1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Icehouse - Miller Brewing Co.

IcehouseIcehouse

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
51
awful

872 Ratings
THE BROS
62
poor

(view ratings)
Ratings: 872
Reviews: 326
rAvg: 2.05
pDev: 34.63%


Brewed by:
Miller Brewing Co. visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 08-19-2001)
View: Beers (26) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Icehouse Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 872 | Reviews: 326 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

1.65/5  rDev -19.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Pale amber-gold with one steady stream of bubbles rising in the exact center of the glass. The head is off-white and airy, but due to my hard pour, has some staying power. It takes several minutes to fall to a thin film and leaves miniscule amounts of lace.

No real surprises in the nose, but it does seem to be stronger and maybe more hoppy (!) than some others in its class. The flavor is bolder and more bitter than many other macro lagers. Skimpy malt, more would be welcome. Harsh, grain-like, acidic, bitter, thin and dry, how's that for a murderer's row of beer attributes?

Icehouse is the worst of both worlds. Too nasty tasting for lovers of truly good beer and too flavorful for lovers of easy-drinking, virtually tasteless macro swill. It's a wonder that anyone buys this more than once.

Serving type: can

08-29-2004 15:25:10 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of mikesgroove
mikesgroove

South Carolina

2.95/5  rDev +43.9%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Well I was out at dinner and it was this or bud light. Poured a pale golden yellow with a white foamy head that faded to nothing in mere seconds. No lace and lots of carbonation. Smell was really of nothing, maybe a slight muted corn or grain, but really nothing. The taste was balnd, tolerable when ice cold, but really absolutly nothing to write home about. Overall ehh, not again unless I have to. No life, or profile to it at all.

Serving type: bottle

06-02-2007 01:50:22 | More by mikesgroove
Photo of womencantsail
womencantsail

California

3.08/5  rDev +50.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

The beer is amazingly clear with a white head. Clean aroma with a strong corn character. Some grainiess and a bit of yeast. Very simple flavor as well. No hop character or anything, but a clean flavor and moderate sweetness. Better than I had remembered.

Serving type: can

07-17-2012 16:04:50 | More by womencantsail
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

2.13/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Quite ordinary. Not as bad as most Macros, but far from quality. Hightly carbonate and clear yellow. Modestly creamy head that may or may not lace. Grainy sweet aroma with light hop detection. Tastes the same grainy sweet with the addition of cereal grains, decent hop bitter, yet little hop flavor. A grape skin or apple skin flavor. Finish has a grainy bittering. A bit corn sugar sweet in the end. Fairly crisp without drying.

Serving type: bottle

09-13-2005 19:50:28 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

2.55/5  rDev +24.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Six-pack of 12 ounce bottle - $4.79 at the nearby Publix in Canton, Georgia.

Appearance: Pours a clear, darkish yellow body with a typical, fizzy, white head. No head retention as it crackles out within seconds.

Smell: Very, very mild nose giving a teensy sniff of vapid maltiness and dehydrated corn kernels.

Taste: Mild maltiness rounded out with hints of corn stalks. Lightly sweet. Faintly sourish, metallic hop character with a low, low bitterness. Goes out on the finish as bland as this ride started.

Mouthfeel: Thin-bodied. Medium-light carbonation.

Overall: You get what you pay for, I guess.

Serving type: bottle

05-31-2011 15:09:30 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of TMoney2591
TMoney2591

Illinois

2.83/5  rDev +38%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Served in a Chicago Bears shaker pint glass.

Beer #3 during Swill Tour 2010. It pours a clear urine topped by an uber-urine-y few fingers of white suds. The nose is only malt husk...though I think I can get some cashews in there too. It ain't "bad"...just not good. The taste makes me unhappy. Maybe some wheat, corn, whatever flavors elicit images of personality-less folks in bowler hats. Seriously, this is one lazy-ass beer, folks. The body is quite light, with a light moderate carbonation and a crisp-ish finish. Yeah, this is pretty meek. It ain't all that bad, just...it's the wallflower at the party who's all really shy and when that decent-looking gal over there asks him to dance (I assume out of pity or something) he stutters and wets his pants, fleeing in even greater ignominy than usual. Yeah.

