1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Mojo Risin' Double IPA - Boulder Beer / Wilderness Pub

Mojo Risin' Double IPAMojo Risin' Double IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
84
good

722 Ratings
THE BROS
64
poor

(view ratings)
Ratings: 722
Reviews: 392
rAvg: 3.74
pDev: 13.64%


Brewed by:
Boulder Beer / Wilderness Pub visit their website
Colorado, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  10.50% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: UnionMade on 02-12-2007)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 722 | Reviews: 392 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of KansasBeerLover
KansasBeerLover

Kansas

3.53/5  rDev -5.6%
look: 5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Had a pint glass, nitro on-tap.
A - Golden amber body that is almost clear. Head was about 2.5 fingers of extra-fine bubbles, ivory in color. Lacing was continuous to the bottom of the glass with a ridge left at every sip.
S - Weak for an ale of this caliber. Piney hops with citrus. I expected far more with the head.
T - Bold, bitter, hops, a touch of malt. Started on the weak side, but improved into the drink.
M - A lot of carbonation, dry on the finish.
O - After admiring the head for several minutes, I was disappointed with the aroma and taste. Some will enjoy the nitro and it was a good, but not great experience for may taste.

Serving type: nitro-tap

05-15-2013 06:02:00 | More by KansasBeerLover
Photo of codsmith
codsmith

Illinois

3.83/5  rDev +2.4%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A- light orange amber with a thick white cream hea. d from the nitro. Has some slight haze about it even after settling all the way. It laces the glass incredibly well

S- heavy dose of citrus hops with some orange peel character.

T- has a sweet caramel maltiness with noticeable alcohol coming through in the taste. Finishes with only a slight bitterness, but it is lingering. Taste profile seems rather muted.

M- nitro has a heavy feel at first, but finished rather thin and light.

O- a decent double ipa, but nothing I would go out of my way to get again.

Serving type: nitro-tap

03-04-2012 20:12:38 | More by codsmith
Photo of msarver16
msarver16

Pennsylvania

3.48/5  rDev -7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured from nitro into standard 14oz "pint" glass.

Got a proper nitro pour, waited a minute for everything to settle and was left with a fairly transparent golden/orange color with a very dense 2 finger white head.

I always have a tougher time getting a good nose from nitro. Able to get hints of orange, tangerine, hops, and booze.

Taste starts with a caramel malt and earthy bittering hops. I get a hint of that orange and tangerine, then its just bitter and boozy.

Mouthfeel is silky smooth nitro goodness with a rolling bitter finish.

Overall, was expecting better. A slightly above average beer but nothing I will be excited about in the future. I prefer the mojo single ipa. Still say the sweaty betty is boulder's best offering.

Serving type: nitro-tap

02-06-2012 22:37:56 | More by msarver16
Photo of nc41
nc41

North Carolina

3.8/5  rDev +1.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Nitro tap makes this killer smooth. But like most DIPA's this one also suffers from being a tad too sweet. Nice creamy head, nice nose, but really average in taste, big and definately boozy. At 10.5% the ABV is too much to have more than a pint. Worth a shot for anyone who likes DIPA's and big beers, but the more doubles I try I definately trend back to sharp clean IPA's. My idea of a big double is Hopsickle or Port Brewing Mongo, brews that drink like a hopped up IPA, and not brewed with candied fruit. Not oppressively sweet, but it could stand a little more bitter at the finish.

Serving type: nitro-tap

06-11-2011 13:12:59 | More by nc41
Photo of jrhartkeii
jrhartkeii

Ohio

4.83/5  rDev +29.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

Dutch's 4/6/2011

A: Bartender slow poured into a standard pint glass. Almost an orange hue, poured cloudy, settled with a very nice head. The head clung to the sides as I drank.

S/T: Taste the hops immediately, and really enjoyed how the citrus flavor lingered.

M: Didn't feel heavy like I expected. Although it's high in alcohol, it didn't affect the beer negatively.

O: Have ordered this a few times on tap. I really enjoyed it, so I took some time last night to review. I enjoy double IPA's and this one is a really good. Would be interested in seeing how my experience would have differed if I home poured from a bottle.

