1. Rating beers by attributes (look, smell, taste, feel, overall) is back! Read the latest update ...
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Double Dragonfly Imperial IPA - Upland Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Double Dragonfly Imperial IPADouble Dragonfly Imperial IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

202 Ratings
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 202
Reviews: 78
rAvg: 3.65
pDev: 13.15%
Wants: 5
Gots: 11 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Upland Brewing Company visit their website
Indiana, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  9.10% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Gritsak on 08-03-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 202 | Reviews: 78 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of quintonmaximoff
3.5/5  rDev -4.1%

quintonmaximoff, Jan 31, 2012
Photo of captainbearcat
3.5/5  rDev -4.1%

captainbearcat, Jan 31, 2012
Photo of PhineasGage
4.5/5  rDev +23.3%

PhineasGage, Jan 27, 2012
Photo of boilermakerbrew
3.6/5  rDev -1.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A- Nothing tremendous. Poured a deep golden hue with a quarter inch frothy head that retains well and laces decently.

S- Smells absolutely filthy with hops. Big floral notes. Slight sweeter malts underneath, but just barely there.

T- Not nearly as hoppy as the smell and style predicts. Good sized hop profile up front that melds quickly into sweeter, maltier notes. Hops bitterness remain throughout the drink, but very tolerable and somewhat enjoyable.

M- Somewhat light and fairly carbonated. Not quite as smooth going down as one would hope. The hops make it a little rough on the palate overall.

Overall, not a bad experience for my first DIPA. Definitely a sessionable beer. One that I probably won't seek out again, but one that has showed me not to fear the imperial version of a style I don't usually enjoy much.

boilermakerbrew, Jan 27, 2012
Photo of LC86
3/5  rDev -17.8%

LC86, Jan 08, 2012
Photo of rmehughes
4/5  rDev +9.6%

rmehughes, Jan 05, 2012
Photo of MichaelBurns
4.5/5  rDev +23.3%

MichaelBurns, Jan 03, 2012
Photo of Listers
4/5  rDev +9.6%

Listers, Jan 03, 2012
Photo of bertram
4/5  rDev +9.6%

bertram, Dec 24, 2011
Photo of jheiss
2.5/5  rDev -31.5%

jheiss, Dec 18, 2011
Photo of robwestcott
3.58/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

cold from the tap at the brewery a translucent copper to gold to a 12oz goblet with a full finger, big bubbled, longer lasting tan head

subtle-ish aroma of citrusy hops and a nice pale caramel malt following up.

citrus hops forward, the bitter's big and up front, but there's a nice slick malty after.

medium bodied, creamy smooth, big bitter to the tongue.

overall - well above par, nice example of style.

robwestcott, Dec 16, 2011
Photo of dannyfrost
4/5  rDev +9.6%

dannyfrost, Dec 16, 2011
Photo of southhousebrew
5/5  rDev +37%

southhousebrew, Dec 13, 2011
Photo of CarterSeaton
4/5  rDev +9.6%

CarterSeaton, Dec 07, 2011
Photo of adamant1912
5/5  rDev +37%

adamant1912, Dec 05, 2011
Photo of deapokid
3/5  rDev -17.8%

deapokid, Dec 03, 2011
Photo of RTrain12
4/5  rDev +9.6%

RTrain12, Nov 27, 2011
Photo of Another6Pack
5/5  rDev +37%

Another6Pack, Nov 22, 2011
Photo of Rempo
4/5  rDev +9.6%

Rempo, Nov 20, 2011
Photo of DoctorB2B
4/5  rDev +9.6%

DoctorB2B, Nov 19, 2011
Photo of bpfrush
3/5  rDev -17.8%

bpfrush, Nov 15, 2011
Photo of drpdaddy
4/5  rDev +9.6%

drpdaddy, Nov 15, 2011
Photo of Treebs
3.2/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Bottled March, 2011. Served in a Founders snifter.

A: Pours a semi hazy amber color. A fluffy white head forms on the pour and sticks around for a bit. Leaves some nice sticky lacing.

S: Some sweet caramel, candied sugar, some resin and some pine. Smells slightly boozy. The hops have certainly faded.

T: More affirmation of the hops fading. Big malt backbone, slight resin. Some bread and booze. The hops are practically none existent.

M: Medium bodied with a nice carbonation, but there are no real discerning flavors left on the palate.

O: At this point it's a slightly malty and bread beer with some slight herbal and pine hops at the backend. This bottle wasn't fresh in terms of DIPA's, but it seemed to fall off pretty quickly.

Treebs, Oct 30, 2011
Photo of shanblur
3.53/5  rDev -3.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Bottled in February of 2011. Poured from 22oz bomber into a tulip.

A - Hazy amber color with a moderate white head which leaves extensive lacing. Some floaties on the bottom.

S - Hops present but somewhat muted smell.

T - Hops forward with piney and earthy hops. Some minimal malt accents. Not very complex.

M - Medium body with little carbonation.

A respectable brew. Have only had the regular dragonfly at the brewpub before now. Not complex but a decent imperial IPA.

shanblur, Oct 23, 2011
Photo of iDrinknewglarus
3.18/5  rDev -12.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A: Amber-orange and hazy. The beer pours a slightly tan head that sticks around and laces beautifully.
S: Tons of caramel. I'm not sure how old this bottle is but I'm getting a ton of malt and just a touch of hops (comparatively). Nutty.

T: Really sweet taste. Kinda like sugar coated caramel. Touch of alcohol. Hops? Sure. Floral and herbal hop flavor. Pine as well. Pine bitterness across the palate. Dry finish. I'm not really digging the flavor profile, I wish it was more hoppy and less of a malt bomb.

M: Medium-thick. Subtle carbonation.

Was disappointed with this beer. Maybe I got an older bottle, but this was a malt BOMB. Definitely east coast... not at all west coast (which I prefer).

iDrinknewglarus, Aug 20, 2011
Double Dragonfly Imperial IPA from Upland Brewing Company
83 out of 100 based on 202 ratings.