1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Pete's Wicked Ale - Pete's Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Pete's Wicked AlePete's Wicked Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
76
okay

511 Ratings
THE BROS
82
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 511
Reviews: 371
rAvg: 3.29
pDev: 16.41%
Wants: 6
Gots: 6 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Pete's Brewing Company visit their website
Texas, United States

Style | ABV
English Brown Ale |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 09-04-2001)
View: Beers (0) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Pete's Wicked Ale Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 511 | Reviews: 371 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Sammy
Sammy

Ontario (Canada)

3.98/5  rDev +21%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Aroma of C hop, chocolate malt. Good carbonation. Nicely hoppy, citrus, and brown in that it had a bit of root beer taste to it and had a reddish brown colour. Well malted, tasty and I could have this as a regular brew.A very nice ale, in a blind taste I thought it was a Great Lakes.

Serving type: bottle

12-16-2005 03:55:01 | More by Sammy
Photo of t0rin0
t0rin0

California

3.25/5  rDev -1.2%

12-07-2012 03:42:50 | More by t0rin0
Photo of djrn2
djrn2

New Jersey

3/5  rDev -8.8%

02-12-2013 17:01:50 | More by djrn2
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

3.6/5  rDev +9.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Crystal clear reddish copper. The head is light 'toast brown' and is soft and frothy. It falls unevenly, but quickly, with the end result being almost no lace. The nose is of caramel malt, lightly spicy hops and grain.

Spicy hops have their say throughout the mouthful, but play second-fiddle to the sweet, toffee-like, toasted malt base. The modest bitterness of the hops peeks through to a slightly greater extent on the back end. The body could stand some firming up; its a little too light.

I have no preconceived notions with regards to Pete's Wicked Ale because this is the first bottle that I've ever had. My understanding is that it was much better in the old days. My opinion of this version is that it's a fair-good brown ale, no more than that. It isn't likely to challenge anyone's taste buds, but then all beer doesn't need to do that, does it?

Serving type: bottle

04-28-2004 21:30:24 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of metter98
metter98

New York

3.4/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A: The beer is relatively clear dark garnet in color and has a moderate amount of carbonation. It poured with a quarter finger high off white head that gradually died down but never completely faded away.
S: There are aromas of caramel and nutty malts in the nose along with some notes of fruity yeast.
T: The taste has nutty flavors along with some notes of malty sweetness and hints of caramel malts. A very slight amount of bitterness is present, which helps prevent the sweetness from becoming cloying.
M: It feels a bit shy of being medium-bodied and slightly smooth on the palate with a moderate amount of carbonation.
O: This was a pretty good beer among those available in the early 1990s but doesn’t really stand up to some of the other craft beer offerings currently available in the style.

Serving type: bottle

06-06-2012 01:17:37 | More by metter98
Photo of brentk56
brentk56

North Carolina

3.1/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Pours a clear dark amber, almost caramel color with a modest ecru head that leaves some nice lace

Smell: A little vegetal with a hint of tea; not very enticing

Taste: Brown bread up front, with an unusual herbal sweet bitterness that develops by mid-palate; the bitterness is grainy, while the sweetness has a hint of caramel; after the swallow, the flavors fade quickly and the finish is very clean

Mouthfeel: Light to medium body with moderate carbonation

Drinkability: Although there are some interesting elements, it is almost as if all the character has been brewed out of this beer; just OK

Serving type: bottle

04-17-2009 23:32:03 | More by brentk56
Photo of nmann08
nmann08

District of Columbia

3/5  rDev -8.8%

11-28-2011 22:49:37 | More by nmann08
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

3.2/5  rDev -2.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Would not have considered this beer to be a Brown Ale. It seems more similar to amber ales with a more toasted character. Anyhow, they are obviously going for a traditional English flavor. Even at that, this one falls a bit short. A modest brown-amber color cased a light head and fell without a lace. Aromas are grainy and malty with a light whisp of hop aroma. Perhaps a slight amount of caramel and chocolate. Flavors are toasty, bready and similar to aromas. Waters considerably in the body, but makes for an easy drinking beer. The finish is clean and refreshing. A safe beer, but not interesting enough for me to drink regularly.

Serving type: bottle

10-07-2005 20:35:29 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of acurtis
acurtis

New Jersey

3/5  rDev -8.8%

01-15-2012 03:58:26 | More by acurtis
Photo of womencantsail
womencantsail

California

3.25/5  rDev -1.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A: The beer pours a dark amber color with a finger of off-white head sitting on top.

S: Intensely sweet on the nose with a big time dark fruit character, possibly prunes and raisins. Some toffee, caramel, and brown sugar gives additional sweetness as does the hint of chocolate.

T: Sweet toffee and brown sugar are present all the way through. Some mild dark fruit notes and perhaps a hint of nuttiness and toasted bread.

M: Light to medium in body with a medium carbonation.

