1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Santa's Private Reserve Ale - Rogue Ales

Not Rated.
Santa's Private Reserve AleSanta's Private Reserve Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
85
very good

1,930 Ratings
THE BROS
91
outstanding

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,930
Reviews: 1,140
rAvg: 3.77
pDev: 13.79%
Wants: 41
Gots: 61 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Rogue Ales visit their website
Oregon, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Ale |  6.00% ABV

Availability: Winter

Notes/Commercial Description:
10 Ingredients:
Carastan 30-37 & 13-17, Crystal 70-80 & Rogue Micro Barley Farm Dare™ & Risk™ Malts; Chinook & Rogue Farm Revolution & Freedom Hops; Free Range Coastal Water and Pacman Yeast.

13º PLATO
65 IBU
73.1 AA
26.75º L

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 11-29-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Santa's Private Reserve Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,930 | Reviews: 1,140 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of YOOJ
YOOJ

Louisiana

4.08/5  rDev +8.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Little Helper is a good beer.

Defining it is a bit difficult, I would call it a hoppy but light(er than normal) red ale.

Very drinkable. Nearly no head.

Good beer, but the malt flavor is not very interesting, and not pronounced considering the color. But I am a hop fan so that is just fine.

All around great, hoppy, and drinkable red. Wish Rogue made less expensive beer!

Serving type: bottle

12-16-2009 09:36:25 | More by YOOJ
Photo of ffenski
ffenski

Ohio

3.85/5  rDev +2.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Picked up at Bella Vino, Springboro.

Pours a rich, deep amber. Leaves an abundance of thin yet creamy lacing.

Hoppy notes yet overshadwed a little by biscuity malt blanket.

Piney citrus flavors with malty background- good balance. Hops touches palate at first sip then malts enter the picture. Finishes with nice hop bitterness.

Medium feel with moderate to high bubbles.

Good drinkability- nothing too special- would buy again but not before many other ales of this type.

Serving type: bottle

12-16-2009 01:37:44 | More by ffenski
Photo of CampusCrew
CampusCrew

Florida

4.5/5  rDev +19.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

appearance: deep amber, kinda of reddish, nice head retention

smell: loaded citrus from this beer and strong hop aroma

taste: a nicely hopped ale, and I was very surprised. lots of citrus and decently balanced

mouthfeel: medium bodied

drinkability: awesome beer and I think it may be rogues best

Serving type: bottle

12-15-2009 15:16:34 | More by CampusCrew
Photo of brendan13
brendan13

Australia

4.5/5  rDev +19.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

A - Pours a redish copper colour with orange hues. A 3cm slightly offwhite head hangs around for a fair while.
S - Piney, herbal and slightly citrus fruit hop notes a top a bready, caramel maltiness.
T - Much like the smell but the citrus comes through a bit more.
M - Lighter side of medium bodied, medium to high carbonation, fairly light mouthfeel and enough bitterness to make you take notice.
D - A very tasty, sessionable red ale. MORE!

Serving type: bottle

12-14-2009 10:51:29 | More by brendan13
Photo of Long813
Long813

Ontario (Canada)

3.5/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Recieved from wordemupg via trade.

G: Pint Glass

A: Dark red (clear) body with two fingers of dark tan head. Half decent retention but dissipates into a thin blotchy ring. Leaves nice layered lacing.

S: Reminds me of St Rouges Red a lot. Dry hops are very forward, some floral aroma and caramel in the back

T: Dry hops are dominant here, but not to strong. Some citrus and malty notes.

M: Medium-light body with medium carbonation. It leaves a slightly sticky-dry feeling in the mouth and pleasant bitterness.

D: To me this seems like a less intense Rouge's Red. Every aspect just seems to be a weaker version. It's not bad though. It's easy to drink, nothing is off putting. Nice simple beer.

Serving type: bottle

12-14-2009 03:49:34 | More by Long813
Photo of MrDanno96
MrDanno96

Ohio

3.55/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: Typical reddish/amber color. Started with about a finger of creamy off-white head, but quickly dissipated to a thin ring. Lots of sticky lacing.

S: Not a whole lot on the nose. Floral hops and some pine mostly. Some very subtle sweet fruit. I expected a little more.

