Dismiss Notice
Hello, is it beer you're looking for?

Learn more about beer. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for as low as 68% off the single issue price.

Subscribe now →

Warrior Single Hop IPA - Mikkeller ApS

Not Rated.
Warrior Single Hop IPAWarrior Single Hop IPA

Educational use only; do not reuse.
very good

154 Reviews
no score

(Send Samples)
Reviews: 154
Hads: 233
Avg: 3.76
pDev: 12.77%
Wants: 3
Gots: 7 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Mikkeller ApS visit their website

Style | ABV
American IPA |  6.90% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 02-13-2009

Brewed at De Proef Brouwerij, Lochristi-Hijfte, Belgium.

Ingredients: Water, malts (pilsner, cara-crystal and munich), hops (warrior) and yeast.
View: Beers (296) | Events
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Reviews: 154 | Hads: 233
Photo of roodie
3.08/5  rDev -18.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12 oz bottle into a pint glass

A: pours an orangish brown with 1 finger of pillowy white head. Retained for 1-2 minutes. Minimal lacing.

S: no real standout aroma. Light carmel malty scent but no hoppy character to speak of. Underwhelming.

T: begins with a hint of malt but is dominated by bitter hoppiness, but a little skunky, like Heineken.

M: bitterness lingers on the tongue. Moderate carbonation makes for a spicy character.

O: not my favorite IPA but a nice way to learn about Warrior hops. Hopefully it wasn't a skunked batch. This hop isn't much for aroma but does pack a bitter punch.

 614 characters

Photo of Jenkster4
3.1/5  rDev -17.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Pours a light brownish orange. Burnt orange maybe. Got about a fingers worth of off white creamy head on the topside.

Smell: Not a very hop vibrant IPA. You get more of the caramel and some spicy malts that were used in this one.

Taste: The taste is pretty sweet and smooth, you get the caramel again. You really get more of a spice effect rather than a hop bitterness. Its not bad though.

Mouthfeel: Pretty pleasant mouthfeel overall. It's a really thin beer, but you get some nice lingerings in the back of your palate.

Overall: Just a decent offering. Wouldn't seek this out, but if it was readily available I would snatch it up again no doubt.

 652 characters

Photo of brew3crew
3.13/5  rDev -16.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Had on tap at the firkin espenisve bottle so happy to see it not quite as expensive on tap

A very cloudy orange color with a white head that sticks around for a while

S- very malty which is surprising for a fresh keg. Can not pick up any hops at all. Comes out a little momore as it warms up, but still not much

T-begins a lot like it smells but the hops finally come out in the finish. Very bitter with almost no taste to it at all. My guy is saying old beer. But aren't we spoiled with ipas?

M-medium body and smooth

O-have never had a warrior hop beer but if this is what the hop tastes like it is very unflattering.

 624 characters

Photo of Metalmonk
3.56/5  rDev -5.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

23/12/11 on the cap, which I suppose is the best-by date (Dec. 23, 2011). Like to see that, and want to see more of it from all brewers.

A lovely looking beer here, with a blazing orange-red sunset color to the liquid and a superbly creamy and firm head that lasts for the duration, and also paints the glace with big slashes and splashes of lace.

Smell-wise, I'm going to assume Warrior wasn't bred to be an aroma-type hop. Not much going on in the nose at all, something very mildly herbal (like weak herbal tea)...not even the malts used are doing much here. Won't rate it lower than a "3 - average" simply because there's nothing undesirable here either.

The taste offers a bit more than the aroma, but it still has a pretty one-dimensional feel to it. But, it is a "single" hop IPA, and as such shows off Warrior for what it is: bitter, leafy, raw, earthy...also clean and pithy, and some citrus rind, but not citrusy sweet. Not coarse. No pine or resin elements either. A straightforward, simple hop. A kind of woodiness creeps in with some warming, reminding somewhat of the (weak) herbal element I detected in the smell. The malts don't seem to impart much flavor here; they were probably used conservatively, to not overwhelm the featured Warrior hop.

Feel-wise it's smooth and soft, only lightly brushing the tongue with carbonation. Along with the appearance, it's the most pleasing aspect of this beer.

