Golden Pheasant - Pivovar Zlaty Bazant a.s.

Not Rated.
Golden PheasantGolden Pheasant

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
77
okay

405 Ratings
THE BROS
82
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 405
Reviews: 253
rAvg: 3.36
pDev: 16.07%
Wants: 5
Gots: 18 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Pivovar Zlaty Bazant a.s.
Slovak Republic

Style | ABV
Czech Pilsener |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 04-11-2002)
View: Beers (8) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Golden Pheasant Alström Bros
Ratings: 405 | Reviews: 253 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of kvnstfrd
3.75/5  rDev +11.6%

Photo of Campodog
2.75/5  rDev -18.2%

Photo of chicagoabbot
3.95/5  rDev +17.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

500ml into a snifter...big pilsener head with decent retention on top of a clean body. Solid lacing for the style. Aroma isn't quite as funky with the yeast as I like in this style, but it's well balanced and also very clean. Taste is balanced, smooth, highly drinkable. Mouthfeel is clean and crisp too. I am using that adjective a lot in this review, but this is quite simply a super clean beer. Good value too, easy call to buy frequently, it's a classic of the style.

Photo of Jose9e
3/5  rDev -10.7%

Photo of civilizedpsycho
2.85/5  rDev -15.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured bottle into pint glass.

Appearance: Pours a golden color that is very clear, although the slightest bit cloudy. Had no head.

Smell: Has a pretty standard European Lager smell of somewhat funky malts with a bit of hops.

Taste: The taste somewhat follows the smell in being somewhat funky, although it does have a very smooth finish.

Mouthfeel: It's pretty thin.

Drinkability: This isn't bad. On it's own, it might be a little rough for me, but it goes really well with food. I could get this again if I'm in the right mood.

Photo of shamus
3.28/5  rDev -2.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A deep blonde colour moving towards a copper tone. The head started off huge and disipated almost instantly. Zero lace.
Not much of a nose but the mouthfeel is nice and beads on the palate. very drinkable in that respect. Not acidic. However not much flavour. As the farmer said "That'll do babe, that'll do." but not much more. Take it when it's offered but don't seek it out.

Photo of evlu1441
3.68/5  rDev +9.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This beer pours a nice golden colour, completely clear with a nice foamy head.

The aroma is crisp with hops and a slight malt backbone. Quite fresh.

The taste is where this beer stands out. It starts out quite clean and crisp with a fair bit of bitterness. This gradually gives way to some light sweetness and maltiness. It finishes with some slightly spicy bitterness.

Overall, this is a nice, and slightly layered beer. A pleasant surprise.

Photo of pharmerdoc
3.25/5  rDev -3.3%

Photo of marty21
3.13/5  rDev -6.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A: Pours a clear deep golden colour with a big two finger white head. Settles to a thin cap with little clumps of thicker foam and left decent lacing.

S: Bit of a skunky aroma. But besides that there's a bit of a grass smell or at times it seems more like a vegetable smell.

T: More skunkiness. For other tastes I get grassy notes and it seems to have a little spice right at the end.

M: Light carbonation with a light body.

D: I'm not sure if this beer is always supposed to be skunky like this or not, but the skunkiness overpowered the aroma and taste to the point that it was difficult to pick them out.

Photo of Doppelbockulus
3/5  rDev -10.7%

Photo of traumaqueen
2.25/5  rDev -33%

Photo of tubacharlie
3.5/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A low profile white head quickly dissipates to a thin film over the clear, honey-yellow brew with very little lacing. It clouds up a little as the last dregs from the bottle drip in some yeasty sediment. It has the smell of Euro mineral water and damp wood.

The beer has a decent grain bill, with a touch of sweetness in the cereal malts and some light hops giving a bit of bitters character. Overall a pretty smooth product, easily consumed, with a nice, straightforward label and well rounded flavor profile. Probably would pair well with a roast pheasant dinner.

Photo of Nizzle913
3.5/5  rDev +4.2%

Photo of ommegoose
4/5  rDev +19%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

500 ml bottle with foil around the neck. $1.29 is too cheap to pass on.

