1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Deep South Pale Ale (Reb Ale) - Lazy Magnolia Brewing Company

Deep South Pale Ale (Reb Ale)Deep South Pale Ale (Reb Ale)

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
75
okay

190 Ratings
THE BROS
74
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 190
Reviews: 83
rAvg: 3.23
pDev: 16.41%


Brewed by:
Lazy Magnolia Brewing Company visit their website
Mississippi, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  5.21% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Deep South Pale Ale is Lazy Magnolia's Pale Ale, a crisp and clean beer with the perfect balance of hops and malt. Its body and clean finish are ideally suited for all seasons, and the brew is moderately hopped for a great aroma and impressive finish. Deep South Pale Ale doesn't fit into any category of Pale Ale, it's a style we made up!

27 IBU

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 11-07-2006)
View: Beers (20) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Deep South Pale Ale (Reb Ale) Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 190 | Reviews: 83 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of mikesgroove
mikesgroove

South Carolina

3.55/5  rDev +9.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A new one for me for sure. I have been fairly impressed with what I have had of theirs and this one was no exception. Served cold and poured into a pint glass, this one was consumed on 1/27/2010.

The pour was decent, dark amber in color with slight red highlights to it that seemed to fit the style nicely, Small white head crept up and over the top and gently settled down leaving a cratered and rocky look that soon turned to a bare copper top. Lots of bready notes coming off of here right away, smooth and delicate caramel as well as a touch of musty bread are all trying to work themselves in now in various forms. As I take the first sip I notice the feel to be a little lighter then I would have thought but it does seem to work overall. Well carbonated the first sip hits with caramel malts and an herbal, almost flowery like taste that melts into a gritty and bready malt. Very nicely done. Easily drinkable as I was able to put this one down fairly quickly and move onto the next selection of the night.

Overall while not the best thing I have ever had it certainly worked and I would have no issue with trying another one.

Serving type: bottle

01-28-2010 23:58:43 | More by mikesgroove
Photo of womencantsail
womencantsail

California

3.1/5  rDev -4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Oh yeah. Mississippi tick thanks to Bobby.

A: The beer pours a golden amber color with a small white head.

S: Lightly hoppy on the aroma with a hop profile comprised mostly of citrus peel and grass. Otherwise, it's quite sweet with lots of toffee and bread malt aromas. Maybe just a light floral hop note.

T: Not the most pleasant flavor. It begins with stale bread, a touch of metal, and cardboard. A rather light floral hop note with sweet malt/bread and some fruity yeast esters. Hints of grass and a very mild bitterness.

M: Medium in body with medium to low carbonation.

O: My first Mississippi beer was a disappointing one. Decent aroma, but below average flavor.

Serving type: bottle

09-06-2011 14:57:09 | More by womencantsail
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

3.73/5  rDev +15.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

16 ounce pint - $4.75 at Taco Mac in Kennesaw, Georgia.

Appearance: Served a light copper body, quite clear, and topped with an eighth of an inch of whitish foam.

Smell: Forward notes of caramel, pale malts, and a bit of basic breadiness ahead of the citrus (quietly pithy) and lowly resinous florals.

Taste: Sugar-toned pale malts with a bit of pils, too. Faint florals and citrus fruitiness. Medium-light bitterness. A minor hint of light-colored caramel joins the party with some warmth, though later and lighter than expected from the nose. Closes out lightly bitter and dry.

Mouthfeel: Medium-light body. Medium carbonation.

Overall: Works as a nice little slender, sleek, food-friendly ale.

Serving type: on-tap

11-18-2011 15:11:55 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of Mora2000
Mora2000

Texas

3.68/5  rDev +13.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Thanks to piginapen for trading this one to me.

Pours a clear yellow with a huge white, pillowy head. Looks about like a BMC lager. The aroma has a lot more hop character than I expected, with some pine and earthy aromas. You get some citrus and biscuit malt as well. The main flavor is piney hops. Wheat is present, but not as much as expected. The beer finishes very dry and is highly carbonated with a light/medum mouthfeel. Overall, this is a nice drinking hoppy pale wheat ale. I have not had many beers like this and would like to try it again.

Serving type: bottle

12-29-2009 20:49:05 | More by Mora2000
Photo of Rifugium
Rifugium

Pennsylvania

3.5/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

First had: bottle at Riverside Market Cafe, Ft. Lauderdale, FL

I figured I'd might as well try this as I probably won't see Mississippi or any of their beers any time soon. Pretty much standard APA here. Poured into a Bell's shaker pint, a clearish, copper liquid with about a 1/2 inch of frothy white head that sank to a thin layer and left a bit of lacing on the glass. Aroma of citrus and pine hops, pale bready malts. No surprises here, but certainly nothing bad about it. Similar taste, citrus pith, piney, leafy in the hop department, mildly bitter, solid sugary malt base, toasted grains. Medium body, moderately dry and crisp. Nothing that hasn't been done before, but a good basic pale ale overall.

