Dragonfly IPA - Upland Brewing Company
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 505 | Reviews: 192 | Display Reviews Only:
3.23/5 rDev -5.6%
Reviewed from notes.
Pours a slightly-darkened golden color with a slight white head and not much of any lacing. The nose brings some light grapefruit and citrus hops along with a pretty hefty dose of sweetness. The taste is mild citrus bitterness with some nearly cloying sweetness in the background. Feel seems overly thick because of the sweetness. Some bitterness to save it, but this is just all too sweet. I will say it is better on tap than in the bottle; this is true for nearly all of their beers.
10-24-2010 14:26:11 | More by Thorpe429
2.3/5 rDev -32.7%
Brassy rustic orange with a surprising number of superfine bubbles. The pale golden cap, currently filling at least three-fourths of the glass, is soft and airy, yet looks to be sticky enough to melt in an attractive fashion and to leave more than a token amount of lace.
The nose is too balanced. In fact, several more sniffs tell me that earthy, toasted malt has the clear advantage over hops, an obvious no-no in a beer of this style. Dragonfly was bottled a mere 4 months ago, which isn't nearly long enough for an IPA worth its hops to have faded to this degree. Ergo, it wasn't hopped enough at the time of bottling.
No surprise that the beer doesn't taste very hoppy either. What greets and overwhelms my palate is an odd, fruity sourness. It makes me wonder if I got a bad bottle. On second thought, I just went back and read my review of Upland's Bad Elmer's Porter and it looks like this strange sourness is a brewery trait. Either that or they're both bad bottles.
Earthy malt and spoiled, sour fruit are still #1 on the hit parade (make that the 'miss parade'). As a result, it's hard to appreciate any sort of hop flavor or bitterness at all. Maybe some of the latter, but then what good is hop bitterness without hop flavor? It's hard to believe the '7 hop additions' that the brewery claims. Maybe if they mean hop in the singular rather than the plural...
The crazy carbonation settled down visibly by the several minute mark so I wasn't worried that the mouthfeel would be too busy. And it isn't. It isn't big enough for the style, though, and is barely passable for an APA. I'm only giving it an average score because it works as a light IPA (which, to me, comes dangerously close to being an oxymoron).
Dragonfly IPA is the second member of the Indiana trio of 'fly' beers that I've had. I didn't much care for Barley Island's Barfly IPA, although it's better than this one, and I haven't yet had Oaken Barrel's Superfly IPA. Dragonfly doesn't have the bite of its namesake and is really little more than a pest. Time to call the Orkin Man.
01-23-2007 14:55:45 | More by BuckeyeNation
3.81/5 rDev +11.4%
Appearance: Arrives with an amber color and a nice head with good retention
Smell: Malt forward caramel with pith and pine
Taste: Caramel, up front, with a developing pithy bitterness; after the swallow, more caramel returns but the finish is filled with pith and pine
Mouthfeel: Medium to full body with moderate carbonation
Drinkability: A malt forward IPA that has a nice dose of balancing hops
Thanks, jonallan, for the growler in 2013 that gave me a chance to re-visit - much better than in my first encounter
05-15-2010 20:01:09 | More by brentk56
3.3/5 rDev -3.5%
Got this one as an extra recently and as I am always glad to try some new IPA's, I had to dive right into this. I put it in the fridge and saved it for dinner last night. A nice looking label on the twelve ounce bottle that was poured into a pint glass. A very bright amber was poured out of it, with a small amount of haze, but it was mostly clear to be honest. A huge three finger high head of white foam came up over the top, reminded me of a Belgian pale, with some really nice staying power, once it cratered its way down to a film across the top, the side glass lace coated most of everything else left in its wake.
The aroma was a mixed bag. Very might, with a good amount of yeast thrown in, this was definitely not coming across as your typical IPA, that was for sure. A good amount of orange in the back, but you had to fight through some lemon, and grassy aromas to find it, with a touch of banana like yeast in it as well. The flavor was much more of the same. Lots of carbonation in it, gave it an even lighter feel then I was expecting. Light flavors of lemongrass, apple, and orange peel were all over this. A big grain fed back kept if from being overpowered, but to be honest this was much more a Belgian IPA then what I thought it would be and it was a light one at that. Great drinkability though with an outstanding session able factor as I could have made a night out of this one for sure. This was a very easy drinker that was for sure.
Overall it was not bad, but not close to what I was expecting. It was a decent and very light Belgian inspired IPA, but not much more then that. I might try it again one day, but it was a little on the average side for me and nothing really sticking out or making too much of a difference here.
05-23-2008 10:38:05 | More by mikesgroove
2.98/5 rDev -12.9%
Enjoyed a few glasses of this beer at Ruth's Chris Steakhouse in Downtown Indianapolis. Sadly, this is the only local beer available at the premier resturaunt.
