1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Smoke From The Oak (Wine Barrel Imperial Version) - Captain Lawrence Brewing Co.

Smoke From The Oak (Wine Barrel Imperial Version)Smoke From The Oak (Wine Barrel Imperial Version)

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
88
very good

87 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 87
Reviews: 38
rAvg: 3.92
pDev: 16.33%


Brewed by:
Captain Lawrence Brewing Co. visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
American Porter |  12.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: aerozeppl on 12-19-2010)
View: Beers (118) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 87 | Reviews: 38 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of Florida9
Florida9

Illinois

3.73/5  rDev -4.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Batch 4

A: dark brown , but still fairly translucent. A bit of a reddish tint. Forms. Them light brown head. No lacing.

S: smoke, apple, cherry, foxy grapes and some light red wine.

T: a tad bit sour. Wine, red grapes, light tartness.

M: medium bodied. Tart, though I'm not sure it's supposed to be. Mild bitterness. Dry and astringent on the finish.

O: a nice beer. Not sure it's supposed to be as tart as it is, but it sort of works. Certainly drinkable and I liked it more so than the rum barrel.

Serving type: bottle

01-05-2013 23:39:04 | More by Florida9
Photo of homebrew311
homebrew311

Illinois

3.23/5  rDev -17.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Appearance is murky reddish brown with active bubbles settling almost no head. Nose has lactic acid character with red wine, light chocolate, and absent of smoke. Taste reminds me of a sour porter. Getting plenty of oak and wine, not much else. Mouthfeel is effervescent with light body. Overall, a little more sour than I expected. The smoke takes a back seat.

Serving type: bottle

01-05-2013 23:38:50 | More by homebrew311
Photo of ngeunit1
ngeunit1

California

4.43/5  rDev +13%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A - Pours a dark black with a hint of brown and a finger of frothy chocolate-khaki colored head. The head fades down at a normal pace leaving behind some lacing.

S - Aroma is a mix of roasted chocolate malts, coffee, vanilla, smoke, oak, red wine, black licorice, dark fruits, and some booze.

T - Starts off with a mix of roasted chocolate malts with some vanilla, dark fruits, and black licorice. Through the middle, oak and red wine come through with some good smoke and some coffee. The finish is a mix of roasted chocolate malts, red wine, smoke, vanilla, oak, coffee, black licorice, and dark fruits with some booze.

M - Full bodied with moderate carbonation. Feels smooth with a smokey, sweet, and warming finish.

D - Very drinkable. The red wine really adds some nice complex flavors on top of the big base porter and balances it out.

Serving type: bottle

11-19-2012 00:50:23 | More by ngeunit1
Photo of mdfb79
mdfb79

New York

4.2/5  rDev +7.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

From 10/13/12 notes. Big thanks to Wherethewildbeersare for sharing this one at the Top Hops tasting; thanks Joey!

a - Pours a pitch black color with one inch of dark tan head and low to moderate carbonation evident. Looks exactly like the Rum version.

s - Smells of roasted malts, chocolate, sweet dark fruits, raisins, vanilla smoke, peat, wood, toasted malts, and light coffee. Sweeter than the Rum version and more going on; I like this nose better.

t - Tastes of roasted malts, sticky sweet dark fruits, chocolate, vanilla, smoke, wood/oak, peat, burnt malts, coffee. rum. Again, sweeter and more vanilla, chocolate, and fruit than the rum version for me; definitely prefer this one.

m - Thick, full bodied porter with moderate carbonation. Considering the ABV it is pretty easy to drink, but I felt more alcohol in the rum version than the wine version.

o - Overall a good smoked porter, and I definitely preferred this version to the Rum. I felt this one had more going on, and the rum barrel hid some things I really enjoyed about this one. Worth seeking out.

Serving type: bottle

10-15-2012 20:34:21 | More by mdfb79
Photo of Jeffo
Jeffo

Netherlands

2.38/5  rDev -39.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Got this entire set from STEG a while back. Thanks for the trade man!

From a 750ml into a snifter.
Vintage: 2010

APPEARANCE: All the variants basically look the same. Pours our transparent brown and yields a small, medium looking, tan head with god retention. Head fades to a wisp and ring. Black, relatively transparent looking body with no carbonation evident. A ring remains until the end and leaves lots of lacing down the glass.

SMELL: Smoked malts, a touch of roasted notes as well, and some dark chocolate. A hint of white wine in there as well, but mostly the smoke and dark malts are evident.

