1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Fraoch Heather Ale - Williams Brothers Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Fraoch Heather AleFraoch Heather Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
85
very good

1,021 Ratings
THE BROS
91
outstanding

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,021
Reviews: 693
rAvg: 3.75
pDev: 13.07%
Wants: 45
Gots: 31 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Williams Brothers Brewing Company visit their website
United Kingdom (Scotland)

Style | ABV
Scottish Gruit / Ancient Herbed Ale |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Brewed in Scotland since 2000 B.C. heather ale is probably the oldest style of ale still produced in the world. From an ancient Gaelic recipe for "leann fraoich" (heather ale) it has been revived and reintroduced to the Scottish culture. Into the boiling bree of malted barley, sweet gale and flowering heather are added, then after cooling slightly the hot ale is poured into a vat of fresh heather flowers where it infuses for an hour before being fermented.

(Beer added by: purplehops on 10-06-1998)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Fraoch Heather Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,021 | Reviews: 693 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of kbub6f
3.58/5  rDev -4.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A short, dense, bubbly, pale, cream-colored head leaves spotty lacing. An opaque, pale, brownish, caramel beer. The smell is sweet with tangy caramel and overripe fruit. A toffee, sweet, floral front; a light, sourish, caramel-malt middle: a little thin, a little oily. Sour toffee finish shows alcohol and tangy, sour fruit juice. Interesting: tangy, fruity, malty, caramel middle with a sour, bitter, finish. It's very "old" tasting (not stale, but like an "old-style" beer... if that makes any sense). Good.

kbub6f, Jun 29, 2005
Photo of DrJay
3.98/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Slightly hazy pale amber colour. Short stand of white head that rapidly thins to a smattering of lace. Smells of sweet maltiness, a bit bready, very floral, with a little honey and herbal character. Heather flavour is quite strong, but still backed up by malt sweetness. Floral and herbal towards the end, which finishes on the caramel sweet side, but still with a bit of dryness. The body is on the light side with moderate carbonation. Interesting beer and definitely worth a try.

DrJay, Jun 23, 2005
Photo of Phyl21ca
3.23/5  rDev -13.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottle: Poured a hazy orange color beer with a small head and not much in terms of retention. Aroma is somewhat malty with some strange sweetness. Taste is also sweeteer then expected though it does not seem to come directly from added sugar but more derived from one of the other ingredient. Light spices also hit the palate at the end and again are hard to properly identified. Nice and enjoyable overall but would not necessarily seek this again.

Phyl21ca, May 24, 2005
Photo of pentathlete
4.1/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Pours a cloudy orange with a small white quickly dissipating head. Smell is tart floral and grassy with a smattering of spice. The taste, after trying Heavyweight's version, is much more balanced and subdued than I expected. Refreshingly crisp, malty, and "flowery," like chewing on a dandelion stem with a beer chase. Mouthfeel was medium, pleasantly so. This was a fine brew that is easy to drink. The recommendation of having this with a salad or mixed greens seems right on the money. Highly recommended if you are new to this style.

pentathlete, Apr 18, 2005
Photo of dauss
3.85/5  rDev +2.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Presentation: Skinny 330ml bottle. Freshness notches on the bottle. Best before February 2006.

Appearance: Slightly hazy golden orange. Small white head but dissapates very quickly.

Smell: Sweet malt smell. Notes of honey, cinnamon, and nutmeg. I've never had heather before, but it has this light flowery aroma. Very pleasant.

Taste: Thick sweet malt with honey and a floral and peculiar taste. It must be the heather. Its finishes dry with more heather, and a very light hop bitterness.

Notes: First heather beer. Very interesting taste that the heather imparts, almost like a hop taste and aroma, but different. This beer is a little too sweet for my taste though.

dauss, Apr 16, 2005
Photo of SupaCelt
3.5/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This poured out an orange looking colour. A tiny white head came up with just a ring left to remember it by. Not very much carbonation here.

