1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

John John Hazelnut (Rum Barrel Aged) - Rogue Ales

Not Rated.
John John Hazelnut (Rum Barrel Aged)John John Hazelnut (Rum Barrel Aged)

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

228 Ratings
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 228
Reviews: 141
rAvg: 3.45
pDev: 18.55%
Wants: 5
Gots: 10 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Rogue Ales visit their website
Oregon, United States

Style | ABV
American Brown Ale |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

"Rogue Hazelnut Brown Nectar aged in Rogue's Hazelnut Spiced Rum barrels."

13 Ingredients:
Harrington, Klages, Brown, Carastan 13/17, Crystal 70/80, Crystal 135/165, Beeston Pale Chocolate & Rogue Micro Barley Farm Dare™ malts; Saaz and Rogue Micro Hopyard Revolution Hops; Hazelnut Extract, Free Range Coastal Water & Top Fermenting Pacman Yeast.

34 IBU
77 AA
3.2º Lovibond

(Beer added by: Docer on 07-19-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 228 | Reviews: 141 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Tilley4
2.85/5  rDev -17.4%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

I'm not a huge fan of the regular version of this brew but I'm hoping that this might give it a twist to the good...

Pours a dull brown with a very murky muddy appearance and virtually no head at all... Just sorta sits there... No carbonation that I can tell...

Decent aromas of caramel malts with hints of the namesake hazelnut mixed in...perhaps a touch of the spice present in the aroma as well but that could be my imagination. Not sure what I was expecting but I don't think it was this...

Dull flat tasting maltiness with what I can only describe as hazelnut coffee creamer mingled in... I guess what I mean is that it tastes phony to me... Lifeless brew... I'm with one of the earlier reviewers on this in that I'm thinking Rogue hasn't perfected barrel aging their brews...


Tilley4, Nov 08, 2010
Photo of BuckeyeNation
3.13/5  rDev -9.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Much closer to dark apricot orange than hazelnut brown. The cashew colored crown is not up to this brewery's usual standards. The foam doesn't have very interesting topography and almost no lace is making its way to the glass. Liquor barrel-aging tends to do that.

The aroma is underpowered, even when the head has largely faded away. JJA smells like a toasted bready brown ale with a hint of hazelnut. Spiced rum is not appreciated. Looks like there's some work to be done on the palate.

If full-strength Hazelnut Brown Nectar is truly the base beer, and is aged in barrels that had previously contained spiced rum, then how in the world does the ABV go from 6.2% to 5.0%? Unless less malt is used in this offering... which is what it tastes and feels like. Sorry, but I'm not feeling this John John.

Specifics include brown bread with a small amount of earthy caramel and an even smaller amount of hazelnut (splash of Frangelico). Still no rum and still no spice. There simply is not enough barley to deliver the proper amount of depth and boldness of flavor. Even a modest bitterness has no trouble burying whatever sweetness might have been present.

The mouthfeel is too thin (even taking ABV into account) and the bubbles are harsh and fizzy, living at the edges of the beer rather than buried within and creating creaminess. Yet again, not up to the usual Rogue standards... at... all.

Either Rogue Brewery is slipping or they haven't yet figured out how to barrel age beer. John John Hazelnut (Rum Barrel Aged) is a disappointing effort that isn't anywhere near as good as Hazelnut Brown Nectar. Unless major changes are made, there's no need for this one to be released again.

BuckeyeNation, Nov 08, 2010
Photo of mikesgroove
4/5  rDev +15.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

had the chance to try this one on tap at barleys last night. my last big night out before a month long beer stop. served cold and into a pint glass, this one was consumed on 11/07/2010.

the pour was a nice medium brown color with a smooth even head of lace that was tinged the slightest color of off white. decent lacing but a fairly bare top.

aroma is light run notes, lots of roasted malts and hints of brown sugar that all seem to play off each other quite nicely and leave a pleasant, earthy air to them. a bit lighter then i was expecting but it seemed to work as each sip let the flavor bounce around the tongue and lead to warm run notes, dark malts, lots of sweet notes and a touch of spice in the finish.

overall not the most interesting of beers from rogue i have ever ha but i certainly cannot complain.

mikesgroove, Nov 08, 2010
Photo of Liverpool08
3.95/5  rDev +14.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours a nice dark amber brown. Nice puffy white head. Nice sweet aroma of hazelnut, and dark rum.Very nice flavor, warm spices and hazelnut mix with just a hint of the dark molases rum flavor. This is a really nice brown ale. Its a little flat in the mouth, could use a little more carbonation. Otherwise a real treat.

