Milwaukee's Best Premium - Miller Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Milwaukee's Best PremiumMilwaukee's Best Premium

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
53
awful

234 Reviews
THE BROS
48
awful

(Read More)
Reviews: 234
Hads: 687
rAvg: 2.13
pDev: 34.27%
Wants: 2
Gots: 70 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Miller Brewing Co. visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 08-18-2001

No notes at this time.
View: Beers (32) | Events
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Milwaukee's Best Premium Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 234 | Hads: 687
Photo of FrozenJoe
4/5  rDev +87.8%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.25

12 oz can. $16.74 for a 30 pack of cans at Walmart.

Appearance
Small head that dissipates quickly. Minimal lacing. Light golden, yellowish body. Moderate but lively carbonation. Looks like a typical American Adjunct Lager.

Aroma
Clean. Mild maltiness. White bread.

Taste
Mild sweet maltiness. Light dry corn flavor. Very clean and smooth. Mild balancing hops. The taste is good. For a cheap, lighter style adjunct lager this is good. The malt flavor is nice. The corn flavor is subdued. The hops are very mild but there. Hard to find a better tasting beer at this price point. Much better than many other lagers that cost more. Clean. Nothing off.

Mouthfeel
Well carbonated but still soft on the palate and easy to drink. Light bodied. Very clean and smooth. A great hot weather beer.

Overall
A great "cheap beer". Light and smooth. Good beer flavor for the style and price point. 12 oz cans are the way to go. Buy fresh. Serve ICE COLD. Pour out into a frosty mug and enjoy! This is a no nonsense old school lager. It is clean and refreshing at a great price. The taste is very good because you can taste the malt and the hops are very light but decent. The corn tastes good without being too astringent. For a light bodied adjunct lager this is a great brew. Very consistent. Ice cold goodness.



[Old Review from June 2014:
32oz can. $1.99 at the local beer convenience store.

Appearance
Large foamy white head that dissipates quickly. Light lacing. Very light golden body. Crystal clear. Light carbonation.

Smell
Starts out harsh and astringent. After the beer settles for a minute or two the smell improves. Corn and malted barley.

Taste
A slightly watered down, more light bodied version of Miller High Life. Corn and malted barley. The barley flavor is quite nice, but you have to get through the corn to taste it. There is a sweetness to this beer. Hops are light. They are detectable as a balancing bitterness on the back end. The hops balance the sweetness and corn/barley nicely. There is a slight astringency/harshness to this beer that is best masked by COLD TEMPERATURE. However overall this is a fairly well balanced, smooth, drinkable beer. Actually TASTES GOOD.

Mouthfeel
Light bodied. Carbonation is strong on the tongue.

Overall
This is a somewhat harsh, but tasty economy macro lager. Miller goes too heavy with the corn every time. That being said, I still like this beer and would drink it again. Tasty. Has potential. Good value. Not the highest quality.] (2,526 characters)

Photo of Falcone
2.25/5  rDev +5.6%
look: 2.25 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2.25

The pour produces a surprisingly thick head with a lot of disproportionate bubbles. It fades quickly to a thin lace with a wee bit of lacing (also surprising). The look displays the expected macro filtered clarity with plenty of rising bubbles. Color is light gold and appealing.

The aroma is of stale grain husks and a bit of corn. Smells surprisingly dirty and a bit like a poor malt liquor, though without any alcohol heat for obvious reasons.

The taste is a bit better than the aroma. Surprisingly decent malt flavor. A bit on the sweet side though there is just enough hop bitterness (assuming actual hops were even used here) to keep it from being cloying. The finish is a bit rough, kind of wet and dirty. A touch of alcohol is also detected, which is kind of sad considering the low abv.

