapefruit backed by pine aroma. Lacks the fierce assertiveness I was expecting.

Malt doesn't establish a foothole as much as collapses after the first step. The juicy citrus hops immediately take over and have a big bite at the swallow. In the aftertaste though the citrus recedes and the pine goes from pleasant to industrial cleanser.

Decent mouthfeel. Finish absolutely destroys drinkability.

The brief middle isn't worth the start and finish of this beer. This is one DIPA you can pass on.

Serving type: bottle

11-24-2009 20:30:58 | More by RonfromJersey
Photo of BurnInLA
BurnInLA

California

1.93/5  rDev -46.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Maybe I don't have an experienced enough palate, but this beer just seems unnecessarily over-hopped. No balance here, just tons of bitterness.

Interestingly, I see several reviews mentioning that the hops are not present enough?

Well, I guess taste is very subjective and relative to a baseline... some see a glass half full and some see...

I won't be buying it again.

Serving type: bottle

07-24-2011 07:12:58 | More by BurnInLA
Photo of SWMeyer4141
SWMeyer4141

Texas

1.98/5  rDev -44.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

ABV 9.7%

Poured into a claret.

Appearance-Burnt orange, lots of haze. One finger soapy off white head with very nice lacing. Lots of bubbles still clinging to the perimeter of the glass.

Smell-Fresh bottle as far as I know, and getting alot of caramel and chocolate malts, not so much hops. I get some grapefruit, lemon and pine in the backround. I thought this beer was dry hopped?

Taste-Damn. Huge unpleasant bitterness. This is just bitter as fuck, no balanced at all. Completely slapped in the face with hops and back of the throat is just burning. So dry, carbonation can't even help this. I guess I'm getting some light grapefruit but something is wrong with this beer.

...Even as this beer warms it gets worse...

Mouthfeel-Prickly, numbing and horrible. Not sure If I can drink much more of this.

Overall-Hands Down the worst IIPA I have EVER had. No balance, just slapped with bitterness, no malt, no fruit little sweetness. I'm going to try and finish the half of bomber that I poured, and will most likely drain pour the rest. The fact that you can get a Hop Stoopid for 4 bucks there is no reason for this beer to ever be purchased. EVER.

Serving type: bottle

07-24-2011 20:23:52 | More by SWMeyer4141
Photo of ehammond1
ehammond1


2.13/5  rDev -40.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Bottle

Liquor Stop
San Marcos, CA

A clear amber body with a touch of haze throughout the beer. A half inch high head that sticks around, eventually leaving sticky webs of lacing down the glass. Very pretty beer.

Although that's where the fun stops...

This beer has some pleasant floral notes and I also smell some banana peel. The hot alcohol is present in the nose and only becomes more pronounced as the beer warms. Whatever is here that is pleasant is overshadowed and dominated by the strong smell of hot alcohol.

This beer is a bitter, bitter beast. While I do love a bitter monster, (Port Hop 15 comes to mind) this one is decidedly unpleasant. Starts highly bitter, and then the beer moves into a very unpleasant place dominated by alcohol harshness and high astringency.

Relatively thick mouthfeel.

I did not enjoy this beer. It's a bitter beast, but tastes and smells of burning alcohol. Unpleasant.

I drank this beer a few years ago and drain-poured it with many similar complaints. I wanted to revisit it again to give it another chance, but the beer has not improved, and after enjoying so many DIPAs since, this one actually seems even worse now than it did then. It's not for me.

Serving type: bottle

04-03-2011 19:30:21 | More by ehammond1
Photo of tanarm
tanarm

California

2.19/5  rDev -38.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours deep amber. OK clarity. Ok head retention.

Smells like hop candy. Sweetness looms behind herbal hops. Boozy alcohol on the nose. Citrusy and piney hops.

Whoa, caramel comes out to play! Prickly alcohol and bitterness, with a long bittersweet finish. Slight metallic finish.

Thick full body. Chewy for sure. Low carbonation.

No date on this bottle so I can't be sure how old it is, but this is tough to drink. Even as an American Barleywine this would be hard to give a good score, but it's closer to that style than anything.