TASTE: Light roasted notes with some smoky flavors for sure. Oak in there as well, and some acidic wine at the finish. Mild but lingering aftertaste of smoke, acidic wine and dark chocolate. The wine notes don’t work, and give it an acidic tone that isn’t all that pleasant.

PALATE: Light and bubbly body with higher levels of carbonation. Creamy enough on the palate, goes down fine and finishes dry on the palate. An acidic bite as well.

OVERALL: This was definitely the worst of the bunch. The wine barrel lent a line of acidity that just didn’t sit well with the rest of the beer. Not one worth seeking out unless you’re trying to complete the set. Regardless, thanks for the trade on this one STEG. We had a lot of fun with this set.

Serving type: bottle

04-05-2012 20:30:58 | More by Jeffo
Photo of jegross2
jegross2

Illinois

3.98/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Reviewing the Smoke From The Oak (Wine Barrel Imperial Version) from Captain Lawrence Brewing Company. This is my first ever beer from Captain Lawrence, but I have heard good things about this brewery out of New York.
Score: 90

Unknown vintage bottle (forgot to check the label!) served in a "The Bruery" brand tulip and enjoyed on 03/23/12.

Appearance: Deep brown, mostly opaque save for a strip of brown highlight atop the glass when held up to a light. Between the glasses poured at the table, it seems like there is a combined 2-3 fingers of creamy milk chocolate covered head at pour that quickly settles into a bubbly ring around the glass. Minimal lacing, poor retention. 3.5/5

Smell: Huge notes of smoke, oak, and hickory wood. There's some funky white grape, white wine acidity, a little roasted chocolate and a light vinegar aroma too. 4/5

Taste: Like the nose, there is lots of smoke on the palate. I am glad I capped the evening off with this beer, because it's a lingering palate wrecker! Tart white grape, oak and roasted chocolate. There is a "fatty meat" flavor on the palate entwined with the smokiness that others described as "pork-like." I do not detect any booziness whatsoever despite the 12% ABV. 4/5

Mouthfeel: Medium bodied, high carbonation. Oily/smooth mouthfeel. Smokey and sweet finish. 4/5

Overall: This beer struck a real nice contrasting balance between the heavier smokey flavors and the lighter white wine/tart grape flavors that left an interesting effect on the palate that can only be described as a "prickley sweetness." I still do not like sours, and this one has Brett intentionally added to it, but I thoroughly enjoyed this beer. This one is a true smoke bomb. I would definitely be interested in trying the other variations of this beer at some point in the future.

Recommendation: Fans of smoke beers and wine wine should seek this beer out. Be warned, however -- this one is heavy on the smoke!

Pairings: Barbequed chicken.

Cost: $12 for a 750 ml bottle.

Serving type: bottle

03-28-2012 07:17:51 | More by jegross2
Photo of tewaris
tewaris

Minnesota

3.8/5  rDev -3.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Shared generously by maximum12. Thanks! Poured into a tasting snifter.

Perhaps the smokiest beer I have ever had to date! Very strong notes of smoke and char with only a tiny bit of dark fruit character coming through in the nose. The taste is mellower than the nose, although still mighty smoky. Dark and raisin-y with decent amount of roast and tannins leading towards a mildly astringent finish. A very unique beer but lacking balance.

4, 4, 4, 4, 3

Serving type: bottle

01-20-2012 19:31:08 | More by tewaris
Photo of jaxon53
jaxon53

Connecticut

3.83/5  rDev -2.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Again, another big thank you to my boy FishGetter, for getting me this bottle at the release. Batch #4. I've been waiting to try this for some time. Served this chilled, as the bottle states, but allowed it to warm abit before sampling.

Appearance: Smoke from the Oak Wine Barrel pours out a deep brown color, almost into black. Very gently poured this into an Ommegang chalice, not really sure of the carbonation level. I'd say about two fingers of thinnish, off-white head rose. Head faded away on the quicker side, leaving bits of webby lace behind. Can just barely see some tiny floaties moving around in the glass.

Smell: Quite a bouquet here. Definitely getting some soft wine notes. Just the slightes bit funky. Weak hints of oak. Roasty to say the least. Light touches of friut. Bits of wood here and there and some smoke.

Taste: Very interesting. Wine is in there, just not what I expected. A just barely noticeable tart flavor. A little funk, all but buried in the background. Roasted malt and some rich chocolate. A little smoke around the edges. Finishes smooth and dry, with a tart zip in the end. A little bit of alcohol is present in the finish. If I tasted this blindly I would have never guessed the base of this beer was a Porter.

