1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Tjekket Pilsner - Mikkeller ApS

Not Rated.
Tjekket PilsnerTjekket Pilsner

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

62 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 62
Reviews: 42
rAvg: 3.47
pDev: 15.85%
Wants: 2
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Mikkeller ApS visit their website
Denmark

Style | ABV
Czech Pilsener |  4.60% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Brewed at De Proef Brouwerij, Lochristi-Hijfte, Belgium.

Ingredients: Water, malts (pilsner, munich and cara-pils), hops (saaz) and lager yeast.

(Beer added by: ClockworkOrange on 02-12-2009)
View: Beers (277) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 62 | Reviews: 42 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of nickd717
nickd717

California

1.93/5  rDev -44.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 1.5

Bottle from K&L in Redwood City, labeled as "Czech-style pilsner" but I've heard this is called "Tjekket pilsner" abroad.

A - Pours a nice bright golden color with a substantial white head.

S - Aroma is sweet malt, floral hops, and a little band-aidy smokiness, which is pretty strange.

T - Flavor is sweet malt, floral/grassy hops, butter, and...uh oh...loads of band-aid/smoke on the finish. Not good. At first I thought, "Ok, I can drink this!" but before too long, I had to make this one a rare drain pour.

M - Nice, light and crisp.

D - Well, it was a drain pour, so not good.

This would be good without the band-aids! Maybe it just doesn't travel well. I'd like to try this again in case that was a bad bottle, but just wish these beers weren't so damn expensive.

Serving type: bottle

09-10-2009 00:36:54 | More by nickd717
Photo of Knapp85
Knapp85

Pennsylvania

2.17/5  rDev -37.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

So this has got to be my least favorite Mikkeller brew I've had thus far. I opened the bottle and poured it out. Everything looked great. Then I took a whiff of it and had to do another to make sure. To me this beer smelled exactly like a Medicine Cabinet. The flavor of the beer was like drinking liquified band-aids. I was severely disappointed in this beer. I love Mikkeller and everything they do. Except for this one. This was a waste of a few bucks in my opinion.

Serving type: bottle

04-01-2011 04:10:56 | More by Knapp85
Photo of Travlr
Travlr

District of Columbia

2.2/5  rDev -36.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Maybe my expectations were too high after tasting the real stuff in Prague and Lazhne Bodanic. This one was cloudy straw colored with a large white head that formed a plateau - so far, so good. Not much lacing. Almost no aroma. Tasted of wet plaster, neither malt nor hops dominated, it just fell flat. Disappointing.

Serving type: bottle

10-31-2009 14:53:44 | More by Travlr
Photo of BurpingtonDC
BurpingtonDC

Maryland

2.25/5  rDev -35.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Sheesh! Ok This was poured into a pint glass...

A - Cloudy, murky, non-specific coloration; like a glass of beer comprised of a thousand different pilsner dregs poured into one glass at the end of a rough evening.

S - Slight hoppy scent from the Saaz, but not much of anything else.

T - Dishwater

M - moderate carbonation and a typical light pilsner body.

O - I was really disappointed by this Pilsner. Quite possibly one of the worst I've ever had. Totally unfulfilling. Sorry.

Serving type: bottle

10-20-2011 20:13:31 | More by BurpingtonDC
Photo of RoninTK3
RoninTK3

New Hampshire

2.65/5  rDev -23.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A - Hazy orange/gold with a lot of sediment floating around. Nice looking pils, but apparently you really can't judge a book by its cover.

S - Citrus fruits, a bit hoppy and bready. Floral notes.

T - The citrusy notes come through but so does an unpleasant grassy flavor. Even worse, this one has a smoky/rubber aftertaste that is extremely unpleasant. The band-aid flavor people keep mentioning is not a joke. Very disappointed.

M - Light body with average carbonation. Typical pilsner.

This was my second Mikkeller beer and a huge disappointment after the first. As someone that really appreciates a good pilsner, this one just doesn't fall in that category. It has no problem pleasing any of the other senses, but if it doesn't taste right it isn't worth drinking...

Serving type: bottle

01-31-2013 20:17:56 | More by RoninTK3
Photo of kojevergas
kojevergas

Texas

2.78/5  rDev -19.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

33cl brown glass bottle with standard pressure cap served into a pint glass in high altitude Denver, Colorado. Reviewed live. Mikkeller is me favourite brewery in the world.

A: Five finger head of nice soft cream lacing, good thickness, and great retention. Colour is a nontransparent cloudy yellow.

Sm: Light cream, and... that's all me broken nose can pick up. All apologies, lads.

T: Flat cream, bland hops, a weak barley foundation, and not much else. A simple disappointment from Mikkeller. Decently built and balanced, but not up to Mikkeller standards.