T: Some toasted/burnt malts up front quickly give way to bitter hops. Some subtle citric/tropical sweet fruit can be tasted, but barely. Not quite what I was expected, but it's decent nonetheless. Pretty simple flavors, but a decent balance is struck between them.

M: Light to medium body and just a little sticky. Nice bite from the carbonation.

D: Meh. I wasn't impressed, but it's by no means a bad beer. I would have it again if offered, but probably won't seek it out.

Serving type: bottle

12-13-2009 06:09:44 | More by MrDanno96
Photo of javincik
javincik

North Carolina

3.65/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured from a 22 oz bomber into a nonic pint glass.

A-Color is an orange-red topped with a slightly off white finger thick head which dissipated very quickly.

S-Mostly hops. Lots of floral aromas with some fruit and grassy notes.

T-Sweet up front with some citrus characteristics. Hops kick in through the middle. Hops and malt fight it out briefly before a rather abrupt slightly bitter finish. Hops are crisp and focused, but the finish is quick-rather surprisingly so. Of course the hops come through more and more as it warms. Finish is still tight. Not much lingering.

M-About average for the style. Carbonation lingers a little on the tongue.

D-Easy to put down. Not something that really requires your attention. Nice while watching a movie or sports.

A solid amber, but nothing spectacular. Doesn't have anything that would make me reach for it over the myriad other choices in the style. Will not actively seek it out again, but wouldn't turn it down if someone offered me one.

Serving type: bottle

12-13-2009 00:46:58 | More by javincik
Photo of Shadman
Shadman

Alberta (Canada)

3.93/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Nice amber orange color, chill haze, excellent head and lacing.

Was expecting more in this dept. Nice balance between the sweet bread malt and the floral pine-like aroma, but it is quite mild.

I liked it, but to my palate it tastes a lot like a variation of their IPA, which is excellent btw. More English than Yank in the nice balance between the sweet bread malt and slick, slightly oily pine hop.

Smooth, balanced, easy to drink.

Expensive, but nice ans easy to drink...but for me...tough to peg where it falls in the Ale spectrum...but certainly a good brew if you like a well balanced, hopped up brew.

Serving type: bottle

12-12-2009 06:36:14 | More by Shadman
Photo of cpetrone84
cpetrone84

Pennsylvania

3.13/5  rDev -17%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A-very dark orange color with hues of red pouring almost two fingers of a light khaki colored head that dissipates relatively quickly but leaves a decent lacing on the glass

S-not much smell coming through, light pale malts hit first with a hint of cinnamon backed with light citrus taste and a hint of orange

T-very light flavor, pale malts come through on this with just a hint of christmas spice, really just a touch of cinnamon and a hint of vanilla with a touch of citrus and orange at the very back

M-a medium to light body with a relatively smooth mouthfeel, a lot of carbonation burning the throat with a crisp bite at the finish

D-not a lot of flavor, almost like a crappy pale ale with some cinnamon and sweetness

Serving type: bottle

12-12-2009 00:24:27 | More by cpetrone84
Photo of cbutova
cbutova

Massachusetts

3.5/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Pours a straight up clear amber red with a very robust two finger head that retains very well. The head is light tan and pretty creamy. Lacing is alright left in high quantities before I take a sip. Smell has a pretty large portion of hops, piney ones, and some pale malts can be picked up. Eventually it is just pale malts that dominate the nose. Nothing very special about the smell here. This beer has one of the strangest hop flavors to it. The individual elements of this beer are nice but they don't really blend well. The hops seem unchecked even though this isn't a hop bomb. I think there is too much piney hops and nothing else. Some citrus hops and sweets too. Also pick up some citrus peel and spices. I guess it reminds me of Xmas but the piney hops bitterness are just too much for me here. It is still better than average I would say because of the malt backbone once it shines through. Mouthfeel is way too light and I can tell right away. The carbonation is fine and there isn't any warming but it reminds me of water upon the first sip. Drinkability is not to bad besides the extreme pine hop bitterness factor. This beer was not expensive and the taste is not bad. Not sure if I will try this one again.

Serving type: bottle

12-11-2009 21:48:30 | More by cbutova
Photo of bamadog
bamadog

Kentucky

3.7/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pour is from the bottle to a pint glass.

