1. Extreme Beer Fest tickets go on sale Sat, Sep 27 @ Noon EDT.
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Seeing Double IPA - Foothills Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Seeing Double IPASeeing Double IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

522 Ratings
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 522
Reviews: 180
rAvg: 4.06
pDev: 10.1%
Wants: 66
Gots: 39 | FT: 3
Brewed by:
Foothills Brewing Company visit their website
North Carolina, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  9.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 10-09-2005)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 522 | Reviews: 180 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of devilben02
3.9/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a murky orange-copper color with a fluffy but sticky head. The aroma is dense with a fresh and juicy combination of citrus (mostly orange) and grassy hops that carries through into the flavor. The flavor is not purely driven by bitterness, though, with a prominent candy sweetness providing a nice balance that is prominent but stops well short of cloying. Texturally, it is resinous but smooth, helping the beer go down easy but leaving a lingering trail of bitter and sweet after the swallow. It is definitely boozy, but not overwhelming.

Overall, Seeing Double is like spending an early spring day in an orange grove. It's not perfectly comfortable due to a slight chill in the air and a small (but harmless) ant hill nearby, but those small drawbacks are easily overlooked in favor of the overall experience that is quite enjoyable.

devilben02, May 24, 2010
Photo of Haybeerman
4.18/5  rDev +3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

A: Clear copper color. Poured a 1 finger tan head with good ertention to a thinck cap. Lots of sticky lace.

S: Nice blend of citrus, grapefruit and pine. Sugary sweet malt character.

T: Grapefruit sweet caramel and residual sugar. Really well balanced for a DIPA. Resiny magnums for considerable bitter finish. Disguises the alcohol well.

M: Mediuim body. Ample carbonation. Resiny bitter lingers; but good it was there form balance.

D: Flavorful, balanced and very drinkable for a beer this big. ABV a little daunting.

Haybeerman, May 15, 2010
Photo of BeerImmediately
3.75/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Picked up a growler at the brew pub last night after sampling a few others.

Pours with a short, off-white head over a hazy iced-tea colored body with plenty of carbonation present. Good sticky lacing.

Sweetness in the aroma was the surprisingly dominant quality - butterscotch. Pine needles come thru next and are faint for the style.

Thick body is the first thing you notice - goes in slow and glides across the palate. Resiny hop bite attacks you right away, reminding you of the style. Bitter grapefruit rind battles it out with a heavy dose of caramel malt sweetness. Pineapple as it warms, and honey, too. Cloying, but tasty.

Filling, no doubt. Drinkability is below the "great ones" but with the good flavors and nice balance, it's a DIPA I'll definitely seek out again when in NC.

BeerImmediately, Apr 04, 2010
Photo of avalon07
4.4/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

A: Poured from a growler to a tulip glass. Had a deep orange color and a thick consistency. There was a half inch of foamy, long-lasting head and very good lacing.

S: A surprisingly subtle aroma of hops, citrus, and a sugary sweetness.

T: Tasted of grapefruit, hops, caramel, and a little malt. Well balanced and not particularly boozy considering the alcohol content.

M: A well-carbonated beer with a somewhat oily finish. Medium-bodied.

D: A very drinkable IPA.

avalon07, Apr 02, 2010
Photo of adam42381
4.38/5  rDev +7.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Purchased a growler on Sunday (2/28) at the brewpub. Poured into a pint glass.

Appearance: Pours a medium amber brown with a hint of orange and a 1 finger white foamy head. Almost no lacing.

Smell: Pine and citrus with subtle hints of caramel.

Taste: Grapefruit and citrus rind flavor mixed with pine up front. Nice sweet caramel malt flavor in the middle followed by a nice hoppy bitterness that finishes very nicely.

Mouthfeel: Medium bodied with a decent amount of carbonation.

Drinkability: Very high drinkability for a beer with 9.5% ABV. This is a beer that will sneak up on you because the flavor doesn't give much indication that the ABV is high.

