1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Double Dragonfly Imperial IPA - Upland Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Double Dragonfly Imperial IPADouble Dragonfly Imperial IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
83
good

196 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 196
Reviews: 78
rAvg: 3.65
pDev: 13.42%
Wants: 6
Gots: 11 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Upland Brewing Company visit their website
Indiana, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  9.10% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Gritsak on 08-03-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 196 | Reviews: 78 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of MichaelBurns
MichaelBurns

Indiana

4.5/5  rDev +23.3%

01-03-2012 19:18:24 | More by MichaelBurns
Photo of Listers
Listers

Illinois

4/5  rDev +9.6%

01-03-2012 02:36:52 | More by Listers
Photo of bertram
bertram

Illinois

4/5  rDev +9.6%

12-24-2011 18:01:43 | More by bertram
Photo of jheiss
jheiss

Indiana

2.5/5  rDev -31.5%

12-18-2011 20:16:34 | More by jheiss
Photo of robwestcott
robwestcott

Indiana

3.58/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

cold from the tap at the brewery a translucent copper to gold to a 12oz goblet with a full finger, big bubbled, longer lasting tan head

subtle-ish aroma of citrusy hops and a nice pale caramel malt following up.

citrus hops forward, the bitter's big and up front, but there's a nice slick malty after.

medium bodied, creamy smooth, big bitter to the tongue.

overall - well above par, nice example of style.

Serving type: on-tap

12-16-2011 20:21:17 | More by robwestcott
Photo of dannyfrost
dannyfrost

Indiana

4/5  rDev +9.6%

12-16-2011 03:32:06 | More by dannyfrost
Photo of southhousebrew
southhousebrew

Indiana

5/5  rDev +37%

12-13-2011 02:57:27 | More by southhousebrew
Photo of CarterSeaton
CarterSeaton

Indiana

4/5  rDev +9.6%

12-07-2011 19:54:05 | More by CarterSeaton
Photo of adamant1912
adamant1912

Michigan

5/5  rDev +37%

12-05-2011 04:44:02 | More by adamant1912
Photo of deapokid
deapokid

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev -17.8%

12-03-2011 18:18:56 | More by deapokid
Photo of RTrain12
RTrain12

Illinois

4/5  rDev +9.6%

11-27-2011 15:01:57 | More by RTrain12
Photo of Another6Pack
Another6Pack

Michigan

5/5  rDev +37%

11-22-2011 02:25:41 | More by Another6Pack
Photo of Rempo
Rempo

Indiana

4/5  rDev +9.6%

11-20-2011 16:44:34 | More by Rempo
Photo of DoctorB2B
DoctorB2B

Massachusetts

4/5  rDev +9.6%

11-19-2011 05:29:04 | More by DoctorB2B
Photo of bpfrush
bpfrush

Wisconsin

3/5  rDev -17.8%

11-15-2011 21:58:17 | More by bpfrush
Photo of drpdaddy
drpdaddy

Wisconsin

4/5  rDev +9.6%

11-15-2011 03:43:47 | More by drpdaddy
Photo of Treebs
Treebs

Illinois

3.2/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Bottled March, 2011. Served in a Founders snifter.

A: Pours a semi hazy amber color. A fluffy white head forms on the pour and sticks around for a bit. Leaves some nice sticky lacing.

S: Some sweet caramel, candied sugar, some resin and some pine. Smells slightly boozy. The hops have certainly faded.

T: More affirmation of the hops fading. Big malt backbone, slight resin. Some bread and booze. The hops are practically none existent.

M: Medium bodied with a nice carbonation, but there are no real discerning flavors left on the palate.

O: At this point it's a slightly malty and bread beer with some slight herbal and pine hops at the backend. This bottle wasn't fresh in terms of DIPA's, but it seemed to fall off pretty quickly.

Serving type: bottle

10-30-2011 13:53:10 | More by Treebs
Photo of shanblur
shanblur

Indiana

3.53/5  rDev -3.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Bottled in February of 2011. Poured from 22oz bomber into a tulip.

A - Hazy amber color with a moderate white head which leaves extensive lacing. Some floaties on the bottom.

S - Hops present but somewhat muted smell.

T - Hops forward with piney and earthy hops. Some minimal malt accents. Not very complex.

M - Medium body with little carbonation.

A respectable brew. Have only had the regular dragonfly at the brewpub before now. Not complex but a decent imperial IPA.

Serving type: bottle

10-23-2011 18:25:06 | More by shanblur
Photo of iDrinknewglarus
iDrinknewglarus

Wisconsin

3.18/5  rDev -12.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A: Amber-orange and hazy. The beer pours a slightly tan head that sticks around and laces beautifully.
S: Tons of caramel. I'm not sure how old this bottle is but I'm getting a ton of malt and just a touch of hops (comparatively). Nutty.

T: Really sweet taste. Kinda like sugar coated caramel. Touch of alcohol. Hops? Sure. Floral and herbal hop flavor. Pine as well. Pine bitterness across the palate. Dry finish. I'm not really digging the flavor profile, I wish it was more hoppy and less of a malt bomb.

M: Medium-thick. Subtle carbonation.

Was disappointed with this beer. Maybe I got an older bottle, but this was a malt BOMB. Definitely east coast... not at all west coast (which I prefer).

Serving type: bottle

08-20-2011 00:25:02 | More by iDrinknewglarus
Photo of rmalinowski4
rmalinowski4

Illinois

2.98/5  rDev -18.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

22oz bottle poured into a Mikasa tulip.

