1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Pale Ale - Mountaineer Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Pale AlePale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
79
okay

51 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 51
Reviews: 48
rAvg: 3.45
pDev: 15.07%
Wants: 1
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Mountaineer Brewing Co.
West Virginia, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  5.59% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

An American style pale ale, brewed with pale and crystal malts and a touch of oats.

(Beer added by: WVbeergeek on 03-13-2006)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 51 | Reviews: 48 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of t0rin0
4/5  rDev +15.9%

t0rin0, Nov 08, 2012
Photo of bonbini26
3/5  rDev -13%

bonbini26, Jan 13, 2012
Photo of jenray
3/5  rDev -13%

jenray, Nov 28, 2011
Photo of billab914
3.18/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle into my Three Floyd's glass. It poured a slightly hazy amber color with a half inch, frothy white head filling the top of the glass.

The aroma has some moderately sweet, pale, grainy malts to it. Just a bit of citrusy, fruity hops come through as well. Could have used a little more hop presence for an APA to overshadow the pale, sweet malts a little more. At least for my tastes in the style.

The taste also shows a lot of the sweeter, pale malts to it throughout the beer. I get a little fruity hoppiness to it up front with a moderate, dry, grapefruit like bitterness coming out in the finish.

The mouthfeel is medium bodied with carbonation being moderate. Overall it wasn't a bad beer, but didn't stand out in the style either. It could have used a little more hoppiness to help balance out some of the malt sweetness a little more. Decent beer overall.

billab914, May 29, 2011
Photo of yourefragile
2.63/5  rDev -23.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12 oz bottle, thanks Jeff.

Pours a slightly hazed, sickly straw golden color with steady carbonation supporting a massive, dense fizzy cream colored head.

Aroma is intensely lemony and mildly grassy.

Flavor is less offensive than the aroma and appearance suggest, but still mostly forgettable. Strong bready and grain body with light caramel malt sweetness hides underneath a pungent lemon zest.

Medium bodied with low carbonation; finish is very dry and tangy.

A forgettable APA, but there isn't anything toooo wrong here and this makes for a worthy WV tick.

yourefragile, Apr 27, 2011
Photo of CharlatanSin
3.28/5  rDev -4.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Thanks boatshoes for the bottle. (I think.) You the man! (Now THAT I know.)

A: Poured into a New Belgium tulip a slightly hazy golden orange. Body looks nice, but little to no head even on an aggressive pour. What little is there leaves a very thin ring.

S: Grainy. Light citrus hops. Not a whole lot going on.

T/M: Pleasant enough, but nothing special. Grain, especially in the finish. Some orange-y hops. Finish is bitter and slightly astringent. I'm trying to figure out more to say, but it's thoroughly middle-of-the-road. Mouthfeel is thin, with pretty low carbonation for the style.

D: A thoroughly average pale ale. I'd go for it in a West Virginia watering hole, but it's not really a beer to show off to your friends.

CharlatanSin, Mar 14, 2011
Photo of Huhzubendah
2.48/5  rDev -28.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Bottle shared by Thorpe429. Thanks Mike!

The beer appears transparent and light in orange in color. The head is approximately a half inch thick and leaves some decent lacing in its wake. The aroma has a subtle hop presence with a strange scent emanating from the beer. Uh oh. The flavor is mediocre, with very muted hop and citrus. Overall the beer just tastes a bit off kilter. The finish is rather dry, and leaves an unpleasant vegetal taste on the palate. Not my bag, baby.

Huhzubendah, Mar 11, 2011
Photo of Thorpe429
2.08/5  rDev -39.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Bottle picked up at Total Wine in Alexandria. Served in a Bruery tulip.

Pours a moderate copper color with a thin white head that dissipates too quickly and leaves behind only a tad bit of lacing. The nose is faintly reminiscent of the fact that at one point someone might have considered adding a hop cone or two to it. In honesty, there is a very, very, very (enough of those) faint presence of light citrus and herbal hops. Malt is there in a bready form, not really lending anything on its own. The taste echoes the nose, and not in a good way. Finish is ever so slightly dry with moderate carbonation. Not something I would have again.

Thorpe429, Mar 08, 2011
Photo of drabmuh
3.2/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Bottle gifted by Thorpe429. Thanks buddy. This beer is like a light ale, if such a thing existed. I had this rather late in the evening of heavy drinking, I thought it was unremarkable but unoffensive.

Beer is light amber with a diffuse head of nothing and no lacing, low carbonation.

Aroma is hoppy and dry with minimal malt and some grain.

