1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Shangrila - Birrificio Troll

Not Rated.
ShangrilaShangrila

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

35 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 35
Reviews: 28
rAvg: 3.48
pDev: 16.09%
Wants: 2
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Birrificio Troll visit their website
Italy

Style | ABV
Belgian Strong Dark Ale |  8.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: wl0307 on 10-02-2006)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 35 | Reviews: 28 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Chugs13
2.75/5  rDev -21%

Chugs13, Nov 24, 2013
Photo of matjack85
2.5/5  rDev -28.2%

matjack85, Aug 15, 2013
Photo of beernads
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

beernads, Apr 10, 2013
Photo of laituegonflable
1.95/5  rDev -44%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours a reddish amber hue, clear body with white head, nothing particularly special. Looks fluid, and very pale for the style. Not great.

Smells very phenolic, with a herbal hop aroma but an overwhelming whiff of booze as well. Slight diacetyl-ish character coming through midway, maybe just a touch too much sweetness there. Bit metallic on the back. I'm afraid it's actually unpleasant.

Malty sweet all over the palate, with some slight fruity notes upfront, raisiny sweetness. From the midpoint on it's all big booze notes though, which also dries up the potentially pleasant opening notes. Just too big. Needs so much more body here to combat the strength in the flavour. Basically all the flavour and complexity of flavour is swallowed up and sapped out by the booze.

No real texture at all either. A shame.

laituegonflable, Jan 31, 2013
Photo of ADZA
3.2/5  rDev -8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Got my growler filled with this at Cellarbrations and pours a very dark non see through amber hue which leaves a two finger wispy head and a rim of lacing,the smell is caramel,banannas,raisins and boozy alcohol i dont smell much of the curry or spice,the mouthfeel is medium bodied and once again abit of a let down as not full bodied as had hoped and on taste i get strong sweet toffee malts along with caramel,warming alcohol,raisins,sweet apricots and finished with the sweet candied malts once again and overall after the reading the spiel on what this brew had added to it i was quite interested but i dont really get the strong spice or curry as promised and unfortunately i would not revisit this cheers.

ADZA, Sep 17, 2012
Photo of CrazyDavros
3.63/5  rDev +4.3%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Pours dark amber with a small, fading head.
Noes shows sweet caramel, over-ripe bananas, faint unidentifiable spices, may some garlic.
Some sweet malt transfers through as a flavour, whilst the spices remain in the background, although they are a little more pronounced than in the aroma. some alcohol shows through, along with a metallic note.
Carbonation is a bit excessive.

CrazyDavros, Aug 27, 2012
Photo of t0rin0
3/5  rDev -13.8%

t0rin0, Aug 23, 2012
Photo of lacqueredmouse
2.98/5  rDev -14.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

On-tap at the Local Taphouse for their Italian SpecTapular.

Pours a pale amber hue, quite clear with a very light and rather insipid body. Head forms a thin ring of off-white. No lace. Overall, it looks pretty damn disappointing.

Nose is similarly disappointing. Instead of the heady array of Himalayan spices I was promised, we get weakly fermented apple cider with a touch of cinnamon as almost a throw-away afterthought. Very light on, as well, giving very little up at all.

Spicy characters on the front of the palate at least, again focussing mainly on a slightly sweet cinnamon character, that builds to a pasty cinnamon-sugar dosage on the finish. Some phenols come in mid palate to do something I don't know what. There's not a lot here for them to meld with or clash against.

Feel is light, but with a tingle from the spice.

Overall, no, it's not a bad beer, per se, but it sure is pretty dull given when it promises.

lacqueredmouse, Aug 13, 2012
Photo of zaphodchak
3.65/5  rDev +4.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Light, kinda straw brown body, cloudy, lightish tan head, thin.

Nose is a bit odd. Kinda metal tang.

Taste has coriander, and some spice; anise is there I guess, the rest (I had to read the bottle) are hard to pin down as well. Overall impression is Belgian golden ale. Faintly bitter.

Mouthfeel is light with faint carbonation.

Interesting, but the spices aren't present enough to be compelling.

zaphodchak, Apr 08, 2012
Photo of imperialking
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

imperialking, Jan 09, 2012
Photo of jophish17
3/5  rDev -13.8%

jophish17, Dec 24, 2011
Photo of akorsak
4.08/5  rDev +17.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A pin at Farmers' Cabinet. Shangrila aged in sherry barrels that held JW Lees Harvest Ale.

A: The ale pours with a thick and pulpy look, ample sediment hazing over the ale and giving it a reddish-brown color. No head.

S: Vanilla, sherry strength and wood. Mild sourness follows. The base Shangrila beer has a very unique spice profile that, unfortunately, doesn't come through very well. Instead, it is swallowed up by the sherry barrel notes.