Mouthfeel: Smooth, medium bodied mouthfeel. Medium carbonation. A pleasure to the palate.

Overall: Quite a complex beer, that I feel needs to warm a bit to really show off. Definiteley worth seeking out.

Serving type: bottle

01-15-2012 18:18:38 | More by jaxon53
Photo of maximum12
maximum12

Minnesota

3.38/5  rDev -13.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Big thanks to the ever-generous beerloco (& Mrs.) for bringing this along on a trip to MN last December. Been sitting on it to allow the smokiness to mellow a bit; a year seemed about right. Broken open at a tasting last night. Big, square-looking 750ML bottle.

Pour is just this side of dead black, thin carbonation. Nose is a revolution of smoked malts that overwhelm any subtlety.

Smoke from the Oak Wine Barrel Aged is like a charred log of beer. The roasted smokiness comes off the beer in 28 foot rollers, roaring onto the palate without concern for which is the salad fork. The only other thing that arrives is a spare, slight shot of vinuous character from the wine barrels, right at the end, a dry, tart note that barely penetrates the inferno. Really, a couple of 2 ounce pours of this one is enough.

You need to really dig smoke beers to like this one. Pretty good, but just too much for me. Glad we split this bottle twelve or so ways!

Serving type: bottle

12-18-2011 15:05:29 | More by maximum12
Photo of Durge
Durge

Connecticut

4.03/5  rDev +2.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A solid black-brown color with a creamy tan head and fantastic lacing. The aroma has a nice sour lemon and wheat wine. Not what I expected from a porter and the smoke is not obvious, but quite likable none the less. The flavor follows suit with great sour lemony rhubarb in a malty Alka-Seltzer mix. This tastes like a decent sour and in no way like any typical porter. The smoke is only evident at the end of this brew and remains subtle at best. Medium bodied with fair tingly feel. Not sure about the style but I love it as a sour.

Serving type: bottle

11-14-2011 04:38:46 | More by Durge
Photo of jamescain
jamescain

Texas

3.58/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a sniffer.

Appearance: Black with dark reddish hues when held to the light topped off with a mocha colored head that barely forms a lacing and ends up as a ring around the glass.

Aroma: Smoke, roasted grains, chocolate, vanilla, and subtle spicy notes.

Taste: Chocolate, subtle smoke and roasted notes, a hint of spicy wine characteristics and s touch of sourness, not where I would like it though.

Mouthfeel: Medium body with medium carbonation and a slight amount of alcohol on the finish.

Overall: I was hoping for more wine characteristics to emerge from this beer or perhaps some sourness, but I didn't find either.

Serving type: bottle

10-05-2011 20:26:35 | More by jamescain
Photo of Jwale73
Jwale73

Rhode Island

3.93/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

750ml bottle served in a chalice. Pours the color and clarity of cola with a frothy, loose, one inch, mocha-colored head that dissipates into a cluster of bubbles around the edges. Nose expresses smoke, band-aids and tannins towards the back. Fortunately, there is much less of a band-aid presence and more of a rauch-like quality in the flavor profile. In addition to the smoked malts, the wine barrel really comes out here. Mouthfeel is medium-light with a creamy/oily texture and a carbonation just shy of still. Overall, really interesting and complex. Having not had too many wine barrel-aged brews, I don't have much of a frame of reference, but this beer was quite pleasant and I have to say that I definitely like the Imperial Porter base on these beers over the old recipe.

Serving type: bottle

09-28-2011 22:14:16 | More by Jwale73
Photo of DefenCorps
DefenCorps

Oregon

4.08/5  rDev +4.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Bottle from joefuzz. Thank you for this trading this great set of beers to me. Like I said, it's strange that this beer's been out for about 10 months and is only at 25 reviews.

Pouring black with dark reddish brown highlights, this beer is capped with a dense, thick, creamy brown head with excellent retention and lacing.The nose is great. The stronger smoked porter base is obvious, again lending a moderately meaty, smoky, mildly ham-like smoked salt character. The wine is difficult to describe apart from a generic tannic red wine. There's a blend of mild tartness, mild Brett character and the creamy, mildly caramel milk-like character from the base beer. Unlike some other reviews, I don't pick up much bandaid character on the nose. Solid stuff.