Appearance: Pour is a beautiful golden honey with slight hints of ruby when held to the light; starts with a huge three finger off-whtie head that fades very slowly and becomes rocky; solid webs of lacing left on the walls of the glass; pour looks thick and viscous and shows strong carbonation; body is slightly cloudy; head fades to a very thick skim on the surface.

Smell: A nice combination of citric/oragne peel hops with very sweet and sugary malts -- scent is almost like a creamy orange caramel candy; slightly spicey aspect in the far back; smell is quite potent.

Taste: Not as nice as the smell, but still pretty decent. There is a firm balance of the sweet and slightly bready malts with the citric hops, however, the hop presence is more bitter in the mouth and there's a definite bitter and metallic/coppery flavor that tends to linger throughout; slightly spicey finish; overall, it grows on me as it warms a bit and as I drink it down, but the metallic aspect really kind of turns me off a little.

Mouthfeel: Body is a little thick, so that's good as it matches up with what it looked like on the pour; solid coating throughout the mouth; carbonation keeps a thicker beer pretty lively. Very nice.

Drinkability: I love how it looks and smells, and the taste isn't bad, but that metallic aspect just kind of makes me wince a little bit; ABV is pretty do-able as well. Overall, I'd probably drink it again, and wouldn't mind coming across this one on tap sometime to see how different it would.

Serving type: bottle

12-10-2009 04:23:25 | More by bamadog
Photo of Stigs
Stigs

Pennsylvania

3.6/5  rDev -4.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle served in a DFH signature glass

A - pour yields a bit over two fingers of huge soapy & pillowy light tan foam, lacing like mad as it slowly falls to a big mound floating in the center of the glass. the beer is a musty deep amber color, very festive.

S - had to let this warm up a bit as it didnt smell like anything at first. faint malty sweetness and some lightly roasted grains right off the bat, thats about it.

T - bitter citrusy (grapefruit) hops, sweet toffee malt and some holiday spiciness. unfortunately, none of these flavors are very pronounced. kind of dull.

M - nice big carbonation and sticky yet oily feel. one of the better parts of this beer.

D - this is one of those good ideas just not quite executed well. a real treat to look at, but im just searching and searching for both some body and character in the nose and mouth. like a SN Celebration Light.

Serving type: bottle

12-08-2009 02:43:45 | More by Stigs
Photo of BrewIndy
BrewIndy

Indiana

4.18/5  rDev +10.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Picked up a bomber of this after hearing about it on the World Class twitter feed.

A: Poured with a nice thick head that went down a bit but retained nicely. Amber and close to the color of rum. Very nice looking actually.

S: Sweet and hoppy smelling. Makes me want to skip this section and drink it already! I bet this is what Santa smells like :)

T: Much different than what it smells like. A nice ale flavor at the front and actually at the end it reminds me of potato chips. I have no idea why and it's not a bad thing. It's actually like a cross between a red ale and a amber ale. Is there a difference? Sure there is.

M: Very nice, this is what I like my ales to feel like.

D: Whenever you want another of the same beer when you're finished you know the drinkability rates high. No problem with a bomber an dyou should probably get 2 or 3 to share with your friends.

Serving type: bottle

12-06-2009 04:59:54 | More by BrewIndy
Photo of billyshears
billyshears

Maryland

3.35/5  rDev -11.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A - Tall, foamy head. Dark amber body.
S - Piney, cirtus hops
T - Hops take center stage here; quite bitter and lingers. Subtle malts in the background, though its just not as much there as it should be. A bit unabalanced.
M- decent mouthfeel, tingles tongue.

When I think Christmas/winter brews, I expect to see some yummy malts and a bit of spice; any bit of that here was hidden under the hops. I think an increase in malts could've made this a really great Christmas brew, but as it stands, I can't recommend it when there's better winter red ales out there (Yulesmith).

Serving type: bottle

12-05-2009 21:06:44 | More by billyshears
Photo of Clydesdale
Clydesdale

District of Columbia

4.03/5  rDev +6.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: Pours a deep, slightly hazy copper-orange color. The tall, creamy head has a burnt orange tint and a dense, almost milkshake consistency. Retention is very good, and lacing is impressive. This is a good looking holiday beer for sure.