Mf: Smooth and wet. A bit too much so on each count. Sort of complements the flavour, but not really.

Dr: Easily drinkable, priced extremely high, and only of limited quality. I'll never have it again, methinks.

Serving type: bottle

08-13-2011 08:21:53 | More by kojevergas
Photo of bark
bark

Sweden

2.83/5  rDev -18.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

The colour is pale gold; the liquid is a bit cloudy. The high white head leaves massive amounts of lacing.

The smell is buttery with hints of yeast and dry minerals. Hints of rubber.

The taste is a bit yeasty with some diacetyl. The bitterness is unexpectedly light. Some dry ester-y fruity notes. The short aftertaste got a strange off taste of phenols (paint).

The carbonation is medium to strong. The liquid is smooth.

A bit too unclean for me. Not a very good interpretation of a Czech Pilsner.

Serving type: bottle

04-07-2010 19:36:11 | More by bark
Photo of plfahey
plfahey

Illinois

2.85/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

11.2 oz. bottle poured into a tulip glass

Appearance-Medium to deep gold in color. Somewhat hazy, especially for a pilsner. Moderate frothy white head with medium size bubbles and decent retention.

Aroma-Zesty, spicy Saaz hops are up front in the nose, with some light grainy malt undertones.

Flavor- Initial flavor is clean, zesty saaz hops backed up by a malt character much larger then the aroma would suggest, with almost a bit of toast character. However, these flavors are quickly overpowered by phenolic characters, particularly smoky phenolics, and a hint of plasticy phenolics.

Mouthfeel-Medium body, high carbonation, not a bad start, but the phenolic characters in the finish leave the mouth feeling chalky dry.

Not a terrible beer, but the phenolic characters are out of place and overpower what could have otherwise been a very nice Czech pilsner.

Serving type: bottle

12-04-2010 04:39:43 | More by plfahey
Photo of Monkeyknife
Monkeyknife

Missouri

2.88/5  rDev -17%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from the bottle a cloudy pale yellow with a rich and creamy white head.

Aroma of lemon zest, spicy hops, grain, and new leather.

The taste is quite salt and pepper bitterness along with that same new leather/burnt plastic note from the aroma. Not exactly what I was hoping for with this Czech Pilsner.

Lighter bodied, dry, and sharply carbonated.

A rare miss by Mikkeller and not a beer I would have again.

Serving type: bottle

10-11-2009 17:02:49 | More by Monkeyknife
Photo of Kmlund
Kmlund

Massachusetts

3/5  rDev -13.5%

10-03-2013 16:53:13 | More by Kmlund
Photo of Davepoolesque
Davepoolesque

Massachusetts

3/5  rDev -13.5%

02-16-2013 22:12:35 | More by Davepoolesque
Photo of Exiled
Exiled

Texas

3/5  rDev -13.5%

11-24-2011 19:12:31 | More by Exiled
Photo of notpmekts
notpmekts

Rhode Island

3/5  rDev -13.5%

12-19-2011 04:59:25 | More by notpmekts
Photo of drpimento
drpimento

Wisconsin

3/5  rDev -13.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Hm. Poured with a smallish white head and a little lace. Color is a hazy/cloudy amber. Aroma is malt beery grain grass yeast minerals. Flavor is like aroma but with one flavor that I can't place really standing out - not really a beer flavor, something odd.... Body and carbonation are ok. Finish is like flavor and medium in length. Proly wouldn't get again, except to see if that odd flavor is still there and to figure out what it is.

Serving type: bottle

05-16-2010 19:41:20 | More by drpimento
Photo of djrn2
djrn2

New Jersey

3/5  rDev -13.5%

02-24-2013 04:16:03 | More by djrn2
Photo of IronDjinn
IronDjinn

Alberta (Canada)

3.03/5  rDev -12.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Thanks to Jim at Sherbrooke for the sample. From a 330 ml brown bottle. Obvious sediment swirling around in the bottle the moment it is picked up to pour. Pours out a cloudy straw hue, with a tall loose-bubbled frothy white head which settles to a chunky cap. Looks a lot more like a Wit or Hefe.

Soft grains with musty, dry, leafy hops on the nose, a hint of tangerine peel. Some grassy notes.

Biscuity grains up front in the flavour, dry mild leafy and herbal hops mid-range to the finish, with a fairly clean aftertaste.

Medium-bodied mouthfeel, somewhat slippery texture with a brisk level of carbonation that helps boost a fuller sensation.

I'm under the historical assumption that the whole point of producing the original Pilsener was to make a clear, transparent lager. Well, I suppose this is going more along the lines of the flavour profile, which it touches on the key points for the most part, however doesn't really stand out from amongst the plethora of other examples of the style. Well, it stands out for being cloudy.... This one goes on the tall "take it or leave it" pile of Mikkeller's offerings, I don't feel I'll be missing out if I never have another one.

