1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Kanc Country Maple Porter - Woodstock Inn Brewery

Not Rated.
Kanc Country Maple PorterKanc Country Maple Porter

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
77
okay

77 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 77
Reviews: 40
rAvg: 3.31
pDev: 14.5%
Wants: 3
Gots: 4 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Woodstock Inn Brewery visit their website
New Hampshire, United States

Style | ABV
American Porter |  6.00% ABV

Availability: Spring

Notes/Commercial Description:
A dark full bodied porter brewed with real maple syrup. Black patent malt character shows through in the beginning with a silky smooth finish.

(Beer added by: Bierman9 on 03-26-2003)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 77 | Reviews: 40 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of B967ierhunter177
B967ierhunter177

Pennsylvania

2.05/5  rDev -38.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours a clear brown with amber tones and a thin head and some lace. The aroma is of brown sugar and maple and notmuch else. The flavor begins with a root beer and molasses flavor with the maple syrup showing on the tongue in the finish. The maple grows stronger as it warms but fades rapidly. It's mouthfeel is light-medium. Woodstock Kanc Country Maple Porter is an okay beer, thin for a porter but okay. Slightly recommended.

Serving type: bottle

09-16-2012 00:35:08 | More by B967ierhunter177
Photo of bigred89
bigred89

Maryland

2.25/5  rDev -32%

09-15-2012 22:52:09 | More by bigred89
Photo of donkeyrunner
donkeyrunner

Massachusetts

2.45/5  rDev -26%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

I had this at the brewery and almost got in a fight with our server because he wouldn't admit to bringing me the wrong beer. Turns out he brought me the right beer, it's just a really lame porter.

Clear chestnut color with a large tan head. Decent lace and retention for awhile. Good pour, doesn't hold. Way too light for a porter.

Has a damp earth smell remeniscient of peat in a wimpy Scotch ale. Hints of maple syrup, brown sugar and mild roast malt. Way too thin.

Tastes of earthy, smokey maple syrup with a mild roast malt tang in back.

It's a porter without much porter flavor, look or smell. I don't have a problem with a beer that reaches outside a style but this doesn't really have anything to hold it together. Seems like an experimental homebrew.

Serving type: growler

05-17-2009 23:24:45 | More by donkeyrunner
Photo of Satchboogie
Satchboogie

New Hampshire

2.45/5  rDev -26%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

22oz bomber poured into a pint glass

A: Pours brown, kind of light actually, with a 2 finger light brown fluffy head. Leaves pretty good lacing. Looks a bit thin and light.

S: A little roasted malt, maple sweetness, brown bread. Smells like an overly-sweet brown ale more than a porter. Very sweet smelling.

T: There's just that touch of roasted malts in the front, but it almost disappears to the brown-bread like malt in the middle. A good bit of maple syrup and dark breads. Very light flavor that almost completely disappears between the middle and finish. The finish is slightly bitter and a little metallic. I actually think the flavor isn't that bad, but it's too light and more like a brown ale than porter. I don't feel like the roasted malts play much of a role in this.

M: Fairly light mouthfeel, not even medium. Way too light for even a modest porter. Fairly hight carbonation that fizzy all the way through the finish and lingers a bit with the metallic qualities, dry and bitter qualities. While the flavor is fairly weak, the mouthfeel is even weaker. Just way to thin and too much carbonation.

O: While this isn't really unpleasant at all, it also just isn't really a porter. The flavors are muted, roasted qualities practically missing, way too thin. As a brown ale, it might get a higher mark, but calling this a maple porter just isn't doing this beer justice. If this was something I homebrewed, I probably wouldn't want to share with others nor brew again.

Serving type: bottle

04-28-2011 03:47:50 | More by Satchboogie
Photo of ygtbsm94
ygtbsm94

Virginia

2.5/5  rDev -24.5%

01-12-2012 08:21:45 | More by ygtbsm94
Photo of brandoman63
brandoman63

Illinois

2.5/5  rDev -24.5%

11-18-2011 21:12:17 | More by brandoman63
Photo of BarrelAgedBrian
BarrelAgedBrian

Massachusetts

2.5/5  rDev -24.5%

04-05-2013 21:50:43 | More by BarrelAgedBrian
Photo of MisterDeeds
MisterDeeds

Massachusetts

2.9/5  rDev -12.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

First, let me make note that this business of wrapping the top of a bomber in cheap loose tin foil HAS to go. It looks cheesy, and they rarely even stay on the bottle, so it's not doing anything to help the beer inside. As much as I hate peeling foil that is stuck around the the neck of a Magners bottle, that is the only way to do it (if you must).

Pours like a combination of a brown and red ale. Colors ranging from light ruby at the bottom,to a nice brown up top. Looks thin for a porter, but the head is a nice fluffy tan.

Not picking up any maple in the aroma. More malty and caramel-like, sort of like an American Octoberfest.