Beer is thin and watery with some hop flavors, mild graininess on the finish, and overall a bland mouthfeel. The beer is uninteresting. I doubt I'd have it again unless it were the only thing at a party I wanted to get a buzz at.

drabmuh, Mar 07, 2011
Photo of Mosstrooper
3.95/5  rDev +14.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a 16oz Samuel Adams Perfect Pint glass.

Appearance: Clear bright golden color with a large white head that dissipates at an average rate and leaves behind some rings and spots of lace.

Smell: Citrus alongside some pine and a bit of earthiness, with a biscuity note.

Taste: Starts of with a bit of an orange/lemon flavor with a bitterness that gets into the back of the throat, then rounds out to be a bit bready. The finish is earthy, before yielding to some more citrus notes.

Mouthfeel: Medium body with light to medium carbonation and a slightly dry finish.

Drinkability: Another solid offering from Mountaineer and a good pale ale overall. This beer is not the best example of its style, but isn't too far short.

Mosstrooper, Feb 21, 2011
Photo of joepais
4/5  rDev +15.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Thanks to Santa Adam for the brew. I poured this brew into a Sam Adams pint glass and it produced a two finger white head that lasted the length of the brew. The body was a clear golden yellow in color. Aromas of bread yeast and malts with a light hop finish. You get the same from the taste. It was nice and crisp in the mouth with ample hops for a pale ale. This was an enjoyable pale to drink and I would have loved to drink a few of these I am beginning to really like this brewery.

joepais, Dec 27, 2010
Photo of mikereaser
3.9/5  rDev +13%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured into a pint glass on 12-12-10

A - Pours a clear golden yellow with an inch of foam that leaves spotty lacing

S - light mix of sweet citrus and piney hops

T - Taste is very sweet, i'm picking up mostly pear, citrus and a piney finish. Definitely sweeter than most pale ales. Unique flavor in my opinion.

M/D - Light to medium bodied, with a crisp carbonation, and a slightly bitter finish. Its easy to drink, though the sweetness makes me not want to have more than one or two.

mikereaser, Dec 12, 2010
Photo of 321jeff
3.33/5  rDev -3.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a clear pale yellow color with a finger of soapy white head that fades to a thing layer across the top.

Aroma is of sweet dough and yeast with minimal citrusy hops in the background. Not as hoppy as I prefer, but it's pleasant nonetheless.

Taste is very sweet up front, some breads again and hints of citrus. Finishes with a faint resin bitterness. Honestly, it reminds me more of a Kolsch than an APA with the exception of the slight bitterness in the finish.

Lots of prickly carbonation in the mouthfeel and it's light in body. Goes down smooth overall and would be a nice refreshing choice on a hot summer day.

321jeff, Dec 10, 2010
Photo of wahhmaster
3.6/5  rDev +4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a Sam Adams Boston Lager glass.

Appearance: Pours a pale golden color with a large, frothy head that dissipates quickly and leaves some spotty lacing.

Smell: Smells strongly of citrus and floral hops, definitely of a West Coast variety.

Taste: Definitely a hop-dominant pale ale. Strong spicy and citrus hops dominate tempered only by a slight malty sweetness.

Mouthfeel: Crisp and drying.

Drinkability: A decent APA. Certainly not the best out there but if you're looking for a hoppy APA from a small-time brewery, this certainly fits the bill.

wahhmaster, Nov 03, 2010
Photo of Gavage
3.65/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Appearance: clear orange in color with a 1/2" head. Some spots of lace stick tot he glass.

Smell: orange citrus and a hint of fruit sweetness is all you can detect with the nose.

Taste: caramel, orange, pear sweetness, and a floral hop bitterness create a mild flavored APA.

Mouthfeel: medium bodied beer. Crisp to start, less crisp to finish. Pretty short aftertaste here.

Drinkability: this mildly refreshing beer is easy to drink but won't blow you away.

Gavage, Aug 26, 2010
Photo of bmwats
3.6/5  rDev +4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a standard pint.

A: Medium golden color. Pours about a 1 and a half finger bubby white head. Settles pretty quickly leaving a foamy blanket on your brew to keep it cozy. Some sparse lacing remains.

S: Pine, hint of orange citrus, and a slight indistinguishable sweet note.

T: Lightly malted, very piny. Kind of semi bitter, and a little semi sweet... not like cloying sweet, but just an interesting slight counterbalance sweet.

M: Light body, bitter palette, dry finish.

D: Good however you choose to drink it.