Overall: Excellent double IPA. It's one of my new favorites. I will definitely be making the drive to get a refill sometime in the near future.

adam42381, Mar 05, 2010
Photo of bosox941827
3.63/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

16 oz. standard pint glass, on tap at Tyler's Tap Room, Durham, NC.

A - Cloudy, amber-y orange/brown color, with just a hint of lace at the top of the glass.
S - Malt and citrus-y
T & M - Wow, first sip get a tremendous hit of citrus, specifically lemon, from the hops. It's almost astringent, but it blends quickly with the background sweetness before resolving into a hoppy, tongue-drying finish. You can tell that the alcohol is there, but it is fairly well-hidden (if I didn't know it was 9.5%, I would have guessed it was ~ 7%). Carbonation on this one is low, and it goes down pretty smoothly. This is a heavy beer though, and it thick and almost syrupy. Had it with Tyler's great blackened crab cake and have to say it was a perfect match.
D - Surprisingly drinkable given the ABV, but I suspect that would sneak up on you pretty quickly.

This is good, but not *great* imperial IPA; would prefer the hops to be a bit more prominent throughout the taste. Would definitely order it again though.

bosox941827, Feb 20, 2010
Photo of Lunch
4.5/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Served on-tap at Foothills Brewery in Winston-Salem, NC during the 2010 Sexual Chocolate release into a Foothills Brewing Signature glass at the appropriate temperature (02/05/10).

A: Pours a hazy and glowing, dark, golden, amber with a beautiful rich, orange hue. Capped with 1.5 fingers of an off-white with decent retention leaving patchy lace.

S: Fresh aroma of grapefruit and pine with note of citrus and some tropical fruit. Really intense hop profile quite similar to very fresh Weyerbacher Double Simcoe.

T: The taste follows the nose with some intense pine and citrus hops with a wonderful degree of bitterness that coats the entire palate without be overly harsh. The malt backbone is quite rich as will with layers of caramel and toffee.

M: Full-bodied with moderate creamy carbonation and slight slick characteristic. I really enjoyed the bitterness from this one.

D: Extremely drinkable and if it were available locally I would drink this frequently.

Overall I must say that is an exceptional DIPA from Foothills and one that deserves great praise. Highly Recommended.

Lunch, Feb 18, 2010
Photo of GeezLynn
3.93/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: orange-tan color with a pretty good head.
S: caramel malt and pine. Just a little citrus. Pleasant but not all that strong.
T: honey, grapefruit, pine, and sweet caramel malt. Biscuity malt flavors jump out more as the beer warms. The finish is long and bitter.
M: medium bodied, light on the carbonation

Seeing Double is aptly named as this beer definitely packs a punch. A little too hot and sweet for me to be having more than a few, but I did enjoy a good 30 oz of the growler. Would rate this below the People's Porter, Total Eclipse, and Hoppyum if you have your choice at Foothills, although all four are well-made beers.

GeezLynn, Feb 17, 2010
Photo of Metalmonk
4.15/5  rDev +2.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a hazy reddish-rust color, burnt orange highlights, with a super-creamy head of small, tight bubbles. Damn good lookin', uh huh.

Nose isn't as vibrant as I remember from previous meetings, and this is brewery-fresh, right from the growler. Maybe it needs to warm a little...but I am getting mostly citrus from the hops, and just a smidgen of toasty/biscuit-y malt.

On the tongue, a strong pine essence muscles in and knocks down those citrus fruits that I caught in the aroma...although there's some of that too, mostly in the form of grapefruit rind bitterness. A super-hopped beer with good caramel-y malt backup, wonderful when fresh like this. Cinnamon, honey and light alcohol warming come through strongest in the finish.

Round and buttery smooth, although not as creamy as most great DIPAs. Fairly healthy carbonation, a little more than expected considering the style and serving type, but it's doing its job just fine.

