John John Hazelnut (Rum Barrel Aged) - Rogue Ales
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 227 | Reviews: 141 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by StoneBrewFanatic:
3.58/5 rDev +3.5%
A - Pours a brownish murky amber into my snifter with almost one finger of head that dissipates quickly and leaves almost no lacing.
S - Not much here. A little nutty and a little malty with faint hints of rum.
T - Caramel malts, dry nuttiness, slightly bitter, not a lot to it, but good.
M - A little on the thin side with bright carbonation for how light it is.
O - Not all that exciting for what it's advertised as being, however it's a pretty tasty brown ale.
11-11-2011 02:16:41 | More by StoneBrewFanatic
More User Reviews:
3.83/5 rDev +10.7%
Poured into a standard pint glass a deep amber hued chesnut brown with a thinner quick to fade off white head.Caramel toffee and some light toastiness mainly in the nose,light vanilla shows thu lightly as well.A bit thin and on the prickly side at first in the feel department but it mellows after a bit.Flavors have more of the hazelnut presence I think than the aromas,lightly toasted hazlenuts and caramel toffee mainly,a decent earthy dryness in the finish to keep it from being overly sweet.Its a mellow tasting brown ale but it has some decent oaky/nutty flavors to it.
10-01-2010 13:27:32 | More by oberon
3.58/5 rDev +3.5%
The beer pours a brown color with an off-white head. The aroma is heavy on the spices (mainly nutmeg but also some cinnamon) as well as some brown sugar and some toffee from the malt. The flavor is very dry. I get some toasted malt notes with some cinnamon and nutmeg, some nuttyness and some alcohol. I also get some nice rum notes in the flavor, which add to the base beer. Medium mouthfeel and medium carbonation. Good, but not as good as the unaged Hazelnut Brown Nectar.
07-18-2011 01:41:28 | More by Mora2000
4/5 rDev +15.6%
I love Hazelnut Brown and I was excited when I purchased this...Off-white head retreats gently to the typical slightly murky brown. The original Hazelnut has a perfect dense and sweet flavor; John John has that mild spice thanks to the barrel treatment. I can imagine other breweries overkilling the spice, but Rogue being Rogue gets right on the money.
I agree with other reviewers who describe the initial sip as non-descript, but during the swallow the flavor comes forward with a mixture of toasted malts and light hops.
Would I buy it again, I would probably buy the original Hazelnut first, but then reach over and grab one.
12-02-2010 02:48:55 | More by WCBCFrank
3.48/5 rDev +0.6%
(Served in a tulip glass)
A- This beer has a slightly dense but clear glowing brown body with a tan thick film of head that last a bit. There is a few hints of carbonation gliding to the surface.
S- The soft toasted malt hint has some spiced rum hints and a chocolate malt note in the finish.
T- There is a slight tartness with a hint of chocolate malt that has some toasted malt qualities to it. The finish takes on a stale spice taste that lingers for a moment. As the beer opens up there is a full brown malt flavor that is watery with a taste of hazelnut in there aswell.
M- This beer has a medium-light mouthfeel with a big fizz that scrubs the finish.
D- The hazelnut flavor is soft and blends with the stale spice flavor to make this beer a little unappealing. The spice rum hints are soft and the brown ale beer is even softer.
01-04-2011 03:34:48 | More by rhoadsrage
3.53/5 rDev +2%
The ingredient stats on the bottle available this side of the 49th are slightly askew from those stated here, including, most prominently, an ABV of 6.2%...
This beer pours a slightly muddled ruddy amber hue, with two fingers of foamy pale beige head, which leaves zip in the way of lace as it fades away. It smells of sweet bready/biscuity malt, a bit of nutmeg, clove, and mild boozy wood barrel. The taste is more sweet bready malt, and a dry, almost gingerbread/pumpkin pie spiciness, supplemented by an earthy woody character. The carbonation is quite sedate, the body medium weight, smooth, and just a tad cloying. It finishes off-dry, the nutty malt still stronger that the proffered miscellaneous dryness .
I very much like the hazelnut, in fact, it's my favorite nut, and by that metric, there ain't no hazelnut in this here beer. A shame, that. Much more a fall Oktoberfest/Winter Spice offering than the titular barrel promise, but in my experience, rum is rather quiet in its influence on any manner of aged content.
11-05-2010 02:32:24 | More by biboergosum
3.6/5 rDev +4%
Bomber into a 12 oz. Samuel Smith nonic.
