1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Miller 64 - Miller Brewing Co.

Miller 64Miller 64

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
46
awful

560 Ratings
THE BROS
55
awful

(view ratings)
Ratings: 560
Reviews: 215
rAvg: 1.81
pDev: 35.91%


Brewed by:
Miller Brewing Co. visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
Light Lager |  2.80% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: ZAP on 06-04-2008)
View: Beers (26) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 560 | Reviews: 215 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of sluggermatt15
sluggermatt15

Pennsylvania

1.98/5  rDev +9.4%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3.5

Had this on-tap for lunch last week.

A- Pours a straw yellow with an off-white lacing.

S- Smells of grains, alcohol, and mostly water.

T- The majority is water and this is understandable because of the extremely low alcohol content. Also tastes of some grains and slight bitterness.

M- Highly carbonated, so this beer doesn't score well here.

D- Decent drinkability, pretty good for a light beer. Could see myself pounding these down, and for the price, it's not a bad idea.

Serving type: on-tap

07-11-2010 21:04:28 | More by sluggermatt15
Photo of plaid75
plaid75

New York

2.6/5  rDev +43.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4.5

Poured a light straw hue with a one finger foamy white head. There was decent retention and no lacing.

The smell featured nothing. Really there was no aroma from this cold draft.

The taste consisted of a very faint grain.

The mouthfeel was thin and very carbonated.

Overall not much to report here. Barely beer, but refreshing.

Serving type: on-tap

06-03-2010 22:30:58 | More by plaid75
Photo of Cyberkedi
Cyberkedi

Georgia

1.18/5  rDev -34.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Comes out of the tap a typical clear straw-yellow, but it does at least have a fine-bubbled head. Aroma is weak, though crisp and malty - not at all promising. Flavor is very thin, like beer that has been cut with water. Texture is so watery, one might as well be drinking water - there is just a teeny bit of tingle, not near enough to feel like beer. Fuhgeddaboutit.

Serving type: on-tap

02-10-2009 01:32:15 | More by Cyberkedi
Photo of cdkrenz
cdkrenz

Wisconsin

1.73/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

A - Two inches of bright white head that actually leaves a decent lacing at first. The body is transparent and a very light gold color.

S - Light and malty with a fruit punch hint.

T - Meek and disappointing water with malted grain flavor. There's a bitter tinge as well but it's not a good taste.

M - Cold and slightly coarse considering how watered down this sucker is.

~ For a cheap sessionable brew this is not the one. Go for a High Life Light instead.

Serving type: on-tap

12-28-2008 16:21:25 | More by cdkrenz
Photo of AtLagerHeads
AtLagerHeads

Ohio

2.05/5  rDev +13.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Served on tap at a hotel bar with only the Buds in competition. Bland. The appearance was light yellow with not remarkable quality other than general clarity. White, thin with no staying power and a little light lacing. I kept trying to grasp the taste, but there just wasn't anything there. Watery and thin with no aroma to give it a lift. There just wasn't enough of any impression to give a sense of this beer. To say something positive - it beats Bud.

Serving type: on-tap

03-10-2003 04:44:56 | More by AtLagerHeads
Photo of alphagnome
alphagnome

Iowa

1.73/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Appearance:
Incredibly clear, pale gold body crowned with a surprisingly thick, white head that disappeared to nothing quickly but left plenty of lacing behind in the process. Light trails of carbonation. Looks good, oddly enough.

Aroma:
Here is where it takes a turn... Damp grains and light traces of corn. Light sweetness. Nothing else.

Taste:
Follows the taste.. Dull grains and faint corn. Rubbery aftertaste.

Mouthfeel:
Lifeless in pretty much all aspects. Thin and watery. Little to no carbonation.

Overall:
This, surprisingly, isn't horrible... BUT pretty damn close. And, unlike a few other beers I've had recently this is drinkable if only just. Not refreshing by any stretch of the imagination as I found myself yearning for the bottom of the glass to approach. I'll sum this up with this: Sometimes you have to have a bad beer to enjoy a the good ones. That's exactly what this experiment was for me, I will spend the rest of my days ensuring I never drink this one again. It's really the only reason you should have for consuming this as well.