Nice orange-golden color with some carbonation streams visible. It took a bit of effort with the pour to coax a head out of it, and what was there ended up receding to a thin cap rather quickly.

Initial waft of skunkiness after popping the cap, and then after the pour as well. I don't find this a terrible quality in a Czech pilsner. It's pretty much to be expected in this beer in particular, which is not packaged in as beer-friendly a way as Pilsner Urquell is in the 12 packs and covered six-packs. There's a spicy hop presence that's quite enticing, once the skunky notes fade, which they do when given a few minutes.

Very little grain sweetness as it first hits the tongue. This jumps straight to the hops. I approve. Grassy mid-palate, and an ample amount of Saaz hops in the back. It's not overly bitter, or overly anything for that matter. Well rounded, but doesn't skimp on flavor. Finishes dryly bitter with a touch of sweetness. Probably a little milder than Pilsner Urquell in hops.

This beats Urquell in mouthfeel for sure. Sometimes that beer feels slick and soapy, but this hits the right spot. Medium-light, which seems optimal for the style. Does not overdo carbonation.

This is a beer made to be consumed en masse. I would have no trouble drinking several. Very refreshing, and great for summer. Also hits a pretty reasonable price point. Beats the crap out of just about all the Euro lagers out there in terms of taste. This beer won't wow you with appearance or nose, and if you're the type who lets a little skunkiness ruin the drinking experience, then this isn't for you. But it tastes good, is quite refreshing, and would pair well with just about any meal. If available, it's a better choice than the more expensive Pilsner Urquell.

Photo of Hopscat
3.75/5  rDev +11.6%

Photo of Ecxeeder616
4/5  rDev +19%

Photo of maviola
3/5  rDev -10.7%

Photo of Dougology
3/5  rDev -10.7%

Purchased in Bratislava from a store. Typical pilsner/lager. It's not Budweiser.

Photo of aristeros
3.45/5  rDev +2.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Tried based on the recommendation of a friend from Slovakia. Poured into a pilsener glass. Pours a very clight yellow, excellent clarity, lots of visible carbonation, almost no head.

Smells of a light malt--some grain smell--and some hops. Also, something that smells halfway between Swiss cheese and socks that I associate with Continental lagers and some pilseners.

Sweeter, malty to start. Lightly hopped, but because the other flavors aren't too strong it seems almost moderately bitter by pils standards. Clear, crisp, with a watery mouthfeel, superior for the style. Slightly dry finish.

Not my favorite pilsener, but it's alright.

Photo of IllNate
4.25/5  rDev +26.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 5 | overall: 4.5

A - 2 fingers of creamy white head. Excellent clarity. Pale gold colour.

S - Familiar Pils smell. Grassy spicy hops.

T - Rich malt character. Surprisingly complex malt character. Nice balancing bitterness with some spicy character in the end.

M - Very smooth and full bodied, excellent!

D - Very good.

I have to question the treatment of the beer others have reviewed. Not only does the beer have to be fresh, but it needs to be treated well. Green bottles are notoriously bad for poor shelf life.

I Did not get any 'floaties' and the head was bone white. An all round excellent pilsner.

Photo of acknight
4/5  rDev +19%

Photo of Sathanas
3.25/5  rDev -3.3%

Photo of SickBrew
3.75/5  rDev +11.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Purchased from "By the Bottle" in Vancouver, Washington.

Poured into a standard pint class.

This is a nice and solid Pilsner. Great impression in the glass. Aroma is right there with the great pilsners and the taste is clean with no fruity esters. A good medium bodied mouthfeel sends this one straight back. Bottoms up!

Long live the Bohemians!!!

Photo of Gottesverachter
3.25/5  rDev -3.3%

Photo of skeetermoses
3.7/5  rDev +10.1%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I just picked up this beer today, just finished it, not too bad, it was not too impressive pouring it, but overall This is a pretty tastey beer. Would like to see what else they put out. It is also My first slovak beer. Overall, I could easily see myself drinking this again, perhaps with a good hearty meal.

Golden Pheasant from Pivovar Zlaty Bazant a.s.
77 out of 100 based on 405 ratings.