Serving type: bottle

12-31-2012 21:32:59 | More by Rifugium
Photo of Jason
Jason

Massachusetts

3.2/5  rDev -0.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12oz brown ale with no freshness date.

LOOK: Big froth, shiny golden

SMELL: Spicy, floral, orange zest, hint of pine, biscuity, yeast, faint esters

TASTE: Bitter, vegtal, thin graininess, orange peel, leafy, earthy, grainy, dry, chalky yeast

Assertive with a lot going on, a bit chaotic as the hoppiness runs a bit astray and there is not much there to tame it. One and done.

Serving type: bottle

01-03-2012 02:51:13 | More by Jason
Photo of corby112
corby112

Pennsylvania

2.45/5  rDev -24.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12oz. bottle received as an extra in a recent trade with piginapen. Thanks again man!

Pours a dark golden orange color with pale golden yellow hues when held to a light source and a massive three finger frothy, pillowy white head that very, very slowly dissipates into a lasting cap and ring that leaves sporadic spots of chunky lacing.

Slightly earthy piny hop aroma with subtle citrus notes and a biscuit malt backbone. Pretty bland smelling.

Pretty carbonated up front leading into a crisp medium body that is very hops forward with a subtle malt backbone and bone dry finish. Very dry piney hops up front that linger throughout over a biscuit and graham cracker malt backbone that is kind of thinned out into a very long dry, bitter piny hop finish. Not very well balanced and kind of one dimensional.

Serving type: bottle

12-05-2009 06:46:11 | More by corby112
Photo of woodychandler
woodychandler

Pennsylvania

3.2/5  rDev -0.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

This was a gift to me from Sam Knocken and I wanted to get it in while it is still fresh. The CANQuest (TM) must wait!

From the bottle: "American Pale Ale was first crafted by West Coast Brewers who drew inspiration from English and India Pale Ale styles. Americans are known for taking a good idea to the extreme. Southerners are known for taking extreme ideas and making them great."; "Some think the South is behind the fads. We aren't slow. We just take our time, use what we like and leave the rest behind. This is the sentiment behind Deep South Pale Ale: something bold and distinctive, a vibrant reflection of the culture and flavors unique to The Deep South."; "Deep South Pale Ale's dry hop aroma reminds you of a walk through southern pine forests on a warm summer day. The crisp malt character is balanced with the spicy aroma of hops to provide a smooth, refreshing finish. We broke away from published style guidelines and created our own style: Deep South Pale Ale."

My pour initially netted a finger-and-a-half of tawny head, but it quickly fell, leaving some sticky lacing in its wake. Color was a deep-gold with NE-quality clarity and Midas and Croesus were envious. Nose was indeed redolent with pine hops, but I will have to take their word for it on what "southern pine forests on a warm summer day" smell like. Mouthfeel was medium but the taste seemed kind of saturated with dry hops. My tongue felt like it had been dusted with hops by the time that I swallowed. Finish was dry, but it just did not seem to be my cup of tea.

Serving type: bottle

10-22-2012 22:37:32 | More by woodychandler
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
Beerandraiderfan

Nevada

3.73/5  rDev +15.5%
look: 3.25 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

Copper pour, big white head to it, had concerns about infection the way it kind of gushed, but it was all good in the end. Aroma, discernably hoppy, dry hoppy even, good job MS! Amarillo? Kind of a piney vibe to it, nothing over the top.

Light body, good hoppiness, there was even this mildly sweet tartness going for it, almost as if it was a little bretted. Purposeful or not, it worked nicely. Light body, crisp, hoppy, tartness, good job all around. Bitterness is just right, the hops and tart shine above it. Maybe some mint aspect is what has me saying brett.

A great wheat beer in my book. Its not gumballhead or sumpin sumpin, but its clearly in the second tier of wheat beers for me. Would recommend on a hot day.