You can do much worse than this, though you can also do much better. While I don't factor price into my ratings I will say I that this isn't a bad value pick ( I payed under 6 bucks for a 12 pack). Overall you are still much better off going with PBR. (1,051 characters)

Photo of BeerWithMike
2.49/5  rDev +16.9%
look: 2.25 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

I know, I know BUT never tried it and it is very cheap. Like 50c a can. LOL! Sampled back on May 30th. Comes in a 12 ounce can. Can chilled down to 36 degrees F in my beer cooler and poured in to a vintage "SCHLITZ" thumb-print-goblet.

Brew pours a deep golden-yellow in color with a think white head, as most of these types of brews do. Some spotty lacing was seen when sipped. The aroma is pretty much like all the others of this style, which is grains and sweet corn for the most part. Pretty much is said for the taste along with some yeast. Lightly dry finish with a bit watery. Lighter bodied with good carbonation. Overall it was just OK (if that) and not special. A cheap brew if you are budget-minded. (711 characters)

Photo of priwen
3.59/5  rDev +68.5%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Clear, straw appearance with thick, white, bubbly head. Mild aroma of corn husks with a slight breadiness. Flavor is very light. Corn taste and not much else. Nothing offensive. Watery mouthfeel. Smooth, crisp finish. Slightly sweet. Overall: A very drinkable beer. Nothing bad about it, but also nothing memorable about it either. Good beer for a hot day when you're looking to pound a few.

12 can
Best by: Jul 13 15
Served in a Pint glass (442 characters)

Photo of frinknasty
1.64/5  rDev -23%
look: 1.75 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.75

When you attend Texas Tech, but are under drinking age, and your roommate is of drinking age but from Illinois, this is what you end up drinking most nights. thank goodness I graduated! (185 characters)

Photo of DrainBamage
2.64/5  rDev +23.9%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a nice golden color with a nice head that lingers. Smells quite putrid like most other adjunct lagers. Goes down smooth, but a little bitter on the palate. Not much flavor but not bad either. Overall not bad for a adjunct lager. (234 characters)

Photo of maximusj
1.47/5  rDev -31%
look: 2 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 1.25 | feel: 1.25 | overall: 1.5

I used to drink this in high school when it first came out and good thing I didn't know any better. It is still one of the weakest tasting beers out there. It is cheap so if your beer budget is $10 per month this might be the beer for you. (239 characters)

Photo of KYGunner
1.75/5  rDev -17.8%

The aroma is typical American Adjunct with a sweet corny malt, metallic tinnieness and an airy scent of carbonation.

For the most part I don't find this much different than so many adjuncts as the corn is sweet and pervasive. It does have a bit of metallic flavor and a harsh carbonated feel. It tastes cheap and is cheap. (324 characters)

Photo of Caveworm
3/5  rDev +40.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Milwaukee's Best Premium - Miller Brewing Co. Poured from the can into a glass, this brew's got a 1/8th finger thick white head, no lacing, and a clear pale golden body.

Smells like corn mostly, along with other grains. Nothing really out of the ordinary going on here,

The taste is pretty aveage,too. Just a regular American lager taste.

Mouthfeel with this brew is lean and crisp, no lingering elements whatsoever.

Overall a solid 3 for Milwaukee's Best Premium - Miller Brewing Co. Its ok, nothing terrible,but on the same note its nothing out of this world. I'd get this for a big ass party that mainly would consist of people that don't even know what the term "head retention" is. (713 characters)

Photo of hokieguy95
1.85/5  rDev -13.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 2

The Beast!!

For your last 2 bucks you could get a 6 pack in the 80's. If you had 6 bucks you had a case.

