1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

XS McRogue Scotch Ale - Rogue Ales

Not Rated.
XS McRogue Scotch AleXS McRogue Scotch Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
86
very good

162 Ratings
THE BROS
94
outstanding

(view ratings)
Ratings: 162
Reviews: 92
rAvg: 3.83
pDev: 14.88%
Wants: 8
Gots: 9 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Rogue Ales visit their website
Oregon, United States

Style | ABV
Scotch Ale / Wee Heavy |  7.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
9 Ingredients:
Amber, Pale Chocolate & Rogue Micro Barley Farm DareTM Malts; Kent Golding, Willamette and Rogue Micro Hopyard Revolution Hops; Rolled Oats, Free Range Coastal Water and Top Fermenting Pacman Yeast.

17.5º PLATO
45 IBU
75 AA
28.6º Lovibond

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 09-22-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of XS McRogue Scotch Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 162 | Reviews: 92 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Stinkypuss
Stinkypuss

Pennsylvania

3.78/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

McRogue Scotch Ale, from a tiny bottle. Pours a dark brown with a mocha head. Aroma of roasted malts, brown sugar and piney hops. Flavor follows suit, on the maltier side. A bit nutty and bready, hint of peat but not as smokey as other examples of the style. Full bodied mouthfeel. A decent example of the style, albeit a simple one. Easy to drink, but they need to put this brew in 12 oz bottles.

Serving type: bottle

12-13-2010 04:48:15 | More by Stinkypuss
Photo of mynie
mynie

Indiana

3.35/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

When I first saw this at the liquor store I thought it was, like, mad old. But it turns out that Rogue reintroduced the mini bottles sometime recently, when I wasn't paying attention.

Anyhow, tiny little bottle gets poured into a tiny little sampling glass. It looks like thick, muddy tea and it smells like raw peat moss. More complexities come through as it warms: chocolate, weeds, and furniture polish.

Tastes... tame. And, odd as it sounds, it actually gets tamer as it warms up. The peat turns to cocoa, and there isn't much by way of yeast or alcohol complexities.

Not a bad beer, all in all. It's really drinkable for its size and it tastes just fine. But--call me picky--but I when I spend five bucks on an 8 ounce bottle of beer, I expect that beer to have a bit more going on than this one does.

Serving type: bottle

12-13-2010 04:40:34 | More by mynie
Photo of Shiredave
Shiredave

New York

3.83/5  rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

A Vintage Bottle Review

7oz. Nip -" Bottle in 2000" Lithographed on the glass. Gifted from either Sebbie or Jackson - I know they both gave me a bottle of this years ago - just not sure which one this is.

So... 10 years seemed like an appropriate age time for this now extinct beer. And at 7oz. - not really worth sharing. And in hope that this will have morphed into something special, I want to sample this on its own rather than amidst a half dozen other aged or rare beers as always happens. Fuck ya's all! I'm drinkin it myself.

A faint "pfft" is heard as I uncapped the twist off cap with an opener- this is encouraging - dont always hear that on these old Rogue's. It pours flat into the Ola Dubh snifter- some soapy bubbles on top of the caramel brown liquid. The thin froth fades quickly - absolutely no carbonation is present.

Aromas of cooked brown sugar and maple and higher alcohols flood the nose along with some stale pasty oxidation notes. The oxidation smells blow off but a pasty flavor persists in the beer's flavor tho not overwhelmingly. What is surprisingly lost in this beer compared with earlier tasting is it's body. The rich aromas used to be followed by medium - heavy almost syrupy Scotch ale flavors, but this example is almost thin as if it has attenuated over the last 10 years in the bottle to a terminal gravity near water.

Not disappointing really tho not stellar by any means, this held up reasonably well considering it is only 7%. But the rich fullness and toffee sweetness has mellowed considerably with time and it drinks much like a flat 60 Shilling rather than an 80 shilling as it used to to my taste. Still - these guys have been making " extreme beers " ( hate that term) while the guys in Delaware and San Diego etc. were still home brewing.