The palate is rich and luxurious. With a blend of cream, smoke (and a rather intense smoke character at that), dark chocolate (think closer to Lindt's 90% cocoa versions) and a rich, vinous character. The wine character is hard to pin down. It's got dark fruit characteristics, but none of the sweetness. I guess a blend of raisins and darker cherries, stripped of their sweetness, is how I can best describe this. Some moderately floral vanilla is present in the mid-palate as well. What all of this yields is a beer that's rich, savory and creamy, beautifully balanced and potentially very food friendly. Medium-full in body, this beer has a wonderful mouthfeel, helped greatly by the creamy carbonation. Smoky and mildly meaty on the finish, there isn't much of a tannin character that lingers. I guess my one complaint would be that the finish is *just* a hair watery, but not enough to make me penalize it too severely. As of now, the sourness (intended or not) hasn't fully fleshed out, and this beer is excellently balanced, and is ready for drinking. I think I prefer this over the original Wine Barrel SFTO.

Serving type: bottle

09-06-2011 02:53:57 | More by DefenCorps
Photo of aerozeppl
aerozeppl

New York

4.6/5  rDev +17.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

A: Super dark brown. No light gets through even when held up to the light. A surprising amount of brown head. Quite a bit of lacing as well.

S: The smoke notes are up front and powerful. A little bit of bandaid in the nose but not that bad. The wine comes through nicely and it had a nice heat to it. The nose really has so much going on. As it warms up the oak wine comes out more.

T: The smoke is up front but the wine really gives it something nice. The oak and wine combo really works well. It is a little bit hot still but it has a lot going on. Just keeps getting better as it warms up.

M: Not as thick bodied as the regular imperial porter. Quite smooth body. Low carbonation but it works well.

O: Really nice. Just a wonderfully complex beer. Tons going on without it all being overbearing.

Serving type: bottle

08-30-2011 00:46:00 | More by aerozeppl
Photo of Gueuzedude
Gueuzedude

Arizona

3.95/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

A solid pour into my Lost Abbey Teku glass produces a three-finger thick, nicely browned head that leaves some nice layered lacing on the sides of my glass as it slowly subsides. The beer is a nice black hue that shows a hint of ruby to it around the edges when held up directly to the light. The aroma smells of roast and berries is apparent as I am pouring this, but a more focused look at the aroma smells of fresh cut sawdust that is backed by a sort of medicinal phenolic note that smells like a freshly unwrapped bandaid (I actually like that smell quite a bit, but I am not sure I want it in my beer). There is perhaps a hint of tartness to the finish (I am not sure if it is roast or whine barrel derived). Hmm, let me reevaluate that Band-Aid note, it is actually contributed partially by the smokiness from the malt, I still can’t shake the comparison to a Band-Aid, but it is much more pleasant than I had originally surmised; the oak character definitely mixes with the smoke to contribute to this character as well. A deep draught of the aroma reveals a rich toasted maltiness as well as the red-wine derived, tart berry notes, but you really have to dig for these most times. In the end the nose is fairly solid; not as objectionable as I had at first feared, but also not as appetizing as I would have hoped before cracking this beer.

The beer feels somewhat rich and viscous as it first hits my tongue, but it finishes with a light, dry oak and tart wine character in the near finish, but then the long finish sees a touch of the malt heft coming back to linger on the palate. Buttery oak flavors, spicy oak, ample berry like wine character and a fresh cut wood flavors define the good side of the oak contributions. There is a touch of plastic / Band-Aid phenolic notes towards the finish; again I think this is a flavor derived from the combination of oak and smoke flavors. The smokiness also contributes a touch of a savory quality to this beer. A dark berry character becomes more noticeable as the beer warms up, though it still plays a supporting role in the flavor. The malt character certainly has a richness to it that is quite satiating at times; the smoke definitely boosts this, but there are flavors of toasty whole grain (this really stands out in the flavor, especially as the beer warms up), amply roasted notes, some touches of roast bitterness, complex dark malt sugars (not sweet, but really moved towards the savory side) and a deeply toasted nutty note that stands proud in the flavor profile.

This beer really ends up being quite tasty and enjoyable as it warms up, though it never entirely shakes the Band-Aid notes (moreso in the aroma than in the flavor, though it is still always at least subtly in the flavor as well). I am not sure if the Band-Aid notes are purely from the oak / smoke combination, or if there is a start of something funky going on here, but this isn’t nearly as integratedly good as the funk’ified non-imperial Smoke from the Oak Wine Barrel; the lush texture is perhaps a bit better than the “regular” strength version, but every other category was better in the original (even if it was likely harder to be consistent). I have a feeling that my overall impression of this beer would be better if it had started out towards the high 50°F (mid 10°C), as opposed to the low 40s (~5°C) that this started out at; in fact I find myself giving this a bump up in its enjoyable quality as I drink more of it on the warm side of cool.