The beer opens with a rich, fruity aroma of caramelly malts and yeasty esters. Comming off really sweet with an herbal note of floral and piney hops, albeit light. Inviting but not as intense as most IPAs to the nose.
Flavors definately favor the malts, giving a rich, bready-toasty-biscuity flavor and a follow up of caramel and toffee. Over-rippened fruits of peaches, apples, and appricots give a complex sweetness from the yeast. The hop flavor comes in very late and offers a bit of pine and flowery character (rose). Again, nice but not an IPA.
Textures are rich, creamy, and sweet proving to be less attenuated than needed. The lack of malt crispness, the timid hop character does little to dry the beer or to offset the malty sweetness.
A farily good beer, but not the advertised IPA that is expected. The sweet malts and fruity esters make me thing English Bitter or ESB, but the hop character doesn't settle with me in scale or varity. There are several things amiss here.
02-17-2009 02:40:05 | More by BEERchitect
3.39/5 rDev -0.9%
Fresh a fresh bottle this beer is much better.
This poured out as a decent golden color with a white head on top. The retention and lacing were both unimpressive. The smell of the beer is malty, not much of a hop aroma at all on this beer. The taste of the beer is very malt forward with a very subtle bitterness in the finish but not nearly enough to make this a solid American IPA. The mouthfeel of the beer is pretty good, nicely carbonated and had a decent body to it as well. Overall not really an American IPA but more of an old English one with the earthy hops and malts that this beer has.
12-22-2013 04:03:45 | More by Knapp85
3.29/5 rDev -3.8%
Served in a Lagunitas mason jar.
According to the notch on the label, this was bottled ON September 2013. I don't know when exactly during last month, nor why a professional brewing operation would allow such a glaring grammatical error to persist, but I'm heading in regardless. This stuff pours a clear sunset amber topped by over a finger of dirty white foam. The nose comprises slightly old caramel (think Werther's Originals that have been hanging around your grandma's friend's apartment for way the hell too long), mixed greens, and a twinkle of sweet flowers. The taste brings in more of the same, but, much like Upland's Harvest Ale, some orange peel sneaks in and drowns most else out for most of the time. The body is a light medium, with a light moderate carbonation and a sorta/kinda drying finish. Overall, a decent enough IPA, nothing at all to write home about, but at least it's nothing offensive. I will likely go elsewhere, though, for my IPA needs.
10-12-2013 05:13:01 | More by TMoney2591
4.13/5 rDev +20.8%
Bottle is notched October 2007.
Sticky, fluffy head of foam that forms a craggy peak above the lip of a tulip glass. Dirty reddish amber tone with suspended flecks of yeast sediment. Lacing is left on the sides of the glass. It has an unfiltered and robust appearance.
Sweet and grassy aroma, with belgian candi sugar similar to a Tripel. Spring-like and fresh, hop florals, but more subdued in place of the amped-up pine & citrus of American IPA's.
First taste impression is that it's very much like an English IPA rather than American. Tea-like, some residual herbal hop bitterness towards the end, and into the finish. Light apple note from the yeast. Pale malt or wheat make up most of the middle. Dry and herbal hops, maybe a low alpha-acid English variety like Fuggles or Kent Goldings. Medium bodied with fairly low carbonation. This reminds me further of English styles, with the resemblance to cask ale.
Highly drinkable, especially in warmer weather. Hell, it's January, and two went down easily. Underrated, and seemingly misunderstood...compare this to something traditional from the UK like Fuller's IPA and see what you think.
01-01-2008 23:05:59 | More by emerge077
3.63/5 rDev +6.1%
A - Poured out a clear, golden-yellow color with a small, white head of thin foam. Not much lacing left behind.
S - It smelled of citrus - touches of orange and grapefruit. There was a light aroma of caramel.
T - It had a sweet citrusy flavor from the hops. Also, a touch of spicy hops. Some caramel malt for a nice base.
M - It was crisp and sharp with a snappy dry finish. A light to medium bodied beer.
D - This is a nice tasting IPA. It is certainly worth a try.
05-26-2010 02:02:06 | More by zeff80
3.5/5 rDev +2.3%
Acquired from raznug, courtesy of the Under 100 III BIF so a big "Thank You" goes out to him. Poured from a 12oz bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.
A: The beer is a deep amber brown color, with a large off-white head that fades slowly and leaves a spotty lace on the glass.
S: The aroma is kind of faint but contains floral hops, caramelized malts and a touch of citrus.
T: The taste starts out bready with a hearty malt character up front. The a decent hops presence comes in along with some mildly sweet flavors of caramel and citrus. It's a pretty well-balanced but overall the taste is a little bland. The after-taste is slightly bready and slightly bitter.
