Grozet - Williams Brothers Brewing Company
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 419 | Reviews: 322 | Display Reviews Only:
3.35/5 rDev -4.8%
Purchased 4-pack of Scottish historic ales from the LCBO. 1/4 is the Grozet, a gooseberry and wheat ale.
A - Light gold in colour with with minimal head retention.
S - Biscuity and meadow-sweet aroma with grassy and fruity notes. If I close my eyes I feel like i'm in a lush forest in the spring time.
T - The lager malts definitely come through. Slightly fruity flavour, although not as prevalent as I would have anticipated.
M - Crisp consistency with almost prickly carbonation and a quick finish.
O - Not overly impressed, but it is a very subtle drink - not one feature dominates. With that said, I expect this to be my least favourite in the 4-pack, mainly because it is brewed with lager malt, which I don't have a good palette for. With that said, others may come to a different conclusion.
01-14-2014 00:27:56 | More by Spesme
3.14/5 rDev -10.8%
The last beer as part of the Williams Bros. 4 pack Sampler Pack. Served chilled.
Appearance - Clear pale mixture of golden and off-orange hues. Only 1/2 finger of frothy head with only Ok retention. Some bubbles rapidly rise to the surface.
Smell - Aromas of low-hanging fruit and rather floral. Tok a few whiffs and could get much more than that.
Taste - Quite fruity with a palpable dry taste and dry bitterness to the beer. Again well-disguised as I wasn't able to pick up much more than that.
Mouthfeel - Medium-low carbonation, dry finish and very soft feeling in the mouth as with other in this style. A bit fizzy feeling despite lower carbonation (although this works in favor of the beer here).
Overall - For whatever reason, I just didn't really enjoy this, one of those situations (to me at least) where the sum of the beer was less than the individual components. I think this is a beer worth revisiting, as I feel that I might evaluate this differently in the future, but i definitely found it to be the weakest beer of the sampler pack.
01-06-2014 17:41:13 | More by DenisKolkin
2.99/5 rDev -15.1%
A: Pours a clear pale golden color with a 1/2 finger white head and good lace. Lots of visible carbonation in the glass.
S: Earthy and a touch musty with an evident ripe berry and fruit backbone. Kiwi, red currant, gooseberry and some wet hay. An almost fruit leather note in there as well.
T: I don't know, kind of just tastes like a weak wheat ale. Underwhelming to say the least. Light slightly sour wheat note that kind of just dies. Some grain, chalky yeast and, yeah, off-tasting wheat. That's about it. Damn it.
11-20-2013 02:28:57 | More by notchucknorris
3.63/5 rDev +3.1%
So I picked this up kind of on a whim when I went to the beer store (the best kind of store there is).
Pours a hazy thick orange/amber colour. more bubbles than really head, if that makes sense.
I can't decide how I feel about the aroma on this one. Theres a decidedly fermented characteristic to it that I take to be from the gooseberries. Some herbs and a touch of spice on the back end, but the pervasive characteristic is almost musty. Kind of reminds me of when I worked at a vineyard. Actually, that's the best description I can think of: musty fermented berries and white grapes. There's a hint of sweet somewhere in there as well.
It is sweeter than I expected, with honey being the first thing that hits me, then that musty white grape note comes back. It's sweeter on the tongue than on the nose, and the musty fermented aroma gives way to a fruitier flavour. I actually find myself kind of enjoying it, at least moreso than I expected.
The taste is a little... not quite watery, but trending in that direction (p value not within significance), but I can't say it's thin because it actually has a medium to chewy body, which I find quite appealing. After smelling it, I was concerned that this would be kind of stale and brackish on the tongue, but it's actually quite crisp and refreshing. I find myself pleasantly surprised, and would certainly consider it again.
11-10-2013 19:09:09 | More by kemoarps
United Kingdom (England)
2.95/5 rDev -16.2%
Opalescent lager and lime in colour. small off white head.
Lime, gooseberry & bubble bath on the nose.
Dry lager background with a fruit twist.
Mouthfeel soapy and oily.
Not my type of thing. Comes across a bit medicinal.
Best when served really cold.
10-15-2013 19:41:27 | More by WGO
2.95/5 rDev -16.2%
11.2 oz bottle into a tulip.
A: Pours a golden amber color. What head is formed is rather miniscule (much less than a finger high), and what little is there fades quick anyways. Lacing is sparse and thin-looking.
S: Rather wheaty and crisp. There is a touch of fruit, but one has to really bury their nose in the glass to find it. On the plus side, at least it doesn't seem like it will cloy...right?
T: There's a decent wheat flavor to start. Soon after, a fruity note briefly pops up before getting swallowed by the crisp bite. Maybe there's a touch of spice on the aftertaste. Crisp? Yes. Easy drinking? Yes. Interesting? Nope.
M: The initial feel is fairly sweet, which is thankfully saved with high carbonation and a crisp bite. Can't fault it for going down easily. Only thing is that it's a bit heavy in texture.
O: I don't get much difference between this and a typical fruity wheat ale, but at least this better than some of the crappier examples of the style. Due to the fact that it's kind of pricey for what it is, I probably won't get this again.
09-05-2013 22:52:32 | More by ThisWangsChung
3.34/5 rDev -5.1%
Poured from an 11.2oz bottle into a mason jar in high elevation Kalispell, Mont. Reviewed live.
A- One finger and a half white head with middling retention atop a golden, slightly hazy body. Looks awfully nice.
S- Crisp aroma, lager smell. Clean.
T- Tastes clean and light fruity. Nice flavor, not complex though. Slightly tart.
M- Thin lager feel. Not bad at all.
O- Very crisp, tasty beer. Not much to say about it.
08-04-2013 00:35:26 | More by Murrhey
Grozet from Williams Brothers Brewing Company
80 out of 100 based on 419 ratings.