1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

1914 Porter - Brouwerij De Molen

Not Rated.
1914 Porter1914 Porter

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
83
good

41 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 41
Reviews: 30
rAvg: 3.64
pDev: 14.01%
Wants: 3
Gots: 5 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij De Molen visit their website
Netherlands

Style | ABV
English Porter |  5.80% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Gueuzedude on 07-04-2008)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 41 | Reviews: 30 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by ccrida:
Photo of ccrida
ccrida

Oregon

4.3/5  rDev +18.1%
look: 4 | smell: 5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

750ml bottle, #488/708.
*Original 1914 Recipe London-Style Porter by Ron Attinson brewed at the Mill
*1.053-1.015, 34.7 EBU, EBC Colour 120.9, 5.8% ABV

Served at cellar temp (I've had it there for only a few months) in nonic - which filled with 95% foam! Although the bottle didn't overflow, I still opted to fill a second, imperial pint glass this time, more slowly and ended with a murky dark amber beer with a creamy tan head with long last that leaves lots of foamy lace. Served at 55F. Score is tricky, as it's a pale color for a porter, but nice. And while the carbonation is ridiculous, the head and lace still end up being attractive. Furthermore, it jives with what I understand a 1914 English Porter is supposed to look like anyways, being a response to the citified country gentry that demanded a lighter beer then the thick robust porters that were the London style from the previous century.

Smell is great, really bright, herbal, minty hops - I was shocked by how fresh they were! I got this bottle as soon as it hit down and have only cellar it a few months, but this was a pleasant surprise. Caramel, toffee, buttered toast, some anise, vanilla and coconut...barrel aged or just malts? Like a mint julep and grape soda, floral, awesome. The may be one of the best smelling beers ever, let alone EP.

Taste is great, again, very fresh. Big chocolate, honey, floral, hay. Some caramel, the minty herbal hops, spicy and candi like, but rounded and milk like, although just a tad to medicinal with a tangy aftertaste. Reminds me of a milk stout, a bit phenolic and hoppy. I've always really loved EKGs, and this a great showcase for them, especially on the nose. Also, there is a rustic feel that I appreciate, I wonder if it is a blend made with old beer? Would be great if there was more info provided on the reconstruction process.

Mouthfeel is full, but silky, smooth, not to heavy, just hazy.

Drinkability is great, a damn tasty beer that I really enjoyed. For whatever reason, I wasn't too geeked on this going in, but now I wish I would have got another bottle while I could have! But the fact is, it was an expensive one-off, and very well may be one and done. Nevertheless, I loved it, especially considering the backstory! It's actually the second post WWI historical English Porter I've had this week, and was totally different (then Manchester Star), but still super good.

Serving type: bottle

11-06-2008 22:15:08 | More by ccrida
More User Reviews:
Photo of afsdan
afsdan

Colorado

4.75/5  rDev +30.5%

05-01-2014 01:38:56 | More by afsdan
Photo of westcoastbeerlvr
westcoastbeerlvr

California

2.75/5  rDev -24.5%

07-04-2013 23:58:11 | More by westcoastbeerlvr
Photo of augustgarage
augustgarage

California

3.35/5  rDev -8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.75

Bottled October 2008 (bottle #207 of 450). Poured from a caged-and-corked 750mL bottle into my Samuel Smith nonic.

Bit of a gusher. Clear burnt umber body with bright rufous highlights and a rocky highly active wheat crown that settles to a thin half finger of foam. Loose soapy lacing; decent retention.

Oxidation is noted in nose, though this comes across more as aged fruit and brandy than wet cardboard and the like...despite hints of berries and very light roast coffee, the beer smells a bit, for lack of a better term, "sweaty."

Tart palate entry with lots of fruit and a fast roasty dry finish. Nutty and bright. Though I prefer more modern incarnations of this ale style, the gentle sourness isn't necessarily out of place in a historical re-creation. Improves a bit once given a chance to breath. An interesting flavor profile that grows on you if you set aside your expectations and put yourself in mind of how this would have been brewed 100 years ago.

This bottle (and probably this batch) ended up a bit overcarbonated, especially for the style. You'd be forgiven for thinking this was an eccentric dark belgian ale (except for the low gravity).