Serving type: bottle

02-11-2014 01:33:11 | More by alphagnome
Photo of DrCDPriest
DrCDPriest

Minnesota

3.35/5  rDev +85.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Opinions vary, but this is the best light beer I have tasted (my wife has bought them all, Bud55, Miller Lite [my old favorite light], Mic Ultra [ok, I do love Mic Ultra Amber - but hard to find in MN], etc.) and Miller 64 has become a staple in our refrigerator). It is light, fresh, crisp, and tastes like, well, it tastes like beer. It has a low alcohol content, so is refreshing on a hot day, or out on a bike ride, tastes great with pizza.

Serving type: bottle

02-03-2014 02:39:44 | More by DrCDPriest
Photo of BeerLab45
BeerLab45

Virginia

2.75/5  rDev +51.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I give this a 3/5 for hitting it's mark.

Is it an awesome craft brew that will leave you wanting to wake up under an empty tap hose?
Uh, no.

But for those trying to manage obesity, have a light refreshing low alcohol beverage it
definitely has a place in the world. Considering that this is very light, very low Alcohol, only 2 weight watchers points..it's an outstanding beer for it's category.

Don't confuse yourself. I am NOT comparing to Zombie Dust, Green Flash, or craft beers.
I'm comparing to Coors Light, Bud 55, etc..

Serving type: can

02-01-2014 17:42:04 | More by BeerLab45
Photo of ValpoExpo
ValpoExpo

Ohio

2.43/5  rDev +34.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.5

Obviously this beer is intended to be something to down on a hot summer day or for someone who is perhaps trying to cut down their drinking without switching to NA beer. Miller 64 is what it is - It possesses good carbonation, a fine straw color when poured and holds it own against the other macro brands.

Serving type: bottle

12-12-2013 21:29:50 | More by ValpoExpo
Photo of Uniobrew31
Uniobrew31

Pennsylvania

1.5/5  rDev -17.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

Beer flavored water. Not bad, just not worth writing home about. If there is no flavor then it can't be bad. I keep this around for my light beer visitors and decided to crack a few. Haven't had aal light in a long time, now I remember why. Also it provides no buzz after five cans. 2.8 abv "lager" ??? At least it's union made which is the only sociallly redeaming thing this about this fizzy yellow water sort of kind of beer like beverage.

Serving type: can

08-27-2013 01:25:05 | More by Uniobrew31
Photo of Libationguy
Libationguy

Nevada

1.55/5  rDev -14.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 1.25 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Brilliant light straw color. Thin, bright white foamy head with short retention.

Cereal, corn, saltine crackers, powdered milk.

Literally no flavor. None. Had two other people taste just to make sure I was not being biased.

Light bodied and watery. Moderate carbonation. Thin, clean and crisp with no finish.

It's technically well made, there is just nothing to work with. It's like the beer version of the fat-free muffin. You're just taking away the whole point by insisting on a product with next to no calories.

Serving type: bottle

07-20-2013 04:41:39 | More by Libationguy
Photo of Hulk_Beer
Hulk_Beer

Texas

2.33/5  rDev +28.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

app- Head pours big, fizzes pathetically like all light AALs. Slightly darker than expected, but no lacing to speak of. Crystal clear with slightly champagne-like bubbling.

sml- Rice, dirty grain. But maybe a hint of lemony hop? Hulk would have investigated further but Hulk was sick of smelling it.

tst- Cooked corn and plain rice. Also malty sweetness but nothing special. One of those beers that taste foul.

mf- Club soda thin. That lemon Hulk smelled came back here and gives some kind of odd tang that isn't flavor. Slightly interesting.

Hulk doesn't mean to always hate on light lagers. Hulk really mean that. If you like Miller 64, please drink it. Hulk just doesn't want to drink it ever again. Hulk couldn't bear it again. Interesting notes of something lemony keep it from flat-out "poor" rating.

HULK

p.s. follow Hulk on Instagram @hulk_beer !!!!

Serving type: bottle

07-09-2013 04:56:44 | More by Hulk_Beer
Photo of harpo111
harpo111

Georgia

1.94/5  rDev +7.2%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.75

Someone gave me a couple of these "low calorie" beers...
A: pale yellow...head was ok..but lasted no time at all
S: a little corn...a wee bit of malt...not much else
T: a little corn...but overall weak..period
m: carbonated...watery
O: Ok if you just want something beer like to drink..but it just has no body, mouth feel and hardly any flavor at all..

would not buy...I would go to gym and get some exercise and drink something better

Serving type: bottle

06-30-2013 02:54:18 | More by harpo111
Photo of Hermanater
Hermanater

Pennsylvania

1.2/5  rDev -33.7%
look: 3 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

I wish you could give this less than 1. I understand that we are to keep in mind the style when rating but this tastes like the brewery workers drank some Miller Light, filtered it through their own kidneys, stored it in their bladders for a while, then...well you get the picture. Seriously, this is bad beer.