Atmosphere is pretty solid. Nice appearance.... nothing great, but a nice rich golden color and a part bubbly / part foamy head. Nose is really good. Hard for me to place the components, but a very nice balance. Flavor is the same... not transcendental, but very full-flavored and well balanced. Overall, this is a good quaff.

bmwats, Aug 23, 2010
Photo of weller1js
3.23/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

appearance: slightly golden yellow with faint cloudiness, average carbonation

smell: mild scent of hops, no other distinguishable aromas

taste: mild clean taste througout the start and middle, hoppy taste does not become apparent until the finish, undertone is clean and does not contain any undertones

drinkability: a basic pale ale, nothing outstanding, but very drinkable and has just enough flavor to make it worth your while

weller1js, Jul 07, 2010
Photo of Rhettbuck
3.05/5  rDev -11.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Appearance - a copper amber color, light head on the top

Smell - smells like a normal pale ale with a hint of citrus

Taste - pretty disappointing, has a kind of metallic aftertaste, better than a generic pale ale from Bud or Miller, but not on the same level as most smaller breweries

Mouthful - evenly balanced, good

Drinkability - if you like pale ales and you don't want to drink horrible can beer, then it might be a possibility, though i'd recommend getting something better

Rhettbuck, Jun 01, 2010
Photo of Duff27
2.9/5  rDev -15.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

First time I have ever had anything by Mountaineer Brewing Company... from West Virginia.

A- Medium to dark golden color. Small white head. Minimal lacing.

S- Tried to pinpoint that smell...couldn't...checked other reviews for help...seems I'm not the only one. Some citrus added to the mystery smell.

T- Flower hoppy, more citrus.

M- Crisp. Medium mouthfeel, some "tongue tingles"

D/O- Per it's style, drinkability is high. If given a choice though, I may reach for a different APA 6 pack.

Duff27, May 08, 2010
Photo of blackie
3.18/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

a: bone white head over a bright golden body falls back to a nice ring

s: subtly resinous tropical hop nose - not bad - over a standard pale malt body, also a weird aroma - not sure whether to call it rotten pineapple or moldy potatoes, perhaps oats out of place in such a light ale?, nothing particularly special here, but it seems to be balanced and well constructed

m: carbonation light-medium, lighter body, a little thin

t: plain pale malt structure, mild citrus juice hops, the same strange aroma comes through a little less here on the tongue - but it's still present, okay

d: not bad I suppose

single from Whole Foods, Fair Lakes, VA

blackie, Mar 30, 2010
Photo of glid02
3.55/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Bottle from a six-pack purchased from a random gas station in southern WV near Union.

Pours a light copper color with a half-finger white head. The head dissipates into a wispy layer on top leaving light lacing.

Smells of pale malts with a light biscuit character and mild amounts of floral hops.

Tastes similar to how it smells. Pale malt flavors with an indistinct fruit character up front are joined midway through the sip by very light amounts of bready malt that carry through to a mildly bitter ending.

Mouthfeel is good. It has a nice thickness with moderate carbonation.

Drinkability is alright. I finished my glass however I'm not sure about another.

Overall this is by no means a bad beer but it really doesn't have a whole lot going for it. Worth a shot if you're in WV and want to drink local - I'll be looking out for their other beer when I'm up there.

glid02, Jan 20, 2010
Photo of Metalmonk
3.2/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Sent by msubulldog25, with an assist from treps. Funny...I've lived in Virginia nine years, and this is my first beer from West Virginia. Never, ever see WV stuff here. So, from treps in WV to Brian in Oregon and back to me in VA. That's beer trading for ya -- thanks guys!

Pours a glaring-white head, about a finger thick, which settles to a soapy skim quickly. Color is quintessential pale ale: a golden/orange-tinted yellow...maybe even "paler" than most, and exhibiting a very light hop haze.

Aroma is not outstanding. But it's different I guess. Mostly floral in nature (no surprises there), but also having a lighter character of boiled veggies, believe it or not, and an almost smoky element to the malt.

Flavor is a balance of toasted grain, grassy hop bitterness (not overwhelming though), a pinch of sulfur, and a faintly fruity edge, especially into the finish, where a peach/pear/green apple character is braided with the grassy hops.

Mouthfeel leans toward the lighter side, but has a nice semi-creamy glide to balance against the tingly carbonation.

This is okay...it's probably better on tap at the source, but this bottled version is decent, just nothing stellar. It doesn't do much to shove other APAs out of the way on my must-get-more list, but there's nothing totally out of whack here either. It's just maybe a little timid and unsure of itself.