Serving type: can

09-27-2010 20:59:29 | More by TMoney2591
Photo of NeroFiddled
NeroFiddled

Pennsylvania

3.23/5  rDev +57.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A crystal-clear yellow-gold body is capped by a short head of creamy bright-white foam that holds fairly well before dropping to an average collar. Lacing is limited. The nose offers a generic beer aroma of sweetish malt and adjunct with a touch of non-descript hops. The body is medium and it's crisp in the mouth with a fine-bubbled, standard carbonation. In the flavor, a slightly grainy, sweetish malt is well-balanced by spicy and floral hop flavor and moderate bitterness along with a subtle apple-like fruitiness. It finishes crisp and dry; almost as if beer had never been there. Very clean and well-brewed but generally lacking in character.

Serving type: bottle

10-25-2003 04:15:57 | More by NeroFiddled
Photo of biboergosum
biboergosum

Alberta (Canada)

2.45/5  rDev +19.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

24oz canned behemoth from another last stop before the Canadian border Yankee gas station, in order to best get rid of my last (below par) American pocket change...

This beer pours a perfectly clear pale yellow colour, with two fingers of thin foamy white head, which leaves a surprisingly attractive columnar array of lace around the glass as it quickly fades away. It smells of diacetyl central - mildly rancid buttery cheap cereal grain, some earthy, weedy character the only distraction. The taste is still pretty cloying in its thankfully underwhelming buttery malt, taking time only to pay homage to some equally sedate skanky, weedy hops. The carbonation is pretty meh, but generally none too obtrusive, the body medium weight for the style, under duress from a lack of any otherwise uplifting metaphor. It finishes off-dry, the dry very much off, in the same sense of the sweet offset. Blech.

Well, apparently the beer Ice Wars that spanned the 49th parallel back in the 90s have left some stragglers - no surprise there. What we have here is, then, a remnant of a bygone era, out of place, but not out of our collective consciousness. Bloody hell.

Serving type: can

09-03-2011 02:55:42 | More by biboergosum
Photo of feloniousmonk
feloniousmonk

Minnesota

1.95/5  rDev -4.9%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

12 ounce can, "smooth, never watered-down taste"...sounds promising?

wan, sallow faintest yellow appearance, head starts big, disappears in a trice.

vacant aroma, slightly sweet and corny,turning sour...

Taste is empty, as well, and not entirely pleasant, either. There's a plastic feel in the texture, body is light as can be, finish is short and none too sweet. Harsh, acrid, grainy-ness dominates what accounts for flavor, and this is revealed to be a thinly disguised alcohol-delivery system, as if we didn't know that already.

As much as I try to complete every sample of every beer I review, this one's gonna have to go down the drain. Not enjoyable, barely tolerable.

Serving type: can

07-18-2005 09:06:06 | More by feloniousmonk
Photo of MasterSki
MasterSki

Illinois

2.78/5  rDev +35.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Thanks to Carleton (SpdKilz) for sharing this as part of our Good Beer/Bad Beer tasting for AgentZero's birthday. Served in a Captain Lawrence tulip.

A - A big white foam settles to a thin cap and thicker collar. Surprisingly good retention for the style. Transparent urine yellow body with some visible carbonation streams.

S - Aroma is pretty mild, but what's there is lemon, yeasty bread, a little bit of honey and corn sweetness.

T - Taste is pretty typical for the adjunct lager idiom. Corn and honey sweetness and a bit of fruity character. Largely inoffensive, even as it warms up.

M - Zesty carbonation, medium-light body, and a dry and slightly grainy texture.

D - A surprisingly decent adjunct lager - I'd certainly drink this over PBR or other similar swill if forced t choose. Probably a good value at its price point.

Serving type: can

01-08-2012 18:28:57 | More by MasterSki
Photo of TheManiacalOne
TheManiacalOne

Rhode Island

2.73/5  rDev +33.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a 24oz can into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a light gold color, with a large white head that fades slowly and leaves a spotty lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is kind of faint but contains mostly adjuncts and light malts along with a faint touch of hops.

T: The taste is pretty well-balanced for the style with flavors of grain, adjuncts and the usual macro sweetness. There's a very mild hops presence. The after-taste is bready and slightly sweet.

