Tjekket Pilsner - Mikkeller ApS

Not Rated.
Tjekket PilsnerTjekket Pilsner

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

62 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 62
Reviews: 42
rAvg: 3.47
pDev: 15.85%
Wants: 2
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Mikkeller ApS visit their website
Denmark

Style | ABV
Czech Pilsener |  4.60% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Brewed at De Proef Brouwerij, Lochristi-Hijfte, Belgium.

Ingredients: Water, malts (pilsner, munich and cara-pils), hops (saaz) and lager yeast.

(Beer added by: ClockworkOrange on 02-12-2009)
View: Beers (248) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 62 | Reviews: 42 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of notpmekts
3/5  rDev -13.5%

Photo of bluesplit63
5/5  rDev +44.1%

Photo of Exiled
3/5  rDev -13.5%

Photo of UncleJimbo
4/5  rDev +15.3%

Photo of BurpingtonDC
2.25/5  rDev -35.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Sheesh! Ok This was poured into a pint glass...

A - Cloudy, murky, non-specific coloration; like a glass of beer comprised of a thousand different pilsner dregs poured into one glass at the end of a rough evening.

S - Slight hoppy scent from the Saaz, but not much of anything else.

T - Dishwater

M - moderate carbonation and a typical light pilsner body.

O - I was really disappointed by this Pilsner. Quite possibly one of the worst I've ever had. Totally unfulfilling. Sorry.

Photo of metter98
3.53/5  rDev +1.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: The beer is yellow in color and has a slight amount of haze and a moderate amount of visible carbonation. It poured with a finger high bright white head that quickly died down but consistently left a thin layer of bubbles covering the surface.
S: There are light aromas of floral hops in the nose along with notes of bready and grainy malts.
T: The taste has flavors of bready and grainy malts along with some hints of peppery spices; these are accompanied by a moderate amount of bitterness from start to finish.
M: It feels light- to medium-bodied and clean on the palate with a moderate amount of carbonation. The finish leaves a bit of dryness in your mouth.
O: The beer is easy to drink but seems lack enough of a malty presence compared to other beers in the style.

Photo of kojevergas
2.78/5  rDev -19.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

33cl brown glass bottle with standard pressure cap served into a pint glass in high altitude Denver, Colorado. Reviewed live. Mikkeller is me favourite brewery in the world.

A: Five finger head of nice soft cream lacing, good thickness, and great retention. Colour is a nontransparent cloudy yellow.

Sm: Light cream, and... that's all me broken nose can pick up. All apologies, lads.

T: Flat cream, bland hops, a weak barley foundation, and not much else. A simple disappointment from Mikkeller. Decently built and balanced, but not up to Mikkeller standards.

Mf: Smooth and wet. A bit too much so on each count. Sort of complements the flavour, but not really.

Dr: Easily drinkable, priced extremely high, and only of limited quality. I'll never have it again, methinks.

Photo of WesWes
3.53/5  rDev +1.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

The beer pours a pale straw color with a thick frothy white head that slowly fades to lacing. The aroma is decent. It has a light, pilsner malt scent along with a standard Czech hop aroma. The taste is decent as well. Again, it has a pilsner malt and Czech hop character. It goes down easy with a mild bitterness and a clean finish. The mouthfeel is fine. It is a low bodied beer with adequate carbonation. This is a very drinkable beer. It lacks a true pilsner mouthfeel. It's hoppy, but nothing too great. I enjoyed this beer, but there are plenty of better examples out there.

Photo of inthebeeraisle
3.2/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured into a pilsner style glass. Happy to try a new Mikkeller beer. Certainly the first Mikkeller lager I've had.

A: Definately more cloudy then I'd except. A straw color. Lots of head, not so much bubbles.

S: The smell was a bit strong on the alcohol for such a tame beer. A slight hop aroma is present to.

T: Pretty tasty. Different. Alomst has hints of lemongrass to go with a distinctive pilsner hop flavor.

M: A rich mouthfeel that keeps your palate coated.

O: My least favorite Mikkeller beer so far.

Photo of Knapp85
2.17/5  rDev -37.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

So this has got to be my least favorite Mikkeller brew I've had thus far. I opened the bottle and poured it out. Everything looked great. Then I took a whiff of it and had to do another to make sure. To me this beer smelled exactly like a Medicine Cabinet. The flavor of the beer was like drinking liquified band-aids. I was severely disappointed in this beer. I love Mikkeller and everything they do. Except for this one. This was a waste of a few bucks in my opinion.

Photo of Trilogy31
3.4/5  rDev -2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a tulip, color is a dark hazy gold. Nice head that slowly dissipates and leaves a ton of lacing. Very straight forward on the nose and taste. Easy going notes of bread and slightly salty biscuits, followed by a light hoppiness and a bit of smoke at the end. Does seem to off a bit of an off metallic taste to it as well. Nice smooth finish and mouthfeel. Nice for the style and a step up from a typical session pils yet the $4.99 a bottle will not have me revisiting it.