Liverpool08, Nov 07, 2010
Photo of biboergosum
3.53/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

The ingredient stats on the bottle available this side of the 49th are slightly askew from those stated here, including, most prominently, an ABV of 6.2%...

This beer pours a slightly muddled ruddy amber hue, with two fingers of foamy pale beige head, which leaves zip in the way of lace as it fades away. It smells of sweet bready/biscuity malt, a bit of nutmeg, clove, and mild boozy wood barrel. The taste is more sweet bready malt, and a dry, almost gingerbread/pumpkin pie spiciness, supplemented by an earthy woody character. The carbonation is quite sedate, the body medium weight, smooth, and just a tad cloying. It finishes off-dry, the nutty malt still stronger that the proffered miscellaneous dryness .

I very much like the hazelnut, in fact, it's my favorite nut, and by that metric, there ain't no hazelnut in this here beer. A shame, that. Much more a fall Oktoberfest/Winter Spice offering than the titular barrel promise, but in my experience, rum is rather quiet in its influence on any manner of aged content.

biboergosum, Nov 05, 2010
Photo of bbeane
3.53/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A- Poured into a DFH snifter... starts with a light brown somewhat fizzy head that lingers very briefly before almost completely disappearing with no trace left behind. The beer is dark amber/copper colored with little activity

S- First smell gives a sweet aroma, almost that of a cola. After some swirls of the snifter it has some toasted malt aroma, but is mostly a great blend of the hazelnut and rum... almost smells like molasses

T- Has a toasted malt taste with hints of hazelnut and a mellow spicey rum finish

M- Medium bodied with very little carbonation

D- Well, an interesting brew and worth the money once to give it a try though I don't think I would spend it twice. I think I prefer the Hazelnut Brown fresh as opposed to rum barrel aged...


bbeane, Nov 04, 2010
Photo of SolomonGrundy
1.85/5  rDev -46.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Waiting for the World Series to resume here on fun Halloween...Have to settle for the awful Raiders while I check out this interesting brew...

Pours a slightly cloudy, rust-colored amber. No real head forms, and no discernable lacing, either. Leaves a thin tiara of persistent head near the rim, and the carbonation is in the middling range. Did I mention I hate the Raiders???!!! Well, I freaking do...

Aromas are very faint...Some sour cherry notes, and that's about it...Do I have a cold or something?? Nope, no cold...

Weird flavor. Super-tangy right off the bat, then it morphs into this somewhat funky (as in Belgian funk) and off-malty. Finish is somewhat thin and lacking. No real hop character in here. All-in-all this is somewhat disappointing. Nothing really going on, and kind of flat all around. Painfully expensive at $8.99/bomber. I'd avoid this concoction altogether...

What I like most: um, I guess the faint sour cherry aroma.

What I like least: pretty much everything else.

Verdict: Very expensive and poor effort from a normally great producer. Avoid...

SolomonGrundy, Oct 31, 2010
Photo of RRC87
2.48/5  rDev -28.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

A: Pours a light clear amber with just a ting of rose color.

S: Dominated by booze. It smells sickeningly sweet like they took rum and added brown sugar to it.

T: Not much flavor. I do get some of the sweet rum flavor but also get a hint of cola. It tastes a little like club soda.

M: Thin and watery made worse by the fact that it is to carbonated.

D: It is super easy to drink as there isn't much to it. It doesn't have much flavor and it is very thin. I could drink a bunch of it, but I wouldn't choose to do so.

Overall: Not impressed. Proof that barrel aging doesn't necessarily equal good.

RRC87, Oct 27, 2010
Photo of Bouleboubier
3.03/5  rDev -12.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

This bares little resemblance to its derivative brew. This creation is strange and interesting. Just about no signs of carbonation, a decidedly auburn hue with a jewel-like glow. Cask-conditioned overall look. Simply a spiced rum aroma with some toasted nut (hazelnut, to be sure). No fruity or bitter elements to the smell. Much of the same for the flavor, only the toasted nut really busts out here with the rum barrel conditioning taking a back seat to it. The most delicate spiced cake malt quality in the finish. Somewhat boring feel due to the absence of discernible CO2. Definitely one of the oddest brown ales I've had. Unique. Can't liken it to a British brown/mild. Neat little novelty ale. Hesitate to give as low marks as I am, however I, for some silly reason, am trying to critique to style. Difficult to do here.

NOTE: The draft I had today was the first with a relatively aggressive injection of CO2. Not great - totally scrubbed away the subtleties in flavor and feel that makes this beer quite unique. This one actually poured with a head. Swirled the beer endlessly in the glass and waited it out until it warmed up decently. Only in the very end did I start to pick up flavor and aroma - as weak as it was. No, sir, I didn't like it. The bar agreed it was a mistake.