M: Crisp and a little smooth, light body, medium-to-high carbonation, clean finish.

D: Not very flavorful but better than most macros, goes down very easily since there isn't much to it, likewise not filling at all, decent kick, good representation of a Fizzy Yellow Beer but taking it for what it is, I think it's not too bad compared to other beers of it's kind.

Serving type: can

01-23-2009 03:22:35 | More by TheManiacalOne
Photo of russpowell
russpowell

Oklahoma

1.63/5  rDev -20.5%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Reviewed this on a whim, was offered a take away from a party that I was DD @ (that does suck, but not so much when this the main offering)

Pours golden with a bubbly head that drops off to a thin film pronto. No lacing or head retention

Taste: Graininess & alcohol, slight bitterness followed up by sickening sweetness

MF: Slick and overcarbonated (uurp!!), how bout waving a few more picture of hops at the brew kettle in anger???

I've been plenty of places in the world where this would be considered decent beer ( when I was 16/Egypt), I think I'll pass unless either one of these 2 scenarios repeat themselves

Serving type: bottle

01-07-2006 03:34:30 | More by russpowell
Photo of WesWes
WesWes

New York

2.53/5  rDev +23.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

The beer pours a very pale gold color with a spotty white lace head. The aroma is less than average. It has a watery, pale malt scent with a skunky lager yeast smell. The taste is terrible. It is really bitter and watery. It is light on malts and heavy on the skunky finish; no complexity. The mouthfeel is also less than average. It is a low/medium bodied beer with way too much carbonation. This is a horrible brew. It's one and done for me.

Serving type: can

03-30-2004 00:57:29 | More by WesWes
Photo of zeff80
zeff80

Missouri

2.05/5  rDev 0%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.5

A - Poured out a very bubbly, straw yellow color. It had a faomy, white, one finger head that receded quickly and left no lace.

S - Smelled like grain adjuncts and some corn.

T - It tasted of grain and corn. Fairly sweet with a bitterness that does not come from hops.

M - It was dry, fizzy and a little thin. A light-bodied beer.

D - It cheap and sessionable, but certainly not a great tasting lager.

Serving type: bottle

10-20-2008 02:25:53 | More by zeff80
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

Ohio

1.78/5  rDev -13.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

On sale 22oz. for $0.70 I couldn't pass one up, but now for appearance: Pours a crystal clear yellow fizzy tone with a bubbly white decent sized head only after a vigorous pour, lacing speckled and thin.
Aroma: Definite corn and rice approach to their malt profile sweet and slightly alcohol ridden after freezing the initial beer they filter out the ice here and what's left is a concentrated version of shit beer. Mouthfeel is thin but overcarbonated and nothing calling out to me. Drinkability: Not a beer I would chill with daily but it goes down easy and would get you crunked up, however if you like beer don't try this one.

Serving type: bottle

09-18-2003 21:09:20 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of Halcyondays
Halcyondays

California

1.93/5  rDev -5.9%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

24 oz. can, bought for $1.29, at a corner liquor store,

A: Pours a pale, fizzy, yellow, the head dissipates quickly, after the second pour, it doesn't last much past 2 seconds.

S: Some faint corn hints and a bit of malt, some alcohol, but very light overall.

T: The beer is almost completely devoid of flavour, which makes the alcohol content, even at 5.5% the major flavour, some corn is also there.

M: Not bad for a macro, fizzy, but bordering on medium-bodied, not as watery as I would have expected.

D: If this is a beer to drink fast to get drunk, Miller is not doing a very good job, I just got bored with it by the middle of the can.

Serving type: can

08-29-2007 18:10:04 | More by Halcyondays
Photo of rhoadsrage
rhoadsrage

Illinois

1.93/5  rDev -5.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

(Served in a strange)

A- This beer pours a crystal clear body with a very light hue of pale yellow with a strong carbonation of big bubbles. The head is a pure snow white with big bubbles pushing through and it fades to a thin ring after a bit.

S- This beer has a very clean smell with a pale sulfury raw grain note with a hint of field corn as it warms. There is a dry hop bitter smell that has no depth and reminds me of what a hop extract might smell like.

