Miller High Life - Miller Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Miller High LifeMiller High Life

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
63
poor

3,362 Ratings
THE BROS
80
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 3,362
Reviews: 1,140
rAvg: 2.68
pDev: 28.73%
Wants: 27
Gots: 532 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Miller Brewing Co. visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.60% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 09-20-2000

No notes at this time.
View: Beers (32) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Miller High Life Alström Bros
Ratings: 3,362 | Reviews: 1,140
Photo of tesguino
4.22/5  rDev +57.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Miller had an example of good beer, miller high life in a 40oz bottle, a lager made without rice, malt, hops, corn starch, and flavorful water, its blonde color is because to its clear and dry malt; good with mexican cheese and american food, try with mexican antojitos too, serve in a glass mug previously cooled, with lime too; 92% recommended.

Photo of futaboots
3.17/5  rDev +18.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A few years ago a friend of a friend moved into my apartment to take the extra room, split the rent, etc... I did not know this person, and when bottles of High Life started to show up in the fridge I remember thinking "The Champagne of Beers? Are you kidding me? I don't like the look of this" I wasn't even beer enlightened at the time, but still I did not like this beer on sight.

Well of course I drank some. And drank some more. And more...

You know, it's really not that bad.

I'll break it down. Color is unimpressive, too pale. The head is just fizzy and weak. Nothing new in the world of cheap American lager so far. Smell is slightly sour, with the barest hint of malt grape lollipop, and hops. Taste is slightly sour and sharply bitter at first, malt in the backround from start to finish, corn?, wouldn't surprise me. A slightly detectable hop flavor as well. Heavily carbonated, which I didn't take points away for, because I really don't mind lots of fizz.

A simple cheap beer.

Photo of chewyboy
2.27/5  rDev -15.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

this stuff taste decent. A little sweet, however there's a sort of unpleasant background taste. The color is typical of any american macro, and so are the head stats. Sitting here writing this reveiw the morning after I only got a little bit hammered of this (*came home drank 2 bottles of water), my head throbs and beats with pain. I don't want to drink this again

Photo of silver1audi
3.2/5  rDev +19.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

High Life has been my choice of budget beer (5.49 12 pk) since my freshman year of college. It's not much to look at, don't bother pouring it into a glass, but it is much better than it's competition. Other beers in it's price range would be Pabst, Beast, Keystone, etc... and this is far more enjoyable than any of those. Depending on my mood, I might actually reach for a High Life in the presence of far superior beers just because it's easy to drink.

Bottom line is, although theres no great unique taste, there's also no bad taste. It's just a cheap, easy to drink beer. I would drink this over a Bud anyday

Photo of LordChesterfield
2.7/5  rDev +0.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This beer smells and looks of corn. This is not necassarily a bad thing as it is typical of American macro lager. Relative to its brothers Miller highlife is quite good actually. It has a straw yellow color and an easy swallow at a low price. That's about all you can reasonably expect from it and in my opinion it does this better that budweiser. The bottles are clear, so they offer little protection from light. I also noticed that it doesn't really leave you with much of a hangover, but I sobered up almost completely before I went to bed.

Photo of battlekow
3.58/5  rDev +33.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

I'm drinking this out of an oversized wine glass, as befits the Champagne of Beers. High Life pours a very pale gold color, good head, good lacing. Doesn't really smell like much, but tastes remarkably good for "swill," sweetly malty with a nice biscuity finish. Mouthfeel is overly fizzy--the "champagne," I suppose--but still, High Life's not so bad. Easily my beer of choice for its class, and better than stuff like New Glarus's Totally Naked.

I'll hopefully pick up a bottle of High Life soon for comparison, as I remember it being superior to the canned version.

Photo of DaPeculierDane
3.23/5  rDev +20.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

I admit that I've got a thing for "Grandpa's Beers." Special X, High Life, Papst, and Old Style all do it for me.

