1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Porkslap Pale Ale - Butternuts Beer & Ale

Not Rated.
Porkslap Pale AlePorkslap Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
74
okay

714 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 714
Reviews: 321
rAvg: 3.19
pDev: 19.12%
Wants: 8
Gots: 30 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Butternuts Beer & Ale visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  4.30% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: John on 03-04-2006)
View: Beers (13) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 714 | Reviews: 321 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of 9InchNails
9InchNails

New Jersey

2.05/5  rDev -35.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Copper color with little bubbles in the body. White frothy head. Not much going on here.

Bread and malt is the main smell not much else.

Grass, grain, bread, subtle citrus, some I bitterness that tastes really weird.

Medium carbonation despite the lack of bubbles. Leaves a weird dry aftertaste.

The worse tasting beer by Butternuts by far. This has nothing going for it. Bland tastes leaving with a nasty aftertaste. Stay the hell away from this!

Serving type: can

05-23-2011 23:34:14 | More by 9InchNails
Photo of MoreThanWine
MoreThanWine

Massachusetts

3.48/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured a 2" head of irregular sized bubbles. Appearance is absolutely beautiful with a clear radiant amber. Smell is mildy of malt. Taste is a little malty but not massive malt as I expected from the "all malt" can label. Body is medium. All in all I love the name, love the can, love even the ecofriendly rings connecting the cans, and love the color. Tastewise those it's just slightly above average.

Serving type: can

05-19-2011 09:20:47 | More by MoreThanWine
Photo of Kinsman
Kinsman

California

2.85/5  rDev -10.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Hazy copper color with a surprisingly voluminous head and sticky lacing left behind.

Biscuity and caramel malt aromas. Faint floral hop character and not much else for aroma.

Taste is maltier upfront than an APA should be. Pale malts provide some sweetness and bread-like qualities. Surprisingly lacking a notable hop flavor and bitterness. Not that I expect a hop bomb but a pale ale should have at least some hop profile. What little there is in this one has a bit of a grassy and floral character.

Mouthfeel is light but smooth and refreshing. Overall, this beer is lacking... in flavor that is. Nothing bad (no off flavors) about it but overall it is rather bland compared to many other APA's.

Serving type: can

05-17-2011 21:33:23 | More by Kinsman
Photo of nastley3
nastley3

Massachusetts

2.58/5  rDev -19.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

A: Poured from a can into a pint glass. Poured somewhat cloudy, with a amber tint. Decent head retention but looks slightly foamy. Overall this beer looks fairly appealing.

S: The can says "all malt" and thats what I smell. It does not smell like a pale ale at all.

T: I find the taste of this beer to be very hard to describe. It is NOT hoppy, slightly buttery, malty but not smoked, and has an aftertaste that I do not like. Basically I give the taste a 2 because I am "not impressed."

M: This beer is slightly over carbonated, but besides from that has a smooth mouthfeel.

O: Overall this beer is simply not my style. For one thing I do not understand how/why it is called a pale ale... it is certainly much different than most APAs I have had. Although the ABV is low the beer is not very drinkable, (one would be plenty.) To put a positive spin on this beer would be to say that it is very unique and somewhat smooth. I will not buy this beer again.

Serving type: can

05-17-2011 20:53:17 | More by nastley3
Photo of surprenant1138
surprenant1138

Connecticut

3.45/5  rDev +8.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a dark hazy amber with 3/4 in creamy light tan head. Good thick lacing with good retention. Aroma is light: yeasty, slight citrusy hops, some grassiness, and a hint of pine. Taste is of yeast, caramel, some vanilla, and some citrusy lemon peel like hops. Mouthfeel is creamy. His is a reddening, reasonably tasty ale.

Serving type: can

05-11-2011 16:57:09 | More by surprenant1138
Photo of Chaney
Chaney

District of Columbia

3.05/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Much darker than I was expecting: Autumn harvest orange color, with a mildly off-white head that drew down from its 1 - 1.5 finger status within a few minutes.

S: Candy sugar won out over the citrus at first, but then the a tingle of orange and apricot regained its footing. Faint, yet present.

T: Doesn't really taste like much of anything. I got sugar water and fruit juice. No really malt backbone or hop profile to speak of. A bit disappointing.

M: The lacing was sticky and ridiculous, and the carbonation was fine, but I could have used a bit more citrus.

O: Not horrible, but not really memorable either. I know this is only an APA, but, please, somebody squeeze a grapefruit into this or something....

