1. Don't miss our 7th annual American Craft Beer Fest featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers this May 30 & 31 in Boston, MA! Buy your tickets now!
  2. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Flying Monkeys Super Collider Double IPA - Flying Monkeys Craft Brewery

Flying Monkeys Super Collider Double IPAFlying Monkeys Super Collider Double IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
79
okay

55 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 55
Reviews: 35
rAvg: 3.43
pDev: 14.29%


Brewed by:
Flying Monkeys Craft Brewery visit their website
Ontario, Canada

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  12.40% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Viggo on 08-17-2011)
View: Beers (67) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 55 | Reviews: 35 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of Sammy
Sammy

Ontario (Canada)

3.38/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Bottle from the brewery. Bomber with a great label. A thin ring of white head on light brown body. Hoppy aromas. A melange of hops, medicinal, with a tad of metallic in the finish. 120 IBU and I believe it. Unbalanced bitter, though the malting is an afterthought. Not well integrated. Drinkable, I suppose up to the style, but not the best example of it.Average mouthfeel.

Serving type: bottle

08-30-2011 13:08:16 | More by Sammy
Photo of Phyl21ca
Phyl21ca

Quebec (Canada)

3.95/5  rDev +15.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Bottle: Poured a deep copper color ale with a large foamy head with OK retention and light lacing. Aroma of citrus and piney hops with loads of resinous notes is quite powerful. Taste is also dominated by loads of citrus and floral notes with some solid notes of pines and resin. Malt backbone is quite solid with light caramelized notes. Body is quite full with good carbonation and no apparent alcohol. Well brewed and interesting though a bit stale and I think this would have been better had it been released sooner form the LCBO.

Serving type: bottle

11-14-2011 20:56:32 | More by Phyl21ca
Photo of biegaman
biegaman

Ontario (Canada)

3.25/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Super Collider is not exactly 'dark matter' nor does it have a head as expansive as the universe. In fact, it looks relatively flat, with a bit of toothpaste white trim that comes apart like stringed cheese. And despite a general murkiness, its brownish body cedes plenty of pecan-colored highlighting. A big contrast to the vibrant label.

To be brutally honest, my first sniff of Super Collider reminded me of some failed homebrewing experiments. The smell of wet, dead leaves and rank citrus is one that I recognize as hoppy, but not the most desirable brand of hoppy. The bouquet is a hot mess of sugary, not entirely fermented malts that smells a bit like cheap brandy with added hops.

For the time being, while the beer is cold and near full, I'm glad to have a front row seat on this train wreck. There's enough leafy Centennial hop bitterness and candied, acidic-sweet citrus to make it well worth drinking. I have a feeling, however, that that honeymoon will end once the alcohol starts to kick in. (Note: the beer ends up holding itself together alright, but it's just not that palatable. It tastes like something distilled from pine sol.)

Flavour specifics include some big honey and biscuit malt as well as some grassy, flowery hops. That description, however, does not indicate just how 'rough' and 'dirty' the beer drinks. Age will help nothing. This beer is like the towering, tattooed, long-bearded leader of a biker gang: rougher than a rose patch. Think Chino or San Quentin.

In the end, the urge to experiment proved more captivating than reason for this brewery. The people in Ontario wanted something bold with big cojones that could kick them in the butt - this is the beer that will leave them impressed… not favorably impressed mind you, but impressed. This failure with hops proves once and for all that it's not the tool that matters, but how you use it. This is a beer that some people might not drink on a bet.

Serving type: bottle

11-27-2011 16:53:51 | More by biegaman
Photo of Derek
Derek

British Columbia (Canada)

3.93/5  rDev +14.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Bottled Aug 16, 2011. 10.5% abv.

I actually quite like this brew, but I'd probably call it a barley wine.

Amber-copper with a light than head, very thin ring of retention leaves a little leg.

Aroma is very dank and pine, with some dark sponge toffee and citrus rind.

The bitterness is pretty assertive, but there's some toffee-like sweetness to back it up. With 5 months of age on it, it's definitely more of an American barley-wine. Nice resiny pine, marmalade, Curacao orange rind, biscuit, caramel and nut.