Serving type: bottle

11-16-2013 00:54:38 | More by tanarm
Photo of Halcyondays
Halcyondays

California

2.23/5  rDev -37.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

22 oz. bomber,

A: Pour a golden yellow, just a shade or 2 darker than a pils, with a firm, rocky white head with good retention, not a lot of lace, has a standard DIPA look.

S: Smell is promising, get a huge jolt of pine and citrus on opening the bottle, once poured a mint and spice mix comes out.

T: I have a bit of a problem here. Hop flavours are overall tasty, but were definitely muted, compared to what I expect in this style, prosaic compared to what is coming out of San Diego right now. Has good pine notes, but too much peppermint takes over in the end, making the flavour 1-dimensional and boring. Get some bitter lemon zest and medicinal elements in there that I really wasn't in to as well. When it warmed up a bit it was not fun to drink.

M: Mouthfeel is too light for the style, watery, resiny, with a long aftertaste, mild solvent character.

D: Dissapointed about this one since I had heard good things about it in the past. Hate to give a lower review to a local brewer, but in my opinion, this is just not up to par. With all the great DIPA's in CA, I don't think I will revisit this one.

Serving type: bottle

08-31-2008 21:08:24 | More by Halcyondays
Photo of BradLikesBrew
BradLikesBrew

Missouri

2.23/5  rDev -37.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 1.5

Pours a slightly cloudy copper body with a thich, sudsy looking white head.

Citurs and pine sap on the nose. For a DIPA that is supposed to be severely dry hopped, I was hoping for more. I've had Pale Ales with a larger hop scent.

If the aroma was a mild letdown, the flavor is a tragedy. Alcohol is pervasive. There is an astringent character that goes far beyond simple bitterness. Sweet malt is reminiscent of American Barleyine. Hops come and go in flashes, but never land a solid blow. The finish is like cheap whiskey, boozy, but not in that good warming sort of way.

If you have to slam it like you're shooting McCormick Vodka at a frat party to get through a bottle, its not a good beer. I won't be finishing my glass, let alone the bottle.

I don't know what they did wrong with this beer, but it seems like they keep doing it. After reading other reviews, it doesn't sound like my experience was an isolated incident or the result of a bad batch. While plenty of BAs seem to think its decent, it sounds like the shock I currently feel is a rather common reaction to this product.

I hate to be mean. I know someone worked long, hard hours to make this beer and I respect anyone willing to dedicate their life to commercial brewing. It is not any easy thing to do. But this is bad.

Avoid this beer. I won't be carrying it at my store and as it is currently constituted, I would recommend others take a pass as well. You may be able to pass this off on someone with little experience with IPAs and they mat not notice its flaws and simply drink it as a source of alcohol, but I think most experienced beer drinkers will notice right away, there is something wrong with Hop Juice.

Serving type: bottle

01-05-2011 04:59:04 | More by BradLikesBrew
Photo of Mancer
Mancer

New York

2.25/5  rDev -37.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

This beer poured a hazy golden copper with a 1 finger high off-white head. The head dissipated quickly and minimal lacing was observed. The initial smell of the beer was apple juice and hints of alcohol. I know that the hops were the cause for this bizarre smell and the malts were barely detectable. The initial taste of the beer was a burnt caramel with slight malts, additionally it tasted boozy. This brew had a medium to full body and was dry.

This is the worst DIPA that I have ever tried, not sure if anyone read the bottle, but they claim to have invented the first DIPA. Being that the case, you'd think that they could get the style right. I would not recommend anyone to try this beer.

Serving type: bottle

07-07-2010 01:42:03 | More by Mancer
Photo of jdklks
jdklks

Nevada

2.28/5  rDev -36.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

the appearannce of this one is a little disappointing. it pours a light golden color with a soft white head that dissipates quickly. some amber touches to the edges, but overall resembles a pilsner.

there is a faint hop aroma emanating from the glass. its barely perceptible, however, and is accompanied by small doses of citrus fruitiness and a maltiness that promises to "balance" the beer, though this isn't really desirable.

