1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Miller Genuine Draft - Miller Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Miller Genuine DraftMiller Genuine Draft

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

1,925 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,925
Reviews: 586
rAvg: 2.25
pDev: 30.22%
Wants: 10
Gots: 98 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Miller Brewing Co. visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.66% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 02-12-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Miller Genuine Draft Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,925 | Reviews: 586 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of wcudwight

North Carolina

1.2/5  rDev -46.7%

This beer is curtousy of another BA who will remain nameless.
Sampled straight from the clear glass bottle.
I simply can't give anything that looks like piss a higher rating than 1 for appearance. The head, lace, ect... is irrelavant. This beer looks like urine!
This beer smells like the corn I use to catch trout on a hot summer day.
Taste is malty and sweet. More flavor than your typical macro lager, but that's not a good thing here. Very harsh sour apple aftertaste that lingers. I wish it would go away.
I must admit that Miller hit the carbonation head on with this beer. Nicely carbonated which gives it a crisp mouthfeel.
I strongly feel that if you want something this light in body and flavor...something refreshing...on a hot summer day...do the Christian thing, drink water.
Oh well, it's off to the drain with this one.
As a side note. This beer does pair well with microwavable Ore Ida Bagel Bites.

05-16-2007 03:21:45 | More by wcudwight
Photo of logansboat15


3.8/5  rDev +68.9%

My first introduction to something beyond the standard American pilsners, MGD offers a liitle more in flavor. Pours standard pale pilsner yellow with a light head that lingers for a short while. Smells of hops with a bit of something more complex. Tastes well-blanced with an even tug-of-war between the malt and hops. The finish wins the match with a sweet, malty overtone that makes this an above average macro-lager. Light-to-medium mouthfeel that is highly drinkable. A perfect light summer beer. Goes good with almost any food.

05-15-2007 20:10:34 | More by logansboat15
Photo of jomo


2.05/5  rDev -8.9%

Light yellow in color. Head is a brief memory after the pour.

Smell is light, but unappetizing. Yeasty/malty.

Taste is very slightly malty. That's about it.

Mouthfeel is very thin in viscosity and very aggressive carbonation. Soda pop.

Drinkability? I can't lie, I must say this is drinkable.

05-15-2007 04:05:12 | More by jomo
Photo of diego


2.8/5  rDev +24.4%

I’ve had more MGD than any other beer. Pale color with plenty of carbonation, thin white head, clean smell and taste no real after taste. Nothing stands out as good or bad. The price is right and I’m sure it will me in my fridge most days. It’s most welcome on a hot day.

05-04-2007 01:38:53 | More by diego
Photo of jettjon


2.4/5  rDev +6.7%

Into a pint glass a pale golden clear color with few bubbles. One-finger white foam head fades quickly to a bit of scattered cap and a thin ring, with trace lacing. Nose of faint malt and not much else. Taste of very light malt flavor with a touch of sweetness. Mouth is middle-thin, moderately carbonated, and rather plain. Drinkability is OK, nothing particularly interesting. Certainly non-offensive.

Overall: What’s the point? Avoid.

04-30-2007 23:38:12 | More by jettjon
Photo of uncggop06

North Carolina

3.3/5  rDev +46.7%

Tasted along with Miller High Life for comparison (from forum post earlier about similarities between the two). The beer was poured from a 24oz big can into an Okocim glass (0.5L, very nice glass). Head started out strong, then fizzled out leaving some chunky lace on the glass and a wannabe ring after a few sips. Beer is pale gold similar to High Life, but none of the bubbles are there. I would choose High Life over this just for the amazing bubbles. Smell is almost the same as the High Life, but taste is fuller and carries on with the smell, not so great. This is less sweet, with a little more of a grainy aftertaste that the High Life did not have. Although these beers are practically the same (minus the pasteurization difference), I think High Life takes the cake on appearance and drinkability. Plus it was $0.20 cheaper!

04-24-2007 03:47:04 | More by uncggop06
Photo of MrMcGibblets


2.4/5  rDev +6.7%

ah, my favorite beer in the teen years. fizzy, rapidly dimishing large bubbles pass for a head. for some reason i used to enjoy the sweet corn adjunct flavor in this beer. at least it was something a little better than bud. no discernable hop aroma, light bodied, decent balance to this beer for what it is. blond and overly carbonated as you all know. i don't think i'll ever have one again unless i have a midlife crisis or something.

04-23-2007 03:34:55 | More by MrMcGibblets
Photo of PittBeerGirl


2.28/5  rDev +1.3%

This does have a malted taste to it. Maybe with some nutty overtones. Unfortunately its light body and heavy carbonation makes it hard to really taste what it may have to offer. Near average drinkability because you can have another and its not something that I will never drink again.

04-14-2007 16:48:06 | More by PittBeerGirl
Photo of tapman


2.08/5  rDev -7.6%

Someone bought it for me at a bar, what am I gonna do...say no to a free beer?

Pours like water with a flimsy imitation of a head. Color of straw and dead grass. gets an extra .5 because the bubbles look cool. I'm being nice, here.