I like the idea of single hop beers, as an experiment for the brewer, a learning experience for the drinker, and the occasional off-ramp from the usual way of doing things (ie. multiple hops during different stages of the brewing process). I LOVED Oskar Blues' Gubna (which featured Summit hops exclusively) and I know many people did not, but I'm probably closer to majority on my feelings about Warrior Single Hop IPA. Still, the single hop IPA concept is one I fully encourage and will always support.

 1,925 characters

Photo of WastingFreetime
3.53/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A. Looks like a partially opaque tawny amber with nice fluffy head and interesting lacing as it recedes.

S. Very light smell, but what is there does indeed smell somewhat tomato-ish, as another BA member before me pointed out. It is mostly tomato up front on top of caramel malt sweet aroma, with just the faintest whiff of a tiny piece of lemony citrus. I cannot find any smell of pine or grapefruit peel here at all.

T. And here is the educational part of my experience. I now know why Warrior Hops are typically used for bittering because the cleanliness of the bittering finish here is quite lovely. The grapefruit peel absent from the nose shows up here in the taste, but not as fruity as one would expect, as if there is much more pith than rind involved. The long drawn out bitter finish lasts and lasts for quite some time. I'm not getting any pine at all here, only grapefruit peel. However, this aspect of bittering definitely shows the one dimensional nature of only using a single hop. By itself the Warrior doesn't balance well at all. Its just not quite...juicy or fruity enough to accentuate the malt flavor. Its too simple as it is.

M. By not balancing well, I also need to add that it leaves me way too dried out and astringent because of that monster aftertaste. The body is medium neutral. Nothing fancy there.

Warrior added at all three hopping steps is too much of that straightforward clean bittering, too much of what it seems to do well. Imagine a piano concert where the player bashes out that famous intro sting to Beethoven's 9th over and over again ad nauseum. That's kind of what its like to taste Warrior by itself. It grabs your attention and you can tell that it is part of something really special, but grows tiring by itself and you can tell that it is 'unfinished'. The Warrior does not play well by itself, it needs friends to shine.

 1,873 characters

Photo of brewcrew76
3.38/5  rDev -10.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Dark orange with a thick tan head and huge patches of lace.

S - Light sweet caramel and citrus. Very light aroma.

T - Sweet caramel malt with a decent spice kick. Bitterness and malt balanced. The spice lingers.

M - Medium body with decent carbonation and lingering spice.

D - Strange how different warrior seems with other hops compared to by itself. Much cleaner than I expected with more spice. These single hops beer recipes are starting to become underwhelming.

 474 characters

Photo of Knapp85
3.28/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This beer poured out as a muddy looking amber color with a frothy white head on it. The lacing was pretty good. The smell of the beer had a bit of an earthy aroma with some light citrus in there. The taste was of course hoppy and had a pretty good malt back one too. The earthy flavors were there too. The mouthfeel was pretty good. Overall I found this be decent, I wasn't feeling the warriors too much honestly. Its still worth trying though.

 444 characters

Photo of rhoadsrage
2.93/5  rDev -22.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

(Served in a tulip glass)

A- This beer pours a deep dark orange body with a hazy glowing body and a thick light tan head supported by a strong racing carbonation.

S- The aroma of hops was light and had a tomato quality to it.

T- The buttery caramel malt tasted like sweet unhopped wort with a light bitter hop finish that lingered a bit after each sip.

M- This beer has a medium mouthfeel with a full fizz and a soft alcohol heat in the finish.

O- The sweet wort flavor was nice but it had no hop aroma or flavor just bitterness that was only made more bitter by the big fizz. It was a letdown.

 604 characters

Photo of vandemonian
3.46/5  rDev -8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

I had this at ChurchKey where they had 10+ Mikkeller single hop IPAs. It was interesting to taste the characteristics of this hop without interference from other hop types. This hop provided some nice woody flavours but I didn't love the smell.

A: Orange color and 3 mm head that fades to good lacing. 4

S: The smell is buttery with some hints of chlorine. 3

T: Woody and very slightly bitter in the aftertaste. 3.5

M: Pretty thick and reasonably carbonated. 4

O: Nice flavour, but I didn't love the smell so much. 3.5

 523 characters

Photo of jera1350
3.93/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Copper colored with a thick and sticky cap of foam that is rocky and clings to the glass.

