1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Weltenburger Kloster Urtyp Hell - Klosterbrauerei Weltenburg

Not Rated.
Weltenburger Kloster Urtyp HellWeltenburger Kloster Urtyp Hell

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

60 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 60
Reviews: 42
rAvg: 3.49
pDev: 17.48%
Wants: 2
Gots: 5 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Klosterbrauerei Weltenburg visit their website
Germany

Style | ABV
Munich Helles Lager |  4.90% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Murph on 10-22-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 60 | Reviews: 42 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of BuckeyeNation
3.48/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Lightly foggy lemon-amber (that clears over time) with pale banana edges. The cap is barely one finger in size despite a vigorous pour, is dingy white and lacks pizzaz. Like a bored party guest, it hangs around just long enough not to be considered rude and leaves no more than a stunted collar of lace.

The nose is like the noses on any number of nondescript pale lagers from the former Eastern Bloc. There's just enough sweetish grain and musty hops to pull it, kicking and screaming, to above average. It has plenty of power, but does nothing to distinguish itself in the end.

I feel the same way about the flavor. Urtyp Hell is okay beer, semi-enjoyable in its own way, even if it's barely a whisker above average. I continue to be reminded of a Euro pale lager rather than a Munich helles lager. The basics are a barely acceptable pale malt backbone and a respectable amount of musty hops. Like the head, the flavor needs an injection of pizzaz.

There's a pretty good balance between sweet and bitter, with the former marginally more prominent throughout. The finish is the most appealing portion of the flavor arc, although the mouthfeel has broken down by that point. A less than adequate amount of carbonation could have been predicted given the appearance of the head.

My experience with beer from Klosterbrauerei Weltenburg has ranged from the exceptional (dopplebock) to the good (hefe weizen) to the average (Munich dunkel lager). Urtyp Hell falls squarely into the average category. I don't feel a need to drink it again.

Photo of allengarvin
3.55/5  rDev +1.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Appearance: clear pale golden color, with small head.

Aroma: malty, with a slight hop aroma.

Taste: Medium-low body, slightly sweet malt flavor. Hops are slightly evident in the finish.

A decent, refreshing lager, but nothing about it really stands out.

Photo of Boilermaker88
3.53/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Presented in a 500ml bottle just like the one pictured. Poured into an imperial pint glass. The coloration was a slightly hazed pale gold with moderate carbonation and topped by a brilliant white head that almost looked fake. Scant wisps of lace speckled the glass as the head gradually collapsed down to a thin collar.
The nose was unassuming and, aside from some fruitiness and floral notes, was really marginal. A lurking sour aroma caught my attention and was not well received. The taste luckily didn't carry the sourness picked up in the smell. Some modest sweet malt flavor made its presence felt before the gradual build-up of herbal hops commenced. Some light citrus flavor was noted also. The feel was light, crisp and clean.
This must be what Germans have in mind as a lawnmower bier. Light, refreshing but not sporting a whole lot of taste. Still, on a hot day I'd wouldn't mind reaching for one of these.

Photo of surfmeister
2.05/5  rDev -41.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Appearance: yellow/gold, satisfactory head which had adequate staying power.
Smell/Taste/Mouthfeel/Drinkability: There is an annoying sour or "astringent" smell and taste to this beer. It is the prominent note, backed up by bitterness, these are the two strongest characteristics of this beer. Any actual malt and/or hop flavor takes a back seat. Sour and bitter alone are not a pleasant experience and that's what this beer gave. I rarely head for the drain, but I did with this one. Unpleasant.

Photo of PopeJonPaul
3.38/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pale yellow pour with an aroma of overripe oranges and a puffy head that dissolved rather quickly. Very light and refreshing with a fruity taste, but there's really not much to this stuff, it's pretty much a lawnmower beer. Crisp and refreshing hop finish, drinkable enough but not a standout.

Photo of Zorro
3.03/5  rDev -13.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a clear yellow brew with a very violent carbonation level.

Smell is sweet malt and grain and a bit of a horse blanket smell. Mild fruity smells too.

Taste is neutral and grainy with a bit of tartness to it. For some reason I can taste alcohol in this.

Mouthfeel is average.

An OK drinkable brew that reminds me too much of Budweiser.

Photo of beerguy101
3.8/5  rDev +8.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Light orange gold color. Head is small. Aroma is fruity and malty. A medium bodied helles. This one is as bone dry, on a nice mild malty backbone. Mild hop spiciness, touch of orange. Light and refreshing, yet it has enough flavor not to be boring. This would be a great summer beer. Mouthfeel is full and round. Finish is clean and smooth. Aftertaste is slightly bitter.

Photo of BeerManDan
2.38/5  rDev -31.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Was not impressed with this beer. It poured a nice yellow hue with hardly any foam at all. The taste was not all that impressive and I personally think that this beer was over aged. It had a flat and listless taste with a hint of sour on the tongue!

Photo of Bighuge
3.3/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Clear light golden in color. Sporadic bubbles of gas surface evenly. Nice white fluffy head tops it off. Recedes to a thin film and laces adequately. Pale malt on the nose. Very slight noble hop aromas. Body is light to medium. Glides over the tongue fairly effortlessly. Light taste of a pils-like maltiness. Subtle noble hop spice notes. Pretty easy drinking brew. Could put back many of these on a hot day.

Thanks to Senior Shit and his wife for the sample.

Photo of Murph
4/5  rDev +14.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a beautiful, clear straw gold color with a big pillowy white head that sticks fairly well. A nice biscuity maltiness in the nose with some very weak hop presence as well. Big sweet maltiness from the start. Not big as in overpowering but definitely most of the taste. There is a nice, lighter, hop underprofile which keeps it just in balance. Nice sweet maltiness but not to the point of being cloying, medium body and fairly refreshing. Yet another nice beer from this brewery, I definitely suggest trying some of their products.

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Weltenburger Kloster Urtyp Hell from Klosterbrauerei Weltenburg
80 out of 100 based on 60 ratings.