Bad Elmer's Porter - Upland Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Bad Elmer's Porter
No picture.
Have one? Upload it now.
BA SCORE
81
good

140 Reviews
THE BROS
84
good

(Read More)
Reviews: 140
Hads: 304
rAvg: 3.55
pDev: 13.24%
Wants: 9
Gots: 25 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Upland Brewing Company visit their website
Indiana, United States

Style | ABV
American Porter |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: zerk on 05-26-2002

No notes at this time.
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Bad Elmer's Porter Alström Bros
Reviews: 140 | Hads: 304
Photo of loweball727
3.7/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Pours a dark brown/ruby, not quite opaque. Tan head after the pour but quickly disappeared

S - Very faint malty/roasted/coffee aroma

T - Initial taste is just as it smells, with a hint of a sweet, kind of chocolatey aftertaste

M - Color had me hoping for a full bodied beer but felt very thin for a porter

O - Overall it was a decent brew. Good porter for drinking when not focusing on all aspects of a beer. (416 characters)

Photo of theRooster90
3.68/5  rDev +3.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

On Tap at Upland Tasting Room Indianapolis

A: Dark dark brown with nice creamy tan head.

S: Little bit of chocolate, maybe some coffee, malt, small amounts of wood.

T: Smoky burnt chocolate with hints of coffee but barely any.

M: Pretty smooth, not much alcohol.

O: Pretty nice porter with decent complexity. (315 characters)

Photo of Tone
3.92/5  rDev +10.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours a clear, dark brown color. 1/2 inch head of an off-white color. Great retention and slight lacing. Smells of roasted malt, sweet malt, alcohol, hint of oatmeal, hint of wood, and hint of dark citrus. Fits the style of an American Porter. Mouth feel is sharp and crisp, with an average carbonation level. Tastes of roasted malt, slight hop, sweet malt, slight dry hop, hint of wood, and a hint of grain. Overall, good blend, body, aroma, and complexity. (458 characters)

Photo of inlimbo77
3.48/5  rDev -2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle poured into DFH Signature glass. 11/10 bottling date/notch on side of bottle.

A: This pours a deep brown with reddish notes, 1/2 finger tan head that dissipates quickly, nice tab lacing

S: Lots of chocolate notes, dark, roasted malts, some faint coffee espresso notes, not deep though

T: Flavor doesn't match the noses that I got, it's watery in consistency, roasted malts but don't get the coffee or the chocolate

M: Medium but actually quite watery

O: Good but nothing spectacular (499 characters)

Photo of BeerBuckeye
3.48/5  rDev -2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - Pours a dark chocolate mahogany, barely any light getting through. Fluffy 1 finger head that dissipates slowly.

S - Notes of chocolate and dark fruit. Very malty smell, don't smell a lot of coffee or anything, but definitely those dark fruits.

T - Taste has a good amount of coffer, bitter chocolate, and a touch of those fruits. It sort of finishes with a sort of overly bitter aftertaste.

M - Not as thick as I expect from a porter. Leaves a certain dryness in the mouth afterwards as well with a sort of bitter aftertaste.

Overall - I thought it was a decent porter. Not spectacular, and while elements of a great porter were there, I felt like it lacked in some areas that prevented it from being a really good porter. Would definitely drink again, though. (768 characters)

Photo of mcallister
3.45/5  rDev -2.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Nice looking porter. Deep mahogany with a tan head of quarter inch that leaves a sticky residual lace behind.

Roasty aromas, with some nutty ester, milk chocolate, a hint of raisin and other dried fruits. A light black fruit maybe currant comes through. Regardless smells of your typical english style porter....a good thing.