Serving type: bottle

12-05-2010 21:40:50 | More by Shiredave
Photo of beertunes
beertunes

Washington

3.15/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

7oz bottle poured into 10oz glass. Poured a reddish mahogany color with barely a ring of off-white head that had minimal retention and no lacing.

The aroma was mostly malt, with just a trace of the expected peatiness. On the tongue, it was much the same story, slightly sweet malt, a touch of peat and a trace of hops.

The body was fairly decent, although somewhat thin for the style. Drinkability was pretty, especially considering this isn't among my favorite styles. Overall, a decent enough brew, certainly worth picking up nip and trying for yourself.

Serving type: bottle

11-30-2010 22:06:52 | More by beertunes
Photo of NEhophead
NEhophead

Massachusetts

3.65/5  rDev -4.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

8 oz brown bottle, served in a tulip.

Murky, deep brown in color. No head, but a thin ring of white lacing around the tulip's rim. Faint, but short-lived thin lacing.

Caramel and rich toffe notes with fragrant hints of brown sugar, reminiscent of a creme brulee. Molasses notes cover a thin grainy base. Notes of warm alcohol add to the rich aromas, without overwhelming them.

Molasses and lightly sweetened caramel; a bit thin and lacking in sweetness. Mild coffee flavors lay in the wake of the caramel and molasses flavors. Notes of balanced alcohol that leads to a slightly dry finish. Grainy aftertaste.

Medium in body; surprisingly dry. A textural emphasis on grain, which is another surprise for the style.

The flavors are unfortunately mild, especially compared to the rich, creamy aromas. Nothing offensive, but nothing that stands out either.

Serving type: bottle

11-22-2010 02:43:12 | More by NEhophead
Photo of champ103
champ103

Texas

3.08/5  rDev -19.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Pours a murky, dirty looking reddish color. A tiny bubbly head forms on first pour, but recedes in a second. No lace, and looks dead and lifeless.
S: Some smoke, toasted malt, and sweet toffee. Simple, but enjoyable.
T: Very light smoke, sweet malt, and dank hops. Not bad, but way to simplistic.
M/D: A light to medium body. Just a bit thin overall. Easy to finish the tiny bottle, but I would get board with this if there was any more.

Just kind of bland. I am glad I was able to get one of the really small bottles, because that is all I want.

Serving type: bottle

11-11-2010 02:31:34 | More by champ103
Photo of lordofthewiens
lordofthewiens

Maine

3.18/5  rDev -17%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Bottled 2010 (what month?)
Best aged one year
Not impressed.
In a snifter the beer was a hazy orange/amber color with just a tiny amount of head.
Caramel and fruit aroma. Some alcohol.
Caramel taste, raisin, alcohol. Very tepid.
This was a thin, almost non-existent beer. More sweetness than anything else.

Serving type: bottle

11-07-2010 22:19:02 | More by lordofthewiens
Photo of JamesS
JamesS

Indiana

4.47/5  rDev +16.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

On tap at Gibbie's, Morgantown, WV.
Poured a wonderful dark brown with copper flashes of light throughout with excellent head and a bit of nice lacing. Very deep malty scent with a bit of smokiness in the nose. Wonderful flavor, with deep malt tones, a great smokiness, hints of peat, and a touch of caramel. Goes down quite smoothly, but it does have an odd, almost generic, flavor on the tongue at the very end.

Serving type: on-tap

11-04-2010 18:16:31 | More by JamesS
Photo of vkv822
vkv822

Oregon

2.05/5  rDev -46.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

7oz. bottle into snifter.

Cloudy brown with slight red tints and a ring of off white bubbles around the glass, no head.

Aroma is of roast and caramel malts, with some slightly musty and boozy notes as well. Overall pretty subdued and underwhelming.

The taste is fairly watery, though the flavors that do come through are decent. There are predominately notes of caramel, roasted malt and raisin.

The mouthfeel is quite thin and has almost not carbonation to speak of.

I am very let down by this beer, as I had heard good things about the older version. By far my biggest disappointment from Rogue. 7oz is more than enough.

