1. Rating beers by attributes (look, smell, taste, feel, overall) is back! Read the latest update ...
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Rousse - Les Trois Mousquetaires

Not Rated.
RousseRousse

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
83
good

17 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 17
Reviews: 12
rAvg: 3.62
pDev: 11.33%
Wants: 0
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Les Trois Mousquetaires
Quebec, Canada

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: papat444 on 08-23-2008)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 17 | Reviews: 12 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of rogerdandy
4/5  rDev +10.5%

rogerdandy, Apr 16, 2014
Photo of juliendesrochers
3.25/5  rDev -10.2%

juliendesrochers, Apr 20, 2013
Photo of oldp0rt
3/5  rDev -17.1%

oldp0rt, Apr 07, 2012
Photo of ctgui
3/5  rDev -17.1%

ctgui, Dec 08, 2011
Photo of kelvarnsen
4/5  rDev +10.5%

kelvarnsen, Nov 30, 2011
Photo of spinrsx
3.13/5  rDev -13.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

341ml bottle poured into a pint glass

Appearance - after pouring, the beer is a red/amber colour with a large size fizzy beige head. The had dissipated very quickly. I can see an average amount of carbonation, and there doesn't seem to be any lacing at all.

Smell - Probably not a good thing, but the first thing notice is vinegar like scent. Checked the freshness date, and we're still good.. Also some toasted malts and hops.

Taste & Mouth - The beer has a lot of carbonation on tongue. Thankfully it tastes better than it smells. I can taste the toasted malts and a caramel sweetness, followed by the bitterness of the hops. Also some notes of pine and a peppery spice mix.

Drink - Once again I am disappointed in the Les Trois Mousquetaires.

spinrsx, Sep 04, 2010
Photo of bobsy
4/5  rDev +10.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Picked up a 12oz bottle in Montreal.

Wonderful copper pour with a finger of off-white head that exhibited good retention and left some streaks of lace on the glass. Malt-forward nose has bread, nut and caramel, but there's also some steely and grassy hops underneath to provide balance.

Pretty neat flavour is a touch hoppier than I expected from the nose, which is usually fine, but in this case I would have preferred it a little more subdued as the malt backing is excellent and the hops really don't deserve to have an equal billing. A burst of caramel, bread, chocolate, earth and mineral combines with a light woodiness to create an impressive flavour. The hops bring a herbal and lightly grassy character with a surprising bite. Medium mouthfeel and carbonation.

As a lager I doubt it will ever get the plaudits that an ale would, but this is nicely made, interesting and highly drinkable. Its not up to the level of their signature series, but neither is it far off. Great stuff, and well worth trying, especially if your a fan of malty lagers.

bobsy, Jun 29, 2010
Photo of pootz
3.53/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Bottle:

put a copper-red lager in the flute with a 1 finger frothy tan cap. Light carbonation. Good lacing.

Aroma subdued but you get spices, sweet bread and some herbs. Mouthfeel is slick with a medium body.

Flavor is defined by a sweet caramel toffee maltiness and some dried fruit and nut tones from yeast byproducts... then that is equally balanced off with a lush herbal-pine hop mixture. Finish gets slightly bitter with a great bready sweet aftertaste.

I think what the brewer was after here was a genuine traditional Vienna style and he got half way there with the choice of malts and yeast but the hops are too prevalent to make this a true Vienna...and that is too bad because I like this beer for its great malt profile however with the higher hop bittering it comes off more like a light Munich dark than a Vienna. A Vienna should be sweeter in the finish with the hops more attenuated...still a good drink by any standard though.

pootz, Jun 08, 2010
Photo of andrenaline
3.78/5  rDev +4.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A - Pours a thin layer of bubbly head, which very quickly dissipates and leaves no lacing. Nice clear copper brown with a red hue and a little visible carbonation.

S - Rather light scent, bit of hops on the nose. Sweet chocolate malts also present.

T - Almost a smoked / woody flavour to it. Not overly strong flavour, and finishes a little on the bitter side. The chocolate malts are present and a bit of citrus hops are blended as well. Nicely balanced.

M - Very light, not overly carbonated and goes down very smooth.

D - By no means a blow-you-away red lager, but a tasty one worthy of trying. One of the better beers from their mixer pack for sure.

andrenaline, Jun 05, 2010
Photo of JohnnyBarman
3.88/5  rDev +7.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured into a lager glass.

A brilliant ruby-copper hue, about a 1/2 of head with great staying power. Lots of flecky lacing.

Nose is malty with notes of hops and caramel.

Starts off with a malty, caramel flavour and finishes earthy and slightly bitter. Very subtle notes of cherry or peach. Bitterness lingers. Took me about five sips to get into it, but now I'm digging this one.