The smell was like a bizarre flowery scent. I guess that would be fair heather I smell there. I detect a little cloven influence here as well. Smell's like a bouqet of some flowers I guess. Where's my leotard?

The taste is just a bit too earthen for me. You have this flowery flavor mixed in with a honey wine mead character, and it just ends up being a bit queer. Sure, the bottle looks good, but this stuff is close to drinking Febreeze or sumfin. I'll take hops over heather anyday. This was like flowerpot runoff. I guess the taste is a bit unfamiliar and strange. Overall, one could drink this stuff. I probably will not buy this again, but it was unique for sure. Feels like what you would drink if you were ruffing it using stream water and fresh picked flowers and the like. Interesting.

SupaCelt, Apr 12, 2005
Photo of TinusTime
3.65/5  rDev -2.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours an orange amber with very little head or visible carbonation. The aroma is a touch sweet with a little flowery medicinal scent. Taste is smooth, nice maltiness with a touch of honey in the finish. Finishes a little sweet, but the herbal nature of the beer makes this fairly nice. Very interesting beer. Was not sure what to think of it at first, but it grew on me and I would buy this again if in the mood.

TinusTime, Mar 25, 2005
Photo of GClarkage
4.1/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 5 | overall: 4

03/23/05- Purchased at a wine store in Sonoma, CA

Presentation- 16.9oz bottle with a best by date of October 2005. Poured into my Duvel glass.

Appearance- Amber-orange colored with a very creamy small head with evaporates over time to leave just over a light white ring around the top. Lacing is less than average.

Smell- Mildly fruity with what I guess is a heather scent according to many other BA reviews. It's a nice scent any way you look at it.

Taste- A nice light sweetness, with what seems to be honey and tea herb like tastes. Maybe a peachlike taste in the mix, but honey and herbs are the main ones I sense,

Mouthfeel- Super smooth and low carbonation. This one seems as if it's almost on cask. Very creamy and velvety. Nice!

Drinkability- Not your everyday beer. I can definitely see the hobbits drinking this out of their lead chalices. This completes my Brewery Craigmill experience as I have had the Alba Scotts Pine Ale, the Seaweed Ale, the Gooseberry and the Ebulum Ale and now this. All of them an experience, some of them very good and one of them that was great.

GClarkage, Mar 24, 2005
Photo of aquatonex
3.63/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

My favorite offering from the 4 pack sampler from this brewery. Pours light brown, almost transparent. Looks like a darkish ginger ale. A small head with moderate carbonation. Smells of light malts, barley, and flowers. Taste follows with a nice flowery taste with a strong foundation of light maltiness and barley. I'd definitely drink this one again, a heather ale that has good body.

aquatonex, Feb 28, 2005
Photo of Goldorak
3.05/5  rDev -18.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

The first of four from the "historic ales from Scotland" giftpack.

Appearance: Opaque and orange, with only a little bit a froth.

Smell: Herbal, and a little wildflower honey.

Taste: Pale malty/barley flavor, very low carbonation, I'd say almost flat, which I guess historically may be true to form. Faint sour aftertaste. Sort of tastes like a Beer that got heatstroke.

Goldorak, Feb 27, 2005
Photo of Sammy
3.6/5  rDev -4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Certainly worth trying. I could probably handle a pint of this with a meal. A bit of peat moss in there, bitter, long dry finish. Citrus, honey,some malts. Barley in there. Understated carbonation. I wonder how this would be three years aged. Orange colour.

Sammy, Feb 27, 2005
Photo of BeerFink
4.22/5  rDev +12.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a slightly hazy golden color with a decent head. Smells sweet like honey and slightly grassy. The taste is very mellow. Slight malt up front leading into the sweet heather taste. The heather lends a great herbal quality to this beer. The overall effect is slightly reminiscent of a good mead, however it is not nearly as sweet. Definitely an interesting beer. It is light and very drinkable, and the unique flavor could enhance any situation.

