1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Grozet - Williams Brothers Brewing Company

Not Rated.
GrozetGrozet

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

421 Ratings
THE BROS
88
very good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 421
Reviews: 322
rAvg: 3.52
pDev: 13.92%
Wants: 10
Gots: 5 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Williams Brothers Brewing Company visit their website
United Kingdom (Scotland)

Style | ABV
Scottish Gruit / Ancient Herbed Ale |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
From the Gaelic "Groseid", Since at least the 16th century Scots monks and alewives brewed indigenous drinks from cereals, wild herbs and ripe fruits. Tibbie Shiels green Grozet was immortalised by such Scots literati as Sir Walter Scott, Jas Hogg. (The Ettrick shepherd) and Robert Burns whoconsidered it a most convivial drink. Brewed with lager malt, wheat, bog myrtle, hops and meadowsweet then secondary fermented with ripe Scottish gooseberries.

(Beer added by: canadianbarman on 09-12-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 421 | Reviews: 322 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by theWrkncacnter:
Photo of theWrkncacnter
theWrkncacnter

North Carolina

3.23/5  rDev -8.2%

Poured from a 12oz bottle with an April 2007 "best by" date.

Color is kind of a dull, hazy yellow-ish amber. There's some sediment in the brew, but nothing crazy. Leaves a small head that dissipates fairly quickly with a little bit of lacing. Initially it smelled like a cheap pilsner, but after a few minutes the nose really opened up to reveal some sweat red wine smells, maybe a little bit of berry in the background.

Taste is initially sweet with some toasted malt tastes in the background, but as you swallow that quickly turns into a very dry, lingering taste that feels almost exactly like the aftertaste of a dry red wine. Not too much hop character, but I don't think that's what they're going for anyway. I don't mean this in a bad way, but it's almost as if someone poured some red wine into a glass of a good wheat beer.

After the first few sniffs and tastes I wasn't crazy about this beer but I liked it the more time I spent with it. Mouthfeel is slightly watery with that very dry after taste that I mentioned before. The beer is fairly drinkable, but I'm not sure I'd have more than one in a single sitting. My only real complaint is that the beer isn't anything special to look at. Overall a decent beer.

03-20-2007 00:55:02 | More by theWrkncacnter
More User Reviews:
Photo of oberon
oberon

North Carolina

3.83/5  rDev +8.8%

Pours a light golden with a decent white head that left some trace amounts of lace,very effervesent (spelling?) aroma like a spring meadow along with a touch of citrus very pleasing to the nose.Taste is delicate lightly sweet with a lightly toasted grain note a little tart in the finish but light.This would be a good summer refresher I think light and delicate glad I had the chance to try this.

11-11-2004 23:47:34 | More by oberon
Photo of DaPeculierDane
DaPeculierDane

Wisconsin

3.55/5  rDev +0.9%

Very cool beer. Absolutely unique. Best by Feb, 2007 date. Better drink this one fast… I’m a couple days late.

First of all, appearances: WTF? Seriously, WTF? This is a weird brew. Pale copper color body with a thin white head, whose soapy lace persists very well. Minute but steady streams of carbonation keep various types, colors, and sizes of yeast suspended permanently. There are chunks of yellow, red, and white particulate matter floating in massive quantities.

Aroma: hard to describe. I guess it smells like goose berries. I’ve smelled goose berries but I can’t remember what they smelled like. There is a sweet powdery yeast quality as well. Light and fruity.

Taste: hmm…I’m kina lost here too. What is this? Gooseberry? Strange, layered fruits. Candied, hard to place. Weird.

Mouthfeel: sweet front, grainy and phenol loaded finish. Twangy and powdery.

Drinkability: I’m not sure. This is weird. Um?

03-03-2007 03:35:17 | More by DaPeculierDane
Photo of beerhunter13
beerhunter13

Ontario (Canada)

2.5/5  rDev -29%

01-14-2012 14:54:33 | More by beerhunter13
Photo of JasonA
JasonA

Massachusetts

4.08/5  rDev +15.9%

Thanks babe for a wonderful xmas present.

Not sure I will be able to do this style justice, but Ill try my best.

Pours a barely translucent unfiltered wheat. Solid carbonation with ample lacing present. Looks like what beer must have looked like before any filtering.

Super citrus, almost sour. Maybe the sour is the goosberry. Some of that must be hops, but I think most of it is fermentables, maybe rye with the wheat?

