1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Miller Genuine Draft - Miller Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Miller Genuine DraftMiller Genuine Draft

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
55
awful

1,956 Ratings
THE BROS
53
awful

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,956
Reviews: 588
rAvg: 2.25
pDev: 30.67%
Wants: 10
Gots: 107 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Miller Brewing Co. visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.66% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 02-12-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 1,956 | Reviews: 588 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by jazzyjeff13:
Photo of jazzyjeff13
2.28/5  rDev +1.3%

A 500ml clear glass bottle with a BB of Feb 2011, so it's a few weeks out of date. Picked up cheap from my local offie. Label states that this was brewed in the EU under licence from Miller.

Poured into a Sam Smith's pint glass. A clear golden colour with light carbonation. Almost no head - a thin layer of white foam that disappears within seconds of pouring. Faint aroma of light malt and a hint of solvent.

The taste is clean but weak. Light malt with mild sweetness and a slight solvent note upon swallowing. Hints of corn. No discernible hops aroma or bitterness. Mouthfeel is smooth but watery, and lacks crispness due to the low carbonation. Virtually no aftertaste.

Incredibly boring - bland and flavourless. It's dull to look at and has little aroma, taste or body. Amazing to think that this is one of the best selling brands in the US. Avoid - there are so many better beers out there.

jazzyjeff13, Apr 02, 2011
More User Reviews:
Photo of RyanLaCount03
3.5/5  rDev +55.6%

I tried this beer one time during the summer of 2012 and thought it was an ok to slightly decent beer. It is not a beer that i would have all of the time, but I would probably recommend it to another to try it. The taste was distinct and was very smooth and different from Miller High Life. The process of making a draft beer gives this beer a different characteristic.

RyanLaCount03, Feb 22, 2013
Photo of RoyalT
2.13/5  rDev -5.3%

Appearance – Clear, yellow body with strong carbonation and the typical Puxatawny Phil up and down head.

Smell – A light grain aroma, but not a lot. The Bud was a veritable bouquet compared to this nose.

Taste – Typical grain with a good amount of sweetness. Definitely sweeter than The King. It’s not fruit, though. More like Ju-Ju Bees or Gummi-Bears (not the good Gummi-Bears from Germany; those awful ones that they sell at the movie theaters).

What the heck is going on with the finish here? I can’t describe it, but it ruined what little flavor was in the body. I don’t know what that is.

Mouthfeel – Good carbonation and fairly smooth.

Drinkability – Thirty-minutes of prep time in the freezer and canned to keep out the skunk does the trick with this one. That aftertaste though probably took it down a whole point.

RoyalT, Aug 17, 2003
Photo of cam477
2/5  rDev -11.1%

cam477, Sep 04, 2013
Photo of beerhunter13
1.5/5  rDev -33.3%

beerhunter13, Jan 09, 2012
Photo of tectactoe
2/5  rDev -11.1%

tectactoe, Jun 09, 2014
Photo of JudgeRoughneck
4.28/5  rDev +90.2%

This is a crysteal clear, radiently golden beer. It has no head to speak of, but does manage to leave quite a bit of lacing after the pour. Aromas are very light, and of cracked grain. No sickly sweetness to the aroma at all.

For the style, this beer tastes pretty badass. It is refreshingly dry, balanced, and delivers just a splash of fruity hop flavor in the finish. A light but very creamy mouthfeel accentuates these qualities to make this by far my favorite offering from the big 3. It is a very fresh tasting beer with minor, if any, perceptable flaws.

JudgeRoughneck, Jan 02, 2007
Photo of tbryan5
1.5/5  rDev -33.3%

tbryan5, Jan 10, 2013
Photo of Dmann
2.33/5  rDev +3.6%

I guess this is drinkable at keg parties but not anywhere else. It poured a clear yellow color with a lightly frothy head that faded after a minute or two. The smell was very sweet and not pleasing at all. The taste was not much better. It was a very sweet taste but a grainy sweetness that got to me after a couple sips. I guess I got used to it after a few sips and it started going down eaiser so I gave it a little bit higher drinkability rating. Overall it is a standard macro that is bland, boring and not worth your time.