A rich smell of sweet malt that resembles apple pie or a sweet rhubarb cake. Very fruity hop presence.

The taste consists of balance between the moderately bitter hops and the sweet malt. Some spice and fruit notes mixed in.

Very smooth and very soft carbonation with a dry finish.

A decent IPA. The warrior hop is tasty, and is nicely profiled. The malt seems to be a bit much for it in this beer perhaps though.

 508 characters

Photo of champ103
3.92/5  rDev +4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

On tap at the Flying Saucer in Houston, TX

A: Pours a very cloudy red color. A bit to much yeast suspended. A one finger white head forms, and recede to nothing in a minute. Light lace.
S: Malty sweet up front. Some caramel. Though plenty of citrus hops. Grapefruit and some bitterness, but not over the top. Which I like.
T: Follows the nose. Pretty simple. Lots of sweetness up front with some caramel. Citrus and grapefruit are the dominate hops. There is a light bitterness that works well with the sweetness.
M/D: A medium body that is a little under carbonated. I wish it was just a bit more crisp. Easy to drink. I put a pint away without a thought.

A nice IPA. There is some sweetness along with plenty of citrus hops and a bit of grapefruit bitterness. Though it never gets out of hand. A well balanced IPA, and one I would recommend.

 845 characters

Photo of sweemzander
2.29/5  rDev -39.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

11.2oz bottle poured into a tulip. Thanks to cjacobsen for sharing!

(A)- Pours a cloudy orange amber color. Produced a good foamy off-white head dissipating to bubbles. Some lace.

(S)- A little funky & earthy. Some bitter hop and pine notes.

(T)- Same as the smell. A bit funky but has some malty aspects. Poor hop flavors.

(M)- A good carbonation level. A bit off-centered and funky with maltiness, but poor hop presence.

(D)- A bit of a letdown compared to the others. Decent, but plain compared to the rest.

 515 characters

Photo of DaveAnderson
3.43/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Saw this and the Nelson Sauvin Single Hop on the shelf, am tasting them side-by-side. I have no idea how to read the dates on the bottle caps. This one reads "10/12/10/", which seems to indicate a date of December 10, 2010 or October 12, 2010. Is that a bottling date or the "drink by" date? The bottle offers no clues.

Anyway, on to the tasting.

A - Pours a cloudy, apricot color, with a thin, white head, which recedes quickly, and leaves little lacing. Quite a contrast to the Nelson Sauvin, which was really foamy. This one leaves a sediment layer in the bottle, which again has me wondering about the date.

S - I don't know if it's the yeast or the malt, but nothing about this beer screams "American Style", other than those words on the label. I think it's a little of both. I don't smell this malt in American IPAs, and I don't smell this yeast. It smells like a brewery, actually -- not something I usually smell in a finished beer. There's a distracting metallic odor. Is it the age? Are there really hops in there?

T - I think I was right -- both the malt and the yeast are different from every American IPA I have tried. Tastes very much like it smells, which disappoints me a little. The hops can be discerned now, even on the nose. But only just. It has a clean, if sweet, flavor, and a satisfying, bitter finish. Tastes like an overcooked version of Hop-It.

D - The more I think of it, the more I believe this bottle was past its "drink by" date. Even so, I would take this over a lot of actual American IPAs. I would have gladly had a second (11.2 oz) bottle, but I don't know about three.

 1,610 characters

Photo of MeisterBurger
3.47/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Bottle at beerbistro.

Pours a cloudy russet brown topped by an off white head dropping sheets of lace.

Aroma of caramel malt and piney citrus. Far from the best IPA in this department. I think warrior might be a better bittering hop than an aroma hop.

Taste is sprucy, piney and minty bitterness against a crisp toasty caramel malt. Great malt profile is let down by the one-note hopping as I really get nothing but resinous pine bitterness and not a whole lot more.

Medium body with a crisp carbonation.