Nothing like the smell. Pale, with ample, yet sublte bittering hops. I would imaine this is how hops was done to preserve beer. There is some spice in there I cant place.

Finish is a little watering, meaning no ample body. Not bad, but nothing mind numbing per-se. However, this must be close to style for the times.

Overall a solid beer. Nothing spectacular, but my guess would be this is how beer was served for quite a long time.

01-24-2010 22:24:31 | More by JasonA
Photo of JakerLou
JakerLou

New Hampshire

4/5  rDev +13.6%

08-25-2013 00:55:45 | More by JakerLou
Photo of Jason
Jason

Massachusetts

3.9/5  rDev +10.8%

Presentation: 33cl brown bottle, brown label with an odd Medieval symbol. Best before Aug 1999 clearly marked.

Appearance: Straw in colour with chill haze. Pours as frothy as a champagne, that leaves a two finger chunky white head in its wake.

Smell: Slight wine aroma, herbal; perfume-like.

Taste: Tea-like, but, more herbal with grape flavours which dry. Malt characteristics are light, adding some mouth-feel to the brew. The aftertaste is slightly tannic with some dextrin sweetness and grainy-feel.

Notes: Another age old recipe brewed by monks and alewives since at least the 16th century. This is a complex, refreshing brew, with its mixed fruit characteristics. A "must try" for beer enthusiasts. "Grozet" is Auld Scots for "gooseberry." Brewed with lager malt, wheat, bog myrtle, hops and meadowsweet, then secondary fermented with ripe Scottish gooseberries.

04-15-2002 10:46:33 | More by Jason
Photo of merlin48
merlin48

Kentucky

3.33/5  rDev -5.4%

Another odd recipe from this Scottish brewery that offers an ancient recipe with offbeat ingredients. This 11.2 oz bottle pours a clear, canary yellow, with a skimpy white head that disappears in seconds. No lacing. Aroma has fermented berries, malted wheat, and an odd herbal/floral note that defies identification. Mouthfeel is light bodied with low carbonation. The taste is, well, different. Malted wheat, fermented goosberries, and a salty note in the background. Dry and bitter, with an herbal aftertaste.
This is my least favorite of this brewery's odd offerings. Too many bitter flavors going on here, and I can't even identify the culprits. I compliment the brewery for experimenting with these ancient styles, and I will continue to try these. Certainly, this is ale is one that is not mainstream, and might be worth a try.

05-22-2004 19:00:04 | More by merlin48
Photo of tigg924
tigg924

Massachusetts

3.9/5  rDev +10.8%

Appearance: a small head, small carbonation, and a light yellow color--similar in color to Bud

Smell: wheat, a faint sniff of berries, a bit of pepper, and some floral notes

Taste: wheat, dried flowers, sour berries, and honey

Mouthfeel: It is light and crisp and alternates between being sweet and tart

Drinkability: This has a different taste than other beers I have tried...There is just enough to know the beer is from Scotland as it has a light Scottish Ale taste...I could drink several because of its uniqueness

01-15-2009 05:13:21 | More by tigg924
Photo of JohnnyBarman
JohnnyBarman

Ontario (Canada)

3.45/5  rDev -2%

First of my Historic Ales From Scotland 4pack.

Poured into a tall lager glass. Medium golden hue, slightly opaque. About a half inch of head quickly receded into a ring.

Nose is gooseberry and honey, which contrasts with an earthy, peaty or tea-like character.

Starts off with a light, refreshing taste of honey and pale malts, and finishes with a peaty, tart finish. A good earthy character to it. The gooseberry isn't obvious, but it's there. A little undercarbonated, but with a sound body.

An interesting brew. Similar to a light pale ale, but with enough unique characteristics to make it enjoyable. Looking forward to the rest!

04-20-2010 21:35:46 | More by JohnnyBarman
Photo of jakester
jakester

Pennsylvania

3.88/5  rDev +10.2%

Thanks, Amber

I had this as a single at Union Jack's on the Manatawny. I drank it in a tulip glass.

Pours a hazy golden orange with a 1/2 finger head of off-white foam. The head falls very quickly, with almost no lacing. Carbonation looks fairly active.

Aroma is very light and citrusy from wheat. There is also a detectable smell of spices, slightly piney, with (I guess) the smell of gooseberries coming through as it warms. Very light herbal hops comes through late.