Photo of Richardberg
3.45/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A - poured into a tulip. Light yellow-orange. Not much head, but leaves great lacing for a light beer.

S - classic bready pils smell, just enough hops to keep things interesting

T - crisp, straightforward pils. Not much else to say.

M - light body, plenty of carbonated zing.

D - very drinkable, enjoyable, well made lager, if unexceptional.

Photo of John_M
4/5  rDev +15.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

On tap at Max's today. Thought I needed to try the tap version to compare.

The beer pours a light gold color with good head retention and pretty decent lacing. The nose is pretty attractive, showcasing the expected bread dough, honey and pepper. While the beer smells pretty good, it's much better on the palate. There is honey and orange citrus superimposed on a very hoppy flavor profile. Consequently, the finish is impressively bitter and dry. Mouthfeel is light to medium bodied, and so is exactly what I would expect from a well made Czech pilsner. Drinkability is excellent, with the alcohol no more than an after thought.

While this is a well made pilsner, it's not so exceptional that I'd want to pay the price of ordering it again.

Photo of plfahey
2.85/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

11.2 oz. bottle poured into a tulip glass

Appearance-Medium to deep gold in color. Somewhat hazy, especially for a pilsner. Moderate frothy white head with medium size bubbles and decent retention.

Aroma-Zesty, spicy Saaz hops are up front in the nose, with some light grainy malt undertones.

Flavor- Initial flavor is clean, zesty saaz hops backed up by a malt character much larger then the aroma would suggest, with almost a bit of toast character. However, these flavors are quickly overpowered by phenolic characters, particularly smoky phenolics, and a hint of plasticy phenolics.

Mouthfeel-Medium body, high carbonation, not a bad start, but the phenolic characters in the finish leave the mouth feeling chalky dry.

Not a terrible beer, but the phenolic characters are out of place and overpower what could have otherwise been a very nice Czech pilsner.

Photo of mynie
3.68/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

On tap at Crane Alley in Urbana, Illinois.

This is the first craft pilsener I've had that wasn't brewed in the US, I 't think. Since, like, Sam Smith and Weinstephan have to count as big brands, right?

So... hmm... it's pretty good.

Pours a tiny bit cloudy and dull, not the kind of vibrant sparkling sunshine I look for in a good (or expensive) pils. No head, really, and this is the kind of place that knows enough to put a head on a beer.

Smells like very, very dry Czech hops. Straight, strong Saaz, and there's a tiny bit of lemony malt complexity in there, too. But mostly it's very Saaz-y.

The intense dryness of the hops is a little less pleasant in the taste than it is in the aroma. That's not to say that it's unpleasant, because it's not, but it's also not great. The hops blot out almost everything only at the very end there's a little bit of light, crisp citrusiness.

Photo of megahurts4
3.95/5  rDev +13.8%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Mikkeller Czech-style Pilsner (Tjekket Pilsner)

Appearance: Straw yellow, huge pillowing head, and some lacing.

Smell: Grains, malts, and subtle hops.

Taste: Grains, malts, and some hops.

Mouthfeel: Medium-light, smooth, and rich.

Overall:
This is a great pilsner. One of the best pilsners I've had. The flavors are very well balanced and finishes with a subtle bitterness.

Photo of Bendurgin
4.18/5  rDev +20.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Popped this one open and we've got a gusher. I quickly poured it into my pint glass with a bit pouring over the side. The pour is a hazy straw color with a gigantic fluffy white head on top. Great head retention and sticky lacing. I smell some fruitiness in this, like sweet strawberries. Pilsner malts and grains make this a rockin' beer to put your nose into! Good flavor on this and not very complex. Pilsner malts and hop bittering to finish. Nice light body and the abv is tough to beat for drinkability. Really into this one, I want more.

Photo of Mora2000
3.05/5  rDev -12.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Thanks to my brother for sending this bottle my way.

The beer pours a golden-orange color with a white head. The aroma is pilsener malt with some grassy and earthy hops. The flavor is more of the pilsener malt with some dirt mixed in. There is something a little off-putting about the flavor, I just can't figure out exactly what it is. Medium mouthfeel and medium carbonation. Glad I got to try it, but not one of my favorite Mikkeller beers.

Photo of ShogoKawada
3.88/5  rDev +11.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3

11.2oz, into pint glass, listed as 4.6% ABV, not 4.8%. Supposedly this is the house beer for Sushi Restaurant Bento, Helgolandsgade 16, kld., Vesterbro, Denmark.

A- Pale yellow, 4-finger sticky head, really not what I was expecting but not unwelcome. Head like a DIPA, craters, peaks and valleys. Whoa.

