1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Miller Lite - Miller Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Miller LiteMiller Lite

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
53
awful

3,521 Ratings
THE BROS
59
awful

(view ratings)
Ratings: 3,521
Reviews: 1,039
rAvg: 2.15
pDev: 34.42%
Wants: 14
Gots: 275 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Miller Brewing Co. visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
Light Lager |  4.17% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: OldFrothingSlosh on 10-03-1999)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Miller Lite Alström Bros
Ratings: 3,521 | Reviews: 1,039 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of beckscrusader420
2.03/5  rDev -5.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

well what can you say its just another standard light domestic that is just a bit better than coors or bud. Just as most people that take the time to come to a beer site like this I am a snob when it comes to beer. Sometimes I drink miller lite in the .99 plastic bottles when I'm broke like right now. If I could find Yeungling in 16 oz bottles I would never drink miller lite again during low fund times. So yeah Miller is just what it is miller shite. Hebrew Lenny Bruce!!! Now thats a beer.

beckscrusader420, May 24, 2007
Photo of Manosbeeroffate
1.55/5  rDev -27.9%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 2.5

I'm wondering if this is actually beer, it really tastes like water. Pours a pale yellow hinting it might be beer. No smell, no beer taste, just carbonated water. Mouthfeel the same. Overall it is quite refreshing on a hot day, but if you are expecting this to be a beer, you are wrong.

Manosbeeroffate, May 24, 2007
Photo of dickieb
3/5  rDev +39.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

I grew up on this one, its my sesion beer, and my dad typicaly has a keg of it out in the garage. That being said this is the best of the lite or "light" macros. It flows like water because lets face it, it smells and taste much like water. For me it hits the spot on a hot day better then any craft brew, and i would recomend pairing it with mowing a lawn or something.

dickieb, May 22, 2007
Photo of MrMcGibblets
1.95/5  rDev -9.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

unfortunately, i have had this one WAY too many times. when you're growing up in chicagoland, it is unavoidable. keggers as a teen, $10 buckets at shithole bars, girlfriends...i can never escape the presence of this beer. but hey, it won gold at the gabf!!! that must mean something, right? the only good thing i can say about this beer is that it's better than bud light or coors light. if you squint your eyes really hard and pray like pat robertson you can actually detect some vegetal hop aromas in it! super light, super fizzy, super tasteless...

MrMcGibblets, May 15, 2007
Photo of allengarvin
2.42/5  rDev +12.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Yanked out of company fridge. Long day, need a beer... unfortunately, I don't need this one. Pours a limpid gold without much head. Corny, sweet grain nose. Taste is slightly better than ordinary Miller, surprisingly enough: it's bland, but lacks unpleasant corniness of the ordinary beer. Just a little sweet grain and then the taste fades away. Medium body, very neutral texture.

allengarvin, May 08, 2007
Photo of bigelguapo
2.38/5  rDev +10.7%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 4

Bud Light>Miller Light>Coors Light in my opinion after re-tasting this one.

It is less filling, I don't know about the great taste so much, the adjuncts are still blatantly obvious, but for most people who drink this beer, they probably wouldn't have a problem with that.

Not good, but at the same time, you hopefully are at a party or something where you aren't bored enough that the taste of this beer is the most interesting part of your night. If you are, it's probably a sign you need to leave!

bigelguapo, May 03, 2007
Photo of dmamiano
2.2/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.5

95 degrees sitting by the pool in Vegas and it was still hard to drink this.
Drank straight from the plastic bottle so the look of the beer really couldnt be checked.But...
Smell was of very faint hop but nothing else.
The mouthfeel was so thin is was almost sad.
Flavor...nothing much. No malt character or real hop to speak of.
I guess with note true malt and no hops, it was balanced pretty well!

dmamiano, May 02, 2007
Photo of cktison
2.38/5  rDev +10.7%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

On tap, in bottle, what's the difference?
A: Light pale yellow, very little head, dissipates immediately. Looks a bit like carbonated urine.
S: Processed chemicals, bit of flowers and grains.
T: Some grain and hops if you search for it. Bit metallic
M: carbonated, metally, but still smooth.
D: You could drink a dozen and not realize it. It's light beer for a reason I guess.

cktison, May 01, 2007
Photo of Bowdoinbeerboy
1.9/5  rDev -11.6%
look: 1 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Appearance- Light yellowish color, reminiscent of urine.

Smell- Light and without significant bite to it.