A porter by definition. Roasty malts, charred with but not overly so. Nutty with some burn caramel and toffee. Light milk chocolate flavors on the finish. Medium carbonation and a quick finish that start sweet then dries out quickly. (562 characters)

Photo of mikesgroove
4.3/5  rDev +21.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Black as night with a rich tan colored head that reached a height of at least two inches before settling down to a respectable inch of head that did not go away. Lots of chocolate and coffee leading the way here. Hints of molasses as well. Huge flavor here, maybe the best tasting porter I have come across. Lots of cocoa and chocolate, rich, huge flavor with a smooth creaminess that was second to none in my eyes. Really fantastic balance here as the chocolate really starts to come out as it warms. Lots of flavor here with a ton of mellow notes that were just all over the place. (583 characters)

Photo of chugalug06
1.94/5  rDev -45.4%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A - Nice straw colored head with moderate lacing. Brew holds a nice black color with purple and brown hues. Rather basic looking brew.

S - Super homebrew esque funk... Very weird scent. Not much of anything other than chocolate funk. Smells almost like a Coca-Cola...

T - Taste is better than scent, just not by a lot... Taste is buttery chocolate with side of soy sauce. The flavor in this one struggles.

M - Overly carbonated with dry and distinct funk. Light bodied and underwhelming. Horribly out of balance.

O - Brew is smooth, but missing a lot!!! There's not to talk about with this one. I wouldn't go out of my way to find this one again. Thanks for the extra in a good trade! (688 characters)

Photo of Bierguy5
3.42/5  rDev -3.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle, bottled in Nov. 2010. Deep brown color, chestnut highlights. Tan head disappears after just a couple minutes, leaving no lace at all.

Roasty malt with hints of cocoa. A caramel edge as well. Slight hints of dark fruit.

Lighter roast in the malt character. Bittersweet cocoa, slightly harsh and grainy. Not much caramel character or fruit. Finishes on the dry side.

A bit light in the body, with more than ample carbonation. Pretty easy to drink, but lacks depth. Not bad, but not really great either. (520 characters)

Photo of Heischman
3.47/5  rDev -2.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Beer/Brewery - Bad Elmer's Porter - Upland
City/State- Bloomington, Indiana
STYLE – American Porter
ABV – 5%
IBU – 19.6
DATE – 3 JUN 2011
SERVING TYPE – 12 oz Bottle
GLASSWARE – English Pint
LOCATION - HEISCHMAN's TAVERN
APPEARANCE – Black and solid in color, little to no head
AROMA- Chocolate and roasted malts
TASTE – Mild chocolates with a nice bitter of coffee on the tail end
MOUTHFEEL – Smooth and creamy
CONCLUSION – I like the first impressions of chocolate, but they go way to fast. This is a good porter, but nothing special.
-JH- (561 characters)

Photo of ColdPoncho
3.55/5  rDev 0%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

Bottled in January 2011

A - Pours a cola-esque brown filling out to a deep dark brown body with a decent tan head with good retention.

S - Dark fruits, roasted malts, toffee, coffee. Nice nose.

T - Sweet on the front, dark malts on the back, and coffee sticks in your mouth. As it warms, the carbonation really overdelivers the sweetness.

M - Pretty serious body for a 5% abv beer. Nicely done.

O (D) - This is an ok porter, Nothing great. If it was local and cheap, I would drink it. (489 characters)

Photo of bluejacket74
3.58/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12 ounce bottle, bottled in January 2011. Served in a pint glass, the beer pours dark brown with some ruby red tints when held up to a light, along with about a half inch tan head. Head retention and lacing are both good. Aroma is roasted malt, coffee, chocolate and a bit of nuts. Also, the aroma is on the weak side, but it's still nice. Taste is pretty much the same as the aroma, but the flavors are much stronger than you would think compared to the aroma. Mouthfeel/body is medium, it's a bit coating and has good carbonation. It's also smooth and easy to drink. I think it's a decent enough brew, I'd try it again in the future. (635 characters)

Photo of hoosier3334
4.05/5  rDev +14.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Had this one on tap at Upland tap room in BTown. Didn't really expect too much out of it as I'm more of a stout person, but this porter really impressed me. Very easy to drink, but with a (pardon the cliché) robust flavor. Not watery in the least. This beer definitely piqued my interests to try more porters in general. (321 characters)

Photo of weatherdog
2.77/5  rDev -22%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

On tap at the Bloomington brewpub. Served in a 16oz. shaker pint.