This is one that I always keep around in the fridge. At $9 for a case of bottles, High Life makes the perfect “just in case” beer. It’s like a safety net. I like having it near by, knowing that if my obnoxious cousin comes over I won’t have to offer him a Bell’s or something because trusty Miller is there for the non-beer drinker’s beer drinker. Oh, and this beer is called Miller, just plain Miller, not High Life.

Let’s start with the look. The beer itself is nothing special. It looks like liquid sweet corn. The head is thin, white, and not lasting. Overall, the appearance is what you would expect from just about any macro.

The bottle, however, is a different story all together. It features the famous Miller Girl Over the Moon label, which was created long ago by famed industrial designer Brooks Stevens. Stevens is kind of like the Frank Lloyd Wright of industrial design and is probably most known for the invention of the Oscar Meyer Wiener Mobile.

Anyways, the fact that the bottle has a small but kick ass print that was designed by an awesome Wisconsinite gives it a little appearance bonus in my book.

As to the taste, it’s corn syrup. Nothing more, nothing less.

The mouth feel’s not bad, thin, mildly carbonated, refreshing.

What I really like is this beer’s drinkability. It goes down so easy but doesn’t go through me like lite does. I can throw back a bunch of these and I don’t feel full but I do feel like I’m drinking beer, not water.

This is a solid beer and better than bud by leaps and bounds.

Photo of Frozensoul327
3.43/5  rDev +28%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

This is not a bad beer, but due to some who must bash macros, it gets a bad rap. Poured out to a solid golden yellow color with a decent head that came down to about 1/8th of an inch. Odors of corn and malt were present. Taste was consistant with aroma. Very strong flavors of corn and malt, along with a syrupy sweetness that gives this brew a nice appeal. Smooth and creamy mouthfeel, almost like liquid silk. Very nice. When you take the price into the equation, this brew is a no brainer. The best of any AB, Miller or Coors product. Good session beer. Recommended.

Photo of Bang34
2.81/5  rDev +4.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4.5

This is an old standby. Craft beer lovers whould stay away from it but on a college student's budget, sometimes the $6 12er is all that one can get.

pours a straw colored yellow with a good head if poured aggrerssively. the head doesn't stick around too long.

Aroma is of malt and yeast, not very complex at all, though what do you expect.

Not much to the taste for those used to IPA's like I am very smooth, almost no hops a little yeast on the finish.

Very drinkable, a good beer on a hot day but just for refreshment, not for taste. Not very filling, easy to run through them.

The Champagne of beers is just a cheap macro afterall.

Photo of alankwak
3.16/5  rDev +17.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours pale as it should. Nice head retention for a macro and a bit a lacing as well. Definite adjunct(corn sugar) taste but not too strong. Low bitterness and no aroma so hops are a bit lacking. Still for the price, not a bad "cheap" beer that goes down easily. I wish they'd add some saaz aroma hops..would make a big difference. Beats Bud if you ask me. No rice here.

Photo of kmpitz2
3/5  rDev +11.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

An aggressive pour releases 3 fingers of head over top of a clear light straw color. As far as things go, the head has a moderate retention and leaves nice lacing as it recedes. The nose is light, corn-sweet with a lack of hop character. Flavor is very clean, with a moderate corn sweetness, light graineyness and a lack of hop. Not bad at all. The feel is light to light moderate wtih a moderate carbonation. Overall, I've always found this to be a nice and refreshing beer. Not something I get often, but when I need something in this genre, this is where I turn.

Photo of merlin48
3.12/5  rDev +16.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a clear golden yellow body with a one inch white head that has decent retention and leaves a moderate amount of patch lace on the glass. Aroma is negligible, with hints of spicy hop and a suggestion of pale malt. Mouthfeel is light bodied and the carbonation is moderately high. Taste has some grainy malt sweetness that is balanced well with some vaguely spicy tasting hops. Minimal adjunct presence. A good tasting American lager, overall.
A very pleasant surprise here. An American Macro Lager that tastes decent and lacks the offnotes or total lack of redeeming qualities I've found in the other macros. Definitely, the class of the American Macro Lagers that I've tried.