I'll give the High School and College memories a 5. But the beer is awful. (188 characters)

Photo of nicholas2121
3.29/5  rDev +54.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

Milwaukee's Best Premium brew by Miller Brewing Co with an ABV of 4.50%. This brew pours out a nice golden amber color with a nice white head. The smell is grain and corn. Milwaukee's Best Premium has the look and smell of an American style lager. The taste is mild with corns and grans, lighter than what I was expecting. Nothing to write home about but it not bad. I have had a lot worse. For what it is worth this brew goes down smooth with a nice clean finish. There is nothing overpowering in this brew, it has a nice balance to it. Miller Brewing Co. did a nice job with this one. Overall I'm giving Milwaukee's Best Premium a 4.5 out of 5. I would buy this brew again. (677 characters)

Photo of bbluemzbeer
4.75/5  rDev +123%

lwaukee Best pours to a clear yellow. the smell is nothing new to me just your typical of cook vegetables and grains . It does not bother me! Taste like a typical american lager grains and malts. The hops are their to balance the beer out . It has very tiny taste of cardboard if warm but other the that milkwaulees best can hold its own against high price Budwesier , MGD. Your typical american lager with out the price tags. It is the lowest price beer in most market in the country You can take the label off Milwaukee Best Premium beer an put a Coors or MGD label on this beer and 99 percent of the people would not know they would be drinking a cheap beer. This beer is excellent for what it is american adjunct lager. I rate Milwukee Best Preuim with other maerican adjunct lagers an apples with apples rating . Meaning I rate Milwaukee best Preuim with other american lager . IThis beer beats out 95 percent of american lagers out their on the market specially Mexical lagers with their high price . Milkwaulee Best Premium is the best value on market for taste , price and quality. (1,103 characters)

Photo of boogieman
3.28/5  rDev +54%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12oz can poured into my beer glass slightly below room temperature.
Decent appearance. Nothing special. Pretty much what you'd expect from a cheap beer. Bright transparent yellow with a high but quick to disappear white head.
Smell- not too much there. Malty wheaty metallic corn.
Taste- for a cheap beer, not half bad. Malt, subdued honey sweetness, wheat, and corn. Pretty decent actually.
Mouthfeel- too much carbonation for my taste, but nothing out of the ordinary for cheap beers. There's less carbonation than the Milwaukee's Best Ice- my typical go to for an everyday brew, which was nice. Fairly smooth.
For a cheap beer, I think this one might be the way to go. It's the smoothest of all the beers that it's similar to, and has a slightly more refined taste. It also drinks very light. You can chug a bunch without starting to feel bloated. The only thing I would change is that it's less than 5% alcohol. A little more would be nice. (945 characters)

Photo of JuicesFlowing
2.79/5  rDev +31%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Poured into a shaker pint glass.

Look: A clear golden body holds up a fizzy white head that dissipates quickly. Very little lacing if any.

Aroma: Some grains and a lot of corn husk and/or cooked corn adjunct.

Taste: Grainy, very metallic. Some bitterness in the finish.

Mouthfeel: Carbonated, dry.

Overall: Not a complete disaster for the price point, but I've had better cheap beers than this. (399 characters)

Photo of archyquaffer
2.94/5  rDev +38%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12 ounce can into a shaker pint. An aggressive pour produces about an inch of bubbly, foamy, white head that dissipates rapidly but does leave some frothy lace. The beer is a pale golden with medium carbonation.

DMS (cooked corn) and a touch of fruitiness reminiscent of tomato are apparent in the aroma. The taste is clean with little or no hop aroma-flavor, semi-dry finish, a little bit of lingering sweetness and faint bitterness lingers on the palate.

This isn't terrible for what it is, good hot weather beverage, and in my opinion is as good as any other AAL. It holds it own with such brands as a Hamm's, PBR, High Life, Busch, etc. Purchased as part of a 12 pack for $8.49 (that's 71 cents a can folks). Cheapest beer on the rack. (755 characters)

Photo of JosefBerger
1.5/5  rDev -29.6%
look: 1.75 | smell: 1 | taste: 1.25 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Appearance (1.75) : Golden yellow with a light head and medium-light carbonation. Not a very exciting and inviting appearance.

Smell (1.00) : Almost smells stale to me and a has an almost skunky aroma. I'm not very pleased with the smell but I am ready to be proven wrong.