Serving type: bottle

11-03-2010 03:06:13 | More by vkv822
Photo of nickfl
nickfl

Florida

3.98/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A - Pours with a small head of light brown foam on top of a slightly hazy, dark brown body. The head settles quickly and leaves almost no lace.

S - Rich, brown malt character with lots of toffee, brown sugar, and butterscotch. Some light, red apple yeast in the background with a hint of musty hops.

T - Sweet caramel and molasses malt flavors up front with a bit of toffee. Some butterscotch and darker caramel appear in the middle with a light herbal hop flavor. It finishes with strong toffee and caramel as well as some cola and light roasted malt. Lingering flavors of toffee and butterscotch candy with just a hint of smoke.

M - Medium-thick body, moderately low carbonation, and a somewhat sweet finish.

D - Nicely done, there is a great deal of malt character with an appropriate emphasis on toffee. While the malt is central to the experience, there is more than enough hop character to balance things out and it has a touch of English Bitter character as a result. The yeast comes in at the finish with some red apple character that works nicely and makes for a drawn out finish with the toffee and butterscotch.

Serving type: bottle

10-20-2010 04:38:37 | More by nickfl
Photo of Rasolante1
Rasolante1

Indiana

3.53/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Cloudy, rich amber color with a very thin head. The lacing was the most aesthetically pleasing aspect of this brew, but it was barley present within minutes of pouring.

Smell: Fantastic malt profile with the pale chocolate malt dominating much of the aroma. Sweet, honey, some caramel, and low roasted notes.

Taste: Great balance of hops and malt. Again the pale chocolate dominates. The complexity of the nose does not completely come through in the taste. Roast is more pronounced. Alcohol was noticeable but pleasant.

Mouthfeel: This beer seemed a little on the thin side for a scotch ale. Slight astringency, but still enjoyable.

Drinkability: The drinkability of this beer was above average but the astringency prevented it from being great.

Serving type: bottle

10-12-2010 15:18:38 | More by Rasolante1
Photo of JeremyHB
JeremyHB

Minnesota

4.22/5  rDev +10.2%
look: 5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

7 oz Bottle reads: Bottled in 2010 - UNFILTERED & UNFI??ED BEST WHEN AGED 1 YEAR
9 INGREDIENTS: Amber, Pale Chocolate, & Rogue Micro Barley Farm Dare Malts, Kent Golding, Wilamette & Rogue Micro Hopyard Revolution Hops; Rolled Oats, Free Range Coastal Water & Pacman Yeast.

Poured really smooth with a subtle foam. Very small bubbles, seems nicely carbonated for the style. Clear but heavily off red its Amber malts I suspect are Caramel 60L which gives it a phantom 'sweetness'. High ABV is pretty evident, but more of a warming effect than booziness. Has a pretty nice long lasting finish which is a nice contrast to the raisin like flavor you get right away. I would say this is a great example of a beer that is better sipped than drank. (grammar?)
Exceptionally clear. Best feature is its long lasting memorable finish, but comes across slightly too caramel for me.
Amazing beer, I must again point out the 7 oz. bottle which I think is a perfect amount for a beer of this caliber.
I will certainly try to brew a version of this for use personally but maybe I will decrease caramel and chocolate malt slightly and sub glacier for wilamette.

Serving type: bottle

10-10-2010 05:48:35 | More by JeremyHB
Photo of peabody
peabody

Kentucky

3.15/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours out a cloudy coffee look with very little suds. Lots of lacing.
Smell is like an old beer that has been setting out in the sun way too long. Raisin malt and alcohol.
Taste is a very watery sugar malt , and not a lot of sugary malt. Really water with an alcohol aftertaste is about it.
Clean mouthfeel because there isn't much more to this. You do get the alcohol burn for a while afterward.
Drinkability would be only OK if this thing had some flavor. Very bland.

Serving type: bottle

09-26-2010 02:01:43 | More by peabody
Photo of JohnGalt1
JohnGalt1

Idaho

3.1/5  rDev -19.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Edit: The bottle says it is best after a year of aging.. crap.. This is at best an okay beer with no aging... and the little bit of cellaring is only gonna make a weak beer worse.