Serving type: can

05-07-2011 20:21:45 | More by Chaney
Photo of jgirotto
jgirotto

New York

3.73/5  rDev +16.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A = Nice copper color with minimal head. I prefer this to some more clear or yellows

S= Citrus overtones. But overall subtle.

T = standard Pale Ale. Not too bitter. Very drinkable and easy. This is not an impressive offering, but also not too challenging. Fits well into the pale ale category and is very easy to serve.

Heck, gotta be honest - I was drawn in by the can and the name. Rookie move, I know.

Serving type: can

05-01-2011 18:25:20 | More by jgirotto
Photo of Rifugium
Rifugium

Pennsylvania

3.4/5  rDev +6.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

First had: can at Good Dog Bar, Philly, PA

Poured from the can into a pint glass, slightly hazy copper-orange with a minimal white head. Aroma was sweet and malty, light and a bit floral. Taste was somewhat sweet, fruity, bready, with undertones of citrusy hops providing just a small amount of bitterness. Light-medium body, and pretty smooth, making for fairly easy drinkability.

Serving type: can

04-30-2011 15:51:15 | More by Rifugium
Photo of ngeunit1
ngeunit1

California

3.5/5  rDev +9.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Pours a bright slightly hazy orange-yellow color wit ha finger of frothy white head. The head fades fairly quickly down to a ring around the glass leaving behind a few spots of lace.

S - Aroma is a bit bland. There is a bit of sweet malt and some pine hop, but it is not too powerful.

T - Starts off with some bread flavor with some caramel sweetness in the background. Faint hops in the background. Through the middle some more biscuit flavors some out and just a touch more of hops. The finish is a mix of bread and a bit of grassy flavors that linger a tad.

M - Medium-light bodied with moderate lively carbonation. Feels a bit empty and dry. The finish is kind of bland and uninteresting.

D - Very drinkable, but also pretty uninteresting. Flavor feels a bit off and unbalanced and could have used something to make it a bit more interesting. Not bad by any means, but not very memorable.

Serving type: can

04-24-2011 03:02:01 | More by ngeunit1
Photo of lynchtae
lynchtae

Ontario (Canada)

1.85/5  rDev -42%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 1 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Two pigs on a can....that doesn't usually end well. I had a had a hard time getting over what I would call the "menthol" flavors/nose. I think it is some strange combination of different types of hops that amounts to some weird gross minty flavor. I wouldn't bother with this one unless you have some sort of swine fetish.

Serving type: can

04-17-2011 00:00:50 | More by lynchtae
Photo of kbutler1
kbutler1

Minnesota

2.5/5  rDev -21.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

Can! First off, lets talk about this 12oz can shall we? 2 heffers going for the chest/belly bump puts a smile on my face. Why? Not sure, but it sure is entertaining! Poured into a DFH tulip style glass a murky, deep orange brown color with a 2 finger head of light tan. The description says it is suppose to pour crystal clear but there is no way in hell this thing is even remotely close to that. Some lace forms on the glass as it settles. This beer has a rather sweet aroma to the nose of orange, apricot, and slight pineapple. Medium mouthfeel. Malty, sweet, faded orange flavors upfront with really no bitterness. Some caramel as well. There is no product date on the can so I can’t be certain how old it is but if it’s fresh it has a pretty weak hop profile. No hint of alcohol at all. Overall, I was left a little dissappointed in this one. The look and smell is ok but the flavor leaves a lot to be desired. Not something I’d go out of my way to try again.

Serving type: can

04-13-2011 23:03:23 | More by kbutler1
Photo of StoneTSR
StoneTSR

Colorado

2.53/5  rDev -20.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

APPEARANCE: Nice, bubbly, half-inch head. Crystal clear, brilliant copper in color. Very, very nice looking beer.

SMELL: Not much behind the nose, but floral aromas come through the most.

TASTE: The Porkslap tastes more like an IPA than a Pale Ale. The bitter, hoppy and grapefruit flavors are present, and they build throughout the sip, but never quite get there. The beer tastes a little watery.

MOUTHFEEL: Highly carbonated and very refreshing. This beer may not have the greatest flavor ever, but it will quench your thirst for sure.

OVERALL: I could see this as a reasonable choice on a hot afternoon in the middle of August, but late in the evening on a chilly March night in Chicago, it just isn't interesting enough for me to want to finish the whole glass. At the same time it isn't so horrible that it should be drain poured.

Serving type: can

04-12-2011 08:12:01 | More by StoneTSR
Photo of Knapp85
Knapp85

Pennsylvania

2.53/5  rDev -20.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Had to buy it just because of the name. This beer really isn't much or anything spectacular It pours out as a muddy looking orange color and some decent head. The smell is very much all malt like the can states. The flavor also confirms that. There isn't much of a dynamic to this beer... it's malt with malt and malt. Really one dimensional and not exciting to me at all. Just wasn't a fan.