Serving type: nitro-tap

04-07-2011 14:34:30 | More by jrhartkeii
Photo of Ryan011235
Ryan011235

Ohio

4.05/5  rDev +8.3%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Nitro tap in a pint glass at Barley's Smokehouse on 6/24/10

The color is a hazy pineapple yellow while the nitro-induced cloudiness settles; looks milky at first. Once calm it is a clear amber hue. 1/4th inch of smooth foam. Great retention. Awesome lacing; couldn't be better - a solid wall.

Lively citrus aromas: pineapple, tangerine, orange pith & lemon zest. Spicy Amarillo overtones. Mostly hoppy with hints of caramel. Dry, musty yeast here & there.

The taste is surprisingly well-balanced considering how Mojo Risin' smells. Citrus notes upfront, subtle & blended. Hints of grapefruit & orange peel. Balanced by biscuit, dusty yeast & a spot of caramel. A slow, dry bitterness drops in toward the finish.

Feel is so freakin' smooth; it's nearly silky. The nitro makes for minimal agitation; incredibly creamy for a DIPA. Just an ever-so-faint inkling of grit. Warming, though it never suggests 10.5% abv.

Mojo Risin' is very tasty even with the aforementioned balance. Nitro has done wonders for this beer. Get it on nitro if you are able. I passed over several IPAs & DIPAs at Barley's Hop-IPA-alooza to have a second pint of this.

Serving type: nitro-tap

07-09-2010 02:18:38 | More by Ryan011235
Photo of chaz01
chaz01

Ohio

3.8/5  rDev +1.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

On nitrogen tap at South Park Tavern

A: Pale straw yellow, thick creamy head that looks like a layer of milk floating on the beer. Head slowly recedes producing nice lacing.

S: Citrus, orangey aroma with some piney notes.

T: Nice hoppy flavor, not real grapefruity, more piney and grass notes with a bit of orange peel.

M: Delicious smooth and creamy mouthfeel.

D: Very smooth and drinkable, alchohol is well hidden.

Serving type: nitro-tap

05-13-2010 13:39:00 | More by chaz01
Photo of Lunch
Lunch

Maryland

4.08/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Served on nitro-tap at Victoria Gastro Pub in Columbia, MD into a 12oz.fluted pint glass at the appropriate temperature (03/05/10). I must say that I am not the biggest fan of nitro-taps especially for Stouts/Imperial Stouts, but I have had several IPAs/DIPAs that I have really enjoyed.

A: Pours a glowing, yet hazy copper with a vibrant burnt orange hue capped with two fingers of a creamy off-white head that stuck around forever leaving a thick blanket of lace.

S: Very citrusy aroma, with orange, grapefruit and pineapple leading the way. Notes of pine, tropical fruit, and an underlying caramel malt are found as well. I always find that nitro softens the aroma, but maybe that's just me.

T: Nice flavors going on here with lots of citrus and pine and a rich caramel malt. Flavor kind of blend together in its creamy body, but it tastes extremely fresh.

M: Mouthfeel of this is great with excellent creaminess and low carbonation. Very thick and full-bodied.

D: Good drinkability and the 10.5% abv. is expertly hidden, but this is a thick and creamy beer with a lot of fullness.

Overall I really enjoyed this beer and found that it to worked well on nitro. Boulder Beer/Wildnerness Pub make some interesting beers and this one did not disappoint. I look forward to trying this on-tap and out of the bottle. Recommended.

Serving type: nitro-tap

03-11-2010 17:58:40 | More by Lunch
Photo of Bartrob6
Bartrob6

North Carolina

3.53/5  rDev -5.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

had this on nitro at the thirsty monk in asheville, along with it served on cask.

the nitro definitely gives a cool look to the beer when its placed in front of you. definitely more clear than the cask serving. had some ridiculous lacing, i'm guessing because of the nitro. the foam was literally just a white blanket down the side of the glass.

the smell was disappointing compared to the cask. i would have thought since the nitro had more gas in the beer that it would push some aromas out of it. this was definitely not the case. aroma was extremely muted.

taste was still good but just like the aroma, it seemed muted form the nitro. it also seemed as though there wasn't any bitterness at all, with all the malt in the beer there needs to be some bitterness detected to balance it out.

mouthfeel was definitely a plus on the nitro. extremely creamy.

this was drinkable but because the flavors and bitterness just weren't there compared to the cask i would definitely switch to the cask serving.