Serving type: bottle

05-19-2013 23:28:39 | More by Hermanater
Photo of Darkmagus82
Darkmagus82

Virginia

1.39/5  rDev -23.2%
look: 3.25 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 1 | feel: 1.25 | overall: 1.5

Poured from can into a pint glass

Appearance – Pours a medium straw colored brew with a two finger pure white head. The head has big carbonation bubblers that pop over about a two minute time period to actually leave a moderate level of lace on the sides of the glass.

Smell – The aroma is pretty much non-existent. I maybe pick up a tiny bit of a corny and grainy smell as was as a bit of paper, but overall it is very light.

Taste – Initially it tastes almost exactly like water. There is a tiny bit of a grainy taste up front. As the flavor advances it goes way down hill from there. A paper and metallic flavor mixed with a bit of bitterness comes to the tongue. The paper grows quite strong and mixes with an astringent and horribly papery taste to leave one quite unpleasant taste to linger on the tongue.

Mouthfeel – The body while quite thin, is not thin enough to hide all the very off flavors of the brew with a carbonation level that is actually more average. This brew should have been as light and highly carbonated as possible, so nothing would get a chance to be sensed by the tongue.

Overall – Well, it looked OK. Unless you just want to look at it, this beer is one to definitely avoid, as its taste was pretty atrocious.

Serving type: can

04-13-2013 01:35:48 | More by Darkmagus82
Photo of TMoney2591
TMoney2591

Illinois

2.28/5  rDev +26%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Served in a Lagunitas mason jar.

Well, swimsuit season's coming up, so we've gotta watch those calories, eh, guys? Anyway, this stuff pours a clear pale straw topped by a finger of white froth. The nose comprises sweet corn, light funky wheat, and a touch of hard water. The taste brings in more of the same, with more hardness to the water and a slightly sharper funkiness from the now-grassier wheat. The body is rather light, with a light moderate carbonation and a watery feel. Overall, a pretty limp, sad beer, one that certainly isn't much of a poster child for the "fewer calories but all the flavor" camp. Give me the calories...

Serving type: bottle

04-03-2013 17:21:40 | More by TMoney2591
Photo of Suds
Suds

Pennsylvania

1.33/5  rDev -26.5%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.25 | taste: 1 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Okay, this is a light beer, and I suppose that I should review it in that light. However, it is also nearly tasteless. It is watery, pale yellow in color...moderately carbonated, and nearly completely devoid of any smell or flavor. Some spritzy carbonic bite, but nothing that tastes like beer. Not worth drinking if you want to taste your beverage.

Serving type: can

03-17-2013 19:42:45 | More by Suds
Photo of orcsinspace
orcsinspace

Virginia

1/5  rDev -44.8%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

This is the worst beer I have ever had. Miller took their concocted piss water and added even more water to it. Stale flavor and smell, mouthfeel of lukewarm water, and a miserable sickly pale color. The only reason I could imagine drinking this is because of the low calories, but if that is the issue, eat a salad once in a while. Weighing in at 2.8 ABV, you'd have to bong a case of these things just to get a slight buzz, which would offset the low calories. As will everything under the Miller label, this is just downright awful. I actually heard there was a scene in the movie Zero Dark Thirty when they interrogated a guy by making him drink one of these. After one sip, he begged to be water boarded. This beer is pure torture.

Serving type: bottle

03-07-2013 20:29:44 | More by orcsinspace
Photo of silverking
silverking

Florida

1.8/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 2.25 | smell: 1 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

A- Very pale straw with a white head. head retention is good, but the lacing is spotty.

S- Very faint. Maybe some grains?

T- Seltzer with some faint grainy tastes. No detectable hops.

M- Ultra light, crisp, and refreshing. Nice for the pool or the beach.

O- Not good. It scored some refreshment points, But It's lack of taste or flavor can't be overlooked.