A curiosity I wouldn't seek out again any time soon, though I'd probably pick up another bottle on the cheap before tying up my home-brew equipment to replicate it. Still, I have a lot of respect for Ron Pattinson, and it's evident that this ale is the result of careful craft and studious research.

Serving type: bottle

05-29-2013 03:07:10 | More by augustgarage
Photo of DrDemento456
DrDemento456

Pennsylvania

3.78/5  rDev +3.8%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Brewed in September 2008 bottled in October 2008

A - Well for 5 years old I still get a 1/4 inch of head that recedes to a mild mocha lace ring. Color is a very clear dark brown with no sediment (which is nice)
S - Mild sour cherry notes with some chalky roast and a touch of chocolate. Doesn't smell too oxidized.
T - Well obviously you get a shit ton of cardboard out of this like licking a box but soft flavors of roasted malts and faint cocoa powder. Far from terrible but far beyond it's prime.
M - Light to medium whatever ABV has been aged out. Now it's kind of like flat Guinness.

Overall I picked this up for 5 bucks at the "House of 1,000 beers" and was intrigued by the low bottle count (bottle 260 out of 450) I guess this beer is a pretty good example of an English porter but I have to disagree that it will age for 5 years. Most porters of this ABV start to fall off after 2 years. Still after 5 it's far from terrible.

Serving type: bottle

03-20-2013 03:32:41 | More by DrDemento456
Photo of Dope
Dope

Massachusetts

2.98/5  rDev -18.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Bottled March 13th, 2009. 4 years old. Uh oh.

A: Medium/dark brown pour. Big light, fluffy, effervescent light brown head. Fizzy head fades fairly slowly. Almost zero lacing.

S: Acetone and sherry. Cardboard boxes.

T: Mild roasted malt, a little smoky. Very plain and bland. Oxidation isn't as bad as the aroma but everything tastes very cardboardy, especially in the aftertaste.

M: Light/medium bodied.

O: A pretty plain and boring porter. It's pretty unoffensive and smooth but there's not a whole lot of flavor here. Very mellow. Age has not improved it all either with the obvious oxidation. Alas.

Serving type: bottle

02-15-2013 03:09:18 | More by Dope
Photo of Hanzo
Hanzo

Virginia

3.75/5  rDev +3%

12-03-2012 02:17:28 | More by Hanzo
Photo of LambicKing
LambicKing

Florida

3.5/5  rDev -3.8%

12-03-2012 02:01:51 | More by LambicKing
Photo of beergoot
beergoot

Colorado

3.45/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Brewed 17 february 2011
Bottled 22 march 2011
Bottle # 1016 1182

Cork immediately popped off the bottle upon loosening the wire cage. Luckily, there was only minor loss of beer...

Light brown body topped with a thick, chunky head. Fair roasted malt aroma backed with a slight sourness. Taste is much like the aroma but with dark malt flavors slightly dominating; fair bitterness at the finish; lightly burnt toast. Light-bodied feel; semi-dry finish.

An okay porter. Too bad it's not clear what the brewer's were aiming for with this beer style-wise. Seems a bit lightweight compared to more modern porters, yet there is nothing really mentioned on the bottle or the brewery web site about the original recipe other than it was was found " in some old obscure building in London". An interesting find for the curious...

Late note: July 05th, 2014

Had another bottle: Brewed 10 February 2009, bottled March 13 2009, bottle # 135, ABV 5.3%, Kent Golding hops for bittering and final hop addition (per the bottle's label)...

Pretty much the same observations and notes from above. I might give the 'Mouthfeel' a 3.5 bump, but otherwise a solid 3.5 overall. Slightly cocoa flavored, a tad sour, smooth and tasty although far from being stunning. Worth trying if only for it's different take on most modern day porter styles...

Serving type: bottle

11-18-2012 21:00:44 | More by beergoot
Photo of Bung
Bung

Michigan

3.28/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

750. A very dark brown with a billowy cream head. Not a gusher, but looks like a high level of carbonation. Lasted quite a while.

Aroma, earthy, molasses and some slightly tart milk chocolate.

Taste, More roast malt, peaty. An earthy yeastiness. Chocolate, a light red fruit note. Slight coffee and more cocoa finish. All these things are masked by an over abundance of carbonation...