Taste (1.25) : I have trouble picking out any dominant characteristics or flavors - not complex at all.

Mouthfeel (2.50) : The feel is not bad, but not outstanding. A very crisp feel with a good finish. Again, nothing sticks out to me.

Overall (2.00) : I didn't absolutely hate this beer but I certainly didn't love it. It's major redeeming quality is the mouthfeel. Without this beer being as crisp and smooth as it is, I would not have enjoyed it at all.

I'll be sure to try this one again in a week or so. I'd like to give it that second chance. (827 characters)

Photo of joe12pk
3.52/5  rDev +65.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

24 oz. can poured into a lager glass.

A - Clear gold with an inch and a half head that stays briefly. Decent amount of lacing.

S - Corn, grains, some malt.

T - Refreshing sweet corn, grains, and malt. Finishes with a light touch of hops.

M - Light

O - This doesn't taste like the same brew I had 15 - 20 years ago! Very good beer & peerless in it's price range- $1 for 24 oz. can. Kudos to Miller! (402 characters)

Photo of mdfb79
2.32/5  rDev +8.9%
look: 3.25 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.25

From 03/24/14 notes. Can leftover from a month or two ago someone bringing it over. April 7, 2015 best by date on the bottle of the can. 12 oz. can into a pint glass.

a - Pours a somewhat clear golden-yellow color with inch of off white head and high carbonation evident. Looks like a typical AAL, not great.

s - Smells of corn, very skunked, bread, grains, dough, and earthy malts. Not good at all with lots of sweet corn and some skunkiness. Pretty terrible.

t - Taste is not skunked and much better than the nose, though not good. Sweet corn, bread, grains, yeast, dough, biscuit, and earthy notes. Not good, but not the worst.

m - Light body, a bit watery, and high carbonation. Too carbonated.

o - Overall not a good beer at all, though honestly not the worst of the AAL's. Nos eis terrible but the taste isn't oto bad, and same look and body as the rest. In the bottom half of the normal shelf AAL's but not the worst. (929 characters)

Photo of DRosen
2.16/5  rDev +1.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 2

The can is the best part of this beer.

Once I year I do hell week. It consists of a few cheap beers like Milwaukee's best premium, Old English 800 and 1 bottle of Guinness (sorry, I do not like Guinness).

Being an IPA fan, but still being able to drink water like coors light and miller light, these are a step down.

Last year I did miller high life, this is around the same if not better. It has a horrible taste, a horrible finish. BUT I can still drink it without making a face at each sip. I only bought a 12 pack, so it should be gone within 10 days and I can go get something else. drinkable = yes, buy choice = yes, enjoyable = not that much. buy again = no*

*unless homeless and have only 6 dollars to my name,

Please note this is still better then the Walgreens beer. (783 characters)

Photo of kojevergas
1.65/5  rDev -22.5%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.75

32 fl oz aluminum can with well-designed label art acquired at the local 7-11 here in Richfield, Utah (I was desperate and there's nothing in this town). Reviewed live. Expectations are extremely low given the brewery. Best before September 16th, 2013. I don't see an ABV listed on the can.

Served cold. Side-poured gently as biting overcarbonation is anticipated.

A: Pours a one finger wide white colour head. No real creaminess. Thin, weak, pathetic. No lacing. Body colour is a bland water colour with a touch of diluted straw yellow. No yeast particles are visible. No bubble show.

Sm: Straw, heavy corn adjunct, pilsner malts, and dirty stale barley. Some grains and cereals. By no means a clean or pleasant aroma. No hop character, yeast character, or alcohol is detectable. A crappy aroma of (fortunately) light strength.

T: Stale barley, straw, corn adjunct, and pilsner malts. Adjunct dominates. Heavy husks. Some middling cereals and grains. No hop character, yeast character, or alcohol comes through. Bland and boring as hell. No depth of flavour. Low intensity of flavour. Flavour duration is below average to average. Horribly imbalanced. No complexity or subtlety at all. Poor execution.