Serving type: bottle

01-24-2013 18:59:50 | More by silverking
Photo of tectactoe
tectactoe

Michigan

1.64/5  rDev -9.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 1.5

What to say about this? Pale straw, clean as a whistle, not much of a head at all, just some puffy white foam that settles in a matter of seconds. There isn't much of an aroma at all, some corn and grains with a weird metallic smell in the background. Taste isn't much different - actually, there isn't much of a taste at all. Some light grain, minimal hop flavor. The thing you taste the most is the water and the carbonation. And there is a LOT of carbonation. Body is as thin as tap water.

Yeah, needless to say, I won't be having this one again. It's just so flavorless and empty. If you're going to drink a beer, then drink a beer. With this stuff, what's the point?

Serving type: bottle

01-07-2013 01:00:21 | More by tectactoe
Photo of Fatehunter
Fatehunter

Oregon

1.8/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Finger of head, big bubbles. Clear, golden colored body. A fair number of bubbles coming up. Decent looking.
Smell is metallic and grainy. There's a subtle unpleasant smell that I cannot place.
Amazingly tasteless. The mildest bitter in the middle with the faintest sweetness at the end.
Crisp body with moderate carbonation.
I'm actually impressed by the almost total lack of flavor.

Serving type: bottle

11-21-2012 21:36:46 | More by Fatehunter
Photo of tobelerone
tobelerone

Connecticut

2.2/5  rDev +21.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 2

Shared with a dieting friend; pours pale yellow, fairly sizeable head with decent retention, some lacing sticking to the glass; doesn’t look half bad.

Very, very mild aroma. All I get is a little grain and maybe some honey sweetness, but that’s about it. Straining and there’s nothing there. This experience continues into the taste; hints of grain and perhaps corn; a trace of sweet honey, but overall fairly dry. Very low bitterness.

Effervescent carbonation, moderately light in body; extremely watery overall. I won’t say this is the worst light beer I’ve had, because it wasn’t. It wasn’t unpleasant, it just wasn’t there at all, really, and I had a hard time seeing the point of drinking something like this. The ABV is so low it won’t have an intoxicating effect, if that’s what’s desired, and by the time it does you’d have drunk enough of these that you could have had a better beer. Certainly not my thing; I’d rather not drink anything and save the calories altogether.

Serving type: bottle

09-27-2012 02:40:09 | More by tobelerone
Photo of 1234Jack
1234Jack


3.5/5  rDev +93.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Not a bad looking bottle. Decent label, I like clear glass. Clean, light golden color.

Out of the bottle smell: Very light beer smell.

Out of the bottle taste: Light but not bad. Flavor doesn't last long, which is to be expected.

Out of the bottle feel: Carbonation.

In glass look: Very light yellow. More of a sustained head than I thought there would be, which was none. Not like this is a comparable head to other beers, but in this category I think it lasted a few seconds longer than others.

In glass taste: Not much.

In glass feel: Watery, carbonation.

This is beer in my opinion tastes better out of their bottle.

Compared to other beers in this category, I think it's decent. There's no point in comparing this to a craft IPA, for instance, that's not the goal of the beer. When compared to other major "diet" beers, I have to say this ranks high because it achieves a goal of not offending me. Other diet beer, or non-diet beers even such as Budweiser Platinum and Rolling Rock offend me and they're not even trying to go lo-cal. There is no reason to drink those beers. This on the other hand serves a purpose and doesn't give me a sour face, so I'm rating this with that in mind.

Serving type: bottle

08-24-2012 06:15:11 | More by 1234Jack
Photo of rfgetz
rfgetz

New Jersey

2.08/5  rDev +14.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.5

Pale, fizzy straw yellow in look. Scent is pale, watery with only a faint whiff of stale light beer. Taste is again very light, somewhat undiscernable from a regular light beer once youve had 1 or 2, stale tasting, light corn. Thin and watery. Compared to Bud 55, this atleast tastes like light beer, and still, thats not a great thing.

Serving type: can

07-16-2012 16:54:39 | More by rfgetz
Photo of TheRougeBastard
TheRougeBastard

North Carolina

1.28/5  rDev -29.3%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

I actually have a hard time thinking of this beverage as "beer"! Typical "Light" beer look and scent. Very little taste to speak of...beer-flavored water??? One possible use would be as a spacer for a night a tasting higher ABV selections!

Serving type: bottle

07-02-2012 05:09:37 | More by TheRougeBastard
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Miller 64 from Miller Brewing Co.
46 out of 100 based on 560 ratings.