Light residual sweetness with plenty of hop acidity and a slightly drying alcohol finish

This is an awesome winter sipper. Personally I'd rather sit down with this than a Big Foot Barley wine. Unfortunately, as a DIPA, I think they may have missed the mark.

Serving type: bottle

01-15-2012 21:25:16 | More by Derek
Photo of spinrsx
spinrsx

Ontario (Canada)

3.58/5  rDev +4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

650ml Bottle

Appearance – Mostly clear copper colour with an average size fizzy beige coloured head. There is a low amount of carbonation visible and there is a fair amount of lacing. The head lasted for around 4 minutes before it was gone.

Smell - Malts, caramel, hops, booze

Taste & Mouth - The beer has an average amount of carbonation and I can taste malts, caramel, and some citrus notes. There isn't as much hop taste as I expected and I can really pick up on the booze. It ends with a malty sweet aftertaste with only a little bit of lingering hop bitterness.

Overall – As everyone else has said, I'm sure this would have been better fresh. It's basically a barley wine. For the 8.95 price tag I would have rather just had 4 bottles of their smashbomb IPA.

Serving type: bottle

10-27-2011 13:35:33 | More by spinrsx
Photo of TheSevenDuffs
TheSevenDuffs

Ontario (Canada)

3.18/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Finally got a hold of a much anticipated bottle of this beer. Poured in to Duvel tulip.

A - Medium to dark ruby colour with half a finger of cream coloured head. Looks like a barleywine.

S - Sweet caramel malts and a good hop bitterness up front; seemingly balanced. Some citrus, pine and toffee notes are evident as well.

T - A noticeable alcohol burn in in the initial sip that somewhat calms down after a while but remains noticeable throughout the glass. A good hop bitterness is evident but somewhat overpowered by the alcohol bite. A lot of malt sweetness too - caramel, toffee and sticky candy. A larger hop presence would be nice.

M - Medium body, light to moderate carbonation.

O - This was an interesting beer. I really wanted to love this one but was let down by it. The alcohol burn was just too overpowering and the hop presence wasn't what it needed to be. In fairness to FM on this one, the fact that the LCBO held this beer up in lab testing for 5-6 weeks, really hurt this one. That said, what this beer needs most is the alcohol bite to settle down, which will happen in the cellar but doing so will kill the hops even more. This recipe needs some tinkering. I couldn't even get through the bomber.

Serving type: bottle

10-23-2011 21:27:15 | More by TheSevenDuffs
Photo of tbeckett
tbeckett

Ontario (Canada)

2.98/5  rDev -13.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Bought a few of these and split one with friends earlier but settling down for a review solo. Bottled August 16.

A - Pours dark copper with a bit of haze and strong carbonation. One finger of light brown head. Head is creamy and fluffy. Some wall-ish lacing and a good retention of half a finger.

S - A good citrusy punch. A little boozy citrus and a caramelly malt note.

T - Boozy. Boozy pineappley citrus. Not all that much depth.

M - Full body, medium carbonation, a boozy and slightly bitter finish.

O/D - Too boozy. Obviously not that fresh, but still, the booze element could have been masked better. Not alot of balance or malt backbone, and the hop profile doesn't seem that strong. Too bad it took so damn long for this to get out, I feel like it would be better fresh.

Serving type: bottle

10-27-2011 00:02:38 | More by tbeckett
Photo of liamt07
liamt07

Ontario (Canada)

3.15/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottle provided by Steve, straight from a brewery. Bottled August 16, 2011 and consumed August 29, 2011. Thanks Steve!

Poured a dark reddish brown, with a mild offwhite head and some light lacing. Nose has some rich sweet malts, light grapefruit notes and some some general citrus character. Malt overpowers this. Taste has a bunch of alcohol, floor cleaner, metal and rich malt character. Weird combination of flavours, and almost cloyingly sweet without a ton hop character. Heavy, sticky and sweet mouthfeel that doesn't exactly work. Sampling this was enough, and I'll hold my money back from this one. Too malty and not enough hop flavour/balance to make this worthwhile. FM has certainly done better before.

Serving type: bottle

09-07-2011 17:37:25 | More by liamt07
Photo of andrenaline
andrenaline

Ontario (Canada)

3.75/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Apparently it's the watered down version with ABV at 10.5% and not 12.6%.