Metalmonk, Jan 10, 2010
Photo of supernaut
2.15/5  rDev -37.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I must admit I was drawn in by the label on this beer, the first one I've tried from the "Mountaineer Brewing Company". Being somewhat of a mountaineer (in the modern climbing context that is) myself, I pretty much had to give it a shot.

What a disappointment.

Appearance - average at best. A decent gold color, but an utter lack of frothiness, head, lacing...you name it, and it wasn't there. It looked like it might be decent....for a moment, but then it transitioned into sheer mediocrity. I might have well have poured myself some Miller High Life. To be fair, there was a bit more color in the Mountaineer Pale Ale...but still, really really average.

Smell - again, quite average...yet I start to pick up on something a bit different..a scent (and later, a taste) I haven't been able to pinpoint...but its not helping this beer excite me.

Taste - ok, now here is where its interesting. The initial few seconds of taste is pretty typical. I pick up on what I consider to be relatively generic pale ale flavors...for (the very very brief) first few moments anyway....before quickly transitioning into a dry, dirty, resonating nastiness. I wonder if I'm drinking a spoiled/skunked beer...but then, having had certifiably bad skunk-beer experiences in the past, I can tell that this one is different. It simply tastes bad. I just can't enjoy this beer on even a casual level

mouthfeel/drinkability - refer to the taste description which pretty much says it all....pretty hard to delve into such an off-putting beer experience.

I don't know what it is about this beer, but it really just rubbed me the wrong way. I even had my wife taste it to make sure I wasn't going crazy....and sure enough, she noticed the same thing - A taste she simply described as...a "little strange".

Anyway, I'm gonna have to rank this one pretty low. I honestly can say that I'd rather be drinking a macro, ultra-generic beer right now....

supernaut, Dec 24, 2009
Photo of msubulldog25
3.45/5  rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A 12 oz. bottle, poured to an 'Oregon Bounty Fresh Hop' pint glass...appropriate as I read the side label and learn that 'generous amounts of Northwest Ahtanum and Tomahawk hops' were used in the making. Special thanks to BA 'trep' for a first taste from both Mountaineer Brewing and the Mountain State.

Below the label's description, an odd slogan that could be interpreted a couple ways: "West Virginia does deserve better beer." Not sure where the emphasis belongs, but the way I read it first seemed more like an apology... :) But let's try it and see...

A: Among the 'paler' of the Pale Ales these eyes have seen: a bright golden, maybe the slightest lean toward 'orange'. Faint hazy fog, not cloudy but enough to distort the view through the pint. Plenty of carbonation, a glass-filling swarm of larger bubbles ascend to a modest 1/2 finger of whitish cream. Thin bands of creamy lace hang askew, partially broken.

S: Pleasant aroma, a flowery/honeyed sweetness, a light biscuity malt. A notable 'oyster cracker' smell that's somewhat dry and flour-y, even a little buttery; unleavened yeast?

T: Greeted upfront by a fine light citrus: orange blossoms, a squeeze of Meyer lemon. Breadiness of biscuits, scones possibly. Lasting flavor that's fruity, but not really 'citrus': it's more like a melon rind, even a little sweet white grape. An innocuous pale that could probably stand more hop 'punch' for most craft beer palates - but actually suits my malt-centric leanings quite nicely.

M: Finer carbonation, creamier than expected, light and airy. The feel seems too slick, the body a little puny. Decent bitterness in the background,

D: A pretty enjoyable brew, truth be told. Though neither aroma or flavor 'wows', it exhibits a good balance in general and refreshes/withholds alcohol well enough to session a couple more. Given the multitude of fine options here in the Northwest, I probably wouldn't seek it out here...but I'd certainly drink it if and when in Appalachia.

Thanks again, Josh.

msubulldog25, Dec 15, 2009
Photo of BeerSox
2.58/5  rDev -25.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

1st beer from WV.

A thin pearl white head develops after a rather aggressive pour. The hue is a deep golden-amber, with a little bit of haze. Stringy lacing.

Sharp grapefruit aroma, behind some strange dark-fruit-like smell. It's a little sour and smokey. I'm not sure I've ever detected this in a beer before.

The odd aroma makes itself known in the flavor as well, almost rotten tasting. The hops add something to savor for, as they are well done with very sharp citrus notes. The malts give a little bit of a toasty base.

Very odd beer. If it wasn't for that weird aroma/taste, this wouldn't be a bad beer.

BeerSox, Nov 15, 2009
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Pale Ale from Mountaineer Brewing Co.
79 out of 100 based on 51 ratings.