Heen & Weer - Brouwerij De Molen

Not Rated.
Heen & WeerHeen & Weer

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
82
good

51 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 51
Reviews: 20
rAvg: 3.58
pDev: 14.53%
Wants: 0
Gots: 6 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij De Molen visit their website
Netherlands

Style | ABV
Tripel |  9.50% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: TKempe on 09-17-2008

42 IBU
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 51 | Reviews: 20
Reviews by MAB:
Photo of MAB
4.35/5  rDev +21.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Beer trivia: This beer is pronounced "Hane en Veer", according to a Dutchman whom I spoke to. Why a double-E would be "A" in the first word and "E" in the last makes no sense.
What a wacky language! This beer would go GOOD with FOOD, though I suppose....

The pour from the tap was torturously slow and foamy, but well worth the wait.

It is a deep copper color with a thick foamy white head. It has a very sweet nose, and slightly citrus-y.
The initial taste is malt & sugar but a hint of bitterness creeps in at the end. The alcohol is very present. Absolutely delicious.
I was most impressed with the mouthfeel. It is thicker than some other Belgian/ Belgian-style brews that I've had and that suits this beer.

You may not like it if you're not a fan of sweets but there is a residual bitterness that builds a bit as the glass empties.

My glass emptied far too soon. I'll have another, please!

More User Reviews:
Photo of Mora2000
3.68/5  rDev +2.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Thanks to bu11zeye for sharing this bottle.

Pours golden orange with a white head. The aroma is citrus, yeast and a lot of spiciness, both pepper and coriander. The flavor is more of the same with the coriander and orange flavors going well together. Medium mouthfeel and low carbonation.

Photo of biboergosum
3.65/5  rDev +2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

330ml bottle. "Back and Forth", the name proclaims. But from what?

This beer pours a slightly hazy, dark orangish amber hue, with three fingers of tight, foamy white head, which leaves a few Southwest-worthy mesas of patchy lace around the glass as it genially sinks away.

It smells of sugary pale malt, sharp, yet sweet orange citrus, a bit of forest floor pine essence, and a middling green yeastiness. The taste is sweet fruity malt - wine wine concentrate, dried apricot - more hefty, bloated pale malt, some soft, sassy spice, redolent of coriander, I suppose, and equally brazen leafy, weedy hops. There may be grass in there, but it's hidden like the FBI's knocking on the front door.

The carbonation is quite frothy, but not really a concern, the body a nondescript medium weight, and smooth, but for a latent edgy, metallic snag, likely due to the burbling booze quotient. It finishes sweet, the saccharine bready malt, and attendant fruitiness offset in only a minor amount by the lingering hops, and heretofore ethereal booze.

I sense that this was intended to be something like a Belgian IPA - a hoppy tripel, or whatever. It turns out that it gets the tripel part down pat; however, the hops seem lost in the mire, though this takes little away from the overall experience. Enjoyable in its own right, and with just too little of that extra zazz, I am most certainly most to and fro about this one.

Photo of Mar02x
4.12/5  rDev +15.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

I bought this beer at the Struise in Oostvleteren during my summer holidays of 2011. It was time well spend. :)

A - An hazy amber/golden colored beer with an off white head. There are some carbonation bubbles racing to the top, but I think that's because of a dirty glass. (I was at my father in law's place again. I brought the beer, he the glasses)

S - Nice and fresh because of the citrus hops and a light pine presence.

T - O! what a nice triple, why didn't I try this one earlier. A light sweet taste upfront, coriander, hops and a nice bitterness.

M - The carbonation is heavy but never unpleasant. The finish is nice and slightly sticky and than comes the bitterness.

O - I really don't understand the other rating, this is good stuff. I will buy this again. I was completely surprised by the taste, nicely done. My bottle had aged for 1/2 year, maybe that's why.

Photo of Sammy
3.68/5  rDev +2.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Bottle imported by Bar Volo. Very sweet, better spiciness at room temperature. Coriander, orange peel, and sweet yeast. Drinkable and smooth mouthfeel.Some lace lines. Not what you expect from a triple, or from the brewery.Not too complex but Ok to try.

Photo of sfprint
3.81/5  rDev +6.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: Lots and lots of carbonation and head, a dark honey color, hazy.
S: Almost IPAish. An edge of plastic on the nose but mixed with a yeasty honey. Minus the plastic, very nice.
T: Complex. Distinct layers. There's a cardboard taste, a certain tree, sage, a syrupy sap sweetness. Very interesting! A tripel? I'm not so sure. Unlike any other tripel I've had.
M: Smooth and round
O: Certainly a beer where I intellectualize the flavors, although in terms of repeated drinking, it's not a session beer. It's a thinkers beer.