Serving type: bottle

07-25-2011 01:55:28 | More by Beerandraiderfan
Photo of thagr81us
thagr81us

South Carolina

3.5/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Served from bottle into a sampler shaker. Poured golden yellow with a minimal white head. Maintained nice lacing throughout the glass. The aroma was comprised of sweet malt, mango, tropical fruit, and fruit hop. The flavor was of sweet malt, tropical fruit, fruit, tropical fruit hop, and mango. It had a light feel on the palate with medium carbonation. Overall this was a decent brew. This brew really had a lot of fruit going on here. While this might sound like a win-win, it was really all that was going on in this one. It just felt like it was missing something to keep your palate intrigued. It is worth trying for the fruited pale ale lover out there, but if you enjoy kick in the face pales, I wouldn’t go out of my way to seek this one out.

Serving type: bottle

11-21-2012 11:44:12 | More by thagr81us
Photo of kylehay2004
kylehay2004

Florida

3.6/5  rDev +11.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: thin head on a clear golden amber body with scattered lacing.

S: the aroma is excellent with lots of citrus and musty, earthy hops. light on the malts.

T: hops are on the bitter, earthy and metallic side. caramel malt base which is semisweet. The citrus is a little more sour and mostly is up front.

M: medium body and moderate to high carbonation.

Overall: strong bitter/metallic after taste for the style. Still very flavorful but just too sour which effects drinkability.

Serving type: bottle

08-21-2012 23:14:36 | More by kylehay2004
Photo of avalon07
avalon07

South Carolina

3.5/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: Poured from a bottle to a pint glass. Had an amber color and a clear consistency. There was a small amount of foamy head that quickly dissipated. Very little lacing.

S: A somewhat muted aroma of hops, malt, and a hint of citrus.

T: Pretty much tasted like it smelled: Mild hops, a little malt in the finish, and a tinge of citrus as well. Not bad, but certainly could have used a bit more of a push.

M: A good amount of carbonation with a smooth finish. Light-bodied.

O: There are definitely worse APAs out there than this one, but there are better ones, too. Not undrinkable, but kind of forgettable.

Serving type: bottle

11-20-2012 03:46:01 | More by avalon07
Photo of twiggamortis420
twiggamortis420

Texas

3.03/5  rDev -6.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12 oz bottle pours a clear, dark gold color with a fluffy white head. Nice retention, just a little lace.

Nose is an even split of crackery, biscuit maltiness and piney hops. A little bit of nutty yeast comes out as it warms.

Taste is pretty similar to the nose with lots of piney bitterness. The malt is fairly prevalent and very boorish. For a new beer, bring something to the table, not just a rehash of something that has been done hundreds of times by hundreds of breweries. This tastes like a Pale Ale that was born in the mid-90s with classic varietals of hops and malt. Its a decent Pale Ale, but it is so very boring and desperately needs more hop flavor. I wont buy it again, I find it to be just on the short side of average.

Serving type: bottle

07-08-2012 17:45:01 | More by twiggamortis420
Photo of BeerFMAndy
BeerFMAndy

Wisconsin

3.03/5  rDev -6.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle poured into an Imperial pint. "Deep south pale ale" 12/05/09 printed on the label.

Thanks to PerzentRizen for this bottle!

A - A moderate pour released a gushing head. After overflowing everywhere, it stood at just above four fingers tall. The loose bubbles hung on for a long time leaving some loose lacing. The beer is a lightly hazy golden yellow with decent carbonation bubbles rising up. Great appearance after the overflow mishaps.

S - The aroma is a bit faint which could be due to the age. I'm picking up low pale malts with a lemon citrusy hop nose that's a bit floral in nature. It could stand to be stronger.

T - The flavor is a citrusy lemon hop crispness with a floral touch and a low pale malt backbone. The whole flavor is just a bit thin.

M - Thin feeling despite a medium-low body. A bit watery too. The finish is crisp from carbonation and a bit dry with very little in the way of bitterness.

D - I think I'd love to try this fresh but it's not terrible now. The body needs a little work and the aroma could be a bit stronger, but it's a great start. I could have a few of these while watching a movie.

Serving type: bottle

12-07-2009 04:04:34 | More by BeerFMAndy
Photo of gford217
gford217

Georgia

3.4/5  rDev +5.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle poured into a pint glass.

Pours a clear golden amber with a steady stream of bubbles feeding the creamy white head, allowing for great retention and some spotty lacing.

The aroma is fairly subdued, even for a pale ale. It's got a bit of spicy/grassy hops up front and toasted malts.

The taste is a tad better but still has the same profile with some light floral hops up front on top of a bready malt backbone. Maybe some honey and a bit of wheat sweetness before a bitter, lightly hopped finish.

The mouthfeel is light to medium bodied and extremely crisp, clean and dry in the finish.

This is definitely a drinkable pale ale but not one with any degree of complexity. Since first trying the Southern Pecan, only the Jefferson stout has stood out to me. Let's hope that MS can pop the cap soon and let LM see what they can really do. As it is, most of their beers are starting to blend together.