BeerFink, Jan 30, 2005
Photo of BDTyre
4.33/5  rDev +15.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a decent gold colour with a very slight haze. Dense head that clings to the side.

It smells sweet, almost syrupy but not overpowering. Hints of heather. Taste is similar, but not necessarily sweet. Bitter on the tongue, with hints of sweetness and flowers in it.

Thicker than expected for a ligh colour ale. Nice carbonation; easy to drink.

So far, I've not been displeased with any of the beers in this gift pack.

BDTyre, Jan 21, 2005
Photo of MuddyFeet
3.6/5  rDev -4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

While this beer pours a very pale burnt orange in color, the color is extremely thick throughout the beer. A thin filmy head lay on top of the beer. The aroma reminds me of camping in a wet forest. The taste is very mild, the hops are there, but nowhere near predominant. There is something else that I would assume is the heather. It is akin to a very, very, very subtle evergreen taste. Just the slightest of hints. The other flavor I notice is a bit of honey. The beer is pretty sweet and while I enjoyed my solo bottle, more than one of these would be kind of boring to the palate.

MuddyFeet, Jan 16, 2005
Photo of Quaffer
4/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

16.9 oz. bottle. Picked this up in Kansas City. Not available here in Wichita.

Appearance: This one poured a washed-out, dark amber. When held up to the light, it showed some strong orange highlights and a slight chill haze. The head rose up coarse and white, disappeared quickly, and left a minimal amount of lace. A rougher second pour produced a denser head, but it too was gone quickly.

Smell: Nothng too out of the ordinary considering the ingredients used in this beer. Sweet malt and honey, tart fruit, and hints floral sweetness. A light amount of peat cut through at times.

Mouthfeel: Light bodied and pretty smooth. Light carbonation arose as the beer hit the throat.

Taste: Like the smell, nothing too out of the ordinary in the flavor, though there was a little bit of a "hit" that was unique to this beer. Sweet and lightly roasted malts formed the main body of the flavor, with some tartness rising up strong in the middle. The finish dried out and provided a light bitterness. This, and in the aftertaste, was when I noticed the floral component that I assume is the heather. Also in the afteraste was a nice malty richness way in the background.

I didn't find the heather to be as strong as I thought it would be in this beer. It could have been responsible for that "hit" in the flavor that I couldn't quite put my finger on. That's entirely possible considering that I have had no prior experience with heather and would have a hard time identifying it. Good beer, though.

Quaffer, Jan 09, 2005
Photo of GuinnessSmurf
3.8/5  rDev +1.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours an orange/yellow color with a healthy fluffy head on top.

Has a spicy herbal smell....must be the heather giving it that floral lightness.

Taste is very herbal, mixes of sweet hops, floral hops, and a wheaty flavor is burried in there too. A nice complex flavor on this beer. Has a really nice slippery body too.

GuinnessSmurf, Jan 02, 2005
Photo of slitherySOB
3.73/5  rDev -0.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Despite the appearance, it's a damn good ale! Pours a hazy, cloudy orange colour. Pleasing to look at. But almost no head whatsoever, and lacing is sparse. Fortunately, it improves greatly afterwards. Dry malts, some herbal and bittering hops, floral scent, and heather. Taste is even better. The heather and floral taste evens out the sweet and dry hops. Aftertaste is a quick whoosh of bitterness that quickly fades. Slick and thin mouthfeel. Highly drinkable as a session ale and as a nursing drink.

slitherySOB, Dec 13, 2004
Photo of Hhawk06
3.6/5  rDev -4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

I've read about this beer for years so I was very excited to finally give it a try. It poured with an attractive light caramel body and a floral malt nose. The head was gorgeous, very finely beaded with a creamy look to it - great stuff. The mouthfeel was more robust than I anticipated given the other peripherals. It gives off a very dry, feathery malt taste that, at times, hints at brandy. The finish is more vinous, dry and pale I say. Overall, this a very easy-to-drink yet different beer. It's definitely worth giving a shot.

