1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Flying Monkeys Super Collider Double IPA - Flying Monkeys Craft Brewery

Not Rated.
Flying Monkeys Super Collider Double IPAFlying Monkeys Super Collider Double IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
79
okay

55 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 55
Reviews: 35
rAvg: 3.43
pDev: 14.29%
Wants: 2
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Flying Monkeys Craft Brewery visit their website
Ontario, Canada

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  12.40% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Viggo on 08-17-2011)
View: Beers (70) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 55 | Reviews: 35 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of DaPan
DaPan

Ontario (Canada)

3.5/5  rDev +2%

02-13-2013 04:03:03 | More by DaPan
Photo of dork2caon
dork2caon


3/5  rDev -12.5%

12-24-2012 19:25:14 | More by dork2caon
Photo of cfalovo97
cfalovo97

Ontario (Canada)

2/5  rDev -41.7%

11-06-2012 17:25:00 | More by cfalovo97
Photo of Molson2000
Molson2000

Ontario (Canada)

3.75/5  rDev +9.3%

09-10-2012 23:59:29 | More by Molson2000
Photo of Rijtjeshuis
Rijtjeshuis

Ontario (Canada)

3.48/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

this was cellared for just under a year.

look ~ a bit darker that other D/IIPAs; it pours a reddish copper colour. clarity is very good. the head was average: it rose up about a finger or two and was off-white, fell fairly quickly to a film with no lacing.

smell ~ I get a lot more malt on the nose than I would have expected from the style. malt was fairly rich with mostly caramel and kettle-caramel flavours
. This is balanced by a hop aroma that seemed to be mostly piney. while I really like piney hops, there was a little less complexity here .

taste ~ the flavor was definitely strong and complex, but again leaned a little more to the caramel-malty than I would have expected. The prominent caramel flavour was a bit unwelcome and took too much balance. there is a bit of fruit with the aftertaste that brings out both piney and grapefruit. Bitterness was much higher than the flavour of hops. There is a long aftertaste, but it was a bit too harsh.

feel ~ good body and carbonation, but the stronger malt still sweetened up the ending more than I would have liked. There was a good helping of bitterness, but not as much hop flavor as I'd like into the ending.

Decent. It has a much richer malt character than I'd usually expect. Most of my problems came from it's deviance from the D/IIPA guidelines. Taste-wise, it worked. I'd really classify it as more barley wine territory, though.

(the one I had was 10.5% abv)

Serving type: bottle

05-13-2012 02:47:51 | More by Rijtjeshuis
Photo of batmanbach
batmanbach

Ontario (Canada)

3.5/5  rDev +2%

05-07-2012 17:19:57 | More by batmanbach
Photo of Wordslinger
Wordslinger

Ontario (Canada)

3.25/5  rDev -5.2%

05-05-2012 09:59:12 | More by Wordslinger
Photo of trippinbillyrmc
trippinbillyrmc

Ontario (Canada)

3.75/5  rDev +9.3%

04-08-2012 15:22:46 | More by trippinbillyrmc
Photo of Adge0058
Adge0058

Ontario (Canada)

4/5  rDev +16.6%

04-04-2012 19:14:42 | More by Adge0058
Photo of beerhunter13
beerhunter13

Ontario (Canada)

3.75/5  rDev +9.3%

03-15-2012 01:39:59 | More by beerhunter13
Photo of SULLYvin
SULLYvin


4/5  rDev +16.6%

03-06-2012 21:46:48 | More by SULLYvin
Photo of cannabanaceae
cannabanaceae

Washington

2.5/5  rDev -27.1%

02-03-2012 13:31:34 | More by cannabanaceae
Photo of sliverX
sliverX

S. Georgia & S. Sandwich Isls.

3.25/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Bottle thanks to korguy123
Clear nice copper nice white head decent lacing
Smell is very malty a bit of toffee slight Orange peel
Taste malty with a not so great hop astringency that feels like eating orange pith. May have left this too long in the cellar.
Mouthfeel is real nice, thick chewy with a nice carbonation
Overall I think this beer would have been much nice fresher bulbs is life.

Serving type: bottle

01-22-2012 02:24:30 | More by sliverX
Photo of Derek
Derek

British Columbia (Canada)

3.93/5  rDev +14.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Bottled Aug 16, 2011. 10.5% abv.

I actually quite like this brew, but I'd probably call it a barley wine.

Amber-copper with a light than head, very thin ring of retention leaves a little leg.

Aroma is very dank and pine, with some dark sponge toffee and citrus rind.

The bitterness is pretty assertive, but there's some toffee-like sweetness to back it up. With 5 months of age on it, it's definitely more of an American barley-wine. Nice resiny pine, marmalade, Curacao orange rind, biscuit, caramel and nut.

Light residual sweetness with plenty of hop acidity and a slightly drying alcohol finish

This is an awesome winter sipper. Personally I'd rather sit down with this than a Big Foot Barley wine. Unfortunately, as a DIPA, I think they may have missed the mark.

Serving type: bottle

01-15-2012 21:25:16 | More by Derek
Photo of eat
eat

Quebec (Canada)

3.18/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

The body is a dark amber, bordering on ruby. Lots of visible sediment. A decent cover of cream white head fades to a thin mist, leaving no lacing.

Lots of sweet caramel malt on the nose. Juicy citrus and tropical fruit (pineapple, guava, grapefruit) with candy sugar. This could be a hoppy barley wine with all this malty sweetness.

IBUs are fairly high but most of the hop character has faded. There isn't a bottle date so it's hard to know how long this sat on the shelf. Malty but still with not enough sweetness to back up the biting bitterness. The bitterness seems to coat the tongue with a dusty chemical taste; not pleasant. Alcohol is decently hidden for 12.4%, possibly hiding among the chemical-like aftertaste. No real complexity, just earthy toasted malt with high IBUs and some warming alcohol.