Bouleboubier, Oct 25, 2010
Photo of Pencible
3.58/5  rDev +3.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: This poured a nearly clear light mahogany with moderate tan head.
S: It smelled like faint coffee and roasted barley, with a little spiced rum and raisin and copper.
T: It tasted like dry earthy barley and roasted coffee, with some copper hops and spiced rum and applesauce. It had a somewhat dirty and mild bittersweet aftertaste.
M: It was fairly thick with some carbonation. Pretty nice body.
D: This was a great concept that ended up being kind of weak. Some people might view it as nice and delicate, rather than being bold or obscene. But I'm an American, so I prefer my beers extreme. So I was a little disappointed this didn't have a stronger rum or hazelnut presence. Plus the taste was a bit dirty, to me. On the plus side, the body was solid and it was easy to drink. But overall this was only a mediocre beer, despite all its potential for greatness.

Pencible, Oct 20, 2010
Photo of champ103
2.93/5  rDev -15.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

A: Pours a dark brown color. At first a two finger tightly packed head rises, but recedes in a second to nothing. No lace is left behind either.
S: The aroma is of spiced rum. Some sweet malt as well. Nothing else that I can pick up. Beyond that pretty neutral.
T: Sweet malt some nutty flavors, and spiced rum. Nothing much else.
M/D: A much lighter body than I was expecting. Thin, watery, and almost under carbonated. Not hard to drink, but nothing I care to finish.

This is not doing it for me. Not much going on here, and what is here does not mesh well. This is not the worst thing I have had, but nothing I am going to recommend.

champ103, Oct 18, 2010
Photo of chrisgn
3.33/5  rDev -3.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a bomber into a BN Army pint glass.

A- Hazy brown. Head reduces down to a thin white surface, very little lacing.

S- The spiced rum comes through heavily in the nose...not much else.

T- Woody and spicy...the barrel comes right through followed by a little malt sweetness. Perhaps if the base beer were better the spiced rum taste would be better supported.

M- pretty thin and watery.

D- The barrel flavor is the most predominant, but not over powering. It is drinkable because the flavors are not overpowering, but the taste is pretty blah.

chrisgn, Oct 18, 2010
Photo of BARFLYB
3.33/5  rDev -3.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

On-Tap at Hulmeville Inn in a pint glass

John John came to me looking like dead guy ale without any head. The liquid was brownish slight red with some light and no life up above, pretty still beer here. Scents include caramel and sweet candi with a dash of hazelnuts that barely register. Hops are not much of a scent opener here, pretty basic stuff. Taste is pretty simple considering this was "aged" on some type of wood, rum it says, but im not picking up anything of the like. This remains a brown ale with a touch of candi sweetness. Feel is less than medium with no activity on the mouth whatsoever, there is no party going on here. Drinkability suffered because I did not want to finish this. Glad I gambled on a tap version of this because If i wasted loot on a bomber I would of been pissed.

BARFLYB, Oct 15, 2010
Photo of peabody
3.68/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours out cloudy brown with very little head. Not a lot of lacing here.
Smell is light hazlenut and just a touch of the rum. I am getting a charred malt and a candy cherry like aroma.
Taste is a little watery but the flavors come pretty quickly. Some bitterness but mostly a rum spice of some sort.
Mouthfeel is watery because of the low abv but this is a clean brew with just a tad of stickyness.
Drinkablilty is pretty good with this offering from Rogue.

peabody, Oct 14, 2010
Photo of mynie
4.6/5  rDev +33.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

On tap at the Issaquah brewhouse.

Smells like superintense hazelnuts. The regular hazelnut brown only kinda tastes like hazelnuts. It's the same way a chocolate sout only kind tastes like chocolate--it's a type of barley, mostly, that has some chocolate complexities.

This beer, on the other hands, smells like Hazelnuts. Like those candies that come wrapped in gold foil.

It tastes like the same kind of candied, chocolatey nutty goodness, only it's backed up by a lightly vinous and heavily spicy complexity. It's a damp flavor, actually more like gin than like rum, and it finishes on an endearingly odd blend of nuts, brown barley, rosemary, and molasses. Gorgeous.

Why is it that I'm the only person who seems to enjoy these John John beers? Is it because their rarity and high price make reviewers expect higher ABV beers? I just don't know. I've never before found myself standing so firmly against the critical consensus.

mynie, Oct 12, 2010
Photo of GRG1313
2.1/5  rDev -39.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

This is a perfectly stored bottle from Hi Times and tasted shortly after being removed from its cooler.