2010 Nip bottle picked up at the COOP today.... $4... way waaaay too expensive ..

Thin 1/2" tan head.. the brew is dark walnut..

okay nose.. toast and caramel... lite roast..

Flavors are thin .. dark toast with some minor caramel... hints of peat smoke.

Mehhh.... okay ... but only an okay representation of a Scotch ale..

Really... $4??? ... medium at best Wee Heavy... at best. Again... Waaaayyyy over priced. Pike Kilt Lifter is much cheaper and alot better.

3/3/3/3/3/3.5

Serving type: bottle

09-12-2010 06:12:28 | More by JohnGalt1
Photo of CharlesDarwin
CharlesDarwin

Rhode Island

3.85/5  rDev +0.5%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Originally reviewed June 10 2007. 1996 6 oz nip bottle. Aroma is a unique and piquant touch of cedar smoke, british candy, old lemons and school paste. Aged and mellow. Gentle and nice. Nips of random spice perk up. Pours a clear burnished deep bronze amber, with a rim of micro white bubble and a few skeins of percolation, seriously. On the tongue, a matured cherry bark blends with old malt husks and candied pears. Quite oxidized hops find their way through and bite as a bit of old cask dusk. It actually bubbles a little bit and released a lit hiss upon opening. Flavors are subtle and marry with a sherry note. Light vinousness finds a home amongst salted minerals and salt-water taffy. Actually, I think this has held up alright. Any beer 11 years old is going to show signs of wear, but for a Scotch Ale with hops, it’s doing okay. I think I like old hops. Actually, in reality, I’m blown away at how good this Scotch Ale is 11 years later, after having purchased it from a minifridge at a shitty liquor store in Grand Island, Nebraska. A hidden gem.

Serving type: bottle

12-15-2007 15:03:46 | More by CharlesDarwin
Photo of SilentSabre
SilentSabre

North Dakota

4.1/5  rDev +7%
look: 1.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured from a 7oz bottle which read "Bottled in 1998", and on the reverse, "Best when aged for 6 months". I think we have that covered. Appearance was just short of offensive having absolutely no head. The lifeless, murky, brown liquid looked like something you might pour out of an old rusty pipe full of rain water. The smell, and everything else, however, was really something! Fantastic aromas of chocolate, sweetened coffee, caramel, and perhaps some candied dark fruit are all present here. Taste, too, is full of nearly everything in the smell, with the addition of a rather nice medium dry finish that sort of reminds me of toasted cereal. Mouthfeel is nothing to get overly excited about, as there is virtually no CO2 at all present here, and the liquid, while not water-thin, is close to it. I would imagine that this was probably even better in its prime, but here, 9 years later, it's still a nice brew. Too bad I had only one.

Serving type: bottle

05-23-2007 01:15:23 | More by SilentSabre
Photo of Gueuzedude
Gueuzedude

Arizona

4.1/5  rDev +7%
look: 3 | smell: 5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

7oz nip bottle, 1998 bottle vintage, Sampled August 2005
This beer pours a hazy brown color, is almost devoid of carbonation and thus has no head. The nose has a huge caramel toffee note to it that is apparent as soon as I start to pour this beer. The aroma is full of concentrated malt notes with lots of aged malt character as well; there is a certain meaty maltiness here, hints of cherry, concentrated raisin, and a hint of sherry. The aroma is absolutely incredible.

The beer is surprisingly light on the tongue (perhaps it is a bit cold), but begins to coat the mouth as it passes on through. The finish is quite complex and interesting, it is almost smoky, slightly astringent, but definitely long and satisfying. The taste is lightly sweet, but has a full malt character with competing notes of toffee, chocolate and a slight burnt caramel note. The toffee note is definitely the dominant characteristic of this beer. This is quite the sipping contemplative brew, though the flavor did not quite live up to the awesome aroma.