Appearance: A quite gorgeous darker and hazy brown or amber or both depending on how you look at it in the light. A nice head sits atop the body of the brew, off-white, almost with some slight amber in there, and stays for a while, at about 1/4" to 1/2". The best part about the brew I would say.
Smell: It's not that it's bad or off or anything to me: it's just really, really faint, unfortunately. There's a bit of brown ale caramelization, and a bit of sourness, but not much else. Maybe some slight vinous characteristics or cider vinegar too.
Taste: How is this not a sour ale? It seems like it should be. I feel like this is closer to a Flanders Red than a hazelnut / rum type of concoction. The rum seems to be faint, if there at all, though post-finish there are some hints of bread and nuttiness, and mild caramelization, though the vinous, semi-sweet cider vinegar tandem is also there, though it's not bad. Then you tend to get some caramel and faint rum sweetness, but again, I'm baffled that the rum is so subtle. Seems like it would go pretty well, so I don't know if it's the barrels or what, but it's not as good as it can be, and I'm really not even sure if it's what they really intended.
Mouthfeel: Not thin, but not too thick, and not spritzy, but not creamy, as it achieves a nice balance with a lot of bubbles to cater to the beer's strengths as far as the mouthfeel.
Drinkability: This was a weird experience for me. I didn't dislike the beer, but it seems not to be what's advertised, or very much unexpected for what it does seem to try and advertise. And for the $8 or $9 price tag, it doesn't seem as worth it. Maybe some more rum, a longer barrel time, or some amount of tweaking, whether it's more alcohol or not, would really make this a possibly pretty eye-opening brew. Can't say I necessarily recommend it, but I'm not saying to completely shy away from it either. I just expected and hoped for more. Maybe they'll do it again and make it better, and then I'll try it again.
10-28-2011 21:38:05 | More by asabreed
3.45/5 rDev -0.3%
This meets the mark of brown ales. It is opaque brown,with some brown ring. The aroma is apricot more than malt. The carbonation is right there from a fresh bottle, brown sugar with a little sourness in the finish. Some rum,like the brown sugar. Ok drinkability.
11-28-2010 21:30:25 | More by Sammy
3.6/5 rDev +4%
A- Pours a dark brown color with an off-white head that quickly dissipates into a thing ring of lace around the glass leaving a decent amount of lacing.
S- The aroma is pretty good. A lot of malt with the some hazelnut notes coming through. I can also pick up a little bit on the barrel aging and some spices as well. The aroma Reminds me a little bit of a pumpkin ale.
T- The taste starts out nutty with a good dose of malt and caramel. The finish is pretty dry and slightly nutty. There is also a good amount of spices. The taste like the aroma reminds me a bit like a pumpkin beer.
M- The mouthfeel is between light and medium bodied with a good punt of carbonation.
D- Overall. John John Ale is another solid beer from Rogue that I'm glad I tried. Definitely worth a try. Recommended.
10-06-2010 03:32:41 | More by cjgator3
3.28/5 rDev -5.2%
Pours amber with a thumb of tan head. Good lacing & head retention
S: Brown bread, pears, brown sugar, all fade as this warms
T: Slight nuttyness, pears, herbal hops, slight rum notes up front. Dryness, figs, plums & leafy hops as this warms, also some tart cherry. Finishes dry, figgy, with nutmeg, & candied fruit
MF: Light bodied, over carbonated, dry
An average brown ale, the barrel aging is half-assed. This either needed more time in the barrel, or they should've put something with more heft in them. A noble but flawed endeavor, I do think they had the start of a great Christmas/Winter ale but got too cheap with the malt bill. Still enjoyed some of the spice & fruittyness
01-19-2012 03:09:46 | More by russpowell
2.48/5 rDev -28.3%
A: Pours a light clear amber with just a ting of rose color.
S: Dominated by booze. It smells sickeningly sweet like they took rum and added brown sugar to it.
T: Not much flavor. I do get some of the sweet rum flavor but also get a hint of cola. It tastes a little like club soda.
M: Thin and watery made worse by the fact that it is to carbonated.
D: It is super easy to drink as there isn't much to it. It doesn't have much flavor and it is very thin. I could drink a bunch of it, but I wouldn't choose to do so.
Overall: Not impressed. Proof that barrel aging doesn't necessarily equal good.