The carbonation causes this to fill the mouth, but really hides some nice flavors I think. Comes off a bit thin and watery also because of this. Abv is low enough to drink a bunch, but the carbonation and price eliminate the desire. Still not sure why the northern euros like to carb everything like its a Saison.

Serving type: bottle

10-29-2012 01:07:26 | More by Bung
Photo of yossarian14
yossarian14

Massachusetts

4.25/5  rDev +16.8%

09-12-2012 20:30:25 | More by yossarian14
Photo of wesley14
wesley14

Massachusetts

3.75/5  rDev +3%

09-11-2012 01:52:56 | More by wesley14
Photo of t0rin0
t0rin0

California

3.5/5  rDev -3.8%

09-02-2012 15:51:53 | More by t0rin0
Photo of StonedTrippin
StonedTrippin

Colorado

4/5  rDev +9.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

bottle number 611. a really nice porter. pours deep dark brown, like chocolate fudge. good tan bubbly head on top. smells like milk chocolate and really roasty malts. flavor has some definite chocolate notes going on, as well as a much lighter malt profile than the appearance would indicate. this is a very smooth beer, velvet mouthfeel and a medium to full body. not as complex and interesting as i had hopped, but this was an excellent porter quite different from what i expected. was nice as an after dinner drink, but for the price i likely will not buy this one again.

Serving type: bottle

04-11-2012 18:43:45 | More by StonedTrippin
Photo of Yabev15
Yabev15

Massachusetts

3/5  rDev -17.6%

02-25-2012 00:54:29 | More by Yabev15
Photo of kmatlack
kmatlack

California

3.85/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

750 C&C bottle. No bottle date, bottle number 253 out of 450.

A- Pours a dark brown with a surprisingly attractive caramel colored head. Head sticks around for the duration of the beer. Kinda creamy looking with dark spots from the yeast. Little bit of lacing on the glass.

S- Awesome aromas of dark roasted malts, hazelnuts, fresh baked bread. A little dull but this isnt really an in your face style of brew.

T- Follows the nose, you get alot more coffee in the taste. It is not very sweet on the tongue, which is good. You are left with a really good aftertaste that reminded me of biscuits.

M- Not really that thick, a little bit slick, good on the carbonation.

O- Have not had a whole lot of beers in this style but i rather enjoyed this beer.

Serving type: bottle

01-30-2012 00:17:32 | More by kmatlack
Photo of StJamesGate
StJamesGate

New York

3.73/5  rDev +2.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Gushes like every de Molen beer. Moussy taupe head over cola, in both fizz and color, body. Mocha, nut, cherry stones and earth on the nose.
Acidic brown malts, some milk chocolate, soil, and some EKG prickly spice to finish.
Nutty brown malt finish and lean tingly linger. Light-medium, crisp, dry, fizzy.

Brown malts rule here, which is historically accurate, I think. But this is fizzier and lighter than I expected. That and the overflow make me think this is over attenuated.

Serving type: bottle

01-11-2012 15:00:07 | More by StJamesGate
Photo of kevgod
kevgod

Massachusetts

4/5  rDev +9.9%

01-07-2012 18:00:13 | More by kevgod
Photo of burnheartsMKE
burnheartsMKE

Wisconsin

4/5  rDev +9.9%

12-16-2011 03:08:18 | More by burnheartsMKE
Photo of JAHMUR
JAHMUR

Connecticut

4/5  rDev +9.9%

11-18-2011 22:50:10 | More by JAHMUR
Photo of amphion1065
amphion1065

Massachusetts

3.28/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 4 | feel: 2 | overall: 3.5

750 mL bottle into a Duvel tulip. Bottled on 3/13/09. Reviewed from notes.

The initial pour is cola black with a huge, light tan head of very tight bubbles. When held up to the light, the body of the beer looks more like a deep ruby barely translucent around the edges. Big soapy bubbles cling to the glass.

The aroma is not terribly pleasant, though not unexpected given the age of this bottle. Tart cherries and an almost pungent sourness dominate the nose. There's a bread-like character to the smell as well. Not much malt here.

