Red Dog - Miller Brewing Co.
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 609 | Reviews: 174 | Display Reviews Only:
1.73/5 rDev -13.9%
Holy crap this is bad. Just figured i would try it cause a huge can was $1.29, knew it was gonna be bad though. This poured a very pale yellow color. People mock the beer because it isn't red but who the hell bought a red dog thinking it was going to be red? This is is a piss swill beer. Lots of carbonation and a unhealthy looking head. Typical macro smell of ass and grains. The chemical smell is there. The taste is fairly harsh, lighty sweet but disgustingly sweet and corny. Light but dirty tasting. Light body fizzy and prickly mouthfeel. Not drinkable!
12-01-2005 04:16:02 | More by kbnooshay
3.63/5 rDev +80.6%
Well, I expected more from this beer, since I wanted to try it in 1999, and just this year I was able to do it. Very pale, almost green, the beer, foam as a lager, but just a few. But what is great is, the dog, actually it looks like welcoming you and like showing you a bottle of the beerm but below the picture.
10-24-2005 14:30:38 | More by nekronos
2.33/5 rDev +15.9%
If Alf was a beer, he would be an ice cold Red Dog. Let me explain why... Miller brought this adjunct into the world in the early 1990's when red beers were a fad...remember that? Oh yeah and that "Plank Road Brewery" thing yeah that was a fad too.. having macro conglomerate companies make virtually the same product under a different name. Now that the red beer phase has sadly come and gone (I miss my Red Wolf, Anheuser Busch) this beer is without a home. From the days when my older brother picked up 6packs of bottles at premium prices to the days of "on sale" 30racks, this beer is past its prime. Pours a light amber color with a robust scent of barely malt and corn. Taste is also of malt with a hint of bitterness left in the palate. Not an impressionable beer at all, especially when trying to get the most of your money. For now this beer will live on in college frat house basements with all loss of the prestige it once had.
10-03-2005 05:58:19 | More by rpgman456
1.23/5 rDev -38.8%
Presentation: 12oz brown glass US-generic longneck bottle, red and brown on white label
Appearance: pale yellow color, medium head, a little lacing
Smell: sweet malt, grain
Taste: medium body, watery mouthfeel, grainy, minimal maltiness and hops
Notes: not a good one
08-27-2005 16:46:57 | More by BeerBeing
1.9/5 rDev -5.5%
This review is part of Macro Smackdown VI, my ongoing attempt to make the consumption of macro lagers more interesting. This edition pits Red Dog against Michelob in a no-holds-barred grudge match between two of the Big Three. Miller has attempted to give this beer some cachet by putting Plank Road Brewery on the can instead of SABMiller. Same old dreck in new clothing or good beer? Let's find out...
Medium amber with slightly more vigorous carbonation. I like the color of this beer better since it's darker and richer looking, but the head is a mess. It's a ghastly shade of grey with a mealy texture, falls to near nothing in minutes and leaves the glass clean. Red Dog has the slight edge on color, although it's more than wiped out by the miserable looking cap. Advantage: Michelob.
The nose is below average, even when taking style into account. The graininess borders on spoiled and there's no hint of hops. I can also appreciate an underlying, chemical-like nastiness that can't be ignored... and is the reason why Michelob wins this round.
Given the smell, I was expecting the full monty of foulness from Red Dog. To its credit, that isn't the case. It's as grainy as its competitor, but is less harsh. It's also a little sweeter (as are many Miller beers), which makes me like it a bit more. Not sweet in the corn syrupy malt liquor sense, but still modestly sweet. Edge to RD in the most important category of all.
The mouthfeel is light and is enthusiastically bubbled. That makes it more interesting in the mouth, even as the flavor is supremely uninteresting.
I'm not sure how the final tally will come out since I haven't put in the scores yet, but the only score that really matters to me is taste. In the end, Red Dog is the slight winner over the more highly heralded Michelob Lager. I could drink a can or two of this stuff if I absolutely had too. Ice cold and accompanied by tongue-numbing spicy food ideally.
08-27-2005 13:32:37 | More by BuckeyeNation
3/5 rDev +49.3%
poured a pale yellow color with abundant white puffy head. Smell is minimal with only a slight sweetness noted. Taste is very mild with little hops or malt to be found, only wetness. Finishes refreshing, but not much more. Good thirst quencher. Spacer beer.
08-27-2005 00:26:14 | More by tgbljb
2.1/5 rDev +4.5%
Pours pale amber with a one finger head. Fades to abundant lacing in a few seconds. No detectable hop aroma, but strong with malt. The lack of hops gives an unbalanced flavor, tastes like low- alcohol malt liquor. Adjunct is present, possibly corn or rice. Naturally, bad tasting beer is one that is difficult to drink. Even the high carbonation does not smooth out the lingerng aftertaste. A bad choice for a cheap session brew.