A - Pours a dark caramel colour, finger of head with some retention and no real lacing.

S - Sweet citrus hops, floral notes, caramel and toffee, brown sugar and cedar.

T - Definitely a bitter beer with an odd resiny oil flavour that dominates the tongue. Caramel and butterscotch are more prominent than the hops, but the earthy citrus notes come through on the finish. ABV is reasonably well hidden offering up a hint of sweetness.

M - Medium bodied, smooth and a touch of dryness on the finish; the way it should be.

O - A unique DIPA and I'm glad the Ontario breweries are starting to dabble in the more adventurous ales. I'd imagine a fresher bottle might offer up some more hop flavours, but I certainly still enjoyed it. Not too sure why it's not getting much love on BA. I've had plenty worse DIPA's, and I would definitely grab another bottle.

Serving type: bottle

11-05-2011 13:11:06 | More by andrenaline
Photo of jrenihan
jrenihan

Ontario (Canada)

3.3/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Bottled August 16, 2011.

Beer is a dark amber-toffee colour. Large off-white head. Decent retention.

Smell is not as full of hops as one would expect. Bready malt, prune, plum and other dark fruit. Brown sugar. Some pine in the background. Smells much more like a barleywine than a DIPA.

Lots of bitterness in the taste. A bit piney. Like the nose, malt is strongly present with bready flavours, but it is not sweet. Finish is bitter. Alcohol is strong and noticeable. The dark fruit flavours from the nose are muted. Disappointingly average. Not a terribly enjoyable beer.

Beer has moderate to high carbonation, very heavy. Feels a bit sludgy and sticky.

This beer needs some work. Has some good qualities but overall is not particularly good.

Serving type: bottle

10-22-2011 18:52:23 | More by jrenihan
Photo of allergictomacros
allergictomacros

Ontario (Canada)

2.3/5  rDev -32.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A - Hmm. Little sticky note on my bottle that says 10.5% - typo or weakened some? Anyway, pours a dark, clear red with a solid, quite stick head.

S - Nose is sweet, citrus/grapefruit, apple and caramel. A bit candy-like.

T - Sweet. A bit too much maybe, and bitter. A bit too much of that as well (160IBUs it says...) Fresh apple cider, booze, old white wine. I'm thinking a bit of oxidation here.

M - Heavy, boozy body with heaps of carbonation.

D - This is gonna be hard to finish. Strong and poorly balanced.

Serving type: bottle

11-02-2011 00:22:52 | More by allergictomacros
Photo of joemcgrath27
joemcgrath27

Alberta (Canada)

3.33/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

big props to my BA in crime andrenaline for including this in his latest shipment
A - lightly hazy deep cedar brown, one finger of tan head retained at a thin covering
S - butterscotch, some herbal earthiness, along with a light boozy aroma, really not much on the nose
T - unique hop mix of perfume and oily resin, some caramel and woody hints, and hints of alcohol
M - medium body with low carbonation, maybe even a little flat, it has some bitterness but 100 IBU it is definitely not
O - definitely a unique dipa with that perfume and resin flavour mix, although it is nothing mind blowing it is always nice to try a pale that's on the fringes of the traditional style, worth a try

Serving type: bottle

12-10-2011 02:51:16 | More by joemcgrath27
Photo of peensteen
peensteen

Ontario (Canada)

3.43/5  rDev 0%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Steve's bottle from the brewery

Deep ruby/amber colour, light off white head that retains at the edge of the glass, a few spots of lace. Smell is malty and lightly boozy, pine scents are there but medicinal and somewhat resemble a pine scented cleaner, hoppy with some citrus. Taste is malty with pine and citrus, big hop profile, alcohol, citrus in the finish as well as warm alcohol heat. Medium carbonation, full body, syrupy at points. Not bad, but I expected a little more from this, still a decent DIPA though.