This is my first single hop beer (that intended to showcase a single varietal) I'm glad I had it. It's good. But it wasn't something I'd go out of my way to get again.

 678 characters

Photo of metter98
3.88/5  rDev +3.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: The beer is very hazy dark copper in color and has lots of yeast particles floating in suspension. A moderate amount of carbonation is visible from the rising bubbles. It poured with a finger high frothy beige head that has good retention properties and never completely faded away.
S: There are moderate aromas of citrus in the nose along with some hints of pine resin. Grapefruit stands out in particular.
T: The taste is similar to the smell with citrusy flavors as well as some hints of underlying caramel malts. There is a good balance between a light amount of malty sweetness and a light amount of hop bitterness.
M: It feels medium-bodied and somewhat crisp on the palate with a moderate amount of carbonation. There is some dryness in the finish.
D: The beer is very drinkable considering its strength because the alcohol is well masked from the taste.

 864 characters

Photo of bishopdc0
4/5  rDev +6.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This beer was suggested to me by the bar tender At lions pride in Brunswick Maine

The look is orange gold and amber mixed together. As it pours a thick beautiful forms and stays

The aroma is earthy. Hops are the star but slight malty aromas make their way through

The taste is heavy with malt and the hops, they mellow very well, earth and grass hops upfront with a malt backed sweetness the hops finish the beer with a bitterness

 433 characters

Photo of JackieTH
3.86/5  rDev +2.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Appearance: Hazy copper brown with a big fluffy head.

Smell: Subtle citrus and earthy aroma.

Taste: More assertive citrus hop with a malty sweet backbone. Nice balance on the hoppy side.

Mouthfeel: Smooth, medium body.

Drinkability: This is a solid IPA, while it's not going to dehydrate your mouth from it's hop intensity, it's enjoyable.

 343 characters

Photo of flagmantho
3.83/5  rDev +1.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured from 330mL bottle into a pint glass. Cap reads 23/12/11.

Appearance: murky orange-brown hue with two thick fingers of pillowy ivory foam with a bit of an orange cast. Looks like a big ol' IPA to me.

Smell: aroma is sweet and funky; slightly vegetal hops atop a caramelly malt backbone. Like Nugget, I'm not sure Warrior makes a great aroma hop; still, it's not too bad.

Taste: sweet caramel malt with a slightly funky, slightly earthy and slightly spicy hop character. Bitterness is slow to grow but eventually builds up pretty well. I like the flavor of this beer more than the aroma, although I admit it is due in large part to the tasty malt characteristics.

Mouthfeel: medium-heavy body with a passable amount of carbonation. It's OK, but it's a bit languid for me.

Drinkability: the flavor is my favorite part of this beer; it's a bit heavy to be a real session brew, but it's flavorful and warming on a cold autumn evening.

 941 characters

Photo of eclaycamp
4.07/5  rDev +8.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Single hop series, this time Warrior. Pours a cloudy amber the color of ice tea. Huge billowing head on this one, rocky yet delicate at the same time. Aroma is faint, not as much as you would hope from an IPA. Appearance is cloudy, perhaps not surprising considering that this beer is either unfiltered or bottle conditioned. First impression of the taste is that it's very clean - maybe that's my inherent bias in Warrior being used for bitterness and not much else. Oddly enough it only has what I would term medium bitterness, and not nearly as much as I've had in other beers. The hop profile, oddly enough, really takes a back seat and compliments the malt instead, at least for me. By the way if you haven't had any of the single hop series I recommend it, as the malt profile they use for it is simple enough yet complex enough to seemingly change every time. What I do get from the hop profile is crisp citrus, almost like lemon lime soda, with some mild spice in the finish. Overall this is another very solid entry into the single-hop series, and should be sampled just for education alone.

 1,100 characters

Photo of ratedz
4.18/5  rDev +11.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Reviewed from notes...

I was interested in trying all 10 of the Mikkeller Single Hop beers, so after I got my hands on a bottle of each, I tried one variation a night for 10 consecutive nights back in August. I really enjoyed examining the subtle differences that the different hops give the beers.