Photo of ryantupy
2.15/5  rDev -19.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Wow! This beer pours a nice clear golden hue with almost perfect clarity. To bad the rest of the beer wasent as nice as its looks. I found the smell to be almost unexistent. The taste was not impressive and it was not smooth at all I could barely finish it. I remember drinking and hating it when I was 16 and my mind had not changed since on this beer.

Photo of DrunkMcDermott
1.26/5  rDev -53%
look: 2 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

Skunked? Gosh, it’s not supposed to be, with its isomerized hops and all. Tried it from the bottle, tried it in a glass, both gave me a big mouthfeel of some plastic dissolved in it. Gotta say it loudly: THIS IS NOT BEER! It’s the Champale, not the Champagne, of beers.

Photo of unkiedave
2.8/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

From a 24 oz. tallboy, average smell, color a very pale yellow with a decent head falling to lacing. Taste and mouthfeel are pleasing, tastes and finishes very clean, with no bitter aftertaste to note. Somewhat of a detectable sweet finish to the palate. A little over carbonated, as there are a lot of bubbles in each swallow.

I would gladly take a Miller High Life any day of the many offerings of the "big 3." Not the greatest beer you'll ever drink, but considering that it is one of the cheaper beers out there, the taste is definately worth the price. This one is probably my favorite "cheap beer."

Photo of WesWes
3.05/5  rDev +13.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

The beer pours a pale gold color with a thick frothy white head that fades to lacing. The aroma is average. It has a light pale malt and adjunct scent that is a bit dry and musty. It has a light hop aroma. The taste is average as well. It has a dry and grainy pale malt and adjunct flavor that goes down easy and finishes slightly sweet and musty. The mouthfeel is fine. It is a low bodied beer with good carbonation. This is a decent adjunct lager. I never really gave it much of a chance before and I'm sure I won't be giving it much of a chance in the future.

Photo of MarkBlackout
3.25/5  rDev +21.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4.5

High Life is a weird brew.. at times it tastes excelent, other times it holds a funky, husky, musty edge that I don't really enjoy. Still, for a cornfed Indiana boy like myself, it doesn't hurt a bit to quaff a bottle or six of this on hot summer day. I admit that the packaging appeals to me and might even influence my purchase - not its old-timey appeal, but rather just the shape of the bottles. But I digress. High Life is far from groundbreaking, but I've relied on it many times in lieu of ordering an MGD, BUD, or PBR even. (don't like it in the bottle.)

Photo of AussieInPhilly
1.64/5  rDev -38.8%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

What kind of a beer drinker would be alured by the concept of his brew tasting like champagne? In short this terrible drink made me feel as if I was a kid who had snuck into his Dad's tool shed and slammed down a bottle of chemicals. If you aren't ashamed to walk out of a store with this one, then perhaps you should walk out with a case of "Natural Light" instead? 1,000,000 college kids can't be wrong! Take it easy boys and girls!

Photo of BEERchitect
2.63/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Probably the better lager of any of the 'Big Three'. In comparison to most of them, High Life is a little bolder golden and has better head retention. Better viscocity to the palate. Creamier and more flavorful. Flavors though, are of high corn sugar and decent malt. Still no hop play at all. Finishes as crisp, but with that corn-like aftertaste. Although its better than most of it's counter parts, its a far cry from the good Chezc Pils. Also makes a great free beer.

Photo of ski271
2.8/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance: From a 40. Clear medium yellow with a very large, white, frothy, fully diminishing head. Some pretty good lacing for the style.

Smell: Mostly corn (which is to be expected from an American macro, but it’s kind of good as far as they go), along with grain, light doughy yeast, and hint of grass.