Serving type: nitro-tap

03-11-2010 15:51:59 | More by Bartrob6
Photo of johnmichaelsen
johnmichaelsen

Oregon

3.7/5  rDev -1.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

On nitro at Max's tonight.

The beer pours a peachy gold color with exceptional head retention and lots of sticky lacing all around. On the other hand, the nose is really dumbed down on the nitro, with barely more then a hint of hoppy citrus, along with a some underlying pepper. The flavor profile also loses something, and this beer is much drier and much more angular on nitro then it is on cask or draft. On nitro, this beer comes across as a much drier, much leaner beer. Mouthfeel is light and fairly creamy, which is a plus, but it's too high a price to pay for the loss of flavor (IMHO). On the bright side, I don't detect any alcohol on the finish, which given the abv., is a big surprise. Of the three different formats offered at Max's tonight, this is my least favorite.

Still a nice beer, but this does not show well on the nitro.

Serving type: nitro-tap

01-29-2010 22:04:59 | More by johnmichaelsen
Photo of superspak
superspak

Michigan

3.8/5  rDev +1.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

12 ounce bottle into tulip glass, best before 7/28/2014. Pours crystal clear bright orange color with a 2 finger dense off white head with good retention, that reduces to a nice cap that lingers. Nice dense soapy lacing clings on the glass. Aromas of big tangerine, grapefruit, pineapple, lemon zest, orange peel, floral, grass, light pine, caramel, bread, and floral/grassy earthiness. Nice and pleasant aromas with good complexity of citrus hops and moderate malt sweetness; with solid strength. Taste of big grapefruit, tangerine, lemon zest, pineapple, orange peel, floral, grass, pine, caramel, bread, and floral/grassy earthiness. Good amount of floral/pine bitterness on the finish; with lingering notes of grapefruit, tangerine, pineapple, lemon zest, orange peel, floral, grass, pine, caramel, bread, and floral earthiness on the finish for a good bit. Very nice complexity of juicy hop flavors and moderate malt sweetness; with a nice malt/bitterness balance and zero cloying flavors after the finish. Medium carbonation and medium-full bodied; with a smooth, crisp, and fairly slick/sticky mouthfeel that is nice. Alcohol is well hidden with only a light warming present after the finish. Overall this is a very good IPA. Good complexity of juicy hop flavors and moderate malt sweetness; and very smooth to sip on for the ABV. A nicely enjoyable offering.

Serving type: bottle

04-05-2014 19:11:13 | More by superspak
Photo of DoubleJ
DoubleJ

California

3.19/5  rDev -14.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

With my high regard of Mojo IPA, I take a walk into its stronger version. 10% ABV? You got it. On to the beer:

Beautiful to look at. Two finger's thickness of airy head and a crisp clean copper body in a chalice are stunning to look at. The lacing is excellent too. Now to stop and smell the roses...ok, I taking my expectations down a few notches. There are subtle notes of orange and tangerine, but the nose is erratic. Mixed in are lawn clippings, weed killer, and leaves. I'm not sure if I'm smelling Double IPA or gardening work.

it tastes strong, but the flavor itself doesn't pull its weight. There's a strong sense of alcohol tasted first, though it isn't obvious and is disguised with a little citrus. Add in some burnt plants, astringency, a bitterness that not only is quite strong, but sticks around in the aftertaste. Despite some flaws, the beer itself is slowly but surely consumed, as neither flaws become strenuous to overcome. It's a big bodied beer, with solvent alcohol hitting and cutting into the modest carbonation.

If a regular IPA is tasty, then its stronger double version must be even more tasty. The beer taster's fallacy has struck again.