The beer pours a brownish-amber color with a cream-colored head that leaves behind beautiful lacing. The smell is slightly earthy with a hint of citrus...not overly hoppy. It feels fairly thick and smooth in the mouth and is lightly carbonated. It tastes similar to how to smells...a little citrus flavor up front that fades into a sweet, malty finish. While it isn't something that will satisfy a true hophead, it is a solid IPA that showcases the Warrior hop very nicely.

 775 characters

Photo of bigfnjoe
3.89/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Poured from a bottle into a perfect pint.

A- pours a very cloudy shade of dark orange with a very puffy 3 finger slightly offwhite head. Head sticks around forever, leaves great laces, and looks fantastic. Well done Mikkeller

S- bitter grapefruit. Pretty weak aroma, disappointing

T- very mild, which is surprising...you get that piney, grapefruity bitterness up front, and it just lingers a little until you swallow, then it hits you big and sticks around a little bit. There's actually some sweetness in there too...you know what, its really good, despite the mildness

M- perfect body on this, not syrupy but not paper thin either. Can't go higher because despite the body being perfect, its not really outstanding...if that makes any sense

D- 6.9% my ass. So easy to drink. Fantastic beer.

 797 characters

Photo of berebrando
3.5/5  rDev -6.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Kevin and I sampled this beer after collecting all ten (simcoe, cascade, warrior, nelson, nugget, amarillo, tomahawk, chinook and centennial). We sampled them, one after the other, to compare the hop varietals. These notes are primarily focused on the hop flavors of each beer and should be used in comparison to one another. This review is one in a series of 10... and then there is "10".

Top of bottle: 10-12-10
Date of tasting: 10-16-10

Hop notes:
Kevin: Slightly higher bitterness than sweetness. drysmouth. carmel like others. citrus smell. earthy orange.
Brandon: more pine, some very funky orange flavor.

 614 characters

Photo of thagr81us
4.1/5  rDev +9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Cap date 10/12/10 Served from bottle into a Dogfish Head Signature glass. Poured hazy red-orange with a two finger off-white head that subsided to one finger slowly. Maintained phenomanol lacing throughout. The aroma was comprised of subtle malt, piney hops, and grapefruit. The flavor was of subtle sweet malt and citrus hops with a nice crisp followthrough. It had a medium feel on the palate with mild carbonation. Overall this one was nice and smooth. Quite refreshing as well. The flavors were very well balanced. Wish I could find this more readily and I might would have myself a new 'lawnmower' beer...

 610 characters

Photo of beveragesampler
4.33/5  rDev +15.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

Mikkeller "warrior single hop IPA. Pours deep orange, three fingers head. Hints of grapefruit, citrus and lime. 6.9%ABV well hidden. Light carbonation, creamy mouth feel, pleasant bitterness. Well rounded. Fantastic for "HOP" education. could not find IBU for this beer, however its fairly low. i would say around 60. i am interested in trying other Mikkeller Single Hop selections.

 382 characters

Photo of david18
4/5  rDev +6.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I went to the GingerMan in Midtown Manhattan and was pleasantly surprised to learn that they were running a Mikkeller special featuring seven our eight single hop ipa's as well as some other interesting specialties. I have loved these beers when I've had, i believe, all of them at one time or another in bottles. On draft, in a flight of multiple single hops, comparing them side by side demonstrates why some hops are better for bitterness and others for aroma and flavor. I recently had a flight of Cascade, Chinook, Tomahawk and Warrior.

Cascade: As might be expected, great aroma and flavor but not as much bitterness as you'd like in an IPA. Very enjoyable and one that I'll get again.

Chinook: The chinook, which is typically a bittering hop, is a sentimental favorite of mine. Although it doesn't offer the same citrusy aroma of many West Coast finishing hops, it is an all around good beer and maybe my favorite.

Tomahawk: Not as bitter as the Chinook but a little more aromatic as well. Very good flavor and and that i might venture for again.

Warrior: The weakest of of the bunch, I thought, but perhaps the most well balance of the four. Some good bitterness, some good aroma, some good flavor. I'll get this again.

Any of these is worthing getting if you see them in bottles or on tap.

 1,304 characters

Warrior Single Hop IPA from Mikkeller ApS
85 out of 100 based on 154 ratings.