Serving type: bottle

01-17-2010 20:51:27 | More by gford217
Photo of tpd975
tpd975

Florida

3.4/5  rDev +5.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Thanks to retorp for this one.

A: Pours a nice golden yellow with an above average white head. Little retention or lace.

S: Nothing earth shattering. Honey, biscuit malt, and floral hops.

T: Light biscuit malt, honey, and good dose of citrus hops.

M: Fairly light in body, nice bitterness for the style.

D: Not too bad.

Serving type: bottle

10-31-2009 22:59:31 | More by tpd975
Photo of emmasdad
emmasdad

Colorado

3.55/5  rDev +9.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Thanks to Tolann and her friends for sharing beers a month or so back at her basement party. This one poured a pale golden color with a nice white head. Aromas of sweet malt, straw and citrus. On the palate, this one is light bodied with flavors of sweet malt, straw and citrus.

Serving type: bottle

07-28-2011 20:31:01 | More by emmasdad
Photo of msubulldog25
msubulldog25

Oregon

3.53/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A 12 oz. bottle with a stamped date on the label: 12/13/10 (is that bottled on or drink before?). One of several sent by BA Mississipping.

Question for LMBC: when, oh when, will you brew a Bulldog Beer? C'mon, Hendersons, MSU is your alma mater and Ole Miss AND USM get their beers first? (Oh, I get it... saving the most amazingly awesome beer for last... clever!) In the meantime, 'Reb Ale' will have to do ~ let's hope I can remain objective... ;-)

A: Pours a light honey/golden, crowned with a finger-high dollop of whitish cream. Complexion is nearly clear, carbonation is scattered but boisterous... but then there's a weird hanging fuzzy unfiltered-ness. I can't tell if this trying to be a clear/filtered beer or a hazy/cloudy wheat. As such, it falls in between and isn't so lovely to look at. But overall head, retention, (fractured) lace and carbonation are nice, so the score isn't too low.

S: Don't know that I like the smell much at first, but then all of the sudden I do; it's a musty grassy wetness. Damp hay, kinda minty but not. Flowery sweetness underneath, then spice, honey, a little berry(?) cereal (???). Interesting.

T: Spicy (think dry pepper) hoppiness bites through a biscuity/nutty grain. A twist of lemon then doughy dryness. Underlying it all is a green herbalness, like parsley or oregano even. Kinda unusual things to pick up in a wheat pale, but there ya go... Through it all, really good malt/hop balance... something 'English' about this, just can't quite put my finger on it.

M: Lighter body (borderline thin), crisp yet smooth enough and refreshing. Clean finish, a touch on the dry side.

D: Nothing astounding here, but likable and easy to drink. I could see this being a summertime favorite (tho' it works ok in winter, too). Although 5.4% abv, it seems like a worthy 'session' beer. Glad for the chance to try - thanks, Ian.

Now to smash the empty bottle into a thousand of pieces (Go to Hell, Ole Miss!).

Serving type: bottle

01-21-2011 07:39:12 | More by msubulldog25
Photo of VelvetExtract
VelvetExtract

Massachusetts

3.58/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A-Copper with a medium sized head. Head is barely tan. It lingers with the body. Laces consistently. Body is a bit hazy.

S-Hoppy. I am surprised. I was expecting just a heap of lazy caramel. Hops are a bit medicinal and grassy. Malt is bread and caramel.

T-Quite bitter. Actually a bit too bitter. Just a bunch of bald bitterness with no hoppy flavors to provide efficient backing. Astringent. Yeasty bread (sourdough?). Then the bitterness sears the palate.

M-Lighter bodied. Kinda hard to drink. Bubbles are a bit too intense. Dry with long bitterness.

O/D-It has its faults and odd points; but I actually did enjoy this brew. I respect Lazy Magnolia trying to make a Pale Ale with some abrasive tendencies. Just misses the mark in some areas.

Serving type: bottle

09-10-2012 02:51:30 | More by VelvetExtract
Photo of sweemzander
sweemzander

Illinois

1.68/5  rDev -48%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

12oz. bottle poured into an imperial pint. No bottled date. Thanks to BeerFMAndy for the trade.

(A)- Pours a hazy copper color that produced so much white foam, I only got about a 1/3 of the actual beer from the bottle. Way overly carbonated.

(S)- Rank Pine Sol cleaner with mountains of lemon.

(T)- Same as the taste; rank lemon & lime cleaner.

(M)- Far too much carbonation. Way too bitter and cloying; might as well drink actual Pine Sol.