Taste: Hmm. I was about to start saying nice things here, but by the time I finished the first glass, I didn’t find it quite as palatable. Corn again, very sweet, and kind of a white grape juice taste in there too. I didn’t smell or taste any skunk through the first glass, but my beer burps are lightly skunky.

Mouthfeel: Thin body, watery texture, lively carbonation.

Drinkability: “The Champagne of Beers”? That slogan is about as corny as the beer, so I guess it fits. But hey, as far as corny brews go, this is one of your better... or at least they don’t try to hide the corny adjuncts. Initially, I thought I found another favorite warm-weather-camping/lawn-mowing beer, but no. Equal or better quality to the more expensive well-known AB, Miller, Coors brews, so taking price into account, I’d take this over them, but there are better cheapos out there. I wasn’t disappointed by this beer, but not really impressed either.

Photo of RBorsato
4.13/5  rDev +54.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Straw color with a full white head and very active carbonation. Balanced grain, fruity, corn aroma and flavor. Light-medium bodied, refreshing and smooth without a lot of cooked-corn character.

I prefer the bottled version over the cans ... seemed to have much better carbonation and liveliness. Very nice American macro -- one of the best actually and one of my favorites.

Per MIller website: 4.7% ABV, 143 cal., & 13.1g Carb

'08155' lasered on bottle
Tasted: 05/25/05

Photo of nota
2.82/5  rDev +5.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Mountain Dew yellow in color. Surprisingly long lasting white head. Not much to smell. For taste, nothing really offensive to speak of, just very light cheerios grain taste and a pinch of hops at finish.. A good amout of carbonation. Overall nothing bad, nothing really good.

Photo of MetroOhio
3.58/5  rDev +33.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

I decided that I'd try to find a cheapie macro that I hadn't yet tried. I've had the PBRs, the Stroh's, and all. To be honest though, High Life, despite its association with bums or what have you, is a really good macro adjunct, and there's not a lot to hate on this beer about if you're reviewing it for what it is.

Serving was a 12 oz Clear glass bottle. Color was a mellow gold, slightly darker than say, Budweiser. Poured with a surprisingly thick head, and retained well till about halfway down the glass. Nose was really soft, with just a hint of grain and cereal sweetness.

Taste:Up front is a load of semi-sweet slickness commonly associated with the macros. Very fizzy, and smooth, and has a hint of fruit as it finishes, most notably apple and grape, but the grape is much slighter than I thought it would be.

Notes-You know, some people may want to just rip this apart needlessly, but it is a solid macro that can hit the spot on a hot summer day, and it's always great for an impromptu party beer. Cheap, readily available anywhere you go, and will always satisfy nearly everyone. For the macro lager that it is, few beers from the Big Three can beat the Champagne of Beers.

Photo of TPSReports
3.73/5  rDev +39.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Fresh from the tap in Milwaukee. Quite a different experience than I am used to from the bottle at home. This beer was ordered by the pitcher and poured into cheap bar glasses -- accompanied with wings.

Clear, golden color. Slight head. Great mouth-feel. None of the metallic aftertaste that hinders the bottle experience.

Will order again, in quantity, when in Wisconsin.

Photo of Maestro
3.16/5  rDev +17.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Serving: 12 oz. longneck clear glass bottle. I poured 1.5 bottles into an imperial pint glass.

Appearance: Bigtime frothy head that disappears before you can blink. There is a foam that clings to the glass,,,I wouldn't call it a lacing.

Smell: Corn and grass.

Taste: This golden brew is exceptionally sweet, but seems to go down ever so smoothly. The taste is not bad at all, considering the circumstances. There are definitely some off flavors as the beer warms.

Mouthfeel: The body is solid but there is a sticky sweetness that detracts a little from the quality.

Drinkability: This is a great session beer for the warm weather. I am slightly impressed, to tell you the truth.

Miller High Life from Miller Brewing Co.
63 out of 100 based on 3,362 ratings.