Pours a beautiful dark clear copper red with a nice but thin and quickly fading light tan head.

Nose has a red wine fruit forward fruity nose that is pleasing and inviting albeit light and not very forthcoming; a hint of hazelnut because you're looking for it and no rum or wood character at all.

Mouthfeel is thin and much more "Rogue like" than the John John in Gin barrels. Mouthfeel is watery, diluted, light carbonation and not inviting or inspiring.

Flavors are faint, light, simple and boring. In fact, the flavors are so weak as to be almost non-descript. Tastes like weak lager. Light watery yeast and a hint of hop and malt. No hazelnut, no rum no wood in the flavors whatsoever.

A "dirty water" finish and little else. I opened a second bottle from another case. Same review.

GRG1313, Oct 10, 2010
Photo of andrenaline
3.9/5  rDev +13%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Enjoyed this one with my brother on Thanksgiving day. I've tried the regular Hazelnut Brown at a recent Rogue tasting, so was really looking forward to this one!

A - Pours a nice brown colour, slightest haze, thin finger of maple coloured head which dissipates after a few minutes and leaves no real lacing.

S - Scent is very nutty, but is supported by a nice bready caramel malt. Sweet maple scent also noticeable and a faint spiced rum on the finish.

T - Very tasty offering with the nutty caramel coming off the top, several spice notes also present with cinnamon and nutmeg also coming into play. Can definitely notice a bit of a spiced rum flavour on the finish and a spiced up bready malt lingers on the tongue.

M - Medium bodied, but could easily get away with a bit more of a thicker and chewy feel. It goes down smooth and is nice and wet on the tongue but is just a tad thin.

D - Overall a very tasty drink and definitely worth a try. I found that the regular offering had a greater nutty flavour and had less of the spice presence, but this one offers a bit of a twist on their classic hazelnut ale.

andrenaline, Oct 10, 2010
Photo of GabrielM
3.98/5  rDev +15.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Poured into a pint glass.

A - nice deep caramel color with 1/2inch white head on top.

S - hazelnut, maple, maybe a bit of the whiskey and some caramel and vanilla.

T - it's decent, but a little lacking. I was expecting some more body and more pronounced flavors of both the whiskey and hazelnut. Each are there, but pretty weak. Not as much depth as I would like.

M - good carbonation, nice mellowness.

D - this is a nice brew and definitely a sessionable brown ale. I could drink this all night.

GabrielM, Oct 09, 2010
Photo of cjgator3
3.6/5  rDev +4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

22oz bottle

A- Pours a dark brown color with an off-white head that quickly dissipates into a thing ring of lace around the glass leaving a decent amount of lacing.

S- The aroma is pretty good. A lot of malt with the some hazelnut notes coming through. I can also pick up a little bit on the barrel aging and some spices as well. The aroma Reminds me a little bit of a pumpkin ale.

T- The taste starts out nutty with a good dose of malt and caramel. The finish is pretty dry and slightly nutty. There is also a good amount of spices. The taste like the aroma reminds me a bit like a pumpkin beer.

M- The mouthfeel is between light and medium bodied with a good punt of carbonation.

D- Overall. John John Ale is another solid beer from Rogue that I'm glad I tried. Definitely worth a try. Recommended.

cjgator3, Oct 06, 2010
Photo of IronDjinn
3.55/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

From a 650 ml brown bottle, abv listed as 6.2%. Pours out a hazy mahogany hue, light cola hue when held to direct light, tight merrengue-like beige head with decent retention.

Clean toasty malt nose, some wood and earthy spice, reminds me of a pumpkin ale.

Sweet sugary character at first in the flavour, with toasty and nutty notes in the middle, earthy notes and dark dried fruits on the finish, then an almost creamy sweetness in the aftertaste. Dry nuttiness farther on into the aftertaste.

Full-bodied mouthfeel, thick and slick with moderate carbonation.

Points for the experiment, but I'd rather save my money and stick to the Hazelnut Brown Ale without all the interference. If it was higher in alcohol it'd make a good stingo.

IronDjinn, Oct 05, 2010
Photo of Gmann
3.98/5  rDev +15.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Pours a slightly hazy brown color with a smallish tan colored head that dissipated into a light ring. The aroma is sweet. It has a brown sugar sweetness with some vanilla notes. I don't pick up much, if any, hazelnut or the spiced aspect of the rum. However, it does have a very nice aroma. The taste is of chocolate malt, some toastiness, a nice subtle vanilla flavor from the rum barrels, some hazelnut but nothing overwhelming like hazelnut coffee. The taste is surprisingly light, kind of has a vanilla coke thing going on. I am giving the feel grade a lower score (3) not because I don't like it necessarily but I think it takes away from the flavor of the beer. The feel is light, not watery, and very carbonated. Too carbonated for the style in that it brings a seltzer water type of consistency to the beer, though it doesn't feel watery, weird. The carbonation just kind of burns the flavor away. I think this beer drinks very well, very crisp from the carbonation. The flavors are good but subtle. I like it, I would probably buy it again.