M: Crisp and a little smooth, medium body, medium carbonation, finish is dry and slightly sticky.
D: A little tasty, goes down easily, not too filling, mild kick, decent representation of style, it's not a bad beer but there are several other IPA's that I would choose first.
06-14-2010 02:27:40 | More by TheManiacalOne
3.46/5 rDev +1.2%
Appears a slightly hazed copper amber hue with a bright off white light khaki head forms thick, with fine bubbles. Aroma big earthy slightly pine and citric based hops, it's almost tart with some herbal hop nose action going on. More pronounced with hop bitterness than hop flavor it's an interesting barrage of hop pellets on the palate, acidic cat pee, citrus zest, and earthiness. Cloying hop bitterness lacks the complimentary malt balance which really makes most IPAs drink so well, this is like some of those early homebrew versions of an IPA that many of us had trying to pack too many hop pellets into the boil without making it blend comfortably with the malt profile. Multiple sips later it reveals the same problems, definitely didn't want to run from it first time I've seen the Dragonfly IPA in Steubenville Ohio. However it doesn't measure up to some of the best standards this style has out there at similar or equal pricing, a cloying bitterness crushes hard between each sip. Carbonation is just a hair too much for me adding to the harshness with each sip medium bodied slightly resinous hop oils sit on the palate. Overall, I think I have hashed and rehashed the reasons why I'm not a fan, beer mail me with further questions.
10-24-2013 16:55:21 | More by WVbeergeek
2.96/5 rDev -13.5%
Picked this up near FT. Knox KY, alas there were no sours on the shelf. Bottled on Oct 2012
Pours golden/honey colored with a thumb of beige colored head. Above average lacing, average head retention
S: Slight grassyness & herbal notes
T: Grassyness, lemon rinds, & bitter orange & some pear fruittyness up front. Grapefruit, grassyness & faint breadyness as this warms, plus some leafy hops. Finishes with herbal & leafy bitterenss, plus a touch of orchard fruit
MF: Light bodied, subtle carbonation, alright balance
Seems more like an English IPA, not impressed, drinks easy enough. Kind of a underwhleming first beer from these guys
01-17-2013 03:56:14 | More by russpowell
3.35/5 rDev -2%
12 oz bottle into a pint glass.
Pours a clear copper, with a finger of creamy eggshell-white head. This retains a very nice looking richness to it that leaves a big frothy cascade of lacing down the sides of the glass. Good overall look here. The aroma is fairly bitter in the nose with spice and grapefruit, which are balanced by some softer smelling notes of sweet citrus and toasted grain. This is all wrapped up in a gentle floral feel that helps keep things airy.
The taste has a moderate bite to it of spice, earth, bitter fruit, and to a lesser extent, pine resins. This is decently balanced by some sweet fruity character and some flat grainy maltiness. Spice, resins, and earth all linger past the finish here but they aren't coming off as overly harsh by any means. The mouthfeel is medium bodied, with a mellow, slick, and creamy feel to it that lets this flow rather easily in the mouth. I'm not picking up any alcohol here which helps add to the overall feel here.
This was a decent little IPA selection here. Not a hop-bomb or anything but the moderate amount of bitterness that was present was well balanced and this maintained a smooth and easy body that kept the drinkibility good. A couple of fresh bottles of this wouldn't go down too badly at all on a hot day.
07-14-2010 19:30:42 | More by Kegatron
3.15/5 rDev -7.9%
One of the worst IPAs I've ever had, this brewery sucks at American ales. Beer is amber and clear with a nice one finger white head small bubbles, some lacing, moderate retention.
Aroma is a little piny and very buttery.
This beer is undrinkable. Butter butter butter butter butter, gross. I won't have any more beers from Upland.
06-17-2012 12:55:04 | More by drabmuh
District of Columbia
3.5/5 rDev +2.3%
12 oz bottle
Cloudy, dull golden amber color with a massive, creamy light brown/off white head. Very dense and foamy, the head hangs around forever and leaves a lot of lacing. Very mild, average balanced aroma that blindly I wouldn't guess was an IPA. Grain and malt dominate with very faint hop presence. Mouthfeel is medium thick, could use higher carbonation and a grainy finish. Not exactly optimal for an IPA. Flavor is similar, nicely balanced malt and grain, citrus rind hop presence, little to no sweetness. Not a bad beer, just not a great or even good IPA, always happy to try something new though.