Serving type: bottle

08-08-2011 13:49:29 | More by Gueuzedude
Photo of jlindros
jlindros

Massachusetts

3.95/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

Thanks a ton to BlessedBeBeer for cracking this.

Pours a super dark colored beer with a creamy lighter head.

Nose has dark roasty but salty malts, lots of smoke, bit of brine, hint of chocolate, bit of booze, lots of roast, a bit less oak than the rum and a hint of red wine, also some fruit.

Taste has semi sweet dark roasty malts, tons of smoke, bit of brine and salt but less so than the rum barrel, dark malts, touch of oak and vanilla, bit of chocolate, nice smoked malt flavor and chewy caramel malts, hits of red fruits and a red wine flavor.

Mouth is a bit heavier bodied, decent carb, hint of warming booze.

Overall great but a bit briny and salty, nice smoke, nice malts, not too drinkable but great flavors.

Serving type: bottle

07-23-2011 20:40:42 | More by jlindros
Photo of mikesgroove
mikesgroove

South Carolina

4.6/5  rDev +17.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

dark brown, nearly black emerged from the bottled and rattled around the inside of the glass producing a nice three inch high head f tan colored foam.

The first notes to hit you were the nice sour funk that was present from the barrels. hints of chocolate and coffee as well; a rich imperial porter, smoked, aged in sour wine barrels. smoky flavor starting to come through in here now, after being nearly absent in the aroma. Nice chocolate malts and hints of roasted coffee throughout as well. This was a nice sweet porter, and I even could pick up hints of vanilla way in the back. t sour note just really kicked in. These must have been one hell of a set of barrels this was aged in as they were all over the flavor as well. The finish even was dominated by a long drawn out sour flavor that really just was just the icing on the cake.

Mouthfeel - This was a nice robust porter with a medium Mouthfeel and as you could imagine, absolutely awesome carbonation. A nice velvet like smooth feel going down, the bubbles tingled your tongue and kept it active throughout. There was a nice dry feeling in the finish. I have to admit, I was again really surprised with how well this went down.

Serving type: bottle

07-11-2011 03:18:12 | More by mikesgroove
Photo of deapokid
deapokid

Pennsylvania

4.18/5  rDev +6.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Enjoyed on 5/21. Picked up the boxed set at Bierkraft in Brooklyn in January. Reviewed from notes.

Pours a shade darker than the other two in the collection, but with a reddish hue that's nicely capped off with a brown lump of head and a sticky, soapy lacing.

The usual nose of smoke and roasted notes are met with a red wine acidic bite. It's strikingly pronounced, a touch sour and very appealing.

Mmm! The roastiness and earthy wood in the porter mingle well with the wine, making for a dry, nutty and subtly tart flavor. A certain milkiness peaks out as well that I didn't catch in the rum or brandy-barreled versions, as does a pipe tobacco floralness. The amount of wine character found in this porter is pretty stunning and it pairs best with the porter of any of these brews.

The mouth is smooth with tart and dry notes in the conclusion. It's quite remarkable that the fruit, chocolate and boozy nuances keep showing up in new and interesting ways when accompanied by such a strong, tannic backbone. Top notch!

Serving type: bottle

07-09-2011 23:23:35 | More by deapokid
Photo of AgentZero
AgentZero

Illinois

4.3/5  rDev +9.7%
look: 4 | smell: 5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Second from the SFTO Imperial series drank side-by-side with the rest.

A - They all relatively of look the same. Black beer, brown on the edges. This one had a little bit more of a head than the brandy version, but I'd say they're comparable in look on the grading scale.

T - Holy balls, this is one of the best things I've ever smelled. Smoke, roasted malt, a little vanilla, some wood, and a great rich wine smell that mixes perfectly with everything else. Fantastic.

T - Taste is not quite as good as the nose, but its still quite nice. It's a little more disjointed, as the wine and roast/smoke seem a bit more separated, but it's still great. Some nice sweetness added from being in the barrel.

M - Medium bodied with soft carbonation.

O - This was my favorite one, just due to the amazing aroma. Would love to drink this again. Once again, not sure how this is an F beer, but to each there own.

Serving type: bottle

07-09-2011 15:37:32 | More by AgentZero
Photo of glid02
glid02

Georgia

4/5  rDev +2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Bottle shared by Corey – thanks! Side-by-side with the rum and brandy versions.

Pours black with a tan head that leaves decent lacing.