I've had even better experiences with this, all three times fresh on tap...I might just revise this review as this glass warms, or with the second glass from the growler, already on deck for later in the afternoon...but still a completely wonderful creation that shows Foothills' big beer muscle holds just as much brain as brawn.

Metalmonk, Feb 13, 2010
Photo of zoso493
4.38/5  rDev +7.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Had this on tap at the brewery. Poured into what I would probably categorize as an oddly shaped flute.

Appearance: Pours a decent looking a coppery-amber color with a fluffy but fairly thin head that leaves only tinges of lacing on the glass.

Smell: Has a really nice, sweet aroma that consists predominantly of noble hops. It also has a bit of a honey-like scent about it, but the floral hops are definitely the most discernible things in the nose.

Taste: Really good DIPA. It has a strong, sweet hop taste to start out, then the hops get put back in their place by the malts before the bittering hops win out in the end. Most DIPA's can become too malt-centric because of the need to balance the huge amount of hops in them, but this one still brings the hops to the forefront.

Mouthfeel: Very thick for a DIPA with a nice amount of carbonation. Pretty satisfying and crisp mouthfeel.

Drinkability: This is a pretty drinkable brew, but with all the hops and at 9.50% you couldn't have a hell of a lot of these.

Overall, this is a really good DIPA. Despite the big presence of malts, it still manages to keep the hops as the central focus of the beer, while being smooth all the time. If you make your way to Foothills Brewery, this is a must-try beer.

zoso493, Feb 10, 2010
Photo of inspektor
3.93/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours copper with no head, so it's not surprising that it leaves no lacing.

Smells fruity, mainly grapefruit.

Taste is fruity, piney and hoppy. There is also a trace of caramel as well. More malty upfront than hoppy.

Full bodied mouthfeel with moderate carbonation

Very drinkable and easy to enjoy.

Overall, a high quality NC brew, not on the level of the de facto DIPA's but good all the same.

inspektor, Jan 24, 2010
Photo of Crittervision
4.3/5  rDev +5.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

[edit: second review]

had at foundation again. also, had hoppyum on draft/tap/whatever with one beer between it and this.

deep amber in appearance. foundation has pretty dim lighting, but even taking that into account, this seemed darker than amber. amber plus a bit of brown. head falls quickly.

smell is grapefruit immediately. an exaggeration of hoppyum which is outstandingly hoppy for an ipa. grapefruit aspect is pungent with some sugar and spiciness.

taste follows with strong grapefruit juice presence and strong grapefruit rind undertones. sweetness to balance.

mouthfeel is pleasant, medium to high carbonation, despite the minimal head. prickly. body has a thickness which i think is expected from a dipa. not quite an oily thickness, but above medium-bodied for sure.

quite drinkable. fruity, citrusy burps. yummy.

much different than my previous experience. both times id had a few other beers. im glad the second experience confirmed the original expectations. an incredibly drinkable beer. not sure of the alcohol, but i was not aware of it [and i didnt notice it as i finished it, a definite plus].

hopefully the statements from my previous review of this beer will be made clear[er] with -[clarifications]- below.

original below 4, 3, 3, 3.5, 3

had on draft at foundation in raleigh

deep cloudy copper head, disappears quickly, nice lacing

homebrewed hoppy smell -[by this i meant to express that the beer was reminiscent of a recent homebrewed ipa i had tasted. it lacked a pungent hoppy character that i expect from ipas, and was surprisingly malty. that said, it was difficult to let this slide for a double ipa from a reputable brewery]-, a little thick but ambiguous, i have yet to have a brewery-made ipa [im pretty sure] that eludes a hoppy character.

a little malty and strange for a dipa. the hops are not in your face by any means. dont know what to think.

carbonation is a bit much. thick. average-ish.

its a little too heavy without the dipa reward of hops. malt character is a bit much. maybe "balancing" too much in a way that throws off any balance?