Serving type: bottle

02-29-2012 06:27:50 | More by IronDjinn
Photo of Mora2000
Mora2000

Texas

3.05/5  rDev -12.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Thanks to my brother for sending this bottle my way.

The beer pours a golden-orange color with a white head. The aroma is pilsener malt with some grassy and earthy hops. The flavor is more of the pilsener malt with some dirt mixed in. There is something a little off-putting about the flavor, I just can't figure out exactly what it is. Medium mouthfeel and medium carbonation. Glad I got to try it, but not one of my favorite Mikkeller beers.

Serving type: bottle

08-01-2010 23:42:10 | More by Mora2000
Photo of inthebeeraisle
inthebeeraisle

Oregon

3.2/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured into a pilsner style glass. Happy to try a new Mikkeller beer. Certainly the first Mikkeller lager I've had.

A: Definately more cloudy then I'd except. A straw color. Lots of head, not so much bubbles.

S: The smell was a bit strong on the alcohol for such a tame beer. A slight hop aroma is present to.

T: Pretty tasty. Different. Alomst has hints of lemongrass to go with a distinctive pilsner hop flavor.

M: A rich mouthfeel that keeps your palate coated.

O: My least favorite Mikkeller beer so far.

Serving type: bottle

05-04-2011 02:12:07 | More by inthebeeraisle
Photo of cvfish
cvfish

Louisiana

3.23/5  rDev -6.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

A - This beer poured a pale yellow color that produced a wispy white head that had little retention and left no lace on the side of the glass

S - The aromas produced by this beer were crisp grains, pepper, and earthy hops

T - The taste of this beer had the grainy beginning, moved to a light citrus and peppery middle, and finished with a bit of hoppy bitterness

M - The mouthfeel of this beer had a light to medium body with a moderate amount of carbonation

D - The drinkability of this beer could be high, it's very refreshing and is exactly the kind of Pilsener I could drink, but the price tag on this beer is ridiculously high: lesson learned, only go for Mikkeller's extreme beers

Serving type: bottle

09-29-2009 19:19:41 | More by cvfish
Photo of lsummers
lsummers

California

3.26/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Initially I thought this pilsner was going to be great. Poured a fantastic hazy gold and smelled of slight lemons, grassy notes and clove. Definitely subtle though.

Taste wasn't as good. Tasted mostly of cereal with a touch of grassy hops and some peppery clove flavors.

Mouthfeel was sharp and fizzy. Felt very carbonated but didn't quite have the head to match.

Overall a great pils to try and compare if you like the style but otherwise I might not pick this one up again.

Serving type: bottle

02-07-2013 06:24:55 | More by lsummers
Photo of Trilogy31
Trilogy31

California

3.4/5  rDev -2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a tulip, color is a dark hazy gold. Nice head that slowly dissipates and leaves a ton of lacing. Very straight forward on the nose and taste. Easy going notes of bread and slightly salty biscuits, followed by a light hoppiness and a bit of smoke at the end. Does seem to off a bit of an off metallic taste to it as well. Nice smooth finish and mouthfeel. Nice for the style and a step up from a typical session pils yet the $4.99 a bottle will not have me revisiting it.

Serving type: bottle

03-21-2011 02:56:34 | More by Trilogy31
Photo of PerHops
PerHops

California

3.43/5  rDev -1.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

This one pours a very hazy, very pale golden color. Very active on the pour and leaves a soapy head that looks thin at first, but eventually develops more body. The smell is more complex than most pilsners I've tried. Some citrus and a little pine. Taste follows the nose, but finishes bisquity with a mellow if lingering bitterness. Not what I would expect out of a pils, but it makes sense that Mikkeller would make a pilsner like this. Not unbelievable, but good and outside the box. I would try again.

Serving type: bottle

01-21-2012 02:41:44 | More by PerHops
Photo of Richardberg
Richardberg

New York

3.45/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A - poured into a tulip. Light yellow-orange. Not much head, but leaves great lacing for a light beer.

S - classic bready pils smell, just enough hops to keep things interesting

T - crisp, straightforward pils. Not much else to say.

M - light body, plenty of carbonated zing.

D - very drinkable, enjoyable, well made lager, if unexceptional.

Serving type: bottle

01-13-2011 03:00:50 | More by Richardberg
Photo of Liquoric3
Liquoric3

Germany

3.5/5  rDev +0.9%

08-07-2013 23:35:00 | More by Liquoric3
Photo of rbrefbeerman
rbrefbeerman

California

3.5/5  rDev +0.9%

01-04-2012 16:38:59 | More by rbrefbeerman
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Tjekket Pilsner from Mikkeller ApS
80 out of 100 based on 62 ratings.