Dmann, Apr 11, 2004
Photo of SuomiHobbit
1.25/5  rDev -44.4%

SuomiHobbit, Dec 12, 2013
Photo of Carissa
1/5  rDev -55.6%

Carissa, Jun 13, 2012
Photo of FadetoBock
2/5  rDev -11.1%

FadetoBock, Sep 02, 2013
Photo of BeerDreadz
1.98/5  rDev -12%

I not a big fan of Macro lagers and not a big fan of MGD i just buy one so i can review ...it does'nt smell good at all...not a good taste...and not even a good appearence .... for me this is a bad beer not good at all if you want to buy a Macro lager this one is not the one

BeerDreadz, Mar 28, 2007
Photo of DaftPatrick
2/5  rDev -11.1%

DaftPatrick, May 15, 2014
Photo of BK2084
3/5  rDev +33.3%

BK2084, Aug 25, 2012
Photo of WuAnquo1
1.5/5  rDev -33.3%

WuAnquo1, Jan 08, 2012
Photo of twi1609372
3.33/5  rDev +48%

not horrable on tap, better than can or bottle. still not by far a good beer but somewhat better than in the bottle. has a flavor to it, not strong but not overly weak either. it was really cheap on tap, so that helps, i guess a fair beer for your value, but i would stick to tap

twi1609372, Aug 15, 2004
Photo of TTripp725
1.5/5  rDev -33.3%

TTripp725, Jul 28, 2013
Photo of generallee
3.5/5  rDev +55.6%

generallee, Feb 13, 2012
Photo of ValpoExpo
2.25/5  rDev 0%

ValpoExpo, Jun 13, 2013
Photo of EsoxLucius
2.08/5  rDev -7.6%

Blah, definately better out of a bottle by the thinnest of margins.

A: light yellow, quickly disapating head. not really anything special, but it looks like a beer.

S: metal and wet grain. put my nose right in it to get something, not very strong at all and that's likely a very good thing.

T: bland, thin, very little flavor at all. what's there is sweet corn and grains with a metallic aftertaste.

M: like the taste, very thin and watery. combine the two and you get a watery feel with a faint hint of beer taste. perhaps it was the mix with my saliva, but this really froths up in the mouth.

O: it was 32*C (89.6*F) outside at a gathering and these started going down after i ran out of my stock.

Bottom Line: Desperation beer.

EsoxLucius, Aug 24, 2011
Photo of TimoP
2/5  rDev -11.1%

TimoP, Nov 25, 2011
Photo of Doomcifer
1.5/5  rDev -33.3%

Doomcifer, Aug 01, 2014
Photo of HerbMeowing
3/5  rDev +33.3%

HerbMeowing, Aug 04, 2014
Photo of Jason
2.17/5  rDev -3.6%

Presentation: 12 oz twist-off clear glass long neck bottle, raised glass around the bottom of the neck donning the Miller eagle and “Cold Filtered”. No freshness date.

Appearance: Light straw hue, very clear. Good sticky retention, white lace sticks as much as it can.

Smell: Big husky and cooked cereal grain aroma, the husk is a bit powdery in its astringency.

Taste: Unbelievably extremely smooth and crisp. Moderate body. Thin maltiness bringing mild astringent husk, cracker-like grain and a touch of malt sweetness. All mixed in with the malt is a semi-coarse cereal / adjunct flavour that is somewhere between cooked corn and bran cereal. Hops are all used up and are complacent with just handling the bitterness even though they are quite dull in flavour. Corn grit after taste leaves an odd feeling in the mouth, almost like sucking on a piece of wood.

Notes: This beer would have been ok but the after taste is damaged with an unpleasant dryness. There are other macros that will do a better job of being totally bland to quench your thoughtless thirst.

Jason, Mar 31, 2002
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Miller Genuine Draft from Miller Brewing Co.
55 out of 100 based on 1,956 ratings.