Serving type: bottle

04-03-2014 05:21:53 | More by DoubleJ
Photo of lochef81
lochef81

Michigan

3.34/5  rDev -10.7%
look: 2.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Grabbed this on a whim with no knowledge of its quality. No date on bottle but I get a feeling its not the freshest bottle I've ever bought. This ale pours a deep red mahogany color with almost no head and very little lacing. This does not look like a dipa. There is an unappetizing over abundance of sediment in this beer. I love unfiltered and bottle conditioned beers but this is utterly ridiculous. Literally chunks of stuff bigger than the end of one of my fingers floating around the beer. It's a definite turn off. The aroma is all malt; buttery, vanilla-y, sweet, and rich. This does not smell like a Dipa. The mouthfeel is thick and syrupy. This does not feel like a dipa. The flavor is very malty; follows the nose with caramel and butter notes. It reminds me of oak aged offerings. There is a little hop bitterness in the taste but it is quickly overtaken again by the malt. There is also a substantial alcohol bite but it is smooth and warming and enjoyable. This does not taste like a dipa. Overall, this one seems far closer to a barleywine or a strong ale than a dipa. I don't know if it is the age or the intention but it is definitely not hoppy or bitter by any means. I'd actually probably rate this higher if it was labeled as one of those and if it wasn't for the completely off putting appearance.

Serving type: bottle

04-03-2014 03:38:00 | More by lochef81
Photo of superkustom
superkustom

Maryland

3.96/5  rDev +5.9%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4

Now I have read a lot or reviews on this beer, mine will be a bit different. Overall, nice copper color, adequate carbonation and great grapefruit nose. The overall mouthful was silky smooth and very bold. I must admit, I purchased this beer 1 year after it was bottled. If you can let this one age, it only gets better!!! At a year, it didn't disappoint!!!

Serving type: bottle

03-15-2014 05:04:48 | More by superkustom
Photo of ISmith87
ISmith87

Arizona

3.51/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - 3.75 - NIce golden clear color with a big white head that sticks around forever, leaves a nice lumpy lacing too.
S - 3.5 - Smells like dirty, earthy hops, with bready, raisin-y malt in the background. It says enjoy by July 18th, 2014 so I'm assuming this is how it's supposed to smell.
T - 3.5 - Dirty, earthy hops, with overly sweet malt in the background, and alcohol - a lot of it. This is probably close to the worst IIPA I've had. I'm trying to figure out where the rank taste is coming from because I love amarillo and centennial hops. Maybe they used a bunch of sugar to increase the ABV? Maybe the wheat malt (I've never used it in an IPA)?
M - 3.5 - Alc is so present it ruins the beer. Medium mouthfeel. Aftertaste is bitter, just bitter. No definition.
O - 3.5 - With a ton of Amarillo hops this beer should taste like straight up orange juice. Instead, it's just sickeningly sweet and dry undefined bitterness.

Serving type: bottle

03-06-2014 05:14:06 | More by ISmith87
Photo of jaisiaram1
jaisiaram1

Ohio

4.99/5  rDev +33.4%
look: 4.75 | smell: 5 | taste: 5 | feel: 5 | overall: 5

Amazing taste and hops, grapefruit taste makes you wanna keep drinking it,after you ship it it leaves a real good grapefruit taste in your mouth that you cant go wrong with.
its just one of the tasty Double IPA,
Smells real good and it has that powerful kick to it that you'd feel soon as you get done drinking it.
Truly great tasty fruity powerful hoppy body that would make your world and party rocks
Cheers...

Serving type: bottle

09-11-2013 01:30:15 | More by jaisiaram1
Photo of JuicesFlowing
JuicesFlowing

Kansas

4.15/5  rDev +11%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4.25

Poured into a balloon glass.

Look: Nice apricot amber color ... Burnt orange. A sudsy cream colored head leaves a group of bubbles on a thin film. Lines of foamy lacing.

Aroma: Sweet caramel immediately, then a very clean dry woody cedar note. A bit of a spicy note to end it.