Tastes like it looks and smells. More like a brown ale than anything else, but the caramel and sweet malts of the Octoberfest style are in there as well. At the back of the surprisingly thick finish, there is a hint of the maple kicking around with slightly bitter hops.

This is not a terrible beer, I would even go so far as to say it is pretty good,it just doesn't seem to me, that it should be called a Maple Porter. Maybe I like Maple Syrup more than the next guy, but I just got excited to try a maple porter, and this didn't really live up to it.

Serving type: bottle

08-26-2009 23:08:59 | More by MisterDeeds
Photo of scottum
scottum

Vermont

2.95/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours out dark brown with a tan headskie. Some notes of maple come through, but not enough to write "maple" on the bottle in my opinion. The brew is however well balanced and grew on me as I drank it. Still, it is quite lacking in body for a porter and I doubt that I will try another. Once again, Woodstock Inn disappoints me.

Serving type: bottle

05-08-2010 22:08:21 | More by scottum
Photo of shanem
shanem

Vermont

2.98/5  rDev -10%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 3.5

A: Looked like a dark red ale more than a porter. See-thru ruby/copper color with an inch of white head that disappeared very quickly. No lacing at all

S: smells like sweet sweet malt with tiny bit of maple in the background, no bittering aroma at all

T: kind of empty in flavor for what I was expecting. has a bit of a sweet maltiness and maple flavor does come out more as it warms

M: Very thin feel for a porter and leaves an odd buttery coating

D: nothing really appauling, and nothing overpowering so it is drinkable, but I probably won't get another

Serving type: bottle

04-18-2009 03:52:34 | More by shanem
Photo of Sinnian
Sinnian

Maine

3/5  rDev -9.4%

07-18-2013 21:21:34 | More by Sinnian
Photo of jefftuck47
jefftuck47

Connecticut

3/5  rDev -9.4%

05-07-2013 04:18:12 | More by jefftuck47
Photo of 906Beard
906Beard

Michigan

3/5  rDev -9.4%

07-13-2014 01:02:26 | More by 906Beard
Photo of paulytasker
paulytasker

New York

3/5  rDev -9.4%

04-21-2013 22:38:55 | More by paulytasker
Photo of davey101
davey101

Connecticut

3/5  rDev -9.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

22 oz bottle with gold foil around the neck. Poured into a pint glass.

A - Dark brown clear body with a four finger high light khaki head. Pours with an almost cascading nitrogen effect. Some moderate lacing.

S - Nutty malts, caramel, sweet maple, and some hard minerals.

T - Similar to the nose. Nutty malts with a bit of maple sweetness. Some roasty bitterness in the finish that comes off mineraly and unpleasant. Watery and thin mouth feel with quite a bit of carbonation.

O - Ehhh. A boring porter with some decent maple flavors but an unpleasant mineral element happening. Not horrible, but I wouldn't seek this beer again.

Serving type: bottle

04-28-2012 23:13:55 | More by davey101
Photo of nmann08
nmann08

District of Columbia

3/5  rDev -9.4%

07-20-2013 23:31:59 | More by nmann08
Photo of thesarahfuller
thesarahfuller

Massachusetts

3/5  rDev -9.4%

11-18-2011 17:53:26 | More by thesarahfuller
Photo of Ivanhoes_Backpack
Ivanhoes_Backpack

New Brunswick (Canada)

3/5  rDev -9.4%

05-15-2012 01:17:34 | More by Ivanhoes_Backpack
Photo of sholland119
sholland119

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev -9.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A-Pours a clear, medium brown to amber with a frothy mocha head, no lacing.

S-Sweet with a hint of maple and caramel malt.

T-More like a brown ale than a porter. Quite a bit of sweetness from the maple, some sweet malt. Need another flavor dimension.

M-Light to medium bodied, just a bit syrupy.

O-Pretty ok, but not really better than that.

HV

Serving type: bottle

12-23-2011 01:13:24 | More by sholland119
Photo of mdfb79
mdfb79

New York

3/5  rDev -9.4%

03-23-2012 18:51:42 | More by mdfb79
Photo of Auslander
Auslander

Ohio

3/5  rDev -9.4%

01-24-2014 19:26:31 | More by Auslander
Photo of sdaly3
sdaly3

New Hampshire

3/5  rDev -9.4%

09-18-2012 22:51:35 | More by sdaly3
Photo of BeerCosmonaut
BeerCosmonaut

Vermont

3/5  rDev -9.4%

01-05-2013 21:21:59 | More by BeerCosmonaut
Photo of Brendog9
Brendog9

Massachusetts

3/5  rDev -9.4%

05-02-2014 00:03:24 | More by Brendog9
Photo of Auror
Auror

Massachusetts

3/5  rDev -9.4%

09-06-2013 14:12:22 | More by Auror
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Kanc Country Maple Porter from Woodstock Inn Brewery
77 out of 100 based on 77 ratings.