O: A little too sweet and not much else going on.

Serving type: bottle

05-10-2011 22:18:14 | More by womencantsail
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

2.8/5  rDev -14.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12 oz. bottle - $1.29 at Total Wine & More in Kennesaw, Georgia.

Appearance: Pours a clear, reddish-brown body with a thin, whitish head.

Smell: Faintly sweetish malt nose of nutty, caramel accents along with a light, fruity note of grenadine.

Taste: Lightly nutty, lightly grainy maltiness with just a touch of dark caramel sweetness. Dash of club soda. Vague hint of cherry fruitiness. Spicy hops with a mild bitterness. Touch of acidity. Finishes dry and a bit fizzy.

Mouthfeel: Medium-thin body. Medium-plus carbonation.

Drinkability: Performs a bit under par, I must say, and in no way would it be, for me, a go-to brown.

Serving type: bottle

02-03-2009 03:36:16 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of jaydoc
jaydoc

Kansas

3/5  rDev -8.8%

12-29-2013 05:22:07 | More by jaydoc
Photo of spycow
spycow

Illinois

3.25/5  rDev -1.2%

01-12-2013 03:10:15 | More by spycow
Photo of Knapp85
Knapp85

Pennsylvania

2.98/5  rDev -9.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pete's wicked was a pretty standard brew. The color is on the darker side which is pretty nice. It separates itself from the normal flag ship brews. I remember this brew being quite drinkable and friendly on the palette. Lightly roasted malts make this brew interesting.

Serving type: bottle

03-24-2011 03:22:39 | More by Knapp85
Photo of zeff80
zeff80

Missouri

3.38/5  rDev +2.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Poured out an amber/orange color with a small, white, bubbly head. Fairly good carbonation and left minimal lace.

S - It smelled of malt and caramel. Also, a slightly fruity aroma.

T - It tasted malty and somewhat bready. Also, some good caramel flavor.

M - It was a little thin but still fairly crisp. A light bodied beer.

D - This is an okay beer. It works as a session brew.

Serving type: bottle

03-11-2008 02:55:07 | More by zeff80
Photo of biboergosum
biboergosum

Alberta (Canada)

3.53/5  rDev +7.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I have to say the only connection I have to this beer is from Denis Leary's beer rant..."Who the fuck is Pete?"

This beer pours a clear dark copper hue, with one finger of dense foamy off-white head, which leaves some decent jet entrails of lace around the glass as it falls away. It smells of sweet orchard fruit malt, and some mild nuttiness. The taste is big on the malt, the bready, nutty sort, with a mild leafy, earthy hoppy offset keeping things from devolving into a Wicked Diabetic state. The carbonation is a bit below average, the body medium weight, smooth, and it finishes off-dry, the nutty malt tempered by the leafy hops.

A decent enough brown ale, with some stronger American hop sensibilities. It ain't Bud, Mr. Leary, but at least it doesn't have any cranberries in it...

Serving type: bottle

09-12-2010 00:56:52 | More by biboergosum
Photo of NeroFiddled
NeroFiddled

Pennsylvania

3.85/5  rDev +17%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Brewed in Tumwater, WA / Eden, NC. Pours a clear, reddish-mahogany body capped by a creamy light tan head. The head holds shortly, and then drops to a decent, creamy collar and cottony surface covering. It leaves some transient lace that's nice while it's there. The nose is softly sweet with notes of Munich malt and a touch of chocolate, but there are no hops to be found. A smooth and creamy, fine/gentle carbonation and medium bodied mouthfeel boosts it's maltiness; and the flavor reflects the aroma. It's malty and softly sweet with the rich, grainy character of Munich malt and some minor caramel and chocolate. Light, spicy hops dance across the palate. The bitterness is restrained, but it finishes drying with a quick flourish of hops and some mild residual malt. Although this is clearly not the beer it once was, it is enjoyable. It lacks the hops that it once had in its aroma, flavor, and bitterness; but it's well-balanced, and possibly even more so than the more aggressive original version.

Serving type: bottle

03-05-2003 17:55:19 | More by NeroFiddled
Photo of TheManiacalOne
TheManiacalOne

Rhode Island

3.18/5  rDev -3.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 16.9oz bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a light brown color, with a short dense off-white head that fades slowly and leaves a thick lace on the glass.

S: The aroma contains caramelized malts, maple, nuts and a faint touch of hops.

T: The taste starts out bready with a hearty malt character followed by mildly sweet flavors of maple, caramel and nuts. There's a mild but complementary hops presence that brings some balance. The after-taste is slightly bready.

M: Crisp and smooth, medium body, medium carbonation, finish is slightly sticky.

D: A little tasty, goes down easily, not too filling, mild kick, decent representation of style, it's not a bad beer but there are several others in the style that I would pick first.