Pour is stand porter pour, deep nearly pitch black with a khaki colored head. Medium long retention with a healthy amount of lacing.

Aroma is very muted and light. Some mild coffee but overall seemingly watery.

Taste starts off with a little astringent roasted grain taste, then some dark fruit plumish esters finish off the taste. Mouthfeel is very thin and watery, nearly no body and a medium high carb level does not help it's cause. No glaring off flavors but it's just an average at best porter, just too watery tasting. (594 characters)

Photo of drizzam
3.86/5  rDev +8.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Brown bottle with a picture of a bushy dude...I would assume that would be Elmer, and that he isn't a nice guy.

Bottled on date of January 2011. Thanks to my friend Veachster for the offering!

A - Dark brown body with ruby highlights when held to a bright light. The body is topped by a frothy tan head that has excellent retention. Nice lacing.

S - Not a lot going on here. Some roasted malt with a nice sweet cocoa accent. Smells good, just a little lacking in intensity.

T & M - The roasted malt bitterness comes through much more in taste than it did in aroma, and the sweet cocoa comes through just a little less. It almost seems to have an earthy quality to it as well, I'm guessing this is presented in the hops. Medium bodied with moderate carbonation. The bitterness lends a drying finish to it.

D - This is a solid Porter and certainly worth a try. Very quaffable, I think I could stock this as a daily drinker. Worth a try for sure. (949 characters)

Photo of Urbancaver
3.21/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a nice dark brown with some orangish hints. Good head and solid lacing. Looks solid for a porter. Smells malty on the nose. Not much else going on. Smells and tastes fairly plain. On the tongue there is some light roastiness coupled with lots of malts. No real complexity on the tongue. Honestly a fairly average porter. For my first upland beer I'm pretty disappointed... (378 characters)

Photo of brew3crew
3.04/5  rDev -14.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Thanks to urbancaver on this wonderful spring afternoon.

A-dark amber with white head that disapates quickly
S-is there one? Can't really pick up anything
T-slight malt in the beginning. Get some choclate and coffee in the after taste.
M-medium body and smooth
D-moderatly drinkable but not anything special (311 characters)

Photo of AdamBear
3.21/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Thanks to brian44556 for hooking me up with this one!

A-black with a thin light tan head

S-smells like a strong mocha...it really does have an even mix of chocolate and coffee. the scent itself is fairly weak though.

T-comes in with a really smooth hit of coffee with small hints of chocolate that transforms in to an odd creaminess. Seriously now, I believe if the brewery didn't classify this as a porter, that it would have been classified as a milk stout. I've only ever detected milkiness like this in milk stouts. It really does begin quite good, but it transforms in to a really dull and boring beer. The after-taste isn't too bad. it reminds me of chocolate covered coffee beans, though not too strong.

M-carbonation seems to low but striking...if that makes sense at all. its not extremely bubbly but it seems to fizz a lot in your mouth. the finish is fairly watery.

D-the after-taste makes it pretty tolerable. Its definitely not a terrible beer...but its just not something I want a lot of. the tastes stay but it doesn't seem to go down as quickly as it should. (1,079 characters)

Photo of SolomonGrundy
3.89/5  rDev +9.6%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Another brew from most excellent trader Brian44556.

Pours a dark, yet colorfully reddish, mahogany. Not much of a head to speak of, and it pour sort of syrupy. I'm guessing it's sweetish and has a high ABV. Let's see....only 5% ABV, wow. Ah, the aroma is that of a robust porter: some molasses, some roasted malt, this even has brown sugar hiding in there. Maybe a hint of clove, also. And cinnamon bun way far back. Neat.

Very robust porter flavor. A nice dark chocolate flavor is milling around in there, too. Kind of swims around against the maltiness. The malty TANG bites you right upfront, then slinks back to its corner. The late middle is interesting: it feels like it's thinning out, but then some excellent, toasty flavors emerge and, along with a nice, subdued hop character, finishes this beer off long and nicely. Very good beer that has surprises here and there. No idea how expensive. Good beer and has some unique nuances for a porter. Worth tracking down.

