1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Red Rack Ale - Woodstock Inn Brewery

Red Rack AleRed Rack Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
78
okay

166 Ratings
THE BROS
76
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 166
Reviews: 95
rAvg: 3.42
pDev: 13.45%


Brewed by:
Woodstock Inn Brewery visit their website
New Hampshire, United States

Style | ABV
Extra Special / Strong Bitter (ESB) |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Amber in color with slight caramel sweetness. Medium hop bitterness. Malty up front with a nice hop/ malt balance.

23.3 IBU

(Beer added by: UnionMade on 07-07-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Red Rack Ale Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 166 | Reviews: 95 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of scotorum
scotorum

Massachusetts

3.88/5  rDev +13.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

a: Clear dark amber with an inch thick white head of small dense bubbles which receded to thin surface foam and spotty lacing.

s: Mild fruit cup. Later, caramel malt dominates.

t: Caramel malt with more than a little hop balance and light fruit undertones.

m: Light to moderate.

o: A good ESB, a bit more fruit notes and overall bitterness than I would prefer but the basic malt flavor is fine and becomes more prominent as it warms.

Serving type: bottle

11-19-2013 03:17:26 | More by scotorum
Photo of BMMillsy
BMMillsy

Florida

2.85/5  rDev -16.7%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.75

Beer of the month club. Pours a pretty red color with small quickly receding head. Sweet fruit aroma with lots of malt and a bit of a buttery tone. Flavor is malty sweet up front, followed by buttery floral taste, and ends with some bitter hops, though these are pretty toned down. A little metallic flavor takes away from things. Easy drinking with plenty of carbonation. Ok beer, but nothing I would seek out.

Serving type: bottle

10-13-2013 02:31:25 | More by BMMillsy
Photo of GarthDanielson
GarthDanielson

North Carolina

2.98/5  rDev -12.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a bottle into a shaker pint, the beer is a clear, slightly pale, amber-copper coloring with a steady, fast flow of carbonation throughout and a filmy, foamy, off-white head that settles into a surface coating. Nose of tangy caramel and hints of nut sweetness. Subtle roastiness on an overall subtle aroma. Flavors are roast and rich sweet forward, with nutty and caramel tang in the backbone, and not much to help balance. A bit jumbled and a bit cloying. Light, frothy bodied due to the carbonation, the beer has an overly sweet aftertaste, with a cloying, effervesced, frothy finish. A little too focused on the sweetness for me, with nothing to really balance.

Serving type: bottle

09-28-2013 01:17:48 | More by GarthDanielson
Photo of Infamous7100
Infamous7100

Ohio

3.48/5  rDev +1.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: pours a copper to to dark orange into my pint glass with thin tan head and minimal lacing.
S: bready, malty and sweet notes of caramel. Light hop notes are present as well but not overwhelming.
T: actually follows the nose well. Great balance between the caramel malt and slightly bitter hops. Nothing leaps out as outstanding but it yields a very steady flavor.
M: surprisingly creamy with a medium body. Very smooth with crisp finish and pleasant slightly bitter aftertaste.
O: a nice, solid straightforward brew. Highly sessionable and great balance. Perhaps could use this as a gateway brew to newbies.

Serving type: bottle

04-07-2013 19:14:57 | More by Infamous7100
Photo of AAG
AAG

Texas

3.01/5  rDev -12%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a cold, 12oz bottle with a good best buy date into a stein.

A - Red, amber, golden-brown; nice head, about 3-4 fingers worth with decent lacing on the sides of the glass. Good looking beer.

S - Malty, caramel, hoppy, grainy, bread-like.

T - Moderate bitterness; caramel taste; bready, grainy, wheaty (is that a word?), decently hoppy but not overpowering. Not bad; nothing too special but a good beer for its type.

M - Comfortable especially for a strong bitter; easy on the palate; goes down smooth; after-taste is very palatable.

Overall - I enjoyed this beer but didn't love it. It's pretty straight-forward - caramel, grain-like taste (tastes like it smells) with a decent hop to it (but not overpowering or too bitter). I would drink this beer again but wouldn't search it out. Pretty good work Woodstock Inn...

Serving type: bottle

04-01-2013 00:07:32 | More by AAG
Photo of RickS95
RickS95

Indiana

3.68/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Nothing earth shattering about the color, though it's a nice combination of brown, orange, and sienna. Mostly clear, but still fairly opaque. The head is non-descript and doesn't have much in the way of retention. But it never fully dissipates, leaving a thin white film up top.

Very malty with what seems to be a handful of different malts (pilsner and caramel among them). The hops appear to be of the savory variety as opposed to citrus.