S: Freshly hoppy notes of pine and sweet citrus fruit. Some pleasant spiciness is also present. Behind the hop aromas, a moderate caramel/tofee malt presence is available.

T: Up front, sweetness is low, with mildly bready and faintly tofeeish malt flavor, along with some light roasted notes. A firm, spicy hop presence with primarily pine and citrus flavors. Perhaps some faint buttery notes as well.

M: Medium bodied. Carbonation is soft and fairly creamy. A dry, somewhat bitter finish.

D: A pleasant, hop-forward winter seasonal from Rogue. If anything, this could use a bit more malty sweetness, but this is still a well-brewed beer that hits the spot on this snowy afternoon.

Serving type: bottle

12-05-2009 20:32:51 | More by Clydesdale
Photo of rapidsequence
rapidsequence

Virginia

3.98/5  rDev +5.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

12 oz bottle, last of my yearly six pack.

Appearance: Clear, dark red. Two inches of fluffy head. Sheets of sticky lace.

Smell: Spicy grassy and citrusy hops. Good ole Rogue Pacman yeast is pretty much unmistakable.

Taste: Good earthy hops bitterness. Toasty malts. Bitter and clean finish.

Mouthfeel: I think the carbonation is appropriate and the mouthfeel is probably about right for the style, but there's nothing especially interesting or lively about the mouthfeel-- nothing wrong with it either.

Drinkability: Well, I get this every year, and am always excited about it. I like Rogue's stuff, and this is reasonably priced, at least in 6 packs. I went to their website to compare this to their St. Rogues Red and found out that their ingredients and specs are identical. I guess they're the same beer. This is a nice, full flavored, hoppy red ale for people who like Rogue.

Serving type: bottle

12-03-2009 03:18:50 | More by rapidsequence
Photo of huricrane47
huricrane47

Oklahoma

4/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A- Deep amber in color with a tan head
S- Hoppy flower smell
T- Slight malt flavor is overtaken with a bitter hop flavor intensified by a dry citrus/flower flavor. Bitterness lingers along with a malty creaminess delivered from the head. very acidic.
M- medium water activity- just right for the style and flavor.
D- Drank it easily. Get if you like dry/hop flavor.

It is good if you want to try a variations of an IPA that has a dry more flower than citrus flavor and a fair amount of bitterness that lingers!! The Chinook (10-14AA) and Centennial hops (7-11AA) used to brew this beer probably adds to lingering bitter flavor experienced afterwards. One thing that I noticed about the beer that it interesting is that; the malt is slightly apparent at first, it is overwhelmed by hops/spruce, and then comes back slightly as you breath out. However, the malt flavor is very subtle and is overtaken by the acidic flavor. Good Beer Overall.

Serving type: bottle

11-29-2009 22:06:51 | More by huricrane47
Photo of bob3701
bob3701

New Jersey

3.15/5  rDev -16.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I guess I should have expected a brew like this from Rogue. This is an excellently made brew. Nice foamy head with a great red/amber clear color and excellent lacing. Maybe I allowed myself to be mislead by the lable but was expecting something Christmasy. This is just a well made high hopped ale. I'm not much of a hop head so it was not good to me but my son loved it. We had picked up the 6-pack of 12 oz. bottles of this.

Serving type: bottle

11-27-2009 21:27:04 | More by bob3701
Photo of LibraryTom
LibraryTom

California

4.53/5  rDev +20.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Oh Rogue.. how I love your beers. I'm really not an amber drinker, and I found this one to be supremely pleasant. I had no idea what it was when I picked it up..

Pours a chestnut brown amber with matching tan-leather head.

Just easy grain and malt aromas, not too complex.

Beautiful taste profile. Rogue always has some sort of character to their beers that I cannot put my finger on, and this one surely has the trademark. A great malty sweetness drives you through the spices, seeming seamless. No radical flavors, just delicious and warming, with no burn at all.

Rich bodied, yet balanced and not overly done. I could put back quite a few of these.

Serving type: bottle

11-27-2009 17:55:59 | More by LibraryTom
Photo of katan
katan

Colorado

3.78/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

22 oz bomber into a pint

A - Very red in color - meets the style for sure. Very clear, filtered. Zero hazing or pacman yeast. Head formation is light white in color, forms strongly, and is well retained. Carbonation overall does appear light.