Smells like a pilsner, which is perhaps the high point of this beer. A very light pilsner, but better than the rest. I can actually tell by smell that it is a beer so a +1 for you MGD.

Tastes like a crappy pilsner, but at least it tastes like some kind of beer. Beats the crap out of "Beechwood aged" beer (WTF?).

Sprite has a thicker texture than this offering.

I'm proving that I am above beer slander and I'll give this beer a 3 for drinkability since I do believe it tastes better than the rest (Buds, Coors, malted liquors, etc.) It does resemble a pilsner and I've had supposedly "good" pilsners that reminded me of this beer, so come game day, you know what I'm buying for my friends.

04-12-2007 16:27:29 | More by tapman
Photo of BeerDreadz


1.98/5  rDev -12%

I not a big fan of Macro lagers and not a big fan of MGD i just buy one so i can review ...it does'nt smell good at all...not a good taste...and not even a good appearence .... for me this is a bad beer not good at all if you want to buy a Macro lager this one is not the one

03-28-2007 08:29:17 | More by BeerDreadz
Photo of happygnome


3.03/5  rDev +34.7%

poured from a plastic bottle into a plastic cup at a Minnesota Wild game

a: golden color inch of white head that remains longer than most macro, little lacing
s: typical macro adjunct
t: well the adjuncts in the malt are evident but it is hard to taste any significant hop presence i will say for a macro this is pretty good
m: fuller bodied than i expected but not a full bodied beer by any stretch

overall, for a macro this is pretty good, far better than bud, however i think i'll pass next time, and besides $6.50 for 16 oz of this...

03-21-2007 21:44:05 | More by happygnome
Photo of Beerman420


2.73/5  rDev +21.3%

I am a firm believer that MGD is the best of it's kind (i.e. massed produced)
In all not a very good beer, but the taste is much better than that of Budweiser, in my opinion.
A - Strong head, golden color.
S - Not much smell. Your average mass beer.
T - Better than some, worse than most. Fuller taste than Bud, watery compaired to Newcastle.
M - Thick mouthfeel. Better than Bud.
D - Very drinkable on a cold day, bot so much during the hot summer days.

03-12-2007 10:25:49 | More by Beerman420
Photo of HochFliegen


2.2/5  rDev -2.2%

Pale yellow fizz with an inch head that went away after a little while. Smell was slightly skunk and corn like. Flavor was of corn and slightly sweet. There was a horrid skunk aftertaste that lingered longer than I care to remember. i did detect a slight amount of bitterness, from hops? I couldnt tell if it was skunk or hops.

03-08-2007 03:10:39 | More by HochFliegen
Photo of Padron4KM


1.45/5  rDev -35.6%

12 oz bottle.
Pale golden, soapy white head. No retention, and very little lace.

Corn and skunk aroma.

Bitter metallic flavor, I had to look again to make sure it was from a bottle.

Finish is a little graininess and a little sweet corn, but mostly metal.

Not very good.

02-25-2007 04:42:43 | More by Padron4KM
Photo of gmfessen


3.05/5  rDev +35.6%

Poured from the bottle into a pint glass, beer is a clear, light golden color with a thin, soapy white head with lots of carbonation rising from the bottom of the glass. Smell is mostly of grainy malt and possibly a miniscule amount of hops. Taste has a slight grainy taste as well, followed by a decent bitterness that finishes very neutral and clean. Not bad for a macro-lager. The mouthfeel is light and has a foamy consistency. This is a pretty drinkable beer and I think I would prefer this to most macro lagers. The taste is not impressive at all, but it isn't offensive either.

02-13-2007 06:23:37 | More by gmfessen
Photo of MMansfield

Nova Scotia (Canada)

1.33/5  rDev -40.9%

I had a bottle at Bubbles Mansion in Halifax. I saw all the generic college guys swigging this shit from clear bottles and figured, hell... I like to try EVERYTHING at least once.

Appearance: Poured a golden straw colour with a medium bone white cap, quickly down to a lacey ring. Didn't look too bad at all.

Aroma: Good lord. Skunked to the max. Aroma of rancid corn, alcohol and vommit. This was horrid.

Taste: Only gets worse. Astringent alcohol, awful sour finish. Rotten vegetables, no hops.

Mouthfeel: Typical of the style.

Final Statement: I'm glad I tried it because I can now say with confidence, this is the worst beer I have ever had.

02-12-2007 01:52:21 | More by MMansfield
Photo of GeneralZod


3.35/5  rDev +48.9%


It looks like an average American lager. Gold in color and translucent. It also is quite carbonated and had high head retention.


It did not smell impressive, but I wouldn't say bad either.


Taste better than most Lagers ie.. Bud.


Carbonated and watery. Both were expected.


Taste good enough for me.