Mouthfeel is slightly watery, with light carbonation.

An enjoyable brew, just about the right complexity. Would make for a great session brew.

JohnnyBarman, May 04, 2010
Photo of ReFill31
3.83/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

341ml bottle poured into a Trois Mousquetaires glass.

A : Nice red color, a little head that do not stays through. Not much bubbles.

S : Caramel, some malt, the smell is not so strong.

T : A little bit sweet from the caramel taste, malty, light taste.

M : Enjoyable

D : Really easy to drink, I would make this a session beer.

ReFill31, Feb 25, 2010
Photo of Shadman
3.13/5  rDev -13.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

3rd of four beers from this brewer's variety pack.

Roasted dark toffee malts dominate the nose, leaving the faint candied fruits a distant 2nd.

Tough one to pin down. Weak and watery flavours, the real taste doesn't kick in until after 3-4 steamboats(seconds)Then the toasted malts come through quite bold and flavour-rich.

Decent mouthfeel, the weak wateriness of the front end detracts a lot from the over all feel.

Not this brewer's best effort...i give it a meh.

Shadman, Feb 16, 2010
Photo of Otterburn
4/5  rDev +10.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

from a mixed pack

poured into a pint,
belongs to a homemade hamburger

Appearance: clear amber, small head, low carbonation

Smell: malty, sweet like caramel

Taste: a bit nutty,caramel, malty, taste is good and clear, this is a decent rousse.

mouthfeel, quite friendly with low carboantion
so the taste is more upfront, so its nice

overall: drinkability is good, its easy to drink and it taste good, get along my hamburger very well. tasty with a good body.

Otterburn, Feb 05, 2010
Photo of wordemupg
4.08/5  rDev +12.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

341ml bottle poured into pint glass dec21 2009

A clear red leaning towards maroon with a fast falling thumbs worth of head that left lace where it existed

S slightly nutty chocolate with some caramel and a little bread, fairly complex for a red

T not a bad thing that this mimics the smell it's quite good and would have gotten a 4.25 if possible

M a little flat but thick enough to please

D a solid beer with no major flaws and well worth trying

a good example of the style and yet another beer from this brewer that's well worth drinking

wordemupg, Dec 22, 2009
Photo of IronDjinn
3.2/5  rDev -11.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

The 3rd of 4 different styles from the Les Trois Mousquetaires variety pack. Pours out an impressive ruby brown with a bright clarity. Short frothy off-whit head that casually lingers on.

Chewy, bready toffee malt nose with some fig and raisin notes as well.

The flavour is okay, but very faint until already well into the aftertaste, almost like a late bloomer that reaches intensity over time. Bready brown sugar and raisins, sweet and sticky texture, fairly one-dimensional.

Smooth texture in the mouthfeel with a good presence of carbonation on the finish to help break up the monotony of the flavour.

Unfortunate, as this is a fairly forgettable amber that seemed to have potential at first, but whispers too much to be heard properly. The aftertaste is satisfying at least.

IronDjinn, Sep 25, 2009
Photo of ZorPrime
4.18/5  rDev +15.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Tasted on May 1st, 2009.

Appearance: Amber color, very nice looking with a nice head.
Smell: Mainly malts with some trace of caramel. The malt smell is very rich.
Tasted: Malt taste and the beer feels full bodied in the mouth however, it feels like a lager. This is a very refreshing amber lager.
Drinkability: Very easy to drink and very thirst quenching.

A must have in my fridge.

ZorPrime, May 30, 2009
Photo of papat444
3.5/5  rDev -3.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

My 50th review!

This beer replaces Aramis, which is now retired.

Poured from a 341ml. bottle.

Appearance: Pours a nice amber-red body, kind of like cherry wood with a generous 3-finger head.

Smell: Malt, caramel (burnt?) with some toffee and a tiny bit sweet. Very good aroma!

Taste: Smooth and malty but not too much. Bitterness is present near the end but that's pretty much it. A bit of a let down after a very nice aroma.

Mouthfeel: Slightly better, has a dry feel to it. Some not-overly coarse malt with a certain spicy finish. Some caramel buried in there with a touch of bitterness.

Drinkability: Not too bad. I wouldn't reach for another in the same session but once in a while sounds about right.

Overall: I let this one warm up a bit but found flavors were a little muted? Maybe better to drink it colder. Appearance and smell were right up there but the taste didn't quite deliver for me. Not bad by any stretch but nothing great either. It is a well brewed beer but it didn't do it for me. You decide!

papat444, Aug 23, 2008
Rousse from Les Trois Mousquetaires
83 out of 100 based on 17 ratings.