Photo of CrazyDavros
3.58/5  rDev 0%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours amber with a massive head.
Nose shows wheat, doughy yeast, pears and spicy phenols. Unfortunately the doughy character is very strong, almost overpowering.
Flavours include loads of alcohol, pretty sweet with lots of candi sugar. A little too much booze and sweetness.
Nice body and high carbonation, helps cut the sweetness.

Photo of Phyl21ca
1.8/5  rDev -49.7%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Bottle: Poured a hazy orangey color ale with a small foamy head with minimal retention and not much carbonation. Aroma consists of overly sweet malt base with not much else to report. Taste is dominated by overly sweet malt with lacking ester and not much character from the yeast which is usually element that I look for in this style. Body was full with medium to low carbonation and no apparent alcohol. Not sure if this was a bad bottle but serious lack of complexity or attenuation.

Photo of RuudJH
2/5  rDev -44.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

De Molen brewery has very interesting stuff, but this 'Heen & Weer' was very disappointing. It could be a misfortunate bottling, but it was just no good to me.

Very flat, light brown. Hardly any carbonation. Disappointing.

Smell and taste are very malty and yeasty, with a fruity sourness as well.
Equal in the taste, with a load of alcohol in it. Metallic, funky. I don't know how to describe it, but turned off by this beer, I'm sorry to say... It's strong alcoholic, and hardly any flavour at all.
I wonder if this was a bad sample, a bad bottling.
In this case, i only took one sip, and got rid of the rest.

Photo of GONZALOYANNA
3.87/5  rDev +8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

330ml bottle.(Bottled on Nov´11,enjoyed on Jan´14). Tripel Karmeliet Oversized Chalice glass. Burnish brass color, foggy appearance. Yellowish off-white foam, creamy & lasting crown. Perfumed aroma displays brown sugar, candies, molasses, ripe fruit –lychis- spices & herbs as well as coriander, biscuit & slight phenolic notes –those last both in flavor & aroma. Malty, sweet & warming upfront. Full body. Moderate carbonation. Dense texture & subtle spicy on palate. Gentle herbal & delicate bitterness. Sweet finish & fruity aftertaste. Well felt but integrated ABV.

Photo of kojevergas
2.42/5  rDev -32.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Served on-draught into stemware at De Molen in Bodegraven. Reviewed from notes taken July 2010. 9.5% ABV.

A: Pours a one finger head of slight cream, fair thickness, and below average retention. Body colour is a semitransparent copper.

Sm: Smokey notes, amber hops, caramelized malt, light cherry hints, and yeast. A mild strength aroma.

T: Strange. Caramelized malt, off-cherry ester notes, biscuity yeasty notes. A very strange build with no real definite direction or focus. Feels lopsided and horribly imbalanced. Quite the mess. Completely off the mark for a tripel.

Mf: Smooth, wet, and undercarbonated. Very meh. I've noticed major carbonation issues with De Molen across the board.

Dr: The 9.5% is dangerously well hidden, but at 8 euro a pint, I expect more than this unflattering taste. I wouldn't get this again. A poor effort from De Molen.

D+

Photo of Sean9689
3.18/5  rDev -11.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a rusty orange/red color, cream-colored head, thin cap. Aroma is fruity, toasted malts, pretty sweet. Flavor is burnt sugars, malts, carmel, and more fruity sweetness. Medium body, high carbonation.

This beer really doesn't do much for me, and there's a lot of other Tripel's I'd rather have other this one.

Photo of rvdoorn
3.5/5  rDev -2.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Had this beer together with my father fresh from the Molen Brewery. Poured into a de Molen sniffer. The beer pours a very cloudy dark orange-amber with some yeast pellets floating in solution, with a small white head.

Smell: Sharp spices (coriander, pepper), fresh fruits (lemon), some orange zest, hops and alcohol

Taste: Malts and hops are mostly present. Bitter for a tripel. There is some sweetness, just enough to balance the beer a bit. Also sharp spices appear (pepper,and coriander again), alcohol is present, hints of fresh lemon and orange zest. The aftertaste is strong bitter.

Mouthfeel: medium-low carbonation. Medium bodied.