Serving type: bottle

09-02-2011 14:55:24 | More by peensteen
Photo of CAMRAhardliner
CAMRAhardliner

Ontario (Canada)

3.23/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours dark amber. The head is not enormous but lasts forever and leaves lots of lace patches on the glass. The aroma is malty and estery with a piney hop characteristic. Pineapple and diacetyl notes also show. The taste is hoppy while also sweetish and buttery like the nose. Alcohol heat is pretty prominent throughout for 10.5% (according to the LCBO). This is a pretty full bodied beer. The finish is bitter with lots of medicenal alcohol heat.

A DIPA with flavor flaws and a very immodest alcohol presence. I'd pass if offered agian.

Serving type: bottle

11-19-2011 02:48:52 | More by CAMRAhardliner
Photo of JohnnyBarman
JohnnyBarman

Ontario (Canada)

3.53/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Bottle from the brewery - thanks 93!

Poured in to my trusty Flying Monkeys nonic. Dark amber-chestnut, pretty dark in colour. Leaves a nice frothy head, good lacing. Not bad.

Nose is quite malty and boozy, with some citrus and resin kicking around. Caramel and toffee, a bit of fruit. My first reaction was "...barleywine?" Certainly not what I expected in a DIPA, but there you go.

Again, the taste isn't quite what I expected. It's a boozy affair, to be certain, with a good smattering of hop and resin flavors, but damn is this sucker malty. Very thick, quite sweet actually. A hoppy barleywine, as it were. I enjoy these sorts of flavors, so I still marked it well, but this wasn't the hoppy experience I was hoping for.

Thick bodied, but there's enough carbonation to keep this interesting and prevent a cloying sensation.

I agree with a few previous posters - reduce the ABV slightly, thin out the malt character and hop it up old school. It's got potential, and I am enjoying it, but it needs a bit of work.

Serving type: bottle

10-03-2011 01:07:54 | More by JohnnyBarman
Photo of korguy123
korguy123

Ontario (Canada)

3.85/5  rDev +12.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

650ml into tulip
Purchased at brewery bottled 08/18/2011

A- Dark red/brown pour, two finger soapy eggshell head that collapses in minutes. Lacing is pretty sticky.

S- Candied sugar, citrus and floral hops with a sweet malt backing. Alcohol is there but barely.

T- Grapefruit, mandarin and pine. Bitter in the front, malty and sweet in the back. It's an iipa mullet lol. Alcohol is slightly warming.

M-Medium bodied, sticky on the lips.

O- This is a big bad beer. Second bottle and I really enjoyed it. Might sit on a bottle and see if it can develop barleywine style.

Serving type: bottle

09-21-2011 01:07:29 | More by korguy123
Photo of SebD
SebD

Ontario (Canada)

4/5  rDev +16.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Tried a bottle at Hardrock 42 in Sudbury

Appearance: It has a nice dark amber/brown colour to it. It has a nice off white head that dies down slowly and has nice lacing.

Smell: The aromas definitly give out hints of citrusy and fruity hops, some caramel, alcohol and a bit of yeast.

Taste: Like the aromas, it has a very nice hop character to it with a nice citrusy/fruity/piney feel with caramely malts and a slight alcohol taste.

Mouthfeel: It has a medium carbonation with a nice balance and complexity.

Drinkability: It's a good drinkable beer accompanied with nice strong flavours and aromas.

Serving type: bottle

09-05-2011 16:34:51 | More by SebD
Photo of MeisterBurger
MeisterBurger

Ontario (Canada)

3.18/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Pours a reddish mahogany topped by a light foamy head. Retains well and laces okay.

Caramel and citrus dominate the subdued aroma along with some mildly off-putting notes that I can't quite pin down.

Tastes biscuity and malty with a warming piney bitterness in the finish. Bitterness lingers in the aftertaste and it's warming in the chest. Hops add bitterness more than flavour, but there's some citrusy notes and floralness (florality?--you know what I mean) to be found. It doesn't really have much character or depth or anything that makes me want to drink more than one.

Mouthfeel is light considering how malty this is. Thin. Not great.

This is kind of a clumsy attempt at the style for me. Not terrible, but somewhat inelegant and not what I look for in a DIPA.

Serving type: bottle

10-27-2011 01:03:40 | More by MeisterBurger
Photo of eat
eat

Quebec (Canada)

3.18/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

The body is a dark amber, bordering on ruby. Lots of visible sediment. A decent cover of cream white head fades to a thin mist, leaving no lacing.