Taste is similar to the scent. Malty and hoppy. Caramel and earthy hops. Pilsner malt and caramel malt are the major players.

A smidge of sweet up front before a wave of balancing bitter takes over. Medium-bodied with a lasting bitterness that lasts til the next sip. Alcohol is not noticeable.

It's pretty good for the style. There's a nice balance between contasting ingredients. Mostly a session beer and a pretty good one at that.

Serving type: bottle

03-10-2013 04:15:02 | More by RickS95
Photo of BeerKangaroo
BeerKangaroo

Alaska

3.31/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Best by March, 2013:

In a pint glass:

A: clear red body, spider web lacing graces the top of the glass as the two finger foamy off-white head recedes, some carbonation is seen rising

S: caramel, malts, apples, the hops only come in as the beer warms, light soap (uh-oh)

T: malty, somewhat sweet through previously mentioned flavors

M: light to medium, sessionable, some harshness on the tongue, caramel aftertaste, sticky finish

O: wanted to get this one done before expiration, not bad, not awesome, seems close to a Red Ale (hmmm....) could revisit

Serving type: bottle

02-21-2013 20:31:45 | More by BeerKangaroo
Photo of B967ierhunter177
B967ierhunter177

Pennsylvania

2.83/5  rDev -17.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

This beer pours a clear amber with a thin head and no lace. The aroma is nutty with caramel and fruity notes and a hint of bread. The flavor leads with caramel followed through by grapefruit and bread crust. It's a bit more bitter than most ESBs but still good. The mouthfeel is light-medium. Woodstock Red Rack Ale is a decent brew, crisp, and refreshing. Recommended.

Serving type: bottle

10-23-2012 21:46:05 | More by B967ierhunter177
Photo of johnnnniee
johnnnniee

New Hampshire

3.08/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a clear golden garnet color with a huge fluffy off white head that slowly dissipates and laces on the way down. Smells of caramel, mineral, and a bit of earth and spice with a hint of butter. the flavor is quite malty with caramel being the dominant taste. Earth, tart, and butter provide a bit of counter to the malty sweetness, but this one really leans to the malty side. Medium body with a moderate level of carbonation and a sweet slick mouthfeel. A buttery malt bomb how shipyard-ish. OK for what it is, but there are better red ales out there.

Serving type: bottle

10-18-2012 22:24:50 | More by johnnnniee
Photo of puboflyons
puboflyons

New Hampshire

3.93/5  rDev +14.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

From the 12. fl. oz. bottle sampled on August 10, 2012. The pour is a highly carbonated medium amber with reddish tones and a quick lasting fizzy white head.

The aroma is full of sweet pale malts, Toblerone, and a crisp, clean hoppiness.

The body is about medium but there is a slight acidity to it.

The focus of the taste is on the caramel malts and yeast with a moderate bitterness and a clean finish. Not a bad ESB in the long run.

Serving type: bottle

08-11-2012 01:39:34 | More by puboflyons
Photo of VelvetExtract
VelvetExtract

Massachusetts

3.73/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

A-Pours a dark color between crimson and orange. Nice orange tinted head. Head is frothy and laces well and is also of nice stature.

S-Sweet with some grassy hops too. Smooth aroma of caramel and a bit of earthy notes. Not intense at all, but definitely pretty attractive.

T-The flavor is akin to the nose. Sweet and easy drinking with a nice clean grassy hop finish. Leans more towards the sweet side but it has enough hop flavor to balance it out. Easy sipping and tasty.

M-Smooth and a bit creamy with massaging carbonation. Sessionable feel and body.

O/D-A mellow yet attractive beer that I enjoyed fresh from a growler. I was a fan, but I have had many like this before.

Serving type: growler

03-03-2012 01:57:58 | More by VelvetExtract
Photo of mdaschaf
mdaschaf

Washington

3.15/5  rDev -7.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Thanks to Dan for this bottle.

A: Pours a ruby/copper color with a small off-white head upon pouring. Not much retention and no lacing whatsoever.

S: Some caramelized malt and a little bit of fruit, nondescript really. There is a bit of honey as well and a slight buttery aroma.

T: On the sweet side, with caramel and honey. Not much hop presence at all. Has a sweet finish.

M: Medium bodied with medium carbonation. Pretty smooth with a slightly dry finish.

O: Decent beer, not a ton going on, but nothing wrong with it. An average beer.

Serving type: bottle

01-09-2012 01:57:29 | More by mdaschaf
Photo of NittanyBeerFan
NittanyBeerFan

Pennsylvania

2.38/5  rDev -30.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured into a nonic pint glass.