What I like most: the robust and nuanced flavor profile.

What I like least: The pedestrian appearance. And low ABV.

Verdict: Worth tracking down if it's priced right. Good and nuanced take on a porter. (1,179 characters)

Photo of HosP
3.43/5  rDev -3.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A- Pours black with a bit of light coming in around the edges. Light tan head.

S- Not much in the aroma department. Faint hints of maybe chocolate and roasted malts. Thought the taste better have more to it than the smell.

T- More to it than the aroma. Nothing huge, but nice. Roasted malts come through the most with a chocolate aftertaste. Nothing spectacular, but ok.

M- Medium body with moderate carbonation.

D- Eh, not my favorite Upland beer. If someone handed it to me, I could drink it, but not going to seek it out. (529 characters)

Photo of secondtooth
3.72/5  rDev +4.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

This one pours a deep, opaque brown, with a sizeable tan head of foam. Some lacing (about 1 finger).

Aroma is chocolate roasty, appealing and understated.

Flavor is similarly chocolate-accented, with hints of wood and a subdued coffee finish. Mellow, slightly burnt.

A sturdy and highly drinkable porter. (308 characters)

Photo of thagr81us
3.03/5  rDev -14.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Big thanks to robwestcott for this as an extra in a past trade! Served from bottle into a Stone nonic. Poured red-brown with a two and a half finger light tan head that subsided to a minimal amount quickly. Maintained decent lacing throughout the glass. The aroma was comprised of sweet malt, roasted malt, and tobacco. The flavor was of sweet malt, slight roasted malt, sugar, and very light tobacco. It had a light feel on the palate with low carbonation. Overall this brew wasn't that bad, but it also wasn't that great either. For me, the flavor seemed a little watered-down. It also had a very light mouthfeel as well. The aroma wasn't that great either. Glad I got to try it, but doubt I will again. (705 characters)

Photo of alleykatking
3.43/5  rDev -3.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Had on tap.

A- Pours a deep darker brown color..red hues come about on the edge of the glass when held to the light. One finger tan head shows medium retention. Streaked lace on the sides of the glass.

S- Roasted malts first and foremost in the nose. There is a light nutty undertone that mixes well with a light chocolate malt as well. Coffee notes dance around the ending of the beer as well. A rather nice smelling porter that seems to be a little muted.

T- Roasted malts take center stage right off the bat. There isn't really much else until the middle and ending of the beer where it turns into a dark coffee bitterness that takes it all the way to the end except for a hint of alcohol.

M- Medium mouthfeel. Carbonation is good for the style. Roasted malts left on the palate and long into the aftertaste with a hint of alcohol. Medium drying on the palate from the alcohol. Flavors were a little one sided and needed to step it up a notch. No real off flavors were present with this beer.

D- This was a easy to drink porter. Nothing special at all with this one. Upland made a very drinkable porter for sure but I think sacrificed some flavor in order to do so. (1,177 characters)

Photo of wedgie9
3.58/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Tasted on draft at Sugar Maple. Pours deep dark brown with a minimal tab head that leaves some lace. Nose is dark malt and good nutiness with a hint of chocolate and coffee. The chocolate, bits, and coffee are all a little more intense on the palate. The body is still fairly light with average carbonation and a long finish that reminds me of eating a chocolate covered espresso bean. (385 characters)

Photo of titosupertramp
3.1/5  rDev -12.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A: Dark brown with red highlights towards the edges and when held to light. Nice amount of head/carbonation..a little surprised that it's so close to being white.

S: Hard for me to pick up anything here. In fairness, my sinuses have been giving me a little trouble lately. Can smell a little roastiness. Not bad.

T: Nice roasty flavors. Slight coffee, chocolate.

M: Well carbonated, dry, smooth.

D: Could easily drink several of these. For a porter, it's fairly mild and light. Low ABV and nice mouthfeel makes this go quickly.

Certainly nothing groundbreaking. If Upland was a band, Bad Elmers would be a filler song for their album. (641 characters)

Bad Elmer's Porter from Upland Brewing Company
81 out of 100 based on 140 ratings.