11-08-2009 21:34:37 | More by yourefragile
3.88/5 rDev +13.5%
12 ounce bottle, from a 12 bottle sampler box. Pours semi cloudy almond amber, typical khaki head, then film and leaves strands of lace. I get orange and grainy hops in the nose. I'm suprised by the low number for this one. Its a moderatly hopped, easy drinking IPA, with some grapefruit citrus, more grainy hops and a decently smooth malt under belly. NOthing amoazing, just a respectable, BA worthy everyday pale ale/almost an IPA
08-08-2009 20:42:42 | More by Billolick
4/5 rDev +17%
(Served in a tulip glass)
bottled in March '12
A- This beer pours a slightly hazy aged copper body with a creamy light tan head that last as it sticks to the glass.
S- The aroma of slightly pungent lime hops fills the glass.
T- The slightly dry caramel malt flavor gives way to green hops that have some nice bright pungency to them. There is some Vienna malt and biscuit malt notes that finish in just a touch of sweetness.
M- The medium mouthfeel has a slightly creamy fizz to it and no alcohol heat noticed.
O- This beer has some nice malt depth under a nice full hop flavor.
08-02-2012 12:52:41 | More by rhoadsrage
United Kingdom (Wales)
2.93/5 rDev -14.3%
Poured into Sam Adams Sensory Glass
Pours a little over a finger of beige head. Decent retention with a lot of lace left. Is an orange hued copper. Lots of sediment in the glass.
Aroma: A low amount of hops. Very bland for an ipa. Some bready malts. Light citrus. Not something I am enjoying.
Taste: Very malty and bready. The hops are there with some floral presence, but I get a bland flavor again. Nothing seems to flow with this beer. Sweetly bittering. Light citrus flavors, but at this point it really doesn't matter. Grassy/weedy hops seem to be what I really dislike here.
Mouthfeel: Bitter and creamy. Medium bodied with a decent amount of carbonation. End dry and with grassy/ditch weed flavored hops.
Overall, not a big fan of this ipa. Nothing seems to flow with this beer and it just isn't what I am looking for in an ipa. I really do not recommend this one.
04-27-2010 04:04:53 | More by mothman
3.5/5 rDev +2.3%
12oz bottle from NorthernTimber as part of The Easter BIF Bunny exchange. Thanks for the opportunity.
Poured into an imperial pint glass, formed a 1/4" off-white head above the somewhat cloudy golden amber brew. Head hangs around, with average lacing. Aroma is earthy fruity hops. Taste starts slowly with sweet pale malts, then hops bitterness creeps in, closing with a gradual grainy aftertaste. Mouthfeel and drinkability are both fine, just nothing earth-shattering here. Would be a nice local.
06-30-2005 22:46:03 | More by ppoitras
2.28/5 rDev -33.3%
LOOK: Pours a hazed copper color with a white head and lacing.
SMELL: Floral hops, perhaps cascade, and pale malts.
TASTE: Faint hops and sweet malts. Not very bitter at all.
FEEL: Light bodied and thin.
OVERALL: Not much of an IPA. Pretty weak by today's standards.
12-19-2013 03:59:05 | More by Stinkypuss
3.23/5 rDev -5.6%
12 ounce bottle into pint glass, bottled in 8/2013. Pours a very hazy/murky golden orange color with a 2 finger dense cream colored head with great retention, that reduces to a nice cap that lingers. Spotty soapy lacing clings down the glass, with a moderate amount of streaming carbonation. Aromas of grapefruit, orange zest, lemon zest, caramel, toast, toffee, biscuit, floral, grass, light pine, and herbal earthiness. Unimpressive and malt forward aromas with light-moderate hop presence; with good strength. Taste of grapefruit, orange zest, lemon zest, pine, caramel, toast, floral, grass, and floral/toasted earthiness. Good amount of pine bitterness on the finish; with lingering notes of grapefruit, orange/lemon zest, pine, caramel, toast, biscuit, floral, grass, and floral/toasted earthiness on the finish. Pretty nice flavor balance and complexity of hop and malt flavors; with a solid and crisp malt/bitterness balance and zero cloying flavors after the finish. Medium carbonation and body; with a smooth, crisp, and sticky mouthfeel that is good. Alcohol is very well hidden with minimal warming present after the finish. Overall this is a mediocre IPA. Aromas were way too malt forward with weak hops; but the flavors were a bit more balanced and crisp. I had no problem finishing off the glass.
01-20-2014 22:10:46 | More by superspak
District of Columbia
3.53/5 rDev +3.2%
Bottle shared by plank10. Thanks Nick.
The beer is light orange with a small head that leaves sparse lacing on the snifter. The aroma is hop forward, with some floral and grassy notes. Decent flavor. Slightly sweet, with a sturdy malt backbone coming in behind. Light bodied with solid carbonation. Simple and easy drinking. A decent IPA.
01-14-2012 03:26:19 | More by Huhzubendah
Dragonfly IPA from Upland Brewing Company
78 out of 100 based on 505 ratings.