Mf: Crisp, smooth, and wet. Not oily, harsh, gushed, or boozy. Biting overcarbonation is the beer's biggest issue. Doesn't suit the flavour profile well at all. A bit thin. Lightly watery.

Dr: The dirty taste and dire overcarbonation really ruin this one. I'll kill all 32 oz with effort, but no way would I buy this again. Another garbage beer from Miller. If this is the Premium, how bad are the other Milwaukee's Best variants? I definitely wouldn't have bought this if I wasn't trapped in a crappy town in Utah. Avoid. Worse than the Busch I reviewed before it.

High F (1,788 characters)

Photo of SerialTicker
2.76/5  rDev +29.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Jul0113 on the bottom of the 24oz can. Bought for like... I don't remember. $1.50?

Appearance: --Skipping. I tend to just drink these adjunct lagers out of the can.--

Smell: Corn sweetness. Malt. It just smells like an ordinary 5% adjunct lager... well, I shouldn't say that. Some have a metallic note or something like that... this is without that, fortunately.

Taste/feel: I think I should be bitch slapped. I don't hate this beer. I really don't. At all. As a matter of fact, I *gulp*... enjoy it? A pleasant carbonation, goes down smooth, sweet (but not overly so), and there's no funky metallic "off" bitterness on the finish.

And that's my honest review. Every now and then I want a cheap drink without having to make a drive to the craft store for warm and more expensive beer. This was one of those times. I'm surprised that this only has a 48 rating ... that's considerably lower than a number of other adjunct lagers I've had that I thought were far less drinkable.

Considering the price and fact that there's nothing that makes me cringe about this beer, I'd certainly have it again. (1,099 characters)

Photo of mjurney
3.23/5  rDev +51.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Appearance:
Pale gold, clear. Fairly good amount of carbonation rising up. Small frothy head that dissipate. Leaves a fine lacing behind.

Aroma:
Faint. I smell some sweetness, grainy and corn.

Taste:
Sweetness up front, grainy, slight toasted malts, corn. Faint bitterness towards the end. Clean dry finish. Body is light, sharp carbonation, crisp.

Overall:
Middle of the road beer. (385 characters)

Photo of SometimesIfart
1.58/5  rDev -25.8%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

A - Didn't bother pouring it so I don't know.

S - Aluminum, Cheap stale malt, Slight adjunct

T - Follows the nose almost completely. Aluminum, cheap stale malt, slight adjunct, And a slight sour note in the finish.

M - Medium bodied with medium carbonation.

O - Overall, Just another cheap swill. Oh well, At 88 cents for a 24oz. can I knew that I was getting. Realistically, At that price it makes me wonder how much the company spends to make a 24oz can of this stuff. I mean, If they didn't make a large enough profit from the beer you'd figure that they would stop making. I'm assuming the production cost per can is somewhere around 10 cents. Think about that before you buy this. (689 characters)

Photo of SCBeerDrinker
4.84/5  rDev +127.2%
look: 4 | smell: 5 | taste: 5 | feel: 5 | overall: 4.5

To me its one of the best beers for its price.The Light is ok, and the ice beer has great taste but i get headaches after a few. It has great taste and is better served ice cold. Wish you could find it on tap more. But you can buy it at most super markets and gas stations around SC. (283 characters)

Photo of buschbeer
2.13/5  rDev 0%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

12oz can
Served in a conical pint glass

A - It is a dismal pale yellow. I got the typical white, rocky, short-lived head.

S - I thought the first one had a skunky smell when poured. The second has more of the grain smell that I have become accustomed.

T - I taste some mild grain.

M - Thin

O - I am not as repulsed as I used to be. I'm more bored now. (357 characters)

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Milwaukee's Best Premium from Miller Brewing Co.
53 out of 100 based on 234 ratings.