Pours a orange hue with a 1 finger white head that recedes quickly and leaves a thin layer of lacing on the glass. There is a huge layer of sediment floating in the bottom of the bottle.

Smell is sweet malt and tropical hops. Orange is the main tropical smell, along with some pine in the background.

Taste is big bitter pine up front with some sweet malt mixed in the middle. The finish is bitter orange, maybe from orange peel.

Mouthfeel is medium body with moderate carbonation. good for the style. Not cloying or dry on the finish.

Overall, this beer is way too much pine for my liking. There is no balance, its all bitter. Bitter hops up front, light malt in middle quickly followed by bitter orange on the finish. I prefer my DIPA's to be more towards the tropical, fruity aspect of the hop. This is just bitter all around. The mouthfeel is the only thing that is better than average.

Serving type: bottle

08-02-2011 23:09:46 | More by rmalinowski4
Photo of scottfrie
scottfrie

California

3/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

22oz bottle in Duvel tulip. Thanks to HosP for this one.
A: Pours a deep dark orange with a couple fingers of dark tan oily head that slowly faded into a dense film that left streaks of sticky lacing down the glass.
S: Big notes of toasted malt, burnt caramel and roasted dried orange peel. There hops are citrusy and full of tangerine and orange scents, and maybe even a bit of perfume.
T: Big notes of hop resin, pine sap, orange zest, and bitter orange rind on the hop side of things. The malt is very forward as well with sweeter notes of sticky caramel and toasted bread crust. The finish is sweet and lightly bitter, like caramel covered pine or orange slices. It’s also very boozy, but far from hot.
M: Boozy thick body with an oily mouthfeel that is definitely rough around the edges.
O: This beer just doesn’t hold water against the greats of the style. PtY has more alcohol than this and it drinks like angel tears. This is good, but not great.

Serving type: bottle

07-14-2011 03:09:55 | More by scottfrie
Photo of fsvan
fsvan

Tennessee

3.45/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Bottled in March 2011, consumed 7/3/2011. Big thanks to titosupertramp for bringing this back from Indiana for me.

A- A pretty bright orange. Unfiltered haze, with some chunks of flocculated yeast. Smallish head, with a good amount of lacing.

S- Fairly subdued, but typical smell for a dIPA. Some citrus, with a small amount of pine. The 9% abv is present from the onset, and becomes a larger player as the beer warms. While the alcohol becomes more present, the rest of the smell profile stays about the same.

T- An odd citrusy taste. Not bad, but unique, for sure. A slightly above average piney bitterness for the style that lingers seemingly forever. The taste is not great for a dIPA, but is not off putting in in way either.

M- On the lower side of medium bodied for the style.

O- This isn't a bad dIPA, but won't get confused with the heavy hitters in the style either. Enjoyable enough, and worth a try if you have a chance to grab one.

Serving type: bottle

07-04-2011 01:57:46 | More by fsvan
Photo of david131
david131

California

3.9/5  rDev +6.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A- An almost clear orange liquid with loads of floaters. The white head is thick and craggy with a great retention.

S- Grass, floral soap, caramel, and a touch of fruitness. Simple but enjoyable.

T- Watermelon, passion fruit, grass, and caramel. The strong fruitness is a nice change of pace for the style.

M- Oily and bitter with a bit of a numbing aspect from the hops and alcohol.

O- An ever so slightly different take on the style. For the price point (sub $5), this is definitely worth a shot.

Serving type: bottle

07-02-2011 03:01:19 | More by david131
Photo of titosupertramp
titosupertramp

Tennessee

3.53/5  rDev -3.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Hazy, dull copper in color. Finger or so of soapy, white head. Leave behind a thin film with larger bubbles floating around. Not a lot of lacing. Some floaties. Gotta love unfiltered beer.

S: Not hop forward, but they're certainly present. Bready, sweet malts. Pine and grapefruit is what I notice mostly out of the hops. There kind of a chalky smell to this that I'm not so sure about.

T: Yep..chalky in the taste too. Not bad enough to ruin the beer by any means, but enough for me to take the scores down a notch. The hop are pretty damn bitter which isn't a bad thing. Pine and grapefruit in the taste just like the nose. Sweet malts balance things out a bit.

M: Dry, bitter with a little amount of alcohol burn. On the full side of medium.

O: I can't say Double Dragonfly is very drinkable because the alcohol makes itself known for sure, but it's enjoyable enough. Won't buy this again, but wouldn't turn it down either.

Serving type: bottle

07-02-2011 02:19:30 | More by titosupertramp
Photo of ATLbeerDog
ATLbeerDog

Georgia

3.58/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a beautiful golden color with plenty of unfiltered haze from a 22oz bomber. A bunch of floaties slowly settle to the bottom of my glass. It is crowned with a mostly white frothy head that slowly recedes while clinging tightly to the glass leaving quite attractive lacing. Aroma is hop weak for the style leading me to wonder of bottle age. It has been in my fridge since purchased last month. Bottled in March 2011 so about 3 months old.

First sip confirms age maybe a factor but it is hardly in the barley wine category. Mouthfeel is quite nice as the carbonation seems spot on and the body is worthy of the East Coast version of this style. Even with some hop fade there is a decent bitter finish. Not among the best in this style but not bad either.

Serving type: bottle

06-30-2011 00:36:24 | More by ATLbeerDog
Double Dragonfly Imperial IPA from Upland Brewing Company
83 out of 100 based on 196 ratings.