T- This beer has a sulfury dry hop bitter flavor that is combined with a carbonic acid finish. There is a very light dry pale malt hint that comes through in the beginning of the taste.

M- This beer has a very light fizzy mouthfeel with a watery texture.

D- This beer has a combo of sulfury dry hops and lots of fizz that is just not very appealing. The fizz is the strongest player in this beer not the malt or the hops.

Serving type: bottle

12-30-2006 02:21:39 | More by rhoadsrage
Photo of Jason
Jason

Massachusetts

2.6/5  rDev +26.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Presentation: 12 oz blue lined can with a picture of an old time rural brewery. Don’t be fooled by the Plank Road Brewery bs this is a Miller product. No freshness date.

Appearance: Pale strawish golden colour with the clarity that comes with all ultra filtered American macro lagers, tight but thin white lace stays for a few minutes.

Smell: Very clean with a faint whiff of alcohol, corn and grain.

Taste: Crisp yet the brew yields a smoothness also that adds to the drinkability slightly. Perfumy alcohol rushes through the mouth and out the nose, ghost like hop profile donning a bitterness that cuts and a trace of leaf flavour middle to end. Malt is their but in a pale and thin form with several cereal grain monkeys riding its back. Some sweetness in the back but dries up in the end.

Notes: A half decent macro lager and for ice beer it is not half bad. Nothing to really talk about, just a clean ice beer to drink if you are into ice beers. No point really, you may as well drink malt liquor.

Serving type: can

03-26-2002 23:41:06 | More by Jason
Photo of Zorro
Zorro

California

2.2/5  rDev +7.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Compared 4 U.S. Macro brews together to see if there is REALLY any winners here.

Executive Summary:

Scores: A S T M D

Coors Regular: 2 3 3 2 3 = 2.7
Budweiser Regular: 2 1.5 2 3 3 = 2.1
Miller MGD: 2 1.5 1.5 2.5 1.5 = 1.7
Ice House: 3 2.5 2 2.5 2 = 2.35


All brews were assumed to be a 2 in all categories before reviewing.

APPEARANCE: All look pretty much the same except Ice House, It’s a Bit darker.

SMELL: Budweiser has almost no smell, just a bit of grain. Coors smells distinctly of Banana and grain with a bit of yeast. MGD smells barely like bread. Ice House smells a bit citrus. Coors was best but Ice House was far better than Bud or MGD.

TASTE: Budweiser tastes of grain and is mildly sweet. Coors tastes of grain and is Tart compared to Budweiser. MGD tastes sweetest, but has an off taste to it. Ice House tastes like a tarter version of Budweiser. Coors was best, only MGD had a weird taste.

MOUTHFEEL: None of these really have it, Bud is thickest, and Coors is thinnest. Only Budweiser has any real Mouthfeel.

DRINKABILITY: Coors and Budweiser are about the same, MGD has that off taste and it cost it points, Ice House is OK, but not quite as good as Budweiser or Coors.

CONCLUSION: Drink better beers! But if you are trapped without a choice Coors, Bud, Ice House, and MGD.

Serving type: can

02-06-2004 03:13:29 | More by Zorro
Photo of Wasatch
Wasatch

Utah

2/5  rDev -2.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours a light yellow color, nice carbonation, small white head, with some sticky lacing left behind. The nose is malty, with some hops, slight caramel. The taste is slightly sweet, malty, slight hop note. Light body. Not drinkable, would not buy again.

Serving type: bottle

03-16-2010 00:41:30 | More by Wasatch
Photo of woodychandler
woodychandler

Pennsylvania

2.1/5  rDev +2.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I am simply doing the CAN-CAN today. Every time that I think that I have had all of the widely-available beers in a CAN, one more pops up in a cooler, beckoning me to lay waste on its shoals.

My first thought was that the big boys sure can make a pretty beer. It had a fluffy finger's worth of bone-white head with decent retention. The nose was pretty weak with a mild lager sweetness deep down, but it was not readily obvious. The color was a golden-yellow with NE-quality clarity. Again, think pretty, not good. Mouthfeel was on the thin side with a very unobtrusive flavor on the tongue. In fact, my tastebuds decided to take a break at one point and wait for something to happen. It never did. The finish just went down like tap water. This was not an evil beer, like many that I have tried in cans. It was simply ho-hum boring.