Wow. not impressed at all. waaay to hot for a DIPA. 9.4% here rivals the alcohol burn of BCS and 120 minute. the alcohol asserts itself as the dominate force over the other flavors, that, though hidden, can be identified as oranges, pineapple, and a bitter hoppiness in the finish that serves as a reminder that you're drinking a beer and not a fruity cocktail made with a double shot. none of the flavors blend and the beer seems to fall apart on the palate. this is a wreck.

as previously stated, the beer is much to hot, and, further, is undercarbonated. drinkability is enough to get me through this bottle, but only because its buzzing me nicely and i want to keep it going. put this on the "do not purchase again" list.

edit: ended up being a drain pour. i've lowered the score accordingly.

Serving type: bottle

12-21-2009 05:37:49 | More by jdklks
Photo of harrymel
harrymel

Washington

2.4/5  rDev -33%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Bottled: unk

A: Pours amber ale with two fingers of faded caramel foam which slowly falls to a quilt of the same. Ringed sheets of lacing. Good looker.

S: Tangerines, pine, a bit of floral character (soapy). Some distantly sweet malts in the back.

T: Hmm, was this done with belgian yeast?! Has a yeasty, coriander like flavor I often associate with tripels. Otherwise, quite bitter with creamy sweetness off the malt/weird flavor. Some peppery sage like flavors. Not really digging this as a DIPA

M: Medium on heavy body for the style. Moderately smooth and lifeless carbonation.

O: Really surprised by this beer, with a name like hop juice, I thought this would be a little more complex. Huh, guess I got sold. Not a very good beer.

Serving type: bottle

09-02-2011 15:39:59 | More by harrymel
Photo of Beaver13
Beaver13

Colorado

2.45/5  rDev -31.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

22 oz bottle. Pours a clear golden yellow with a smallish bubbly white head the goes to a thin film that leaves some lacing.

The aroma is sweet caramel malts and tropical fruits and some floral hops and some stinkiness.

The flavor is some sweet malts followed by an almost minty hoppiness that is combined with tropical fruits. The result is kind of strange. It has quite a bit of bitterness that lingers in the finish. The mouthfeel is medium bodied and a little watery.

Overall, this was much better when I had it on tap at Falling Rock. On tap it was more of a solid traditional DIPA with no mint and tropical fruits.

Serving type: bottle

06-19-2010 05:27:22 | More by Beaver13
Photo of HopJ
HopJ

California

2.48/5  rDev -30.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Really disappointed in this. Grabbed from BevMo and I am hoping this is not fresh. Carbonation is light. Bold aromas and flavors that are unpleasant. Like honey with weird sweetness. Hop flavors are so strong but out of balance. The alcohol does not work here. More like boozie hop extract. Just didn't work for me. The bitterness and metallic quality sticks with you for 15 minutes.

Serving type: bottle

05-22-2010 06:18:51 | More by HopJ
Photo of HopHead84
HopHead84

California

2.5/5  rDev -30.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

9/10/2011

On tap at Oggi's Carmel Mountain.

A: Hazy dark orange with a big beige head.

S: Sweet caramel with bread and sugar. Blah. Some grapefruit.

T: Sugary caramel with bread, pine, and grapefruit. The beer is malt heavy. Bitterness is at a moderate level.

M: Medium body with medium carbonation. The mouthfeel is sticky and dry.

Overall: Too sweet. Too much malt. Too little hop character. IPAs like this should be exterminated.

Serving type: on-tap

09-11-2011 03:54:13 | More by HopHead84
Photo of mattster
mattster

Texas

2.53/5  rDev -29.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Opened 22 fluid ounce bomber bottle, poured into nonic glass.

Pours an interesting "head" that is rather low, yet seems to form bubbles in suspension just under surface of the brew (I've never seen this before). Brew is a hazy amber color.

Smell is of hops - much lighter than other DIPAs that I've tried. Taste improves on hops with slight citrus notes - but beer is no where near as hoppy as name would imply. Finish is OK, but not balanced with the 9.4% ABV (as listed on bottle). It almost taste like someone has poured some vodka in my beer - but I know this has not happened because there is no one else here. I'm not weak - I've had DIPAs (even DFH 120) and never tasted as much alcohol.

Unfortunately, not all beers can be great.

Serving type: bottle

04-07-2008 11:02:20 | More by mattster
Photo of Tdizzle
Tdizzle

California

2.53/5  rDev -29.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Purchased at BevMo! in Brea on 8/24/2008.