Serving type: can

04-08-2011 00:09:38 | More by Knapp85
Photo of Tucquan
Tucquan

Pennsylvania

3.3/5  rDev +3.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Had this on 2011-04-04 in Columbia, PA

A - Hazy orange-amber with 1.5-finger white head. Lots of little bubbles. Mild lacing.

S - Very mild bread and a hint of fruit. Not much here.

T - Sour dough bread, grass, mild spice and good bitterness for a low ABV brew. Dries quickly and leaves a "sweet tart" and bitter finish.

M - Light-medium body and carbonation. Not watery.

O - Would be easy to session. It has some flavor to it and enough bitterness for me for this style. Not a remarkable brew but worth trying.

Serving type: can

04-04-2011 22:38:12 | More by Tucquan
Photo of chodinheaven
chodinheaven

Maryland

3.43/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Looks fine, a hazy orange or amber color with a foamy white head that leaves plenty of lacing. Smells faintly of malty oranges and apricots.

Apricots are very prevelant in the taste and pretty much dominate the whole experience with a faint hoppy taste left on the palate afterwards. Nothing out of this world, but simple and easy to drink. Carbonation is okay but may benefit from a tad bit more. Alcohol is really low, but that doesn't hurt the overall experience. Just a simple, easy to drink beer that's on the fruity spectrum.

Serving type: can

04-03-2011 03:21:33 | More by chodinheaven
Photo of mntlover
mntlover

Tennessee

3.18/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a lightly hazy burnt orange color with thumb sized head from aggressive pour. Head falls fast not much lace to speak of.

Aroma is kind of butter caramel malts with grassy hops.

Taste is like aroma semi sweet malts light hints of butter but not to bad. Finish is light on hops mostly lemon grass like. Kind of a bland average pale ale. Make a great intro beer nothing really offensive just kind of bland more or less.

Mouthfeel is approaching medium with average carbonation.

Drinkability is well easy drinking but not much reason to ever want to have another.

Serving type: can

03-31-2011 22:06:16 | More by mntlover
Photo of nickthetick
nickthetick

Maryland

3.53/5  rDev +10.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: pours an amber red with some ruby tinges into my duvel tulip with all most no head at all, even with an aggressive pour.

S: soft notes of sweet malts, a little dark citrus.

T: darker malts present a toasted biscuit quality with a sweet edge. Blood orange and a little grapefruit.

MF: good full flavor and medium body. Not a lot of carbonation.

O: good beer at best but I would skip over this if it wasn't in the mixed 12.

Serving type: can

03-24-2011 00:47:42 | More by nickthetick
Photo of gabedivision
gabedivision

New York

2.93/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured from the two pig can to a pint glass.

A- Dark murky orange with a huge white head.

S- Rich malts, sweet caramel.

T- Heavy malt blast with a sugary caramel balance and a sweet finish.

M- Light bodied, crisp, easy to drink.

O- Well, since im reviewing a "pale ale" i have to judge it as so...It's not a terrible beer overall but it is a terrible example of a pale ale imo. To each their own i suppose.

Serving type: can

03-21-2011 16:48:50 | More by gabedivision
Photo of Josephkeene
Josephkeene

Maryland

2.93/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a smoky orange with light white lacing.

The smell is of ginger and light hops.

Taste however is amazingly ginger with hints of pumpkin and light hoped. The finish Is clean a little malty with a little hop tatse.

okay beer good for canned and a year round pale ale.

Serving type: can

03-18-2011 02:52:15 | More by Josephkeene
Photo of alleykatking
alleykatking

Indiana

1.73/5  rDev -45.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Poured from 12oz can...

A- Pours a pumpkin orange color with hints of brown toward it. One finger off white head shows poor retention. Some light spotty lacing on the sides of the glass.

S- This is a interesting aroma..as in intersting because it is nothing that I figured it wouls be. The aroma opens up with caramel malts which seems to overcome most of the rest of the nose. Hints of bready notes and butterscotch throughout the whole nose. Very faded or just light grassy hops in the ending. This reminds me of Mishawaka Brewing Company's Four Horseman Ale almost perfect (although its been a while since I have had it).

T- Bready caramel malts start this one off. This makes not only the underbody but almost the entire flavor profile for 90% of the beer. Some light butterscotch notes linger here and there. Ending has some light (or just faded) piney flavor. There is something off about this beer besides the balance. I can't put my finger on it though.