Crittervision, Jan 24, 2010
Photo of Durge
3.6/5  rDev -11.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Found this on tap at the Flying Saucer in Charlotte, NC. The appearance is a murky dark chestnut color, thick and chewy looking. It has a very nice off-white (almost oatmeal) head with notable rings of lacing. The nose picks up surprisingly very little, just a dull wheat and maybe a vague whisp of woodsy hop. Upon the first taste I detect a very different blend of herbal/floral hops and toffee malt. It's relatively mild in a medium (+) bodied brew with well carbonated slightly resinous feel. The flavor is not in my wheelhouse but is interesting enough to avoid too much disappointment. The hops grow on you as it warms and you start to pick up a fair intensity of bitterness. There's a little cotton candy at times but hops begin to prevail, a bit sharp but still sort of floral and peachy. I'd say this improves with time and is worth a try. Funny that the aroma is so absent but it does a decent job for the hop lover and is pretty drinkable although this does not seem like a double ipa to me, a bit too tame.

Durge, Dec 30, 2009
Photo of gatorbreath
3.85/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured from a growler into a Duvel Tulip glass

App: Darker than average amber/copper/rusty color pillowy head that lasts for a bit with some solid lacing

Smell: Citrusy hop smell with some pine notes

Taste/MF: Piny and citrusy hop notes with some malty undertones. The mouthfeel is kind of medium-bodied and carbonated.

Drinkability: the 9.5% is noticeable after the first glass and the burn is prevalent in the tasting. I could probably down a few of these but this is a strong brew.

Overall: Not the biggest DIPA I've had by any means, not my favorite, and the burn is very real on this one. I like it but it will be a rare selection for me in the future.

gatorbreath, Nov 14, 2009
Photo of nickd717
4.18/5  rDev +3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Draft at the brewpub. This is review #200 on BA for me - all right!

A - Pours a cloudy brownish amber color with a large, lasting off-white head.

S - Aroma is citrus/pine hops and caramel malt.

T - Fairly sweet caramel malt, earth, fruity notes, and loads of citrusy/piney/resiny hops. Really well-balanced. Best beer I had at Foothills (no Sexual Chocolate available unfortunately) and pretty damn good overall.

M - Palate medium-full and chewy with some hoppy oiliness.

D - Drinkability really high for the ABV and IBUs.

nickd717, Sep 24, 2009
Photo of rtratzlaff
4.35/5  rDev +7.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A: 1/2" head with a peachy copper body

S: Plenty of grapefruit hop aroma with a good amount of malty sweetness. Maybe some pineapple aromas as well.

T: Sweet up front then overload of hops hit about 3 seconds into the sip washing the sweetness.

M: Decent carbonation and a full body.

D: I wish this had more drinkability (lower abv.) since I love this beer.

rtratzlaff, Sep 23, 2009
Photo of ncbeermonger
4/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

great BIG Beer from right here in NC. Had it on cask at the Summertime Brewsfest here in Greensboro

-Good head, to be admired, smells a little sweet, and floers are present.
-Taste more sweet than normal, must be because of the cask
-the mouthfeel is light, and good
-A very drinkable beer. Not easy to find on cask, but a great find if you hear about it!

ncbeermonger, Sep 02, 2009
Photo of Billolick
4.43/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Pours darker amber, just a moderate head, then a tiny bubble film. The nose here is bold and big, thoroughly hoppy. Thick, creamy and smooth mouthfeel. Nice malt under coating smooths things out for the major resiny and citic hop assault that quickly arrives. Big bold and crunching. Fine brew. Hop lovers rejoice and please begin distribution of this stuff to NY state ASAP, please.

Billolick, Aug 24, 2009
Photo of JWD
3.9/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Had this on tap at the flying saucer in Raleigh NC on a recent trip.

A- Darker than usual, looks very thick and chewy

S- OK, very boozy and barleywine smell

T- Once again BW here, Huge malt backbone sweet and then a bitter finish.