Decent medium body with a slight viscosity and light carbonation.

I'd try this again if it was guaranteed to be fresh but wouldn't call it one to age or purchase when the bottling date is questionable. I can't say I enjoyed this much.

Serving type: bottle

01-14-2012 06:15:58 | More by eat
Photo of irishkyle21
irishkyle21

Ontario (Canada)

3.5/5  rDev +2%

01-13-2012 00:08:34 | More by irishkyle21
Photo of hopsolutely
hopsolutely

Ontario (Canada)

3.5/5  rDev +2%

01-08-2012 00:42:49 | More by hopsolutely
Photo of daryk77
daryk77

District of Columbia

4/5  rDev +16.6%

01-03-2012 21:45:22 | More by daryk77
Photo of Digimaika2
Digimaika2

Ontario (Canada)

3.55/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: Reddish amber colour with a respectable two-finger creamy head with a dirty beige hue. Decent retention as the blanket sticks around for a little while. Noticeable lacing.

S: Pine, candied fruit (fruitcake style), baked bread, molasses/caramel, grapefruit, and tropical qualities. Appealing but I find this a little subdued aroma wise with some digging required.

T: Earthy pine hops, which transitions to the malty bread-like qualities. A strange biting and slightly askew wave of grain follows this. Other qualities detected in the aroma are hard to pick up in the taste. Alcohol quite noticeable (albeit probably hard to hide at 12.4%). Decent overall taste but I feel that some flavours are missing, and that this could be balanced better.

M: Medium body with a moderate carbonation, which tastes about right for the style. Nice and oily with a slightly resiny texture.

D: Had high expectations for this given my excellent experiences with all other FMCB products, however, this unfortunately fell a bit short. Hopefully they can work out the kinks in this. Reminds me of a lesser functioning version of Vermonster.

Serving type: bottle

12-11-2011 02:40:12 | More by Digimaika2
Photo of joemcgrath27
joemcgrath27

Alberta (Canada)

3.33/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

big props to my BA in crime andrenaline for including this in his latest shipment
A - lightly hazy deep cedar brown, one finger of tan head retained at a thin covering
S - butterscotch, some herbal earthiness, along with a light boozy aroma, really not much on the nose
T - unique hop mix of perfume and oily resin, some caramel and woody hints, and hints of alcohol
M - medium body with low carbonation, maybe even a little flat, it has some bitterness but 100 IBU it is definitely not
O - definitely a unique dipa with that perfume and resin flavour mix, although it is nothing mind blowing it is always nice to try a pale that's on the fringes of the traditional style, worth a try

Serving type: bottle

12-10-2011 02:51:16 | More by joemcgrath27
Photo of oldp0rt
oldp0rt

Quebec (Canada)

3/5  rDev -12.5%

11-30-2011 03:14:46 | More by oldp0rt
Photo of bigox420
bigox420

Ontario (Canada)

4/5  rDev +16.6%

11-28-2011 05:25:40 | More by bigox420
Photo of biegaman
biegaman

Ontario (Canada)

3.25/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Super Collider is not exactly 'dark matter' nor does it have a head as expansive as the universe. In fact, it looks relatively flat, with a bit of toothpaste white trim that comes apart like stringed cheese. And despite a general murkiness, its brownish body cedes plenty of pecan-colored highlighting. A big contrast to the vibrant label.

To be brutally honest, my first sniff of Super Collider reminded me of some failed homebrewing experiments. The smell of wet, dead leaves and rank citrus is one that I recognize as hoppy, but not the most desirable brand of hoppy. The bouquet is a hot mess of sugary, not entirely fermented malts that smells a bit like cheap brandy with added hops.

For the time being, while the beer is cold and near full, I'm glad to have a front row seat on this train wreck. There's enough leafy Centennial hop bitterness and candied, acidic-sweet citrus to make it well worth drinking. I have a feeling, however, that that honeymoon will end once the alcohol starts to kick in. (Note: the beer ends up holding itself together alright, but it's just not that palatable. It tastes like something distilled from pine sol.)

Flavour specifics include some big honey and biscuit malt as well as some grassy, flowery hops. That description, however, does not indicate just how 'rough' and 'dirty' the beer drinks. Age will help nothing. This beer is like the towering, tattooed, long-bearded leader of a biker gang: rougher than a rose patch. Think Chino or San Quentin.

In the end, the urge to experiment proved more captivating than reason for this brewery. The people in Ontario wanted something bold with big cojones that could kick them in the butt - this is the beer that will leave them impressed… not favorably impressed mind you, but impressed. This failure with hops proves once and for all that it's not the tool that matters, but how you use it. This is a beer that some people might not drink on a bet.

Serving type: bottle

11-27-2011 16:53:51 | More by biegaman
Photo of jsnoek
jsnoek

Ontario (Canada)

4/5  rDev +16.6%

11-22-2011 04:56:05 | More by jsnoek
Photo of fostachild
fostachild

Ontario (Canada)

2.88/5  rDev -16%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

clear dark red/brown colour. inch of bubbly/foamy off-white head - nice lacing.

smell is nice - hoppy, citrusy, with a bit of fruit, and caramel.

taste is pretty bad - pretty much just bitter and alcoholic - couldn't taste all that much else.

couldn't finish the glass i poured let alone the bottle. pretty big let down from a brewery that i usually enjoy.

Serving type: bottle

11-22-2011 00:47:28 | More by fostachild
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Flying Monkeys Super Collider Double IPA from Flying Monkeys Craft Brewery
79 out of 100 based on 55 ratings.