Overall: tripel beers will never be my favorite, so neither is this one. The beer is quite bitter for a tripel, maybe even a bit too bitter. Still, a nice brew, and I guess if ones likes the style, worth trying

Photo of ADZA
3.48/5  rDev -2.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This brew pours a golden yellow hue with decent carbonation that leaves behind a one finger head and a rim of lacing,the smell of this brew is very herbal with aromas of corriander,pepper,citrus and bananna peels,it has only an average mouthfeel which could be a little bit thicker in my eyes for this style and has tastes of corriander,barnyard funk,belgian yeast and i swear im getting a creamed rice flavour at the end of this brew aswell which makes this tripel finish quite sweet and bready,overall its definately not one of this breweries finest brews thats for sure even though its still easy enough to drink at its price and the selection of other fine beers from this brewery i wont be revisiting this one in a hurry with my hard earned.

Photo of thierrynantes
3.73/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Beer bottle (33 cl.) purchased from Chez Clem (Nantes) and tasted in 2012.

Appearance : orange amber color, with tan foamy head (w some lacing).
Smell : roasted and malty aromas.
Taste and mouthfeel : sweet malty with alcohol presence, leading to a dry spicy and bitter finish.
Drinkability : a good beer in the Belgian style Triple.
To drink at cellar t°.

Photo of RodneyFarva
3.4/5  rDev -5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

served on-tap into a pint glass (yes, i know)

pours a one-finger white head, hazy orange copper color

aromas of apricots, white grapes and pears, some spiciness and yeast present.

some flavors of white grapes and spices, but the alcohol presence is very noticeable and quite sweet as well.

carbonation is low enough to not cut the sweetness much. overall, interesting, but the alcohol and sweetness masked a lot of the flavors i was expecting from the nose.

Photo of thepeter
3.49/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a fairly dark orange with a lot less head than I expected. The lacing left was nice but really I just wanted more head, and who doesn't!!

The Aroma was a lot of yeast, Citrus zest, some pepper adn herbs. I got some bubblegum which I believe was from the yeast.

Taste was similar but not nearly as sweet as it smelled. The yeast was still there but a sharper flavor with more pepper and herbal notes domitating and citrus in the backround.

Medium body, a bit bubbly at first but smooths out and finishes soft. A pretty drinkable beer but left a bit of sticky and odd aftertaste.

Pretty good tripel overall

Photo of TKempe
3.23/5  rDev -9.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A 'hand-made tripel' (brewed with coriander), the label tells us.

The beer looks very hazy and is dark-orange in colour. A moderate off-white head sticks to the glass.

Aroma is very fruity and is dominated by a good dose of coriander. Whiffs of pepper and alcohol make themselves known as well, while malt and yeast give body to the aroma. This smells a lot like La Chouffe, but has more of a candy or chewing gum appearance.

Malt dominates the flavour, producing a full and dry character. It is a taste in which sweetness and a spicy bitterness compete with each other. Alcohol is a main factor as well.

Mouthfeel is full and flexible and is defined by a level of carbonation that is on the low side.

This tripel (which differs greatly from the average one) is a bit rude in my opinion. By far not as refined as other examples. Still a treat to taste something as individualistic as this.

Photo of dgilks
3.75/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Cloudy amber colour with a big, fluffy white head. Decent head retention with the head dissipating slowly to a small head remaining over the beer.

Sweet, honeyed malt with some clear clove spice notes that are very prominent. Mild citrus and dark fruit notes. Extremely spicy and yeast driven.

Big malt flavour with a light honey note. Plenty of spice as in the aroma with some pleasant pear and other fruits playing on the palate. For mine, the flavours are really nice even if this isn't the slightly more refined Westmalle or Chimay.

Medium body with moderately-high carbonation. This works fairly well.

A great little beer and thoroughly enjoyable. The flavours aren't quite perfect for a Tripel but I still like it.

Photo of Daniellobo
3.5/5  rDev -2.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Fair if a bit monochord take on a Tripel

Presentation: 12 oz brown capped bottle. Simple cream illustration with a b/w drawing of a brick warehouse facade, within a light red framing. Notes ingredients, style, best by date 14/07/13, and 9,5% Alc. by Vol. Served on a tulip glass.

A - Hazy deep amber pour, fair frothy head, moderate retention with nice surface memory, and minimal blotches of lacing.

S - Light nose, soft yeasty notes, with caramel and a boozy hint.

T - Moderately yeasty, plenty of caramel and feeling rather hefty around it with a strong sense of bitterness. Yeasty but predominantly earthy at one point lacking much fruit or spice on the palate.

M - Medium to medium/full body with soft carbonation. Nice creamy flow with an slightly astringent finish.

O - Acceptable brew but nothing memorable out it.

Notes: A bit too hefty on the caramel and short missing some spicy complexity... not awful but one of the least memorable De Molen offerings I've tried.

Heen & Weer from Brouwerij De Molen
82 out of 100 based on 51 ratings.