A- Poured into my Dogfish Head snifter, this beer pours a hazy yellowish-orange color with a moderate white head that settles to a patchy layer. Each sip yields a few sheets of lacing.

S- Not what I was expecting at all. The aroma is chemically-sweet and sugary with very little presence of citrusy or piney hops. There are faint notes of pineapple, but I'm mainly getting a strong malt presence backed by a good dose of alcohol. There is a somewhat artificial quality to the smell of this beer.

T- The taste is only a slight upgrade from the aroma. The sweet malt backing has a strange aspartame-like quality that dominates the flavor before a lasting hop bitterness kicks in. The alcohol provides a substantial warming sensation on the finish, which is dry and very bitter tasting on the palate. As the beer warms, the alcohol really starts to punch through in the taste.

M- The mouthfeel is thick and syrupy with moderate carbonation bubbles.

D- The 9.4% ABV is not well-hidden. Plus, the smell and the flavor of this beer are chemical-like and medicinal, making this a chore to drink.

This one was a miss for me.

Serving type: bottle

08-26-2008 03:45:08 | More by Tdizzle
Photo of Murrhey
Murrhey

Montana

2.53/5  rDev -29.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a bomber into a pint glass. Reviewed from notes.

A- Finger and a half white creamy head. Nice retention. Little lacing. Semi-cloudy copper color.

S- Big, citrusy hops. Not much else.

T- Metallic tang of bitterness. Punch in the taste buds. Balance isn't there.

M- Heavy carbonation and fluffy feel. Dry.

O- Nothing really terrible, but not a good beer.

Serving type: bottle

12-17-2012 03:57:55 | More by Murrhey
Photo of DmanGTR
DmanGTR

New York

2.55/5  rDev -28.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Review from notes on 12/5/09

A - poured clear golden tangerine with a well formed, frothy, off-white head. Very nice lacing adorning the glass. Good retention. 4.5

S - Smells very sweet. Lots of maltiness and a hint of citrus. Not what I expect of something called "Hop Juice". Not much going on here... 2.5

T - Wow very sweet. Lots of honey, malts, and a touch of American barleywine type of fruitiness. The delayed hops come after all of that in the form of pine and bitterness. With that said, the beer is very one-dimensional. Where's the fruit/earthy/grassy/piney/grapefruity hop bomb? Disappointing to say the least. 2.5

M - Relatively light bodied, touch of slickness and well carbonated. Very hot in the finish. Lingering burn of alcohol. 3.0

D - Eh, the taste department can definitely be improved. Not very good. A sipper, if anything. 2.0

Serving type: bottle

03-10-2010 14:41:17 | More by DmanGTR
Photo of brentk56
brentk56

North Carolina

2.58/5  rDev -27.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Appearance: Pours a clear light amber color; the inch of head hangs around for a while but doesn't leave that much lacing behind

Smell: Caramel and fusel alcohol buttressed by a waft of piney hops; grassy, overall

Taste: Starts off very aggressively, with a load of sweet candied grapefruit and a lot of fusel aloohol; the bitterness continues to build through mid-palate and after the swallow, but the profile is dominated by this odd combination of sugary sweetness, assertive bitterness and alcohol burn

Mouthfeel: Full bodied with moderate carbonation

Overall: Was excited to try this one on the name alone, but what a disappointment; I just don't think these flavors blend together at all - they fight each other and the loser is my palate

Serving type: bottle

03-24-2011 04:34:58 | More by brentk56
Photo of warmstorage
warmstorage

California

2.6/5  rDev -27.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

22 ounce bomber, $4.25 at Plaza Liquors, Tucson, AZ. Bottle states 9.4% ABV, no date indicated.

Appearance: deep copper to medium orange, limited light beige head.

Aroma: As soon as I started to pop the cap, I smelled fairly intense hops, like opening a bag of fresh C-hops from the homebrew store. Some grain and malt sweetness in the glass, and a sweet, sharp tangy note.

Taste: Wow -- grain, grain, grain. An overpowering grain taste blocks out almost everything else. Something like shredded wheat, or some other deeply grainy cereal grain. Did I mention grain? Also a little sweet maltiness, and a earthy hop note that is muted relative to the maltiness. The grain is like spent grain after brewing, but really not very pleasant. Think the spent grain after it has sat for a day or so, when you're too lazy to clean out your mash tun.