M- Medium mouthfeel. Carbonation is low for the style. Caramel malts are left all over the palate coating it in a sweetness. Aftertaste is mostly caramel malts, hints of light alcohol, and faded piney hops. This beer is out of balance with which the caramel malts dominate the beer altogether. There is a strange off flavor to this beer that I can't quite put my finger on...almost a homebrew like off flavor but I don't know for sure. Light alcohol drying on the palate.

O- I thought this beer was a horrible tasting beer. This is the first time I have had a super malty pale ale that was as I have read seems to be what they are going for. Light ABV means you could drink this one all night long but I don't know why you would. A horrible offering in my opinion. Glad I did get to try this one though.

Serving type: can

03-17-2011 04:27:02 | More by alleykatking
Photo of webbcreative
webbcreative

Oklahoma

4.08/5  rDev +27.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

Thanks to Rhettroactive for the awesome can!

Pours a dark honey color with a white 1.5 finger head. minimal lace that is quickly fleeting.

S= getting a lot of the ginger aromas. Not picking up much hops, as in I would never guess this to be a pale ale blindly.

Taste = again getting more sweet malt, with the ginger quickly there, but its not overdone for my tastes, I actually quite enjoy this unexpected twist. Not hoppy at all. Picking up some fruit flavors as well but I honestly cannot discern what they are, but I get some citrus.

Mouthfeel= medium, pretty much typical for a pale ale.

Overall, this is a really good beer, not that I would have pegged it for a pale ale, but styles be damned - this is a great session beer that I wish I had more access too.

Serving type: can

02-24-2011 03:27:04 | More by webbcreative
Photo of drinkiusmaximus
drinkiusmaximus

New York

2.55/5  rDev -20.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

Pours a murky hazy dark honey color with a fingers width head that settles quickly and leaves slight lacing on the glass. smells of malts i guess there is a reason. It says All Malt right on the front of the can and they are not joking..Taste is malt heavy almost like drinking a slice of hearty multi grain bread. mouthfeel is decent medium bodied and goes down smooth. drinkability is somewhat low for me as I am not a lover of a malt monster and thats what this is. good to have this in my have tried list and added to my steer clear list as well..

Prost!!!

Serving type: can

02-21-2011 00:43:18 | More by drinkiusmaximus
Photo of backfat
backfat

Indiana

3.13/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

this could very well be the coolest can of beer I have ever seen. poured into SA perfect pint glass. Phish "heavy things" guides me through this review.

Pours a pale brown. clear and looking like we are going to have a malty pale ale here. light tan head.

smells nice. beautiful malted barley, caramel, and some dark fruity esters. no trace of hops. smells like an american brown.

taste is very plain. watery with some toffee and cereal and just a hint of bitter.

mouthfeel is thin and very watery

cool can. smells good and that's about it.

Serving type: can

02-14-2011 02:08:13 | More by backfat
Photo of chicagobeerriot
chicagobeerriot

Illinois

1.95/5  rDev -38.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Pours veiled copper with a rapidly dissipating off-white head.

The smell is surprisingly caramel-forward. There's a little bit of pineapple in there, but otherwise there is very little hop presence on the nose.

The taste is also primarily about the malt. Sweet toffee and caramel take the lead. When a bit of pine and hop bitterness come in it's completely out of synch, creating an almost cough-syrup flavor that becomes the proverbial elephant in the room. The finish is a one-note bitter mess that simply does not fit the style. Overall, this is a profound disappointment.

Serving type: can

02-01-2011 01:12:09 | More by chicagobeerriot
Photo of DefenCorps
DefenCorps

Oregon

2.17/5  rDev -32%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

$1.49 single at the Village Pump. Why does the can say it's a Farmhouse Ale when it isn't a saison?

A mostly clear light amber with a dense, off-white head that recedes to a disk leaving no lace. The nose is a little disappointing. I get some cereal, cooked grains, nearly rotting oranges and a rather surprising crystallized ginger. There's also a little spice character, almost mace-like. Unusual, to say the least.

The palate opens with the ginger being very noticeable. Unfortunately, there's not much behind it. There's a blend of honey and malt sweetness, with no real hop character. Mild fruitiness is present, but apart from that, there's nothing. Rather disjointed, the flavors don't come together at all. Light in body, mildly watery, this is quite highly carbonated. Not enjoyable, this is like a watery braggot.

Serving type: can

01-29-2011 23:34:30 | More by DefenCorps
Porkslap Pale Ale from Butternuts Beer & Ale
74 out of 100 based on 714 ratings.