Lots of sweet caramel malt on the nose. Juicy citrus and tropical fruit (pineapple, guava, grapefruit) with candy sugar. This could be a hoppy barley wine with all this malty sweetness.

IBUs are fairly high but most of the hop character has faded. There isn't a bottle date so it's hard to know how long this sat on the shelf. Malty but still with not enough sweetness to back up the biting bitterness. The bitterness seems to coat the tongue with a dusty chemical taste; not pleasant. Alcohol is decently hidden for 12.4%, possibly hiding among the chemical-like aftertaste. No real complexity, just earthy toasted malt with high IBUs and some warming alcohol.

Decent medium body with a slight viscosity and light carbonation.

I'd try this again if it was guaranteed to be fresh but wouldn't call it one to age or purchase when the bottling date is questionable. I can't say I enjoyed this much.

Serving type: bottle

01-14-2012 06:15:58 | More by eat
Photo of CanuckRover
CanuckRover

Ontario (Canada)

4/5  rDev +16.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

First thing first, abv has been stickered over and now is at 10.5%, not 12.4%.

Barleywine description below is accurate. Dark amber, head settles to a fairly thin film quickly. Spotty lacings cover the glass.

Boozy nose. Hoppy certainly, pine aroma certainly stands out.

Hops are right up front, focus seems to be on aromatic hops rather than bittering hops here. Fairly heavy malt flavours through the middle, dark fruit and honey. Slight alcohol heat in the finish, but didn't find it as bas as others.

Not a bad beer at all, certainly different than anything else on offer at the LCBO. I'd buy another.

Serving type: bottle

10-23-2011 22:54:59 | More by CanuckRover
Photo of cratez
cratez

Ontario (Canada)

3.53/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

On tap at Gambrinus Bistro & Cafe in London, ON. Very fresh pint served in proper branded glassware.

Pours a dark copper hue with ruby edges, two fingers of beige froth, and strands of stringy lacing on the pilsner glass.

Smell is big bready, doughy, and biscuity notes, similar to an altbier, with a little bit of stone fruit and bubblegum coming through. Surprisingly malt-forward aroma.

Taste is caramel and deep bready malts with piney-citric hops, lots of earthiness, and an abrasive, aspirin-like bitterness. Alcohol warms the insides after the first few sips but doesn't register on the palate. Rather strangely, some diacetyl was evident on the cough (though not enough to be distracting).

Mouthfeel is creamy, smooth, and fuller than medium bodied with a drying bitter finish and a little heat in the throat.

Overall, Super Collider is a good but not great DIPA that could use some work. For some reason I enjoyed it more out of the bottle at the Golden Tap Awards. Since I know the brewers are perfectionists who will undoubtedly tweak the recipe and make it better, my advice would be to turn down the alcohol a few notches (say 3%), aim for a leaner malt bill, and use more flavour and aroma hops. I'm confident that Peter, Adil, and Co. will revisit this brew and transform it into another Flying Monkeys hit (maybe under a different name, who knows). In the meantime I'll be grabbing bottles from the 'BO to see if I like them as much as the ones that debuted at the GTAs, and I'll update my review then.

Serving type: on-tap

09-25-2011 22:24:42 | More by cratez
Photo of ludachris
ludachris

Ontario (Canada)

3.13/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Great label. Its white foil top gives hint at and helps to justify its higher price.

This has to be the darkest DIPA I've had to date. Its body is a rich caramel amber; mostly clear with a touch of haze. A finger's worth of creamy egg shell head is yeilded after a generous pour, displaying good retention taking into consideration the high ABV. Dots of slippery lace coat to the sides of the glass.

Hugely malt forward is the nose. Thick and fresh toasted malts, heaps of caramel and brown sugar and another kick of sweet malty goodness is all caked on top of an unobtrusive earthy, light grassy hop character. Herbaceous comes to mind. The 12.4% alcohol content is well integrated into the rest of the beer, furthering the sweetness of the malt if nothing else. The hops stand next to no chance in this malt bomb of a DIPA. If I didn't get this fresh from the brewery, I'd be seriously doubting this was a fresh bottle.