Mouth: Slick and fairly full, little alcohol warmth noted, especially given the high ABV.

Overall: Interesting, but terribly imbalanced, and not something I'd buy again. It's hard to see the difficult taste as spoiled, and it doesn't taste lightstruck, but it's also difficult to imagine that this intensely, harsh, almost nasty grainy taste is what the brewer wanted me to taste.

Serving type: bottle

12-05-2007 03:08:01 | More by warmstorage
Photo of Mebuzzard
Mebuzzard

Colorado

2.63/5  rDev -26.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pours a very nice looking beer. Orange/amber/golden body topped by a nice, slightly off-colored white head. If it would have chunked up, I'd give it a 5.

Strong hops aroma, citrus and pine. Some resin and alcohol. It smells like this will bite pretty hard. It's not exactly balanced as just a slight whiff of malt is detected.

Alcohol is dominant in the taste and feel. Perhaps this adds to the bite, but not the flavor. Hops are fighting each other in this one, and none come out nicely. It's harsh taste, not terrible, but seems as though no thought went into it. No offense, but it just seems jumbled. Some may like this, I don't and don't think it fits the style.

bomber was too big...too boozy. Drain pour. Hard to drink.

Serving type: bottle

06-03-2010 06:51:46 | More by Mebuzzard
Photo of DwnTwnBwn
DwnTwnBwn

California

2.65/5  rDev -26%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A - Poured into a pint glass. Almost no head formed. Very clear amber color, bubbles are present, maybe it was a bad pour. It did lace the glass though.

S - This beer has a great smell Very good hop notes. Blackberry, grapefruit, pine. A slight malt smell is there. it smells like it could be a good beer.

T - This beer falls flat on its face here. The hoppyness of this beer is all in the smell, the taste is pretty lame. It seems to have a synthetic hop taste. There are fruity notes and the smell is represented well, but the hop extract is ruining the flavor.

M - Carbonation feels low. Still getting the chemical feel.

O - Not the best DIPA Iv had, not the worst.

Serving type: bottle

07-18-2009 15:50:13 | More by DwnTwnBwn
Photo of twiggamortis420
twiggamortis420

Texas

2.65/5  rDev -26%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

22 oz bomber new to Tx, so it should be relatively fresh but has no visible freshness dating. Pours a considerably hazed, light copper color with a modest cap of tan head. Retention is average and lacing is very nice.

Whoa, thats alot of hops on the nose...approaches obscene! I dont know why, but the first thing to come to mind is pungent cactus or aloe vera plant, some sort of succulent in any case. A shit-ton of caramely and toffee malts try to keep up and the alcohol is a beast. I daresay I am in for a rough ride drinking this bomber by myself.

Hops seem to focus a bit more on bittering in the mouth and let the alcohol flavors wash over the palate first. Lots of dry, tropical fruits forward with a dry, lingering bitterness. The alcohol is all over the place, and frankly; a bit fusel. Sweetness is surely not an issue here, as I was a bit worried about from the smell. Malts range from caramel to slightly burnt toast. This beer is not totally unenjoyable, but it is tough for me to get through a whole bomber, the flavors are not integrated well enough and it has no 'flow' to it. I much preferred the Trestles IPA to this as far as LC offerings are concerned. Extreme hopheads may find this somewhat enjoyable, but it reminds me more of a booze-bomb...somewhere in the nether-realm of a DIPA-Barleywine-HG Malt Liquor. I am calling it a Malt Darleywine. A new style, Im copyrighting this bitch.

Serving type: bottle

07-22-2011 00:45:19 | More by twiggamortis420
Photo of DrunkenMaster
DrunkenMaster

California

2.68/5  rDev -25.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Hop Juice is the complete opposite of Hopsickle. While I get beautiful floral, citrus and pine aroma and flavor from Hopsickle I get some kind of nutty, stale hops and other nasty smelling things in Hop Juice that I dont think should be there in a DIPA. I started to taste the alcohol after just a few sips. In the land of DIPAs I'm not wasting time on this thing. Drain pour.

Serving type: bottle

07-03-2008 20:05:33 | More by DrunkenMaster
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Left Coast Hop Juice from Left Coast Brewing Company
81 out of 100 based on 558 ratings.