Serving type: bottle

09-01-2005 16:08:42 | More by Gueuzedude
Photo of MrNuggets
MrNuggets

Oregon

4.03/5  rDev +5.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

1996
A few large bubbles form a right around the goblet. Sweet smelling with a hint of alcohol. Flavors are well blended. Heavy caramel swirled in with robust malt. Smooth roasty, maybe even smokey flavor. Faint bitterness to finish things off.
This was a great experience. Too bad I'll probably never get to enjoy one of these again.

Serving type: bottle

07-03-2004 05:36:47 | More by MrNuggets
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

West Virginia

3.43/5  rDev -10.4%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottled in 2000, Appearance: After a straight up and down pour forms a dark brown amber cloudy tone with a thin bubbly cream head leaves rings of speckled lacing. Aroma: Deep plum tones toasted caramel notes and a strong alcoholic force brewing there. Taste: Semi sweet air of smoked peated malts, bitterness is there too but not much of a dominant flavor of any kind. Malts seem stale here a bit of diacetyl cooking but still very drinkable. Mouthfeel: Light to medium bodied ale not bad low carbonation, I'm guessing this one didn't age that well. Drinkability: Still a decent Scotch ale the roasted malts stood up with a smoky finish pretty solid brew that I find tame for Rogue, overall drinkability is somewhere in the middle.

Serving type: bottle

02-22-2004 20:46:23 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of brewdlyhooked13
brewdlyhooked13

Ohio

3.3/5  rDev -13.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

1996 vintage, picked up at Party Source in Bellevue, KY. Yikes, where did they find these and how do you suppose they stored them, lo, these 8 long years???

Appearance - poured into a Belgian glass, no head at all, a few bubbles clinging to the glass's edge. Dirty brown color with auburn hues. Plenty of sediment floating around. Kind of rough looking, frankly.

Aroma - sweet and chocolatey with a raisiny, winy bend to it. Mmmmm, smells good.

Taste - sweet and vinous, moreso than the chocolate. A little role reversal there from the aroma's impression. Has a dry raisiny finish, reminds me of a red wine. No hops that I can detect, but 8 years after, that's hardly Rogue's fault. It's odd to consistently smell the chocolate but get that fruity, winy taste. There is a little carbonation in the mouth. Some late chocolate notes well into the aftertaste. Not designed for enjoyment 8 years after bottling, kudos that it's even drinkable. A stiff alcohol level helps to that end, no doubt. Good stuff, but suffers due to age.

Mouthfeel - thinner than I expected, but does a decent job of having some cling in the mouth. Minimal carbonation makes for an overall lacking mouthfeel.

Drinkability - it has some appeal as a discontinued novelty and has a decent fundamental taste, but it really should be scored 'N/A - not applicable', so I'll give this section a score based on the rest of the review's average.

Serving type: bottle

02-19-2004 20:56:56 | More by brewdlyhooked13
Photo of TheLongBeachBum
TheLongBeachBum

California

3.88/5  rDev +1.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Bottled in 2000
Unfiltered & Unfined
17.5° Plato
45 IBU
28.6° L
77M

Presentation: Well I picked up this little, erm sorry “wee” monster along with a bottle of Alesmith Weizenbock (1999) and Alesmith Stumblin’ Monk (2000), that and the pile of dusty clog that I wiped off of the little 7 fl.oz. bottle tells me that this is a vintage beer.

Appearance: Incredibly flat pour that showed little sign of any conditioning. A slightly hazy dark brown body with the merest rim of tan-brown bubbles that form at the edge of the meniscus. Even though this had been in my Fridge for sometime there was still some yeast carryover into my glass that soon settled out to a fudge-like sediment.

Nose: Smokey start dissolved in dark fruits and powerful alcohols, peaty middle with some sweet figs, dates and molasses at the back end.

Taste: Very smoky malts, with some evident bitterness that has lasted well for the last 3 years and it balances the sweet malts perfectly. The bitter-sweet warming feel in the back end has a reminiscent Whisky feel from many a Highland Scotia Single Malt. Quite something – bit definitely a sipper.