Hhawk06, Dec 09, 2004
Photo of RBorsato
3.5/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Hazy murky gold with lots of suspended sediment, a low large bubbled off-white head, and low carbonation. Flowery heather aroma. Spicy malt flavors; fairly robust malt profile. Medium bodied.

Interesting to try from a stylistic/historical perspective but that's about it...

Label states: "Brewed in Scotland since 2000 BC" & "Heather Flowers and Scottish Malt"

Per H.A. website: Into the boiling bree of malted barley, sweet gale and flowering heather are added, then after cooling slightly the hot ale is poured into a vat of fresh heather flowers where it infuses for an hour before being fermented.

Per M.J. - U.B. book: 5% ABV. Froach = Heather (Gaelic)

Best Before End: Oct '05
Tasted: 12/06/04

RBorsato, Dec 07, 2004
Photo of Gagnonsux
3.65/5  rDev -2.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Appearance- Hazy, dark golden color. Nice sized head, pretty creamy.

Smell- Sweet aroma, floral and fruity. I'm guessing the majority smell here is the heather.

Taste- Initially sweet with a mildly tart finish. Similiar in taste to their Grozet Gooseberry. I definently notice an herbal taste underneath the sweetness.

M.F./Drinkability- Smooth feeling on my tongue. Not quite as high on my drinkability scale as Heather Ale Ltd's other products. I could see this getting a little boring after a few bottles.

Gagnonsux, Dec 01, 2004
Photo of baiser
3.5/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Wasn't really sure to expect. Certainly don't come across many beers of this style. But this was a solid beer. A cloudy orange appearance, soapy head, average lacing.

Aroma was tea-like, herbal, floral and malty.

Taste was tangy, herbal, a tea-like dryness, and some alcohol at the back. After taste was grainy. Light, refreshing, thirst quenching. Very unique.

baiser, Dec 01, 2004
Photo of ViveLaChouffe
3.6/5  rDev -4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a hazy orange with very little head, some lacing. Smells fruity, citrusy and floral.

Taste is light malt and crisp. A bit spicy but not alot going on until the finsih which is dominated by what I would presume to be the heather flavors. Really nice flavors in the finish. A bit thin though and not alot going on except for that finish and the accompanying aftertaste. Decent. I like that flavor but expected it to be stronger in the beer. i'll have to try again, maybe it's just too new to me.

ViveLaChouffe, Nov 28, 2004
Photo of felipesegundo
3.48/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Had this beer as first for the evening. It poured nicely but had quite a heady aroma with large bubbles. Very floral smell with a bitter first taste, but mellowed toward the end. Unique beer, but don't believe I could go on a bender with it. All in all, enjoyable, but not one I would attempt to stco regularly in fridge.

felipesegundo, Nov 26, 2004
Photo of cypressbob
3.78/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Cask cond. at the NI CAMRA fest

Pours with a cloudy lemon body, foamy head

Smell, woah...lots of flowers, heather, wild flowers again, elderflower, lavender, quite sweet, some hint of purple violets

Taste, dry and flowery, hints of gooseberry, strong heather, very floral

A very different beer experience, but this little ale was a really nice change, not something i can imagine drinkin all night but once and a while

cypressbob, Nov 20, 2004
Photo of karengarys
2.58/5  rDev -31.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Maybe I shouldn't review this for I am not familiar with the style.

It pours with minimal fizz, and appears flat. It is hazy dark amber. No foam. No lacing. Not even a ring.

Smells like cheap soap, dirt, and some hop.

Tastes almost like beer, bitter, some pine I guess.

Mouthfeel is flat.

Finish is watery.

I don't want another.

karengarys, Nov 18, 2004
Fraoch Heather Ale from Williams Brothers Brewing Company
85 out of 100 based on 1,021 ratings.