1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Rogue-N-Berry - Rogue Ales

Not Rated.
Rogue-N-Berry
No picture uploaded.
Have one? Upload it now.
BA SCORE
-
no score

9 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 9
Reviews: 6
rAvg: 3.2
pDev: 16.88%
Wants: 0
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Rogue Ales visit their website
Oregon, United States

Style | ABV
Fruit / Vegetable Beer |  ABV ?

Availability: Summer

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 06-15-2003)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 9 | Reviews: 6 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by Pegasus:
Photo of Pegasus
3.43/5  rDev +7.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Clear copper in color, with a modest head, which soon fades away. There are modest streams of slow-rising carbonation, and very little lace.

Aroma: Berry aroma vies with the malt for supremacy, the result is pleasing.

Taste: Light berry flavor, with a slightly vinous character, beneath there is a solid malt presence. Overall, the taste seems ephemeral. The finish is clean and dry.

Mouth feel: Fairly full, crisp, with slightly aggressive carbonation.

Drinkability/notes: Pleasant and very drinkable, a pity that it is no longer available. Many thanks to Hardtarget for sharing this rarity.

Pegasus, Dec 30, 2005
More User Reviews:
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
2.43/5  rDev -24.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.25

Another blast from the past, sometimes, you don't even need to refer to your notes when it stands out so much, but alas for the sake of completeness and accuracy:

Reddish brown pour, looked kinda cool, purple to pink head. Aroma was very sweet, not putting me off quite yet. Truly did smell like berries (marionberries what are those?). Wish it was more like Oregon blackberries this time of year.

Taste, ugh, sweet, not enjoyable. Not like beer. Not balanced. Its just like fruit juice. No hops or malt (well some of that), just berries. Nothing to appreciate here, and the price $6 didn't help things.

Beerandraiderfan, Jul 17, 2010
Photo of Beertracker
4/5  rDev +25%

Beertracker, Dec 01, 2011
Photo of connecticutpoet
3.53/5  rDev +10.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This one was a medium brown, slightly cloudy beer with a short head.

The aroma was of berries, with a little maltiness thrown in. It was OK, but not the most well balanced of fruit beer aromas I have ever smelled. Too much fruitiness.

The taste of slightly sweet malt with berry overtones. The fruit promised in the nose was more balanced in the taste, but it just didn't seem to fulfill its potential.

connecticutpoet, Jun 28, 2004
Photo of cdwil
3/5  rDev -6.3%

cdwil, Dec 30, 2011
Photo of BeerManDan
2.23/5  rDev -30.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Not sure if this is the same as I was poured at the brewery. On tap, it was called, "Hascupberry" and was just awful. It poured a deep reddish brown and the smell of berries filled my nose, but that was the highlight of this fruit beer. The taste of berries was there along with a strong bitter and sour taste on the palate. It was a puckering feeling in the mouth and I wanted to spit it out. Not my cup of tea with this fruit beer!

BeerManDan, Aug 01, 2003
Photo of cbl2
3.13/5  rDev -2.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance:

A mostly still cloudy honey brown in color with a half inch white head.

Smell:

Lambic in nature, with hints of cherry the predominant fruit characteristic (label says Marionberries were used in the brewing, but I've never heard of them…).

Taste/Mouthfeel:

A short sharp berry tang greats the tongue at the outset followed by a rather bland, unremarkable beer. Not so much bad as it is disappointing. Not worth another look.

cbl2, Jun 21, 2004
Photo of HardTarget
3.55/5  rDev +10.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Note: Using the new Retired Beer review feature, this was written last year (04).

Bottle inspection: Dusty, but no date. 70’s style label, ingredients and specs typical of Rogue.

Aroma: Red berry and amber malt meld nicely. Very fruity

Appearance: Clear red-amber body with a dirty cotton head that collapsed from a froth leaving a respectable cover, collar, and lace.

Flavor: Burst of fruit, cherry, raspberry, red grape, I guess marionberries. Unfortunately there is a cardboard taste that I fear is from the age of the bottle. I’ll adjust, but still a hit given no date on the bottle, and I just bought it today. Given the flaw, it is a tasty beer. The fruit is full, but not overly sweet. The malt gives a nice depth to the flavor, but I can’t get any peppery hops taste from the Saaz.

Mouthfeel: Medium body, heavy mouth coat that leaves me smacking.

Overall Impression: A tasty beer, I expect no less from Rogue. The age is a factor, but I’m not at all disappointed with this purchase, but I’m not aging the other bottle long.

HardTarget, Sep 01, 2005
Photo of shelby415
3.5/5  rDev +9.4%

shelby415, Feb 28, 2012
Rogue-N-Berry from Rogue Ales
- out of 100 based on 9 ratings.