Taste: Every bit as inspiring as the nose. A thick, sweet malt presence immediately, followed by bitter hops with notes of pine and sour grapefruit rinds. A really dry sour finish.

Mouthfeel: Dry, moderately heavy.

Overall: Better than average in complexity, all of the parts are good making for a great whole. Very bitter, a good one to take time sipping for a while.

Serving type: bottle

09-07-2013 01:33:01 | More by JuicesFlowing
Photo of TMoney2591
TMoney2591

Illinois

2.91/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Served in a Chicago Bears shaker pint glass.

Anyone else have "The Soft Parade" stuck in their head? (I think it's a better song...) Regardless, this stuff pours a clear sunset bronze topped by a finger of off-white foam. The nose comprises mild pine sap, light toffee, and some wild rice growing in a patch of green grass. Haw's that for imagery? The taste brings in more of the same, though the prevailing theme is straight, unabashed resin. It's like bitterness for its own sake, but not to the degree of, say, Palate Wrecker. Still, it's overwhelming on the tongue, especially compared to the other components, and just comes off as unpleasant. A vague, blunt sweetness tries its best to pervade the background, but its results are mixed. The body is a stolid medium, with a light moderate carbonation and a drying finish. Overall, this thing probably had a decent idea (the basic DIPA trope of lots o' hops), but the execution proved flawed, to say the very least.

Serving type: bottle

08-06-2013 07:19:16 | More by TMoney2591
Photo of Bauzen
Bauzen

New York

3.31/5  rDev -11.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

If you liked the Mojo IPA, you'll like Mojo Risin' about the same. The same is true if you disliked either of the Mojos.

Unfortunately, I fell into the later category of people who truly disliked this beer.

First and foremost, it's a barley wine, not a DIPA. Perhaps from a brewing perspective, the folks at Boulder would disagree, but from a flavor profile on the consumer's tastes, it's the farthest departure from what I know to be a DIPA.

Also, the finish tastes more like vinegar than beer.

Probably not going to revisit any more offerings from this brewery.

Serving type: on-tap

07-29-2013 17:23:02 | More by Bauzen
Photo of Act25
Act25

New Jersey

3.35/5  rDev -10.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

12 oz bottle into pint glass. Freshness date says 8-14-13.

Overall - Boulder is batting 0 for 2 with me. Double IPAs also not batting as well as regular IPAs as the alcohol ends up masking the subtle hues available in the ingredients.

The American Double IPA is fad whose time is almost over.

A: Pale copper color, 1/2 inch head, fast fade, zero lacing, not much left, lots of carbonation.

S: Not much... Which proves to me that less is more. Less malt, less alcohol (than 7%) makes a better beer more oft than not. It's ironic because wine would be fine at 14%. I am tempted to let this warm, pour into wine glass and return later when it's closer to 60 f. Grassy, barnyard, hay - a bit. Not much

T: Promises grapefruit / citrus on label. Fruity, grassy in both Like the smell bitter with freshly cut grass, grapefruit rind and some pine. Stings metallic and aggressive. Alcohol causes a metallic roughness and a strange, but original rust flavor. Finishes bitter.

MF: I think I'll look forward to this at warmer temps in a wine glass later, will report back. It's very warming, not really a summer brew. Leaves my mouth ready for cognac, not a food beer. Not an after kayaking afternoon, before dinner beer.

Agree with the A Bros. low marks for DIPA. "balance is lost here".

OK - Came back after leaving in my leffe chalice for an hour. Much better, but still it's a glass of wine, not a beer. It's still an "after dinner" beer. And when I want wine, well, I have a cellar full.
I upped my Flavor & mouth feel and overall rank 1 notch after letting it warm and breathe.

Serving type: bottle

06-30-2013 21:13:31 | More by Act25
Photo of dar482
dar482

New York

2.68/5  rDev -28.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

This beer comes in a copper golden color.

The aroma has a huge earthy aroma with pine. It smells "old" if that means anything.

The taste follows and is almost like a barleywine. It's very bitter, but not really of citrus hops, but more of that deep earthy resin character. So deep that it's almost like bitter tea leaves.