Serving type: bottle

11-28-2010 03:55:03 | More by TheManiacalOne
Photo of Jason
Jason

Massachusetts

3.28/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Better on tap and ice cold during a big feast of bbq. Certainly on the sweet side and some thing I quaff to wash down messy rib at my local bbq joint. A decent no brainer beer that has a touch of flavour to throw in the mix. Not something I’d drink as a regular beer though.

Serving type: on-tap

08-14-2002 18:46:23 | More by Jason
Photo of feloniousmonk
feloniousmonk

Minnesota

3/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Label reads: Brewed and bottled by Pete's Brewing, Utica, NY", not San Antonio.
..."an experience out of the ordinary, Our tantalizing ruby-brown ale with distinctive nuts and aromatic Brewer's Gold hops is sure to stir up an urge to let loose." Not sure if I agree with the grammatical structure there, Pete...(though I know the real "Pete" is no longer around.)

Last time I had one of these was close to 4 years ago, under a different label. Let's see if it's anything like I remember, or, I hope, perhaps better.

Clear, magohany (or, "ruby-brown") in color, brieg cocoa-tan head, gone before you know it.

Sweetness in the nose, recalling nuts, maple, brown sugar, but just barely.

Put past the lips, it just leaps on board the palate, and slips through the mouth with no trouble at all, but neither does it make an impression. Hops play their part lightly, malt makes little of it's supporting role. Meedium to light in body, with a slightly weet, if forgettable finish. Called "exceptionally smooth" on the 6-pack box, but that means little with such a paucity of character.

For a non-threatening, easily guzzled brew, this isn't bad. I'm not in the mood to knock it, but can't recommend it, really. When I last had it, I was deeply disappointed, this time...not so much, though I'm not in the slightest satisfied.

Far better browns out there, ...and "Wicked"? Don't make me laugh...
Maybe 15 years ago...

Serving type: bottle

09-15-2005 00:18:49 | More by feloniousmonk
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

West Virginia

2.25/5  rDev -31.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Pours a ruby amber brown with a tan toffee toned two fingered generous head. Leaves a semi even trickled lace around my pint glass. The aroma has a sharp fruity tone that is sweet at first with little or no hop aroma. Seems like a mass produced run of the mill ale that at one time could have been worthy, but the flavor now is unbalanced between the predominantly sweet tones mixed with the harsh bread like flavors and basically no defineable hop bitterness. The light to medium bodied beer is lacking in body a bit thin and uncomplex definitely artificially carbonated in this one. I could drink a couple of these mediocre excuse for a "micro", but why with all of the other great beers out there today I choose to keep this a beer of the past.

Serving type: bottle

06-28-2003 01:55:01 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of Slatetank
Slatetank

Pennsylvania

3.75/5  rDev +14%

05-23-2013 18:37:53 | More by Slatetank
Photo of WesWes
WesWes

New York

3.4/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

The beer pours a dark amber/brown color with a thin tan head. The aroma is bitter with malty character. There is the smell of roasted barley and caramel malts, maybe even victory malt. The taste is quite bitter with a malty zing to it. It seems quite simple in character, but finishes clean and dry. The mouthfeel is decent; a med body. The drinkability is suspect. I can drink it, but do I really want to? There are many good brown ales out there. This is micro/macro example of an American Brown Ale; high in alpha acids, but it's not the best one I've had. I wish it was less bitter and had more hop flavor an aroma. It's hard to enjoy the maltiness when the bitterness sticks to my tongue.

Serving type: bottle

07-16-2003 16:20:45 | More by WesWes
Photo of jwc215
jwc215

Wisconsin

3.05/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours clear brown with a thin head that almost immediately becomes a thin patch.

The smell is of roasted malt. Earthy with a hin of nut. Subtle berry-like fruitiness.

The taste is of slightly roasted malt. Plenty of water. Some earthy tones. Hint of nut and vague berry-like fruitiness. A bit soapy. Rather bland with a short finish.

It has a rather thin body. Lightly carbonated. Flat aftertaste.

This is a mediocre/average brown ale. Not too bad, but rather ho-hum.

Serving type: bottle

07-01-2007 13:53:32 | More by jwc215
Photo of Gueuzedude
Gueuzedude

Arizona

3/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Light brown to amber in color, pours with a tan head that lasts for a couple of minutes. Sweet roasted caramel aroma with maybe a hint of roast malts. Predominant taste is one of a malty sweetness, it is lightly bitter in the finish as well. A slight hop flavor up front, but it is pretty non-specific and hard to really pull out. Fairly simplistic beer, seems to have lost lots of character over the years. There is nothing wrong with this beer though just not all that great. Worth drinking if your only other option is amber bock.

Serving type: bottle

10-24-2003 23:30:03 | More by Gueuzedude
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Pete's Wicked Ale from Pete's Brewing Company
76 out of 100 based on 511 ratings.