Coppery amber in color. Head is light and airy, not much retention, nor is there much lacing. Just about none, to be exact.

The aroma is fruity, a sign of some good English yeast, with a little bit of diacetyl coming out as the beer warms. The flavor is mildly bitter, and again fruity. However, as this beer reaches cellar temp, the nose and flavor are there-abouts of a tub of move theater popcorn butter. Holy crap. This is the second Woodstock Inn beer that I have had, and they were both diacetyl bombs. Needless to say, they have to get their processes under control to fix this. Otherwise, it is a fairly solid beer. Drink this cold(er) if you have it. It's a shame I didn't.

Serving type: bottle

01-08-2012 22:22:51 | More by NittanyBeerFan
Photo of SickGnar
SickGnar

Pennsylvania

3.35/5  rDev -2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A: Dark orangey copper. Clear with just a couple streams of bubbles rising to large fluffy, quickly falling to rocky, head of light ecru. It keeps a ring and leaves sort of minimal lace.
3.5

S: Eh? Both diacetyl and a light metallic, tangy twang? Great! Sweet, slightly caramel malts are solid behind initial impression. Light & vague hop impression. Warming is no help. What it does have going on is a balanced to the sort of odd.
3.0

T: Better than nose made me fear. Diacetyl takes a backseat to firmly toasty grain & lightly caramel malts. Buttery toffee and hints of dark fruit round out the malts. Nice background / balancing English type hops. Fair bitterness with character herbal, a touch earthy, and with muted spicy and citrus notes. Minerally, hinting at astringent, note seems to be coming mostly form hops. 3.5

M: Barely medium body with slightly over-balanced carbonation. Just a bit coarse on the tongue, but pretty mouthfilling – which softens the effect. Ends up being drying – mostly from hops. Biting edge that fades as warms. 3.0

D: Ultimately a reasonably fair beer. A bit rough around the edges – especially the aroma – but it does have a fair bit going on and does drink alright.
3.5

Serving type: bottle

12-24-2011 19:57:36 | More by SickGnar
Photo of greybeardloon
greybeardloon

Rhode Island

3.05/5  rDev -10.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

best before March, 2012

A: Red.

S: Bread and butteriness (but not butter) and, as it warms, some fruitiness.

T: Buttered toast. Or maybe breadcrumbs on a stick of butter. Some floral hops and a touch of hop bitterness at the end. Lots of butteriness, but the hops do help out a bit.

M: Fine, nice carbonation.

O: Too much diacetyl for my tastes.

Serving type: bottle

11-02-2011 03:20:12 | More by greybeardloon
Photo of Jason
Jason

Massachusetts

3.33/5  rDev -2.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

12oz brown bottle with a freshness date.

LOOK: Reddish brass, clear with a good sized head

SMELL: Malty, toasty, vegtal, buttery, herbal, toffee, grainy, baked apples

TASTE: Caramel, malty, toasted bread, buttery, fruity, leafy, herbal, mildly estery, earthy

Not half bad, I'd love to try the non-contract brewed version of this. Good use of malts, perhaps a more defined hop flavor would help here?

Serving type: bottle

10-18-2011 01:06:54 | More by Jason
Photo of EkimGram
EkimGram

New York

3.6/5  rDev +5.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Appearance: 12oz bottle poured into a standard pint glass. Colour is a very translucent copper-amber. Pours a 1/2 finger head that fades to barely anything. No visible carbonation.

Smell: The aromas are very weak. All that I am getting are some fruity note with a hint of bubblegum.

Taste: Nice malt flavours, very smooth and well-balanced. A little bitterness at the end. Also a hint of yeast.

Mouthfeel: Lightly bodied, mild carbonation, a hint of bite, and a slight sticky finish.

Overall: Nothing special in terms of a red ale. The lack of any prominent aromas is horribly disappointing but the rest is nice. If I was a local of this brewery I would drink plenty but I am not so I won't be going out of my way for it.

Serving type: bottle

09-07-2011 02:31:11 | More by EkimGram
Photo of papat444
papat444

Quebec (Canada)

3.73/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Part of a mixed pack that my wife brought back from her camping trip in NH.

Poured from a 12oz. bottle, best before Jan. 2012.

Appearance: A reddish-amber body whose color is lightly reflected in the very voluminous head. Creamy, steady and frothy. Nice to look at.

Smell: Too faint. Malt, nuts and mild fruit.

Taste: Lots of nuttiness abounds, high on malt with not much hops presence and some dried fruit. Surprisingly pleasant.