Flavor is very light and fruity, with a nice citrusy tang on your tongue. The fruit flavor is delicate, but pleasant, according to style. Spices and gooseberry flavor come through much better as this approaches 55 degrees, and the sweetness is more noticeable. No real hop character in the taste.

Mouthfeel is light bodied, with a medium level of carbonation. It's kind of champagne-like, but not as carbonated. Finish is short and slightly sweet.

This is definitely a slammer. It's not real complex, and I would personally like more of everything, but for the style, it's damn good. Recommended.

12-09-2005 17:09:42 | More by jakester
Photo of andrewdanks
andrewdanks

California

3.5/5  rDev -0.6%

07-09-2014 15:55:52 | More by andrewdanks
Photo of djmitche
djmitche

Illinois

3/5  rDev -14.8%

06-12-2012 15:19:12 | More by djmitche
Photo of Hugh37
Hugh37

Tennessee

3.5/5  rDev -0.6%

08-15-2013 01:28:51 | More by Hugh37
Photo of jazzyjeff13
jazzyjeff13

United Kingdom (England)

3.51/5  rDev -0.3%

A 500ml bottle with a BB of March 2013, so it's just out of date. Picked up cheap from Trembling Madness in York; I hope it's still in good condition. This is based on a Scottish gruit that includes gooseberries in the recipe (the label describes gooseberries as citrus fruit, which is a bit strange as they are actually a type of currant).

Poured into a straight pint glass. A rich amber hue with faint haze and medium carbonation. Yields a small head of white foam that lasts for a few minutes before settling. Aroma of nutty malt with hints of gooseberries, acidic fruit, grass/hay, faint caramel and subtle earthy yeast.

Tastes of mild caramel malt with a fruity sourness and a dry finish. Notes of tart gooseberries, grass/hay, faint nuttiness and earthy yeast. Well attenuated and acidic, with a delicate bitterness upon swallowing. Mouthfeel is smooth and tingly, with a light body and a stimulating sourness. Carbonation could be a bit more spritzy. Slightly astringent, with an aftertaste of mild fruit and a hint of malt.

Pretty good - the light malt and restrained hopping complement the floral fruit flavours without overshadowing them. The label describes it as a brew designed to refresh, which the mild-tasting but sour gooseberry will certainly achieve. The lagering process adds depth to the beer's character. A decent effort that would go down well on a warm day. Worth sampling if you come across it.

04-07-2013 22:02:18 | More by jazzyjeff13
Photo of mokumies
mokumies

Netherlands

3.5/5  rDev -0.6%

01-11-2012 18:59:01 | More by mokumies
Photo of niknar
niknar

Tennessee

2.93/5  rDev -16.8%

This is the last beer remaining from a boxed set my wife bought me for an anniversary gift (God I love her... she buys me beer for a gift!).

Pours out a dark straw color (is it possible for dark and straw to coexist?) with a minimal head that disappears extremely quickly. It left only a few specs behind... not really a collar and definitely no lacing to speak of. Smell is odd to me. I think its probably gooseberries, but then again I'm not sure what a gooseberry is! Not unpleasant, but not particularly impressive. Taste is also quite interesting. Definitely malty, but it seems to be overtaken by the berry flavor. Very sweet, but has a lingering tartness in the aftertaste. I again assume this is from the gooseberries. The flavor is not unpleasant, but it also doesn't quite taste like beer either... sort of hard to put into words at this point. To me it doesn't seem to be particularly well balanced. But again, it's also not unpleasant. The mouthfeel is consistent with what I expected based on the color - thin and refreshing. However, it lacks that certain crispness to it I would have expected. It also seems to be slightly undercarbonated to me. Drinkability is a tough call on this one...but I'm going to go with below average for a gut feel. Its a little too sweet considering how thin it feels. Also, the lingering tartness is somewhat a detractor from the overall offering.

I enjoyed trying this beer, but I could easily name at least 20 beers I would rather have if given options. This is definitely worth a one-time trial just to experience it... but I'm not looking for it again.

Love my wife, but the other beers in the boxed set were better!