Mouthfeel: Thick and rich, it has a very strange mouthfeel for it has no assistance from the carbonation whatsoever, but it is still incredibly warming and huge in the mouth. A real Auld Scotch Ale

Drinkability: 7 ounce was enough to be honest, it’s a warming sipper that has probably seen its peak a year or so ago, and the lack of carbonation detracts from the drinkability a bit.

Overall: Devoid of any conditioning – but still a very good Scotch Ale.

“Cee u, it’s a fecking grate beer, a wee bit auld, bet a canny bru”

Serving type: bottle

01-05-2004 06:57:31 | More by TheLongBeachBum
Photo of Mitchster
Mitchster

Michigan

4.03/5  rDev +5.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Bottled in 2000, 7 oz bottle.
"McRogue Scotch Ale is a hearty Scotch Ale, not to be mistaken for its cousin, Scottish Ale, which is lighter in color and body. Debuted at the 1995 Oregon Brewers Festival. McRouge is brewed with Great Western Harrington, Klages, Beeston floor-malted Amber, Pale Chocolate and pale Weymann Caramunich Malts, and rolled oats. Willamette and Kent Goldings Hops."

17.5 degrees Plato, IBU 45, Apparent Attenuation 77, Lovibond 28.6.

Happened to find a bottle of this tucked away for many years. Completely flat with only the faintest "pssht" upon opening. A completely vertical pours yields no head, only the thinnest ring of bubbles at the edges. Murky and dark brown in color with suspended bits of junk hanging around. Aroma is rich with dark fruits...lots of prune and raisins, vanilla, dark caramel..no discernable hop aroma. Reminds me of Sammy Triple Bock in aroma. Flavor is very nice...again, lots of dark fruit with a lingering malty sweetness..the suprise appearance of medium-roasted coffee in the middle. There is a perceptable alcohol warmth, but no perceptable alcohol flavor. Herbal bitterness is well balanced. Body is suprisingly light from the smell but denser than most Scotch Ale. A burp produces a smoked peat note, though the smokiness is mild in flavor. The finish has more suprise notes of burnt caramel, butterscotch, and a damp rotting stump.

An interesting brew, but it's unfortunate that it's completely flat. This is common to the 7 oz bottles and probably one of the reasons Rogue did away with them. Even though it's flat, it still a damn good Scotch ale and one I'd be interesting in having again.

Serving type: bottle

11-13-2003 02:29:22 | More by Mitchster
Photo of goz
goz

Massachusetts

2.78/5  rDev -27.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

7oz bottle from 2000 bottling.
Pours a muddy brown, small tan ring for a head, with lots of bubbles clinging to the side of the glass. Aroma is super sweet, some alcohol, and a bit of chocolate. Flavor is mainly just cloying sweetness, and somewhat alcoholic. Medium body, maybe a bit on the thin side.

Serving type: bottle

10-26-2003 20:48:25 | More by goz
Photo of jcalabre
jcalabre

California

2.5/5  rDev -34.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

I originally sampled this on Lincoln's Birthday 2003. I am writing this review from my notes.
Appeance: This brew has a reddish/brown color.
Comment: You can really taste the alcohol in this beer, and that's something I really don't enjoy. Maybe I'll have to resample this one, but for now, I'd go for a different wee heavy.

Serving type: bottle

08-31-2003 01:07:18 | More by jcalabre
Photo of Winter
Winter

Wisconsin

4.85/5  rDev +26.6%
look: 4 | smell: 5 | taste: 5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

Bottled in 1998. 7 oz bottle.

Pours a dark brown with absolutely no head. Heavenly aroma consists of sweet toffee, caramel and chocolate. Oh, man, this is going to be good! Mouthfeel is thinner than I expected (somewhat watery), but still very smooth. Exquisite taste consists of sweet malt, caramel, toasted nut, oats and a touch of oak. The rolled oats used during the brewing process adds such a great smoothness of both texture and flavor to this Scotch ale. I wish I would have purchased more than one bottle. If I can find this again, I will definitely stock up.

Serving type: bottle

07-25-2003 16:41:41 | More by Winter
XS McRogue Scotch Ale from Rogue Ales
86 out of 100 based on 162 ratings.