10-27-2010 22:37:50 | More by RRC87
3.98/5 rDev +15%
Pours a slightly hazy brown color with a smallish tan colored head that dissipated into a light ring. The aroma is sweet. It has a brown sugar sweetness with some vanilla notes. I don't pick up much, if any, hazelnut or the spiced aspect of the rum. However, it does have a very nice aroma. The taste is of chocolate malt, some toastiness, a nice subtle vanilla flavor from the rum barrels, some hazelnut but nothing overwhelming like hazelnut coffee. The taste is surprisingly light, kind of has a vanilla coke thing going on. I am giving the feel grade a lower score (3) not because I don't like it necessarily but I think it takes away from the flavor of the beer. The feel is light, not watery, and very carbonated. Too carbonated for the style in that it brings a seltzer water type of consistency to the beer, though it doesn't feel watery, weird. The carbonation just kind of burns the flavor away. I think this beer drinks very well, very crisp from the carbonation. The flavors are good but subtle. I like it, I would probably buy it again.
10-04-2010 02:50:15 | More by Gmann
2.1/5 rDev -39.3%
This is a perfectly stored bottle from Hi Times and tasted shortly after being removed from its cooler.
Pours a beautiful dark clear copper red with a nice but thin and quickly fading light tan head.
Nose has a red wine fruit forward fruity nose that is pleasing and inviting albeit light and not very forthcoming; a hint of hazelnut because you're looking for it and no rum or wood character at all.
Mouthfeel is thin and much more "Rogue like" than the John John in Gin barrels. Mouthfeel is watery, diluted, light carbonation and not inviting or inspiring.
Flavors are faint, light, simple and boring. In fact, the flavors are so weak as to be almost non-descript. Tastes like weak lager. Light watery yeast and a hint of hop and malt. No hazelnut, no rum no wood in the flavors whatsoever.
A "dirty water" finish and little else. I opened a second bottle from another case. Same review.
10-10-2010 22:08:03 | More by GRG1313
3.5/5 rDev +1.2%
22 ounce bottle. Served in a pint glass, the beer pours a hazy brown color with an inch tan head. Head retention is good with a decent amount of lacing. Aroma is toasted malt, nuts, caramel, and a bit of rum. The taste is similar to the aroma, but the bitter flavors are a lot stronger than I expected. The sweet flavors come out more as the brew warms, but the overall bitterness of this beer surprised me. Mouthfeel is light/medium, it seems a bit thin at times. It also has moderate carbonation and it's slightly dry. Drinkability is OK, it's smooth and goes down easy enough. I think this is a decent overall brew. Not impressive, but not bad either.
11-26-2010 22:16:34 | More by bluejacket74
3.9/5 rDev +12.7%
Pours dark hazy amber with a 2 finger tanish head that left spotted lacing all down the glass
Smells of roasted carmel malts and some spice
taste is good and I do not get any pacman yeast flavors that most rogue beers have
the hazelnut is there but its not overpowering - plenty of spice with rich toffee malts
mouthfeel - medium body with low carbonation
drinkability is good and this bomber hit the spot on this chilly fall night
09-26-2010 23:49:05 | More by jsh420
4.33/5 rDev +25.1%
a - white, lacy head overtop of a robust brown body, slightly amber. some legs.
s - this smells a lot like the normal hazelnut nectar, but with a hint of barrel. faint nuttiness and not much else. Barrel/vanilla/alcohol is more significant while I'm drinking a swig.
t - the first thing I'm getting, which is surprising and awesome, is sour. A 3/4 on a 10 point scale, but still...sour. Love it! Whiskey notes, lots of barrel. Some nougaty vanilla, which comes more when I smell while sipping. Nutty malts, less so than the normal version. Very little hops, but enough to balance.
m - pretty light mouthfeel, no booze aside from the barrel notes.
o - I'm actually a little pissed that this beer is only 5% when the normal Hazelnut is 6.2%. I'm not even sure how that is possible, but it apparently is. That being said, this is a really drinkable and delicious semi-sour brown.
10-05-2011 03:22:19 | More by Gobigvt7
4.25/5 rDev +22.8%
Snagged on tap at the PIB... wonderful ale and a must have...
- Great candied brown and copper color, rather clear but molasses rich.... light bubbly peach and amber head...
- Sweet smell, bit of nut, rum, and ester... some vanilla notes as well.. truly unique and something I think they should continue to brew and age...
- Slight spice, nut, oak, and vanilla notes.. all blend together very well and make a very drinkable and delicious ale... I wish most of Rogue's bottled stuff was this good...
- Sweet and mouth watering... the balance of flavors makes for a super high mouth feel..
- Goes down like buttery sweet toffee.. wonderful, and smooth, and light to boot... can I have a keg of my own please!
07-19-2009 01:12:41 | More by Docer
John John Hazelnut (Rum Barrel Aged) from Rogue Ales
79 out of 100 based on 227 ratings.