(D)- No thank you, although its definitely infected or over carbonated or the combination of the two. Could only take a few sips of what was left.

Serving type: bottle

12-12-2009 20:27:50 | More by sweemzander
Photo of harrymel
harrymel

Washington

2.48/5  rDev -23.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

thanks to beerindex for this in my the junk BIF

A: Pours a honey gold ale with excellent clarity and lies beneath a two finger, peanut head with good density. This falls over the coarse of a few minutes and leaves a thick sheet of the same. Sheety lacing. Nice.

S: Smells like buttered emesis. Some sweet feel to the mid point, but the most dominant thing to me is the reminiscence to emesis.

T: Medium floral over a malted body. Light malts with a slight metallic and woody flavor at the ends.

M: Medium body, medium to hi carb. Plenty slimy on the finish.

O: Not much different to me than their Indian Summer. Very average. As a pale ale, weak.

Serving type: bottle

03-24-2011 15:13:44 | More by harrymel
Photo of AgentMunky
AgentMunky

California

3.95/5  rDev +22.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Poured from a 12 ounce bottle into a pilsner glass. Best before 13 December 2010.

A: Anaemic head rests atop a clear copper beer with no effervescence.

S: Nice! It smells lightly spiced with nutty malts dancing about dry-hopped core.

T: It tastes similar -- a nutty dryness precedes a hoppy maintaste. Malts come in to offer a lightly sweet aftertaste, though a hopped, vaguely piney dryness lingers on the tongue. Nicely balanced and pleasant to drink.

M: Crisp and refreshing. This would be a damn fine beer to have around by the pool or after mowing the lawn.

D: Very drinkable; an interesting pale ale. Probably by favourite beer from Lazy Magnolia. Recommended.

Serving type: bottle

12-16-2010 19:15:39 | More by AgentMunky
Photo of EgadBananas
EgadBananas

Louisiana

3.45/5  rDev +6.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Pours a clear, dark sunny autumn color. Head was fairly white, about a finger, dissipating to tiny bubbles.

Not much aroma, but what is there is a little wheat and breadiness, and a dash of grassy hop aroma.

Taste is bready, with a nice grassy, floral hop bite and bitterness. Miles better than the aroma.

Feel is light and crisp, clean and has a nice refreshing quality about it. Drink ability is high, though it's nothing particularly stellar.

Serving type: bottle

09-17-2011 18:46:39 | More by EgadBananas
Photo of lackenhauser
lackenhauser

Maryland

2.98/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Somewhat fuzzy golden color with a head that goes on and on which leads me right to infection out of the starting gate. Not a bad looking beer per se but takes 3 pours to get 12 ounces into a pint glass. Somewhat sulfury and earthy aroma. Mildly astringent. Big hop biterness upfront-somewhat crisp. Faint citrus/lemon like flavor. Hop bite tends to dominate overall. Thin body wise-almost watery. Would seem even more so if it wasnt for the hops. Very, very average overall. Read the label closer-I thought it said RED ale-once I poured the beer I realized what was up. Pass for me.

Serving type: bottle

12-24-2009 05:01:02 | More by lackenhauser
Photo of alleykatking
alleykatking

Indiana

3.28/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from 12oz bottle. Many thanks to betsona for this bottle.

A- Pours a amber color..duh! One and a half finger semi-white head shows medium retention. Nice specks of lace all over the sides of the glass.

S- I get a stronger wheat base out of this with hints of citrus hops and some bitter ones thrown in there as well. There is a certain offness to this that I can't quite pick up on...like corn or something else. Light almost nutty malts in the ending of the aroma.

T- Light roasted malts in the front of the beer show off a light nutty flavor to them. The middle of the beer shows more of a wheat underbody which I could get into a little more than the front end. Ending goes back to a bigger malt with there being some stale bitter hops in the ending. Alcohol is not really there until it warms up which then becomes a little medicinal.

M- Medium mouthfeel. Carbonation is a little light for the style. Roasted malts and hints of nut and whear are left on the palate. Aftertaste is stale alcohol, nutty malts, and hints of bitter hops. Flavors were a little underwhelming at times and not fully balanced. No off flavors were present. Light alcohol drying on the palate.

O- This was a interesting beer. Don't know what I fully think of it. Will the South rise again? Maybe....but not anytime soon in my glass. Well unless I get another bottle of it.

Serving type: bottle

06-22-2011 02:09:55 | More by alleykatking
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Deep South Pale Ale (Reb Ale) from Lazy Magnolia Brewing Company
75 out of 100 based on 190 ratings.