08-01-2005 23:13:03 | More by PBRstreetgang
1.7/5 rDev -15.4%
Appearance: typical of an American Adjunct - fizzy, pale gold, frothy white head with no stamina.
Aroma: You need to ask? Corn.
Taste: Actually worse than others in the style, if you can believe it. Brackish, metallic. They recommend drinking it ice-cold. Probably to numb the taste buds.
Empty aftertaste sitting on a watery mouthfeel. Not the worst of the style I've had, but...
I tell myself the reason I review these types of beers is so I have a firm appreciation for what a GOOD beer is when I taste it. This 'aint it.
04-30-2005 01:02:54 | More by Hunter
1.48/5 rDev -26.4%
The mighty Red Dog. It's never bad when it's free. It pours the typical golden macro color and has no head. The aroma is bitter, a chemical bitter so it is wise not to smell it before you drink it. The bland corn flavor is not terrible when ice cold, but can become quite gross if allowed to warm up. This is not the worst beer made, but it is by no means worth drinking if MGD or Bud is available.
03-28-2005 05:52:02 | More by RushLimbmalt
1.65/5 rDev -17.9%
A refugeee in my fridge, came from I don't know where. Clear light gold color, with about 2" of foamy head. Lots of visible carbonation. Smell is not very prominent, but when you get close enough smells like skunky corn. Taste is bland, but whatever flavor it has is fairly off. Not a lot of hops presence. A cheap, nasty macro, which I'll recommend a pass on.
03-23-2005 00:18:52 | More by TastyTaste
1.1/5 rDev -45.3%
from the 22. cheaper to buy this than a 12oz. poured a yello with a white head. aroma metallic, corn, straw,hints of malt and hops. flavor, corn husks, wheat, light malts and hops. the only reason I bought this that bieristgut said I should rate this Ill get even with him
11-26-2004 21:34:16 | More by walleye
3/5 rDev +49.3%
Red Dog. Big surprise, it's not red. But that's okay because this is only three dollar macroswill. In fact, it's the most tasteless macroswill miller has to offer. This is even more tasteless than Budweiser products. Not a bad job for a cheap macro adjunct lager. Not bad at all. If I want a "crisp, clean, refreshing" beer that doesn't taste like anything to speak of, I'll drink Red Dog instead of paying two dollars more for a Budweiser.
11-14-2004 05:11:35 | More by moocey
2.45/5 rDev +21.9%
32oz brown twist off, lots of numbers on the label, but no apparent freshness dating.
Beer pours a light, bright gold with a fast fading head and shards of lacing.
Beer has a distant aroma of fresh malts/bread. Not bad smelling, just very faint.
The taste is slightly sweet and grainy. The beer has a slight metallic twang (or is that the hops?). Not offensive in any way, not really very good in any way.
This mouthfeel and the beer is under carbonated for this style. Drinkabity is fine for what it is. The beer is better than Bud & Coors, but pales next to some of the good regional brews (think Point, Old Style, etc.).
09-16-2004 16:09:43 | More by Redrover
2.53/5 rDev +25.9%
Spent $3.59 on a sixer of "tall-boy" (16 Oz.) cans.
Appearance- On the dark end of the pale spectrum, but definently not red.
Smell- Typical macro smell, honestly no need for elaboration.
Taste- Better than a lot of macros I have tried. No nasty after taste, and pretty smooth going down. Still, not much in the way of flavor though.
Drinkability- I'd have this again when I'm low on money and still want some beer. Better drinkability than "light" macros, but still not the best of all macros.
07-04-2004 02:00:09 | More by Gagnonsux
1.8/5 rDev -10.4%
Paid $5.99 for a 12-pack.
As you might expect, this stuff is pretty ass. Drink it for the novelty, or because it's cheaper than Bud. Either way, for beer in this price range, it's tough to beat the Red Dog.
We used to call our diet "Body by Red Dog". For good reason.
05-11-2004 04:32:04 | More by benmiliron
1.6/5 rDev -20.4%
When at a party (to a slight degree) you must do as the party-goers do. While my friends have accepted the fact that i'll more than likely bring a sixer to their house with proper glassware in tow, acquaintances and strangers still wonder what the hell i'm doing.
So this particular night I decide to go cheap and drink whatevers being served. And it was the wonderously horrible "beer" Red Dog. From the can.
Basically this is a ghost of a beer - the pale appearance is almost eerily white when compared even to Budweiser. There are so many adjuncts on the nose you don't know if you're sniffing the glass or the beer.
The mouthfeel is pithy and watery. I can't even really taste anything going on here but adjuncts.
When it got warmer major rice or corn flavors appeared. Thumbs down.