Serving type: can

06-25-2009 21:30:38 | More by woodychandler
Photo of stakem
stakem

Pennsylvania

2.6/5  rDev +26.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Thanks to Eric for gifting me with a can of this. I guess every once in awhile we owe it to ourselves to step back and drink something mass produced in order to appreciate the finer offerings... (or at least that is what I am told.) The brew pours a very light color of yellow that is perfectly clear. About a finger and a half of white billowy froth sits atop composed of rather large bubbles. It surprisingly leaves a webby pattern of lacework on the glass. Bubbles of carbonation emit from the solution almost like it is pissed off about being poured into a glass. These rising bubbles maintain some disturbance across the top.

The smell of this brew has some metallic/mineral character overtop of an adjunct sweetness. I say adjunct sweetness generically here because the sweetness to the nose does not seem grainy and fresh, it seems to come from something else that I am not use to smelling. There is almost a dusty afterthought to the aroma here along with the faintest touch of herbal (hops?) I am really putting forth some effort here to pick out descriptors to the aroma but that is it, im spent. I really dont pick up on anything else.

If cold was a flavor, this one got it! "Ice brewed below freezing." I don't know what that means... Just like the aroma hinted towards, this one has an awkward sweetness about it that blends with a metallic/mineral character that isn't that enjoyable. It persists into the aftertaste with a sweetness that is minorly reminiscent of corn. The aftertaste is a mixture of sweetness like bubblegum coupled with faint indications of herbal hops but without the bitterness, only a trace flavoring.

This is a light bodied brew with a moderate amount of carbonation. I drink this and I am immediately taken back to my days before I was of legal drinking age. If you dont have a choice and you are forced to drink this than it is pretty good. But living in the wonderful world we do, and being of legal drinking age, thank God this isn't something I have to be forced to drink. If you are going to drink this, make sure it is cold. ICE cold...

Serving type: can

04-20-2012 21:16:33 | More by stakem
Photo of DoubleJ
DoubleJ

California

1.95/5  rDev -4.9%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Busch Beer had it's turn yesterday, making Icehouse the beer for today here in the College Invitational. Made by the Plank Road Brewery according to the can label, but we all know Miller is the one behind this. Served right out the fridge and into a stange, on to the beer:

Typical pale gold color with a nice foamy head on top. Corn and some funky processed sweet scent (reminds me of Tab soda) are in the smell, not much else. We now get to the meat and potatoes of this beer and find no offensive flavors, pretty clean. That's the good news. Unfortunately, I was wondering when the beer flavor went. Maybe it ran away because I can't find it. The extra slap of alcohol from this brew is slighly felt on the palate, but more so in the throat. It creates a little bit of bitterness and zip to what is a pretty blah taste.

I want to stop, but I can't. I must press on to rate it's "buzzability" (a special side challenge here in the College Invitational). I'm giving the Buzzability a 3 for this beer.

Two down, two to go. Natural Ice is coming up soon.

Serving type: can

08-24-2007 04:06:00 | More by DoubleJ
Photo of plaid75
plaid75

New York

2.53/5  rDev +23.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured a medium straw hue with a two finger foamy white head. There was decent retention and poor lacing.

The smell featured a boiled sweet corn and a husky grain.

The taste upfront sweet corn malt with a gradual shift to a heavy graininess.

The mouthfeel was average with a dry finish.

Overall an average middle of the road macro.

Serving type: can

08-16-2007 04:01:02 | More by plaid75
Photo of Viggo
Viggo

Ontario (Canada)

2.38/5  rDev +16.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a crystal clear golden yellow, big fluffy white head forms, settles down to a layer and some lacing on the glass. Good retention for a macro. Smell is sweet with some slight citrus and honey, little bit of grass and grains, some rice. Taste is sweet honey, some citrus and little bit of floral. Clean finish with a little bitterness. Mouthfeel is light bodied with medium carbonation. Not a bad macro lager, there are worse.

Serving type: can

03-23-2006 00:17:54 | More by Viggo
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Icehouse from Miller Brewing Co.
51 out of 100 based on 872 ratings.