D- this suffered a little due to the boozy BW taste, still OK and a hell of a start to a long day of tasting.

JWD, Aug 21, 2009
Photo of dmamiano
4.38/5  rDev +7.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Had this one at a local Irish pub in Charleston called The Giffon.
Nice, heady pour. Well presented with one finger off white head thinck lacing and sips were taken.
Smell mixes nicely of malts...thick and sweet with the heavy hop bite that tickles the nnose with fruity citrus and spices.
Taste was full on the palate.Big malt of thick caramel malts and juicy hoppiness.
Full feel made this beer seem almost 'chewy'

dmamiano, Jul 19, 2009
Photo of JonMich13
4.43/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A bit apprehensive about reviewing this. Had it on tap immediately after having the glorious Canadian Breakfast Stout on tap at the Charlotte Saucer. Although they contrast enough that I think my palate is ok to review honestly.

A = Nice orange honey color with a light white head. Seemed a bit cloudy.

S = Nice obvious citrus hop. Big grapefruit and tropical hop notes.

T = Gushing citrus and tropical fruit hoppiness. I always prefer the citrus hop bombs to the the piny or floral ones. This is right up my alley. This one has a big caramel malt backing that is very sweet. The malt holds up a bit stronger than most DIPA's. If they backed down on the sweet malts just a bit, this might be perfect.

M = Good oily mouthfeel. Pretty standard for these types of beers.

D = Huge sweet maltiness detracts from the drinkability a bit, but the wonderful citrus hop combo helps make up for it.

Very, very good DIPA from a great local brewery. Viva Foothills.

JonMich13, Jul 11, 2009
Photo of dirtylou
4.38/5  rDev +7.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

on tap, mellow mushroom asheville

cell phone notes

appearance: served in a standard pint, for a non-standard $4. body is a rather dark amber tone, light tan cap with light retention

smell: very nice - tropical fruit, juicy citrus hops, light caramel malt

taste: this was a very good DIPA - juicy and full of grapefruit hop flavor, tropical notes provide a great hop taste. decent balance of caramel malts and no alcohol detected

mouthfeel: smooth and creamy, abv hidden well, light-moderate bitterness

drinkability: good

dirtylou, Jun 27, 2009
Photo of nc41
4/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

One very nice DIPA , had it on tap at Foothills and at the Mellow Mushroom in Greensboro. Nice head decent nose, a predictable solid hop hit on the palate. Nice finish, clean, the hop bitterness sticks around a while. Not world class but one very solid and very drinkable DIPA. If this comes around in Growlers locally I'll be standing in line, but WS is about 120 mile round trip for me..

nc41, Jun 15, 2009
Photo of grayburn
3.98/5  rDev -2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

The appearance is the weakest part of this beer, and its still nice and pretty. Pours a nice orange-gold, light on the head and lacing.

The smell and taste are both as expected, c hops dominate, I love dipas...always predictably nice.

The mouth is a bit heavy, but does not hinder the drinkability in the least, just enough carbonation. Very nice.

grayburn, Jun 09, 2009
Photo of jimmyjames8
4.5/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I am an IPA fanboy. This is my current premium fave. This is beautiful beer with a wonderful deep honey color and white foamy head. There is a hoppy, mashy smell to it. The taste is strong and hoppy with citrus undertones and a honey sweetness but just a hint and a high alcohol tinge. The mouthfeel is warm, full bodied, thick (honey and clover again) and there is to me a slight but good burn to it. The drinkability is good but not great. I love drinking this beer but it is STRONG and will mess you up. I try to save this one for the last of the night and not have more than 2. I have tried a million IPA's and most all are good. This is great. There is supposedly a limited run of this beer put up in Pappy Van Winkle bourbon casks. If that beer was a guitar amp, it would go to 11.

jimmyjames8, Jun 01, 2009
Seeing Double IPA from Foothills Brewing Company
91 out of 100 based on 522 ratings.