S - A strong american hop nose, cascade or amarillo I would guess. Just a hair of malt note behind it.

T - Starts off with a light caramel roasted malty note, which then immediately turns to an overt hop flavor. Bitterness takes over. Finishes with the strong hop note that I detected on the nose. Aftertaste brings back some bready malts combined with a bitter resin.

M - Moderate to high beer body - has a strong backbone of malty sugars and hop oils. Carbonation does come through with a light bite. Leaves behind an oily texture.

D - Moderate drinkability. ABV is manageable. Carbonation is a bit filling - a downside. Hop attack does lead towards some palette fatigue.

I was hoping for a winter ale, but got a beer that is stylistically well done and correct to an amber/red ale.

Serving type: bottle

11-27-2009 04:42:44 | More by katan
Photo of Chelsea1905
Chelsea1905

Washington

3.6/5  rDev -4.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

12oz poured into pint glass.

Poured a nice ruby amber with a very large off white head. Nice and colourful, looks good.

Smell is ok,little bit of hops gives way to a bit of a malty back bone and some alcohol/almost vomit like.

Thankfully no vomit in the taste. More malty, wiht a good hop finish, that warms away into some more maltiness. however, this is very similar to an IPA for a seasonal, there really isn't anything that screams "seasonal" to me.

Mouthfeel is good, and drinks really well.

Decent beer, but I'm already burnt with overly hoppy "seasonals"

Serving type: bottle

11-26-2009 03:35:42 | More by Chelsea1905
Photo of PaleAlien2
PaleAlien2

Nebraska

4.33/5  rDev +14.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 5 | overall: 4.5

Beautiful cloudy amber with TONS of lacing sliding down the sides of the glass. Looks outstanding.

Smells even better. Nice caramel malt with notes of pine needles.

Not really much of any spice in this one, but a lot of hops.

Great mouthfeel. Absolutely perfect.

Probably my favorite winter seasonal.

Thank you Rogue.

Serving type: bottle

11-24-2009 03:31:45 | More by PaleAlien2
Photo of mdwalsh
mdwalsh

Iowa

1.83/5  rDev -51.5%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

A: Very large head, maybe too large. Nice, off white color though and good dexterity. Lots of texture. Sparse but consistent lacing. Brownish amber coloring, very clear. No active carbonation though.

S: Sort of old hops, mostly. Ok, I hate to say this, but I get an almost sawdust-and-vomit smell when I really dig my nose in. Nothing really appealing here, and not very strong.

T: Yep, really stale tasting still, and I still get vomit. It's pretty gross. I don't know if it's old or what, but no thank you. I'd love to review more, but no. This, sadly, is a drain pour.

M: Dry and flat

D: Drainpour.

Serving type: bottle

11-22-2009 04:04:50 | More by mdwalsh
Photo of dondeez21
dondeez21

New Jersey

4.1/5  rDev +8.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Served from a 22oz Bottle into a tulip glass.
A: Ruby Red with a finger thick creamy off white head with mild carbonation. Heavy lacing on the glass.
S: Smell of sweet malt and mild piney hops.
T: This beer is extremely balanced. There is plenty of sweet candy like malt and a slight taste of piney/citrus hops. Neither flavor overpowers the other instead they meet in the middle for a perfectly balanced flavor.
M: this beer had a medium body that wasnt to sticky or overfilling.
D: This beer had excellent drinkability. Not to much in any area but enough to keep you happy.

Serving type: bottle

11-22-2009 01:22:29 | More by dondeez21
Photo of noslenwerd
noslenwerd

Pennsylvania

3.18/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A: Brownish amber red, nice lacing down the glass

S: Smells a bit hoppy

T: Tastes a bit more hoppy than I expected. Usually I can drink hoppy/IPA's as the hops fade a bit but they stuck around. That might be a good thing for some but, this is not my style at all. Nothing about this beer said "Christmas" to me as I did not taste any pine/butterscotch or anything you normally associate with a winter warmer

Summary: Will not be drinking this one again, hops are too strong for a seasonal for me..

Serving type: bottle

11-22-2009 00:31:28 | More by noslenwerd
Santa's Private Reserve Ale from Rogue Ales
85 out of 100 based on 1,930 ratings.