I had this on cask, so possibly that's an issue. Without carbonation, this herbal bittering just overwhelms the palate. It's interesting for sure, but too acrid.

Serving type: on-tap

06-06-2013 20:32:04 | More by dar482
Photo of Darkmagus82
Darkmagus82

Virginia

3.91/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Poured from bottle into a snifter

Appearance – The beer pours a beautiful clear amber color with a half finger of white head. The head sits around for quite some time eventually slowly fading over time to leave a nice level of lace on the sides of the glass.

Smell- The aroma is big and sweet with a decent hop hit. The sweet is a mix of caramel and lots of tropical fruits of tangerine and mango. The hop aromas are mainly of a citrus nature and have some other smells of a floral nature as well. Rounding out these sweeter and hopped aromas is a light alcohol smell as well as a bit of breadiness, overall creating one very pleasant smell.

Taste – The taste begins with a bready base mixed with some sweeter fruit and caramel. With these flavors so too comes a grapefruit citrus hop taste. The grapefruit grows stronger more toward the end of the taste where it is joined by some other hop of a pine nature. More toward the middle of the taste the fruit flavors of tangerine get quite a bit stronger in flavor, matching the increase in the grapefruit hop nicely. With the arrival of the pine, so too come some grassy flavors as well as a moderately strong alcohol flavor. These flavors, when all combined, take the taste to its finish were a semi-sweet mainly citrus hopped and lightly boozed flavor is left to linger on the tongue.

Mouthfeel – The body of the beer is rather thick with a carbonation level that is on the slightly lower to average side. Both are fine for the style which when mixed with the boozy tastes keep it a slower sipper of a beer.

Overall – The look and aroma of the beer are quite fantastic. The taste is decent as well as it has an alright blend of sweet and hop with a nice warming taste and feel.

Serving type: bottle

06-04-2013 00:44:58 | More by Darkmagus82
Photo of CloudStrife
CloudStrife

New York

3.8/5  rDev +1.6%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle poured into a tulip. Enjoy by Jul 9 2013 on the neck.

A: Pours a clear light amber with a full white head. Not very much visible carbonation. The head leaves some nice lacing.

S: Citrus hop aroma is the first thing I notice. Pleasant with a touch of earthiness and grapefruit. A bit of malt sweetness in there as well.

T: This one is bold, a slap in the face of hop bitterness and a strong malt backbone. Hops have great flavor though and blend seamlessly into the malt. Nice fruity aspect going on with the hops. The big ABV is hidden well in all the flavor.

M: Full bodied brew with low carbonation. A bit sticky on the backend from the resinous hops but that gives it a bit of a nectary feel. Very dry.

Overall is certainly a bold and serious double IPA. Worth a try for any hophead. Need to give the Mojo a shot now.

Serving type: bottle

05-11-2013 01:34:24 | More by CloudStrife
Photo of BMMillsy
BMMillsy

Florida

2.95/5  rDev -21.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Pours clear copper with one finger white head. Pine aroma with sweet grapefruit. Slick mouthfeel with very little carbonation. Sweet up front with no real hop punch. Flat, bit of a dirty dry finish. Not as bad as Mojo but really not good. Not an old bottle either, as it says Enjoy By July 2013 and it is only April of the same year. Disappointed for sure.

Serving type: bottle

04-13-2013 03:10:20 | More by BMMillsy
Photo of AdamBear
AdamBear

Pennsylvania

3.53/5  rDev -5.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

A-dark gold with a thick cream colored head

S-aged herbal hops. Medium strength. Smells older than it should

T-comes in with a very bitter flavor of aged grains and hops. It's actually an extremely bitter taste. The flavors themselves are...not wonderful. Has a more citrusy after-taste

M-creamy slightly watery carbonation with a watery finish

O-it's not a terrible IPA really. I'm not big on the flavors, but they do seem to become more complex as I drink it. It gets more and more easy to drink as well.

Serving type: bottle

04-03-2013 01:54:31 | More by AdamBear
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Mojo Risin' Double IPA from Boulder Beer / Wilderness Pub
84 out of 100 based on 722 ratings.