The taste is far better than the smell led me to expect. Again, those tart cherries are very forward, but it's actually pretty delicious. There's a touch of coffee in the mid-palate, and maybe a little caramel. A slight metallic twang, but nothing terribly off-putting. This is a little weak, a little watery, but for a two and a half-year old porter the taste has held up very well.

Overcarbonated and thin, the mouthfeel can't quite stand up to the flavor profile. I'd be curious to try a much fresher bottle.

An interesting experiment, and a bottle I'm happy to have purchased. I suspect that this bottle had been hanging around the store from which I purchased it for some time, slowly inching its way to the front of the pack until it ended up on the edge of a bottom shelf. Much better than I expected.

Serving type: bottle

09-25-2011 02:48:18 | More by amphion1065
Photo of billshmeinke
billshmeinke

California

3.53/5  rDev -3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pich black with about three fingers of light/airy looking head. Retention is pretty solid. Nose exhibits some lactic sourness with some chocolate, hazelnuts, plum, raisins, a touch vinous.

Tastes of chocolate, plum, raisins, coffee, smoke, light lactic sourness. Lingering smoke/coffee.

Medium bodied, extremely well carbonated. Finishes quite dry.

Interesting. I dig it.

Serving type: bottle

08-11-2011 19:14:24 | More by billshmeinke
Photo of HappiestCow
HappiestCow

Wisconsin

3.78/5  rDev +3.8%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

(from notes) Hooked up to the tap and got really excited to try an "original" recipe, especially from Ron Pattinson's historical stand point.

A: Poured thin offthe tap, very little foam. Body not quite totally opaque, but still quite dark.

S: Mild chocolate and coffee, Resembles the smell of a rich chocolate malt, but with a small coffee kick.

T: Hints of molasses, chocolate, and coffee. Has a unique sour finish which I really am enjoying, nothing face puckering, just enough to have a nice sour note. Portersare not my got to beer, so haven't had many, am thinking thesour finish is unique.

M: Thin, not like other porters in feel, yet it is the 'original' ...so...

D: To thin for me, butam loving the end note, making me want more, luckily there is more, so more I shall have. not to sad that this is a one-off though.

(on writing review) Can not say that I have craved this beer again, not that it was bad, just nothing real special drinking. Was a nice history lesson though.

Serving type: on-tap

07-25-2011 18:57:38 | More by HappiestCow
Photo of t0nydean
t0nydean

Maine

1.83/5  rDev -49.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

my second disappointment in a week...jeez

purchased a 750ml from Yankee Spirits in Sturbridge, MA in Feb 2011

opened this beer to an explosive bang! that was a little alarming...poured it and the nice looking dark brown head bloomed out of the glass and onto everything...really unusual for a London Porter.

I take a sip and find that this beer is carbonated beyond what I would expect for even champagne, its like club soda. Very weird for a porter of course, it must have been bottled with an excess of sugars or an unusually hearty strain of yeast...it was undrinkable in this state, literally too fizzy to swallow.

Wanting to taste this beer because it otherwise looked and smelled promising I left it out overnight to see if the carbonation would subside, and it did not.
When I poured it out it literally filled the sink with brown fizz like baking soda and vinegar.

On to the next brew...

Serving type: bottle

02-14-2011 23:01:42 | More by t0nydean
Photo of Mora2000
Mora2000

Texas

3.9/5  rDev +7.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Thanks to my brother for sharing this bottle. Bottle 652 of 672. Bottled 3/13/2009.

The beer pours a dark brown color with a tan head. The aroma is that of a basic English porter with slight twist. The first aromas I get are a lot of chocolate and coffee. I also get some roasted malt. At the end of the aroma is some tart dark fruit notes, which makes me wonder if the beer is going to be slightly sour.

The flavor is basic porter. I get a ton of roasted malt and chocolate. There is not much coffee in the flavor and no detectable hops. As I get toward the end of the glass and the beer warms up toward room temperature, I start to get a little bit of the dark fruit tartness that I got in the aroma. The tartness goes very well with the other flavors, particularly the chocolate.

Medium mouthfeel and high carbonation.

Serving type: bottle

01-15-2011 22:32:56 | More by Mora2000
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
1914 Porter from Brouwerij De Molen
83 out of 100 based on 41 ratings.