Smells of robust roasted malts with large amounts of smokiness and hints of tobacco. Also present are mild amounts of tannins and dark fruits.

Tastes similar to how it smells. Heavily roasted malts up front are joined quickly by large amounts of smokiness. Midway through the smoke fades a bit, allowing dark fruit flavors and light oak to work their way into things, carrying through to a moderately bitter ending. Mouthfeel is good, with smooth carbonation.

Overall this was the version that was least-influenced by the barrels. A nice showcase of the base beer however I would like more of the wine barrel. Still, it’s worth a shot.

Serving type: bottle

07-06-2011 18:54:02 | More by glid02
Photo of Klym
Klym

California

4.38/5  rDev +11.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Review from notes. Tasting-size portion poured into a snifter.

Dark pour with a thin head. Appleskins smoke and pine in the nose-- hard to believe that this is a porter, seems sourish. Taste is amazing with a feta cheese dominated flavor and apple, smoke, and tree bark dancing in the background. Stunningly complex and original. Would love to try all the variations.

Serving type: bottle

06-21-2011 01:10:07 | More by Klym
Photo of Sean9689
Sean9689

Illinois

4.1/5  rDev +4.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Thanks to Mike (AgentZero) for this one. Poured into Bruery tulip.

A - Pours black, tan head, thin ring, thin film on top.

S - Huge cabernet note, which is delicious, slight chocolate, dark fruits, oak. Being a wine lover, it's probably my favorite nose of the three variants.

T - Not as much wine here, but still, very good. Tannic notes, chocolate, slight smoke, oak.

M - Medium to full, rich and smooth, creamy finish.

O - My favorite nose of the 3 but the taste doesn't live it to the nose. Still, very enjoyable and being that I'm a wine guy as well, liked this one. Recommend.

Serving type: bottle

06-13-2011 18:21:29 | More by Sean9689
Photo of black13
black13

Oregon

1.13/5  rDev -71.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Hopsbreath brought three versions to our tasting tonight. We started with the Wine barrel, then moved to the Rum barrel, then finished with the Brandy barrel.

A: Poured very dark with a good 1-2 finger mocha colored head. *this is the only positive thing to note for this beer*

S: What the hell is in this glass! There was not a single appealing aroma to be taken from this glass. Some of the aromas that came to mind were smokey, sour, and wet band-aides. Unfortunately, the wet band-aid was the prominent aroma. Not appealing at all.

T: This actually tasted worse than it smells. It was close to giving me a gag reflex. It was a smokey, tart, sour, band-aid infested concoction that I could only try one sip of.

O: Absolutely bad! When you can only drink one sip, there is really something wrong with a beer.

Serving type: bottle

06-07-2011 23:44:10 | More by black13
Photo of ChaseT
ChaseT

Oregon

1.35/5  rDev -65.6%
look: 4 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

Poured into a Spiegelau Stemmed Pilsner glass.

Appearance: Looked pretty good. Nice tan head on a very dark body. Faded fairly quickly, but was easily resuscitated with a quick swirl.

Smell: Band-aid that had formerly covered an infected wound. Simply awful.

Taste: Just as bad as the smell. I'm not sure what went wrong here.

Mouthfeel: The consistency is decent, but is impossible to appreciate due to the taste.

Overall: I was really looking forward to tasting this beer. I really enjoy both imperial porters and beers aged in red wine barrels. A huge disappointment.

Serving type: bottle

06-07-2011 18:58:06 | More by ChaseT
Photo of MasterSki
MasterSki

Illinois

3.95/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Thanks again to Mike. Served in a Russian River tulip.

A - More foam than the apple brandy version for some reason. Settles to a thick collar and near-solid thin cap. Body is the same in appearance.

S - Really unusual combination of the flavors, but strangely compelling. Wine, oak, smoked meats, plenty of vanilla sweetness, as well as some caramel and roasted malt.

T - Taste is not quite as good. Smoked porter base with light vinous notes and mild oak bite. For some reason the flavors don't integrate as well as they do in the nose.

M - Smooth, chewy, medium-full body, with lower carbonation. Not as gritty as the apple brandy version.

D - Gets a little tiring between the sour vinous notes and the charry bitterness, but still reasonably successful. I'd take the Apple Brandy version over this one nine times out of ten.

Serving type: bottle

05-31-2011 03:44:46 | More by MasterSki
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Smoke From The Oak (Wine Barrel Imperial Version) from Captain Lawrence Brewing Co.
88 out of 100 based on 87 ratings.