05-08-2004 02:23:30 | More by GreenWBush
2.7/5 rDev +34.3%
Ah yes, the dog's red, not the beer. Light golden color, slightly bubbly, champagne like presence. Tender sweetness, combined with the ever-present adjunct offerings, yet they mask themselves well, mainly behind some malty sweetness; crisp and slightly carbonated, a tiny notch above the standard macro. A mid-90's staple that has since disappeared, a dear old friend with many memories, a friend that I may see again.
04-11-2004 01:22:37 | More by GeoffRizzo
1.8/5 rDev -10.4%
The name is Red Dog. The colour is transparent yellow. Do you see what I'm gettig at here? Red. Yellow. Anyway, this is a lackluster, poor showing for a beer. It pours a weak yellow colour with a thin, quickly disipating head. The smell was all skunk. It was absolutly dreadful. Looking past the smell, I took a taste. Light malts with a healthy dose of corn. That's right. Corn. The same stuff you eat on the cob. You know, goes well with a burger? That's the one. This beer won't go well with anything. One good thing about it. The dog on the label looks cool.
03-16-2004 15:48:32 | More by CBFanWish
United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)
2.33/5 rDev +15.9%
I bought this in a six pack, a) cos it was cheap b) because i'd heard it was good
ok, so i found it its not particularly good, its made by the miller corp for a start
Drank from the bottle, very plain dry taste, kinda malty
Similar to bud or any other macro pale lager, easy enough to drink but its very dull
An all round crappy beer
03-10-2004 11:02:24 | More by cypressbob
2.55/5 rDev +26.9%
The beer pours a very pale gold color with a spotty white lace head. The aroma is less than average. It boasts of pale malts, rice, and lager yeast; simply awful. The taste is awful as well. It is light and without flavor. It has zero malt character and finishes with a musty aftertaste; very watered down. The mouthfeel sucks. It is a low bodied beer with less than adequate carbonation. This was my beer of choice when I was 16, but now I wouldn't drink another if I was paid.
03-08-2004 00:19:28 | More by WesWes
1.9/5 rDev -5.5%
Pours a clear standard macrobrew straw yellow.
Smell is nothing much, just some yeast.
Taste is standard macrobrew flavor. Faint traces of grain and hops. I seriously doubt that this beer is brewed and is any different from Miller Regular. I wouldn't be surprised to learn it's the same stuff with a different label.
Mouthfeel is a bit better than water.
Drinkable? Well you can swallow it without being poisoned.
03-07-2004 02:24:59 | More by Zorro
1.83/5 rDev -9%
Another attempt from amcro to try and advertise a "Red" beer.
Color is golden straw...ya..real red uh? Has strong taste initially but softens up as it goes down. A beer that is what it is and what it is...cheap "strong" beer that will make you pay in the morning.
Please take alook at the reviews and just say NO!
02-14-2004 05:20:54 | More by JAL67
3/5 rDev +49.3%
Appearance Nice, clear yellow with a faint tinge of orange. The head came up nicely but, as is customary, went down in about ten seconds.
Smell This has a big grainy corn aroma that actually seems to be kind of smooth as the advertising promises.
Taste The creamed corn and grain mix together well enough, although I wouldnt call the flavor good by any stretch of the imagination. The unavoidable sweet finish wasnt as bad as most.
Mouthfeel Lightly carbonated and crisp. Alas, the big red bulldog is as thin as a continental spaniel with its hair shaved off.
Drinkability I cant actually recommend the Red Dog, but if you have to choose between this and an MGD Id go for this one.
02-14-2004 00:37:05 | More by RoyalT
2/5 rDev -0.5%
I'm not impressed with this cheap american beer at all. This is all my friend had at his house the other day, so I gave it a try. It basically smelled and tasted like a budweiser, but a little better than a Bud, I guess. I did not see the colour or the head of this beer, because I drank it 'ghetto style' right out of the can. This beer had a pour mouthfeel and a low drinkability factor as well. In fact it was even worse in the cans than it was in the bottles! The appearance, taste, and drinkability all seemed worse to me with this canned version of Red Dog. I'd be like Todd, and say 'WHY!?!?' but than again @ $10 for a 30 pack of this in bottles or cans you can't really complain. A cheap beer that is probably good to get drunk on, I guess.
I'll never know as I would almost definately turn down one of these brews in the future...
12-19-2003 17:09:41 | More by francisweizen
2.42/5 rDev +20.4%
This mild lager pours a shiny gold color with a fast fading white head and little wisps of lace. The aroma is mainly of fresh mowed lawn with a bit of hops. A smooth and mellow malt body is a bit sweet, but also a bit pasty and mealy. Theres not much hop flavor attached to this brew. A hint of citrus and metallic bite can be noticed within the seltzery fizziness, with some concentration.
Red Dog attempts to suggest its a Micro-brew, but its really closer to mass-produced beer.
12-15-2003 01:59:57 | More by BeerResearcher
Red Dog from Miller Brewing Co.
50 out of 100 based on 609 ratings.