07-30-2004 23:47:49 | More by niknar
Photo of ADR
ADR

Pennsylvania

3.28/5  rDev -6.8%

Dark yellow and uniformly dull and cloudy. Head starts decently in a straight sided festival glass. Honeyish aroma, not particularly fruity but with some slight ester qualities. Bitter, but not from hops, much more from a medicinal sense of bitter spices, including heavy clove and a black pepper finish. This leaves me wondering what gooseberries taste like, but there is a similarity to the skins of white elderberries, which may contribute to the spicy profile. OK, love the old recipes, but not a among my favorites from Heather...

Source: Liquid Solutions

11-13-2003 16:37:15 | More by ADR
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

West Virginia

3.75/5  rDev +6.5%

Appears with lively small bubbled carbonation very pale golden body with a thicket of white head forming and lasting nicely. Fine speckled lacing lines in layers around the sides of my glass. Aroma a distinct berry jam nose with some sharp wheat additions, some green herbal additions are noticeable as well. Flavor is interesting a big spicy layer combined with a sharp wheat beer notes and finishes with sweet jam with the gooseberries. Actually the best tasting and most complex beer from the 3 of the 4 I've had so far. Mouthfeel does have lively carbonation lighter bodied but not watery and finishes with an herbal dryness not bad. Overall I really like this unique twist on a wheat beer with fruit additions and herbal spiciness to balance it all out this is the most adventurous on the palate and diverse in flavors.

12-17-2011 19:04:17 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of navband
navband

Michigan

3/5  rDev -14.8%

12-05-2013 23:56:14 | More by navband
Photo of TheLevi4000
TheLevi4000

New York

3.25/5  rDev -7.7%

09-16-2013 01:23:41 | More by TheLevi4000
Photo of Brenden
Brenden

Ohio

3.85/5  rDev +9.4%

Starting with a bit of a chill haze, this beer clears up to reveal a deep pale gold color to it. It forms a white head that starts a bit over one finger tall and holds well, fading eventually to thick foam. The lacing it drops is downright chunky if somewhat sporadic, but with plenty of coverage.
A bit of an herbal quality with a mix of raw, unripe berries and ripe ones. The wheat backbone reminds me of cracked white wheat, sort of lighter without a grainy edge. There's a bit of a perfume touch somewhat like lavender gives off.
Things develop more in the flavor, with a mainly herbal but not bracing blend of leafy and tea-like qualities sitting over the dry malts while light pale fruits sit alongside. Some tannins seem to come in underneath. All in all, this beer works.
The feel is light, as I would expect. It's both crisp and smooth, but each mildly, and a bit more of either would make for a livelier sip. As it is, it's easy to drink and is semi-dry, straddling the fence a bit.

05-03-2012 17:21:46 | More by Brenden
Photo of SetarconeX
SetarconeX

Florida

3.7/5  rDev +5.1%

A bit ugly and cloudy, but the bottle was polite enough to warn me about that beforehand. Smells odd, like your classic lousy lager with a whole lot of fruit added into the mix. That's really how it tastes too. Strange. Fruity. Rather unique. Part of me wants to pour it down the drain in disgust, the other part wants a six pack. Yes, I think I have discovered the Budweiser of the ancient Celts!

Shockingly smooth going down, however, considering the flavor. And I do indeed taste a hint of gooseberry, so bonus points for that. Perhaps not destined to be on my standard drinking list, but certainly something I might reach for on special occasions.

10-07-2003 02:57:20 | More by SetarconeX
Photo of watermelonman
watermelonman

California

3.35/5  rDev -4.8%

This poured to a dark yellow and gold without much head. It's leaving zero lace behind.

The body is fairly light. Hops stay consistant through the taste. The smell isn't of much other than a berry oder that isn't all that great. It's not bad, but it isn't a high point. The mouthfeel is a little sharp, but the beer remains pretty drinkable.

The finish has an odd tinge to it, more like a juice than a beer.

06-27-2004 03:15:09 | More by watermelonman
Photo of nickthegun12
nickthegun12

Alabama

4.05/5  rDev +15.1%

awesome beer>>>i like all the beer ive tried from these guys>>>and i don't even like fruit beer but this i can drink!
it appears very clear i like it!
it smells of def. fruit>>>tangy like fruit
i don't know what a gooseberry is but i like it
watery like feel to it goes down very well
i could drink easily 4 or 5 of them!!!!

i could live in Scotland and drink stuff from this brewery all day long!

10-31-2010 03:28:32 | More by nickthegun12
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Grozet from Williams Brothers Brewing Company
80 out of 100 based on 421 ratings.