Gmann, Oct 04, 2010
Photo of mmva321
3.95/5  rDev +14.5%
look: 3 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a pint glass.

A: I'm no that impressed with the look. It's clear with no visible carbonation. It's pretty much brown, darker and with a slight reddish tint. About two fingers of brownish/off-white head that dissipates quickly and leaves no lacing.

S: As-advertised, which means it's awesome. A very earthy but also smooth and malty ale aroma provides the base that has highlights of hazelnut, rum and spices. Maybe a bit chocolaty as well.

T: A little more dull and flat than I would like. The taste, however, is solid and very well balanced, but it doesn't sing the way it should. The hazelnut is overpowering. It's a good flavor, but it drags the beer down. The Pacman yeast is the second strongest flavor, providing earthy tones and the malts round things out very well and make this a smooth drink. The hops, rum, spices and chocolate are only slightly noticeable and should be more present.

M: I've had a problem with the thinness of the John John ales, and while this one is still pretty thin, it's not an issue for me here. A bit more medium-bodied with slight carbonation.

D: The overpowering hazelnut doesn't ruin the flavor, but it does make the beer less pleasurable overall. So it's an average drink, good but not great and unfortunately less than the sum of its parts.

mmva321, Oct 02, 2010
Photo of oberon
3.83/5  rDev +11%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured into a standard pint glass a deep amber hued chesnut brown with a thinner quick to fade off white head.Caramel toffee and some light toastiness mainly in the nose,light vanilla shows thu lightly as well.A bit thin and on the prickly side at first in the feel department but it mellows after a bit.Flavors have more of the hazelnut presence I think than the aromas,lightly toasted hazlenuts and caramel toffee mainly,a decent earthy dryness in the finish to keep it from being overly sweet.Its a mellow tasting brown ale but it has some decent oaky/nutty flavors to it.

oberon, Oct 01, 2010
Photo of Stinkypuss
4/5  rDev +15.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Rogue John John Hazlenut

Appearance: Light brown in color with an off white head. Head recedes to a fine layer around the edges.

Smell: Nutty and malty. Pleasent enough and certainly makes me interested in taking another sip.

Taste: I expected a dominate hazlenut flavor and alot of sweetness, but what I got was so much better. A well balanced ale featuring a light nutty hazlenut flavor, caramel malts and some vanilla. The hazlenut is the most pronounced flavor, everything else is tame. Not overly sweet, well balanced, very flavorful and far from cloying. The only gripe I could possibly have is that there was not a whole lot of rum or oak barrel notes in the beer.

Mouthfeel: On the lighter side of medium bodied.

Drinkability: This is a very nice brown ale that paired well with a variety of breads and cheeses. At $7.00 a draft it is a bit steep.

Stinkypuss, Sep 29, 2010
Photo of JohnQVegas
3.3/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 2 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Bottle into Bruery tulip.

Pours with an almost cola like consistency; murky, almost muddy brown color with an oddly yellowish fizzy khaki head on top that's gone before you know it. Really sub par in the looks department.

Nose is pretty good, however - hazelnuts come through with a nutty, milk chocolatey presence, with the spicing from the rum coming through pleasantly much more than the rum itself. Really, surprisingly nice nose considering my initial impression from the appearance. Fairly straightforward, not too complex, but what's here is pretty nice.

Taste isn't bad, though it isn't great by any stretch either. The rum has a much greater presence here - tangy, spicy, with a bit of that tropical vibe to it, and the hazlenuts in a supporting role underneath. Unfortunately, that tanginess, while it could be great for a full bodied, full flavored beer that could stand up to it properly, just overwhelms this one. Any richness or fullness promised from the beautiful hazelnut presence in the nose is completely missing. Not a bad beer, but one that sadly does not live up to its very high potential.

Mouthfeel is thin in body, with a carbonation that's way too spritzy, sharp, and bubbly. No creaminess, no "presence" - like the appearance, disappointing.

Drinkability isn't bad, overall. This is a beer that's just all over the place, as evidenced by the fact that no two categories got the same score. Interesting experiment, but falls short of what it could be.

JohnQVegas, Sep 29, 2010
John John Hazelnut (Rum Barrel Aged) from Rogue Ales
79 out of 100 based on 228 ratings.