T: On the initial serve, the vanilla and wood are strong, fortified by the sherry. A very mild sourness follows but hardly enough to look at the ale as a sour. Instead, the wood dominates. As in the nose, the underlying ale tends to disappear, lost behind the sweet sherry notes. Easily the most complex of the offerings, not to mention a very rare find.

M: The mouthfeel picks up thick barleywine, sweet vanilla and fortified sherry. The complexity is admirable, a true sipping beer.

akorsak, Dec 18, 2011
Photo of JAHMUR
4/5  rDev +14.9%

JAHMUR, Nov 15, 2011
Photo of clayrock81
3.68/5  rDev +5.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a lighter body than expected for a dark ale and has a two-finger head that dies slow. Really hoppy and bitter aroma with a load of spices; corriander, pepper, clove...not too great w/ spices but there are some in this beer. A light-to-medium body that can even be described as slightly creamy. Tastes seem to vary from tart and citric fruits with some dryness from yeast and bread malt as well as some sweetness from caramel and hint of tropical fruit and/or grape and cherry. Beer is OK balanced but it seems to get caught up on the malts and the fruit flavors are a little bit bland and then the ABV kinda bleeds into the finish. An OK beer but just slightly misses the mark.

clayrock81, Nov 30, 2010
Photo of SFLpunk
3.55/5  rDev +2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Quick notes from Tigris Beverage/g.housen Tasting earlier today. Bottle looks different than picture with a crimson red label with Sharngila in script diagonally across it.

Hazy tawny with off-white head. Nose is of tired caramel (some oxidation?) and Christmas baking spices. Reminds me of a (good) fruitcake. or spice cookie. Palate is wide and sweet like apple cider - nice spices but nothing is overpowering nor taking the limelight. Curry comes out in a subtle way. Tastes like Christmas cookies in an amber ale.

SFLpunk, Oct 06, 2010
Photo of cpanossian
3.85/5  rDev +10.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

I was expecting a sour beer after my first smell - reminded me of Flanders sours. But first tastes were a big surprise - not sour at all. Rich savory ale, with hints of apricot and curry, like Southern Comfort with carbonation and some head. After mellowing in my glass for a short while, further smells reminded me of a nice sherry from souther Spain. This is a fine sipping ale to go along with a meal or nice cheeses.

cpanossian, Oct 03, 2010
Photo of womencantsail
3.2/5  rDev -8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

For some reason, Bobby bought this at the Pizza Port Carlsbad bottle shop and I ridiculed him relentlessly for how awful this beer was going to be. Of course, I was forced to endure a nice healthy pour. Thanks...

A: The pour is a dark orange-amber color with a short lived off-white head.

S: A strange nose on this beer. Quite sweet with notes of corn, salt, and spices. A bit of anise and candi sugar, too.

T: The flavor is quite odd. It is highly sweet, but there is a different sort of spice flavor in there that I can't quite describe, likely from the curry spices.

M: The body is medium with a moderate carbonation, but it's not quite enough to make up for the syrupy nature of the beer.

D: I'll admit, this was not horrible at all, but it was far too sweet. And the (seemingly) curry flavor was a bit too much for me.

womencantsail, Sep 04, 2010
Photo of Georgiabeer
3.93/5  rDev +12.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

On-tap at the Brick Store Pub. Pours amber with very little head but good clarity. Smells of apricot, mango, and spice. The taste is similar, with tropical fruit, especially mango and passion fruit, and some more spice. A bit overcarbonated, but overall a pleasant enough quaff. I wouldn't pay what they charge for a bottle, but finding it on tap was nice.

Georgiabeer, Jul 02, 2010
Photo of stcules
3.38/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Deep amber, ruby edges. A beige foam, beautiful. Good appearance.
In the smell a lot of spices, and a bit of alcohol.
In the taste malt, tending to caramel, and a bit too much alcohol again. Again spices, yes, but more subdued.
Having had this beer in other occasion, we can remember a more smoothness in the mouth, less alcohol, and a lot of good spiciness, very pleasant and characterized.
.

stcules, Dec 22, 2009
Photo of malmquna
4.08/5  rDev +17.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Went to Torino to find this at Eataly, an amazing grocery store with a small restaurant in every section (steaks at the butcher, fish where appropriate, tasty bar food in the beer and wine section).

Beautiful copper to chestnut color, ever so slightly cloudy. Solid off-white head that lingers as a thin cover over the beer and along the glass.

Smells of bourbon or cognac, some banana esters, sweet like candi sugar. The flavor agrees, and immediately meets you with some sweetness, those banana esters again, all over an amber malt base. The flavor may tend a little too much toward estery and boozy.