S- Almost smells like a wit. Hmm. Lots of bready malt, a wisp of fruit.

T- Mild bittering hops, great pale malt. Not too complex, but what's there is great. Sometimes simple is better. Great clean malt presentation. Def. has some flavor notes that remind me of Draft Bear, but much tamer.

M- High carbonation, light body, almost fizzy, goes down well.

D- High, but the price will get ya. $4 a bottle for a pilsener? I like it, I won't be buying this frequently though.

Mikkeller, start contract brewing in the US for some of these beers! We want 6-packs!

Note: other reviewers mention band-aids and smoke. Neither in this bottle. Strange.

Photo of speter
4.03/5  rDev +16.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

A: Pours a cloudy dark gold with a huge, persistent, rock-hard head. Leaves impressive lacing.

S: This has a bit more in the nose than your typical pilsener. There's a fair bit of grass with a lemony note from the hops.

T: This is one bitter pilsener! The bite hits right up front, and in the center and finish, I'm almost detecting a smoky quality. The finish is bitter, and that lingers through the aftertaste. While I like it quite a bit, the flavor is more towards the German pils range in terms of hoppiness. It also seems as if this fermented somewhat warm, as there are definite esters and even some buttery diacetyl.

M: I would never believe this is 4.6% (or so says the label). This is rather full-bodied and very strong in the carbonation department.

D: Very drinkable. This review is somewhat of a difficult one, but to the notion of style. Strictly speaking, this isn't a very good Czech-style Pilsener. It is, however, a great tasting beer that has wandered off the beaten path.

Photo of drpimento
3/5  rDev -13.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Hm. Poured with a smallish white head and a little lace. Color is a hazy/cloudy amber. Aroma is malt beery grain grass yeast minerals. Flavor is like aroma but with one flavor that I can't place really standing out - not really a beer flavor, something odd.... Body and carbonation are ok. Finish is like flavor and medium in length. Proly wouldn't get again, except to see if that odd flavor is still there and to figure out what it is.

Photo of Arenbeer
3.55/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Thanks alot to abrand for letting me try this brew!

12oz bottle into a pint glass.

A- Pours a clear yellow with a huge cloudy fluffy white head that's about 2 1/2 fingers.

S- Sweeter malts with a decent hop presence and a strange yeasty smell.

T- Almost roasted malts with some bitter hops and some citrus, almost orange flavor.

M- Medium body with a decent amount of carbonation and a pretty good bitter dry finish.

SkÅL!

Photo of bark
2.83/5  rDev -18.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

The colour is pale gold; the liquid is a bit cloudy. The high white head leaves massive amounts of lacing.

The smell is buttery with hints of yeast and dry minerals. Hints of rubber.

The taste is a bit yeasty with some diacetyl. The bitterness is unexpectedly light. Some dry ester-y fruity notes. The short aftertaste got a strange off taste of phenols (paint).

The carbonation is medium to strong. The liquid is smooth.

A bit too unclean for me. Not a very good interpretation of a Czech Pilsner.

Photo of garymuchow
3.53/5  rDev +1.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appears cap has a best by date of 28/04/11, so it should still be in good standing. Brewery states De Proef Brouwerij, Lochristi-Hufte, Belgium
Thanks Todd.
Poured into pilsner glass. Exceedingly large bright white head, that shows a rockiness upon settling. Clean malt character with minimal sulfur noted. Slightly cloudy yellow gold and respectable number of bubbles rising. In time a duller pale malt appears, but it's quite mild.
Atypical flavor for style. Malt flavor more closely matches the second malt aroma than the anticipated former one. Hop presence builds through the drink at first with flavor (slightly green and grassy, a little earthy) and then a soft yet resilient bitterness. Finishes softly and tamely. A metallic quality appears mixed in with the hop flavors, not strong, nor necessarily displeasing.
Clean, but not crisp. Soft feel and pleasantly thin. Quite light and flavorful enough, but doesn't leave me begging for another.

Photo of avalon07
4.1/5  rDev +18.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: Poured from a bottle to a pilsener glass. Had a yellow-orange color and a cloudy consistency - something common in Mikkeller beers. There was a huge head - another Mikkeller hallmark - which was foamy and fairly long-lasting. Decent lacing.

S: A nice aroma of malt, grain, and a sharp hoppiness.

T: Surprisingly (for a pilsener) had a strong taste of hops, but also a traditional malty backbone. Also had a grainy quality, as well as a slight acidity. An interesting flavor that isn't quite in keeping with the style.

M: A good amount of carbonation and a dry finish. Light-bodied.

D: Another drinkable, if nontraditional beer from Mikkeller.

Tjekket Pilsner from Mikkeller ApS
80 out of 100 based on 62 ratings.