The bitterness is more assertive in the taste than I had expected from the nose, but it's not enough to change me giving this the title of a malt bomb. The earthy and raw hop character is laced with notes of pine, centering itself mostly in the middle and back of the palate. There's not a lot of bite to the bitterness but it does make its way past the finish where the hops become dry, soft, and reach the peak of their earthiness. The malt character, without much effort, runs equal if not greater to the hop presence. Thick, rich, fresh, and syrupy are all words that come to mind. The malt sweetness is present from beginning to end with it being most noticeable in the finish. I really do love the fresh and sweet malt character in this beer; for the style however, it's not what I'm interested in. This does get points for how well they hid the alcohol.

For me, where this DIPA comes through is in the mouthfeel. Rich, soft and creamy with no alcohol bite. Full bodied, mostly thanks to its sweet richness, imparted by the heavy malt presence.

This marks the first big Ontario crafted DIPA I've had, and I'm sad to say that it didn't meet my expectations. At 12.4% with 160 IBU's written clearly on the label, I was expecting a huge, incredibly hoppy and bitter DIPA and, for a fresh bottle, this was the most malt forward DIPA I've had to date. In terms of offerings at the LCBO, I'd say Flying Monkeys is the brewery in Ontario right now that is pushing the limits of craft brewing and I give kudos to their effort in brewing this. I'm still waiting for the hop monster that tears the enamel off of your teeth and places in BA's top 100 that I can proudly say came from Ontario.

Serving type: bottle

10-12-2011 00:16:01 | More by ludachris
Photo of BBP
BBP

Ontario (Canada)

4/5  rDev +16.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Chestnut amber with decent head and retention as well as slight lacing.

Hops and malt meet harmony in the aroma as they join to form one aroma. It's well balanced but nothing seems intense our sharp enough to stand out.

unlike the description the flavor isn't such an explosion of hops. It seems more like a hoppy english barleywine. I suspect this is at it's prime when fresh but I can thank the LCBO for ruining that. Still very good but somewhat standard for a barleywine.

Medium full. Slight carbonation works well with the body. Slightly dry and moderately sticky in the finish.

Overall it's quite good, but I think the whole hoppiness talk about it was a bit of an exaggeration.

Serving type: bottle

10-25-2011 01:46:05 | More by BBP
Photo of Digimaika2
Digimaika2

Ontario (Canada)

3.55/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: Reddish amber colour with a respectable two-finger creamy head with a dirty beige hue. Decent retention as the blanket sticks around for a little while. Noticeable lacing.

S: Pine, candied fruit (fruitcake style), baked bread, molasses/caramel, grapefruit, and tropical qualities. Appealing but I find this a little subdued aroma wise with some digging required.

T: Earthy pine hops, which transitions to the malty bread-like qualities. A strange biting and slightly askew wave of grain follows this. Other qualities detected in the aroma are hard to pick up in the taste. Alcohol quite noticeable (albeit probably hard to hide at 12.4%). Decent overall taste but I feel that some flavours are missing, and that this could be balanced better.

M: Medium body with a moderate carbonation, which tastes about right for the style. Nice and oily with a slightly resiny texture.

D: Had high expectations for this given my excellent experiences with all other FMCB products, however, this unfortunately fell a bit short. Hopefully they can work out the kinks in this. Reminds me of a lesser functioning version of Vermonster.

Serving type: bottle

12-11-2011 02:40:12 | More by Digimaika2
Photo of WeedKing4
WeedKing4

Ontario (Canada)

3.83/5  rDev +11.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a dark amber brown thats mostly clear. Tastes very malty up front with not a huge hop presence. This tastes closer to an american barleywine style then a double ipa. Quite drinkable for the high alc% in it. No high booze taste detected at all. Its not that bad overall either, but it would have been nice if this didn't sit in the LCBO warehouse for a couple months before being released. Its quite a shame for the state of beer we live in, for Ontario. They completely ruined the chance of this beer making a bigger name for its self.

Serving type: bottle

10-27-2011 03:05:57 | More by WeedKing4
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Flying Monkeys Super Collider Double IPA from Flying Monkeys Craft Brewery
79 out of 100 based on 55 ratings.