This beer is quite effervescent, and that leads to a good mouthfeel with the combination of malt, sweet, and bubbles. Quite drinkable, but likely better with food.

malmquna, Nov 26, 2009
Photo of BARFLYB
3.38/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Split this one with birradr14, thanks for the shot. Pourd into some wine glasses and then some.

A- Shangrila has a chestnut brown/tan look with some lighter shades when up to light. The head on this was enormous with a big soapy beige foam that left some nice streaks. It's a good looker.

S- Initially I was in love with the smell, but that faded after some time. The main smell is that of indian spices with some anise and dark candi sugar. Does not exactly smell like a Belgian dark, I would call this a spiced/herbed beer, perhaps a change is due.

T- On some sips, I really enjoyed this, but on others Shangrila just did not hit the marks. The main taste was that of a mixture of spices with a decent malty base. Some candi sugar rears it's head but not enough to be a dominate flavor, a bit more would of rounded this out a bit, as I found this more spicy than sweet. Some yeast plays a part in the finish. This bottle has probably been sitting on the shelves for a bit, so hops were not in the picture. This is an interesting beer to say the least.

M&D- The feel was lucious smooth with no hops bittering things up. The spices stuck around for a bit on the tounge. I would say this is medium bodied with a high amount of carbonation which probably helped things out a bit. The drinkability was not great, In no way would I dare to polish off a bomber of this on my own. Shangrila actually is a good beer to pair with food for a small gathering. Before looking at the ingredients used I said to myself this would go great with some indian food or some jumbalya, low and behold I saw that some curry spices among other similar ones were used.

Do yourself a favor and pair this with some mildly spicy food and it will make the experience that much better. While not my favorite beer from Italy, this is unique, and would have again in smaller portions.

BARFLYB, Sep 11, 2009
Photo of Suds
2.85/5  rDev -18.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

This is deep, dark amber beer. It has a nice head immediately after the pour, thick and dense, but it doesn't last and produces little lace. Lots of floaties in the brew as well. The aroma is interesting. Huge spice (a bit hot), alcohol, and buiscuity malts. The smell also has a curry, pepper, and ginger note in the spice...it's a lot like the smells in an Asian or Indian meal (maybe that's the point?). However, it seems a little misplaced in the beer, and the divergent aromas don't really meld well. The taste is sweet and spicy, with plenty of Belgian yeast character. Alcohol warmth is abundant. Full, although a bit rough, in mouthfeel. This one is not particularly drinkable, and although interesting, really didn't do much for me.

Suds, Apr 17, 2009
Photo of daftafne
3.8/5  rDev +9.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Found a bottle of this at a Whole Foods in Chicago (I was excited for the good find!)

Poured into a tulip it was an orange/red with a yeast suspended and two fingers of tan head. The smell was really quite powerful. Smells mostly of sweet dark fruits, spice. Taste is sweet but not cloying, finishes with spices. Yes, there is curry in it and it was a tad spicy but just barely. The blend of spices was such that it was difficult to pick them out individually (except for the anise). really well-balanced, especially considering the interesting ingredients. Unique flavor profile. Reminds me of theobroma (for the spice). Creamy mouthfeel, some alcohol warmth. Worth trying though it cost 15 dollars for a 750 ml bottle....

daftafne, Apr 07, 2009
Photo of glid02
3.75/5  rDev +7.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

Had on-tap at the Brick Store in Atlanta.

Pours a turbid red-orange color with a one-finger off-white head. The head recedes into a wispy layer on top leaving light lacing.

Smells of light malts with hints of Belgian candi sugar - there's not a whole lot going on here. If I really stick my nose in there I can get light hints of pears.

Tastes more robust than it smells. Sugar-coated pears meet green apples up front, with a very light amount of spices coming in right at the end. I wouldn't have guessed the ABV was 8.5%.

Mouthfeel is very nice. It's got a smooth thickness with solid carbonation.

Drinkability is good. This certainly wasn't hard to finish, but I don't know if I'd want another one.

Overall this was a tasty beer, but nothing to write home about. Worth a shot if for nothing else than the mish-mash of ingredients used.

glid02, Mar 14, 2009
Photo of dsa7783
3.63/5  rDev +4.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

On-tap at Gingerman...
Great, exotic, authentic stuff...
Pretty pricy in the stores, but on tap a lot cheaper...
Dark-brown hue, thick head and apparent lacing...
Smell: Rich malts, dark, candied sugars, raisins...
Taste: Dark, dehydrated fruits, slight mocha, raisins, purple grapes... Medicinal flavor...
Different...

dsa7783, Mar 08, 2009
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Shangrila from Birrificio Troll
80 out of 100 based on 35 ratings.