Taste- Starts with a mild flavor and ends with a slightly wheaty finish.

Mouthfeel- Light on the tongue without bite.

Drinkability- Medium in the filling range, mildly filling.

Bowdoinbeerboy, May 01, 2007
Photo of argock
2.63/5  rDev +22.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Served on-tap in a 16oz pint glass

Appearance: Bright yellow with thin head and minimal lacing; I can read the paper through it

Smell: Straight grain

Taste: Grainy, corn flavor that is full for a light lager

Mouthfeel: Relatively smooth and crisp that could quench after mowing the lawn on a hot day

Drinkability: Good social beer that can definitely be repeated, but isn't the extra 5 bucks worth it?

argock, Apr 23, 2007
Photo of bark
2.13/5  rDev -0.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Colour is pale yellow; the finger thick white foam sinks down to a lid leaving a fizzy sound but no lacing.

The smell is sweet with some musty-yeasty notes and a hint of alcohol.

The taste is very weak. Some bread-like notes of malt, artificial sweet notes and hints of wet paper in the aftertaste. No bitterness.

The carbonation is extremely strong, large bubbles. The liquid is less watery than expected.

Tasteless yellow fizzy beer.

bark, Apr 20, 2007
Photo of hckyfn9999
2.4/5  rDev +11.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pours a pale golden yellow with a one finger white head that initially goes down quickly and then doesnt fully disappear, with a decent amount of lacing on the glass. Aroma is basically non existant a bit of sweet grain. Taste is typical of the style with a bit of sweet grain again and minimal hops and a bit of corn. Mouthfeel is light. I've had worse of this style but certainly doesnt have a spot in my fridge.

hckyfn9999, Apr 18, 2007
Photo of PittBeerGirl
1.63/5  rDev -24.2%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

great taste less filling?
ok.
pours a really pale watery urine yellow.
smells like a value macro.
ok. it does have more taste than most light lagers-but thats not necessarily a good thing. run of the mill semi-watered down boring macro flavor. I'd rather just have beer water with maybe a hint of excitement.
sure. its drinkable. good throwback beer. not my throwback of choice but its what the people like.

PittBeerGirl, Apr 13, 2007
Photo of darkcarrington
2.5/5  rDev +16.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

If you forced me to drink a macro brew light beer this would probably be the one I chose.

Appearance: Pretty pale, almost the color of ginger ale. Small head that lasts for about 10 seconds.

Smell: Not too much of a smell. Faint hint of alcohol and faint hint of hops.

Taste: More taste than most macro brew light beers. Taste kind of like a watery Miller, imagine that. Outside of that tastes like a standard American Macrobrew.

Drinkability: Pretty easy to drink, but isn't that the point of light beer? Probably not worth it if you really want a beer to sit back and enjoy.

darkcarrington, Apr 12, 2007
Photo of Douglas14
1/5  rDev -53.5%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Pretty bad beer...no to pick on it, but I feel this way about all the huge lite beer labels (bud light, coors light, etc.).

I am re-reviewing this beer to account or my past review of this particular beer before my beer enlightening a couple of years ago (i think this might've been the first beer i reviewed on this site haha...a little underage!).

As for taste there is nothing special to it, just kinda run of the mill. It is very clear and yellow as far as appearance.

Douglas14, Apr 06, 2007
Photo of happygnome
2.65/5  rDev +23.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

a: pours a very pale yellow color with about a eight inch worth of white head disapears fast no lacing
s: watery adjuncty more malt presence than bud light though
t: ice cold its drinkable malt flavors and adjunct are kinda hidden
m: deffinatly a light bodied beer not very good highly carbonated gave me the beer farts

overall this has the potential if served very very cold to be refreshing but i would not recommend it

happygnome, Mar 21, 2007
Photo of prototypic
2.08/5  rDev -3.3%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 4

Appearance: Very light, transparent yellow color. One finger that vanished rapidly. Extremely light lacing.

Smell: To the extent there is much of a smell, I'm picking up some grains, corn, and light malt. Not much in the hops department.

Taste: A little malt in there. The corn and grain flavors are apparent. Not hoppy at all. It's pretty watery as well. To be frank, it's not very tasty at all.