02-09-2007 02:46:08 | More by GeneralZod
Photo of DoubleJ


2.42/5  rDev +7.6%

Before I begin, how come no one complains of MGD using clear bottles for their beer, as folks complain of Corona bottles or green Euro bottles? Anyway, let's get on to the beer:

Poured into a glass, an average head forms over the body, leaving a bit of lacing onto the glass. It's a crisp adjuncty smelling beer, when touching the tongue, bring out a trace of hops with a dominating cereal aroma. Gets annoying after awhile, and that brings down the taste score and drinkability in my book.

In the past, my mom would cook bratwursts in this beer, and they would turn out to be some tasty sausages. I think if I ever purchase this again, I'll use this to cook with before I use it as a refreshment.

02-03-2007 04:28:09 | More by DoubleJ
Photo of matty


3.4/5  rDev +51.1%

I just popped open a cold bottle of mgd and must say it is the average american beer for the average american Joe. No special characteristics or no really negative thoughts about this brew. It seems just like the perfect beer when the average american just wants to sit back and kick up their heels.

01-31-2007 00:30:59 | More by matty
Photo of Westsidethreat


2.17/5  rDev -3.6%

Stuck at the wife's grandmothers house so this is all I got.

A: Dull light corn color, very clean. Surprisingly large sudsy stark white head remains for quite a while.

S: Aluminum, copper, drawing paper, light fruitiness

T: Begins astringent. Flavors of iceburg lettuce, cardboard and corn. Gentle rice sweetness brush the tip of the tongue offering the first interesting aspect of this beer. Minor floral hops move next while a grainy flavor fizzles out.

M: Light body with a light mouthfeel.

D: This is the first macro I've taken the time to stop and review. It was really painfull and I'm not that much of a beer snob. Then again I've never really liked MGD. This is a bad beer through and through.

01-12-2007 05:59:29 | More by Westsidethreat
Photo of JudgeRoughneck


4.28/5  rDev +90.2%

This is a crysteal clear, radiently golden beer. It has no head to speak of, but does manage to leave quite a bit of lacing after the pour. Aromas are very light, and of cracked grain. No sickly sweetness to the aroma at all.

For the style, this beer tastes pretty badass. It is refreshingly dry, balanced, and delivers just a splash of fruity hop flavor in the finish. A light but very creamy mouthfeel accentuates these qualities to make this by far my favorite offering from the big 3. It is a very fresh tasting beer with minor, if any, perceptable flaws.

01-02-2007 18:09:40 | More by JudgeRoughneck
Photo of zuggy9


1.9/5  rDev -15.6%

This, back in college, was my preferred beer, before I had good beer. It pours a golden-yellow with heavy carbonation and no head retention. The smell is grainy and lightly skunky. The taste is somewhat clea but rather blah, lacking much of anything worth noting. It's has a too sweet taste and luckily lacks much of an aftertaste. It's only a choice I'd take if I had no other options, and maybe not even then.

12-22-2006 08:28:49 | More by zuggy9
Photo of Magpie14


2.48/5  rDev +10.2%

Appearance: crisp golden color with alot of bubbles. No real head to mention or talk about.

Smell: mostly corn, grain smell with a very weak hint of malt. Just a touch of skunk makes it right

Taste: i must admit that it is fairly crisp and finishes very clean. Of course the grain/corn flavor is dominant, but when coupled with the crispness it is alright and makes this beer drinkable. Big lingering skunk and corn flavor is bogus and takes away from the overall taste after a while. Medium bodied and strong carbonation. That traditional or classic macro lager, one of the many.

For some reason I find this beer drinkable at the right times...but the "High Life" still has my vote!

12-15-2006 23:50:39 | More by Magpie14
Photo of treehugger02010


2.68/5  rDev +19.1%

I had a bottle of this at a party I was just at, I guess it is one of the macros of choice. The smell had a rather malty smell for an American Macro Lager. The taste was absent. I mean completetly gone, nothing...nothing at all. The color was a light yellow. There isn't much to say about this, but all in all it wasn't the worst beer I have had.

12-09-2006 06:48:51 | More by treehugger02010
Photo of pmcadamis


2.08/5  rDev -7.6%

Bought this 22oz can at the grocery store for a little over a dollar....not a bad deal.

A - Light yellow perfectly clear brew with a one finger head of bone white bubbles...good duration during the five minutes it took me to swill this sucker down (I was hot and very thirsty). A shade or two darker than your average BMC macro lager.

S - Not much aroma aside from the usual macro scent of corn and rice adjuncts. Smells a bit crisper than the regular old Miller or Bud. Basically smells like corn flakes.

T - Sweet cornflake ceral and rice. Not too bad, but nowhere near good.

M - Light and crisp with an abundance of carbonation. A sickeningly sweet finish wraps things up. Absolutley no aftertaste, which could be construed as a good thing due to the poor flavor of this brew.

D - Pretty good for quenching your thirst on a hot day. I've always liked this one much better than other BMC products, but upon reviewing this beer....it's not that much different. All of these BMC lagers really fall into a very narrow spectrum of flavors...and it's not that easy to tell one from the other.

11-29-2006 06:12:21 | More by pmcadamis
Miller Genuine Draft from Miller Brewing Co.
55 out of 100 based on 1,925 ratings.