Mouthfeel: Some bitterness gives it an edge but it's well balanced with an overall smooth body.

Overall: A nice surprise. Certainly worth a second glance.

Serving type: bottle

08-09-2011 00:53:02 | More by papat444
Photo of smakawhat
smakawhat

Maryland

3.9/5  rDev +14%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from the bottle into a nonic pint glass. Best before December 2012 off we go.

A good simple text book amber color slightly clear for the body. Not much rising carbonation. Head is off white perhaps 2 fingers falling normally.

Bouquet is soft mild malts but a strange sweetness to it. Slight toasty grain overalll not bad.

Taste is, kind of mild and muted with a nice breast malt finish. Palate creeps up slowly its as if the finish brings all the tastes. Not too wet either feels about right.

Overall a simple solid example of a sessionable enjoyable amber.

Serving type: bottle

08-06-2011 15:45:58 | More by smakawhat
Photo of GratefulBeerGuy
GratefulBeerGuy

New Hampshire

3.48/5  rDev +1.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Bright amber in color, full 2" off-white foam, nice long lace.

The nose is sweet caramel and buttery toffee aroma from the wormwood house yeast, very distincive aroma. Sweet fruity hops.

A crisp malt bite, sweet fruity hop with just a bit of earthiness and dry finish. The yeast flavor overpowers though and is something you either like or NOT. A medium, lush feel with a decent bite too.

the yeast works with this brew pretty well, but it's not like the woodstock flavor of old.

Serving type: bottle

07-30-2011 22:59:49 | More by GratefulBeerGuy
Photo of vapodge
vapodge

Florida

2.63/5  rDev -23.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

12 oz. bottle poured into a pint glass

A - clear red; thin, dissipating head; no lacing

S - scotchy malts; diacetyls

T - same as nose, with a fair bit of sweetness thrown in; super buttery

M - thin, but nice acidic aftertaste tries its hardest to counteract that butter

D - not for me -- butterscotch bomb; still, it's easy-drinking, but I can't handle that much diacetyl

Serving type: bottle

03-09-2011 20:48:03 | More by vapodge
Photo of cbutova
cbutova

Massachusetts

3.1/5  rDev -9.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A- Deep amber with a small off-white head. Nice webs of thin lace.

S- Buttery notes and nutty malt. Apple fruit notes and caramel malt.

T- Deep buttery caramel and nutty malt. Dark fruit with a slight medicinal feel. No hops. Zesty spicy feel.

MF- Highly carbonated light body. Nice creamy feel and fair bitterness.

DB- Feels all over the place, not much balance of flavor and could use some hops. Doesn't drink ad smoothly as many ambers.

Serving type: bottle

02-27-2011 04:26:24 | More by cbutova
Photo of stewart124
stewart124

Ohio

3.23/5  rDev -5.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Dark copper color with a nice rocky head that fades quickly.

Strong caramel malts in the nose.

Huge caramel character with plenty of residual sweetness and a nice subtle bitterness. Really moves towards scottish ale with the malt character and I am picking up some buttery diactyl. Medium mouthfeel with a bit of spice in the finish.

This is a fairly tasty amber ale but really leans towards a scottish ale. Loads of buttery notes in the finish.

Serving type: bottle

01-20-2011 02:29:04 | More by stewart124
Photo of weazal
weazal

California

4.13/5  rDev +20.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 5

SMELL: Surprisingly rich, sweet smell. Primarily sugary raisins with honey, too. Faint hint of brandy in the back, but not alcoholic at all. Pretty yummy!

TASTE: Near identical to the smell, but dryer. Not over the top, but noticeable buttery, sweet caramel flavor while still being clean and refreshing. A very pleasant combination. Flavorful, but finishes easy. Sharp carbonation is a bit too powerful (creates a metallic like experience) but does add an interesting ka-pow. Barely noticeable hoppy bitterness lingers at the very end.

Serving type: bottle

01-13-2011 23:08:24 | More by weazal
Photo of bonkers
bonkers

New Jersey

3.48/5  rDev +1.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I got this as part of a BOTMC. It pours reddish, brown with a medium white head. The aroma is sweet, cloying fruity. The beer is sweet and fruity, midway it is nice and biscuity. It has a lingering sweetish finish. The beer has medium body, kind of a sticky mouthfeel that doesn't work for me. Not terrible, but not my kind of brew.

Serving type: bottle

01-06-2011 02:24:32 | More by bonkers
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Red Rack Ale from Woodstock Inn Brewery
78 out of 100 based on 166 ratings.