Mouthfeel/Drinkability: Very light bodied and goes down very easy. I remember drinking a lot of these years ago. Overall, this is probably my favorite light macro. Since developing a taste for fine beer, I rarely drink it. But, I'd take this over the other light macros available, especially on a hot summer day. In that setting, it's not so bad. Definitely not recommended though.

prototypic, Mar 17, 2007
Photo of jettjon
2.08/5  rDev -3.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Enjoyed one of these with a buddy who’s one of those “I just drink Miller Lite” guys. I can see his point; it’s a safe, non-assuming beer.

Into a pint glass from the tap a pale yellow gold with average carbonation. One-finger whitish head fades hard and fast to a scattered cap and surprisingly, good sheet-like lacing that hangs around for a while. Nose is sweet of malt and grass; taste is kind of corn-malty, insubstantial in a light-beer-kinda-way, with a sweet off-flavor and a rather unassuming finish. Mouth is thin and watery with middle carbonation. Drinkability is acceptable, though barely; if you’re into knocking back lots of “light” beers, this would be your one, I guess.

Overall: Miller Lite would be my choice of light beers if there were any point to them.

jettjon, Mar 09, 2007
Photo of mikesgroove
2.03/5  rDev -5.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Well because you have to I am gonna try some macros and just put my thoughts out there. Here is the first. Poured a pale yellow, with tons of visible carbonation, big frothy head faded instantly revealing a clear bubbly liquid. No smell, maybe a bit musty but really nothing. Taste was so watered down and bland. Light grain taste, but drink it cold because once it warms its done. Smooth and deeply carbonated, drinks like a soda. The only reasonable points it gets are for drinkibility, if it is ice cold goes down well, if its warm, watch out!

mikesgroove, Mar 06, 2007
Photo of schusterbauer
2.1/5  rDev -2.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

clear pale yellow with a puny saliva head. thin, watery, cold, fizzy. flavored beer water. slight barley malts, slight hops, lots of corn, lots of rough grainy texture. not very well blended, but that hardly matters since there is so little body to begin with. not undrinkable by any means, but by no means desirable.

schusterbauer, Feb 27, 2007
Photo of oldirtycaffrey
2.38/5  rDev +10.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

One of the better light beers out there, in my opinion. Of course, the appearance is that of light yellow carbonated water with a white foamy head that dissipates quickly, but the taste is surely better than a Coors Light. The high level of carbonation doesn't do much for the mouthfeel of this brew, but the drinkability is solid. Basically, I got this at a pub that had a "free beer with any entree" night, and it went well with my fish combo platter.

oldirtycaffrey, Feb 26, 2007
Photo of robmorris31
1.25/5  rDev -41.9%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

Sorry Miller fans, but this was by far one of the worst beers I have ever had. I know I am not supposed to slam a beer but it is hard to find some good qualities about this. Here is one good quality, it is cheaper than Bud Light. That's not really a good quality because Bud Light is so much more drinkable than Mille Lite.

The absolute worst taste is by far from the can! Yuck!

Miller Lite is even worse in the bottle. If you absolutely have to drink this beer make sure it's on Draft!

robmorris31, Feb 24, 2007
Photo of SMark
2/5  rDev -7%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

12 ounce can dated 12256

Poured at 43 degrees with slight head that did not have much retention. Clear, pale and watery with a few small bubbles.

Unable to detect any malt or hops. Clean

Watered down taste of a cold lager.

Nothing off but not able to describe anything exciting.

This is more drinkable in the summer when a good light thirst quencher might be needed.

SMark, Feb 22, 2007
Photo of jasonjlewis
1.93/5  rDev -10.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Holy shit. I used to drink this beer non stop before I got into craft beer. WHAT THE FUCK happened to me? This beer was HORRIBLE. I had to drink keystone light this weekend which I hated as well, but it had no flavor at all so I didn't care that much. This has a gross adjunct and cheap malt flavor. Oh my god, it was gross. I can't believe that I used to like this beer.

jasonjlewis, Feb 21, 2007
Photo of tvercil2
2.25/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12 oz bottle into a pilsner glass.

A - Pale yellow in color with a fast receding white head. Lots of carbonation.

S - Some grains, mostly corn, and not much else.

T - Nothing much here. Very watery with a small hint of grain. Virtually no bitterness.

M - Feels very much like sparkling water, only slightly less carbonated.

D - It goes down easy, but only because theres not much to it. This is basically for people who want something cheap to drink all night, but don't want the beer flavor.

In its defense, I would choose this every time over bud or Coors light, but thats not saying much.

tvercil2, Feb 10, 2007
Miller Lite from Miller Brewing Co.
53 out of 100 based on 3,521 ratings.