1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Festie - Starr Hill Brewery

Not Rated.
FestieFestie

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
73
okay

131 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 131
Reviews: 53
rAvg: 3.14
pDev: 17.2%
Wants: 0
Gots: 6 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Starr Hill Brewery visit their website
Virginia, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Lager |  4.80% ABV

Availability: Fall

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Proteus93 on 09-10-2008)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 131 | Reviews: 53 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of nmann08
nmann08

District of Columbia

3/5  rDev -4.5%

11-24-2011 19:50:42 | More by nmann08
Photo of oberon
oberon

North Carolina

3.05/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Its getting to the end of the O-fest beer season so I figured I'd grab this one today.Poured a clear lighter shade of bronze with a nice one finger tight white head that was gone pretty quickly.Aromas of caramel/vanilla,and toasted grain mainly.A light sharp mouthfeel was kind of annoying,flaovrs were really mild with some residual caramel sweetness and that toasted grain again,the flavors were very light.A pretty average beer,not one to seek out.

Serving type: bottle

10-29-2009 19:41:30 | More by oberon
Photo of kylehay2004
kylehay2004

Florida

3.15/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Enjoyed at the brewery, reviewed from notes. The tap room bartender was great. Stayed open an extra 35 minutes to talk beer. I had a great time.

A: thin head on a clear dull golden with amber hues body.

S: very nice caramel malt sweetness, light fruitiness.

T: the flavor lets you down after that aroma with standard caramel malts however not quite hoppy or spicey for the style. almost no hops can be perceived

M: moderate to high carbonation and medium body.

Overall: drinkable but not memorable.

Serving type: on-tap

07-24-2012 22:25:30 | More by kylehay2004
Photo of TMoney2591
TMoney2591

Illinois

3.23/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Served in a Chicago Bears shaker pint glass.

This is the last sixer I bought before leaving the NoVa area. It pours a mostly clear pale apricot topped by about a half-finger or so of white foam. The nose comprises caramel, peanuts, buttercream, and a touch of orange. The taste seems to initially lean in the direction of an increased amount of orange, but this then dovetails into a heavy dose of buttery biscuit with a generous amount of sweetness tossed on top. What hurts this thing is that the orange doesn't really leave once the maltiness enters; what results is, in effect, a cupcake whose stump is an orange slice. Honestly, it would be fine if this were done in phases, but together it just doesn't seem right. The body is a heavy-ish light, with a moderate carbonation and a somewhat watery feel. Oddly enough, despite the slightly awkward flavors, this thing spitefully retains a decent amount of drinkability. It may not be the best O-Fest I've had, but it's certainly not the worst, either.

Serving type: bottle

10-07-2010 15:33:24 | More by TMoney2591
Photo of woodychandler
woodychandler

Pennsylvania

3.58/5  rDev +14%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

I was so happy to find this beer in CANs during my recent visit to DC that it makes me want to break out in song! With apologies to Madonna, "You're a superStarr, yes, that's what you are, you know it"; to John Kander and Liza Minelli, "Life is a [CAN of] Carnival, old chum, Come to the CANival!" and to Arthur Miller's Willy Loman to his son, Biff, in I.vi, "You got all kinds of great beer!" Sure, the last is a play and not a musical, but when was the last time that a CANned beer was so inspiring?

From the CAN: "Starr Hill founded in Charlottesville, VA (but I founded it at Whole Foods in DC)"; "Life is a Carnival"; "The Gift of Great Beer"; and undersigned by "Mark A. Thompson Master Brewer".

The Crack & Glug was music to mine ears and produced two tawny fingers of dense, bubbling head with good retention. Color was a deep orangish-amber with NE-quality clarity. Nose was very malty sweet, much more so than Yuengling Lager, to which a previous reviewer compared it. Mouthfeel was medium-to-full, not quite creamy and with a pleasant melange of flavors on the tongue, ranging from an initial sugary sweetness to an herbal mintiness and back again. Finish was more sweet than anything else and I think that the constant onslaught of malt would be too much for me to CANsider inclusion in my cooler.

Serving type: can

08-12-2011 19:03:38 | More by woodychandler
Photo of ejimhof
ejimhof

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev -4.5%

08-28-2013 22:41:33 | More by ejimhof
Photo of John_M
John_M

Oregon

3.5/5  rDev +11.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

On tap at the Judge's Bench the other day.

The beer pours a honey amber color with fairly good head retention and minimal lacing. The nose is lightly malty with a hint of ginger and pumpkin bread. Flavors on the palate replicate the nose pretty closely in this one dimensional, albeit inoffensive, lightly sweet beer. The flavors drop off pretty quickly in the finish, and the beer is almost watery at the end. Drinkability is OK, though a bit more flavor would be appreciated. Mehhh....

Serving type: on-tap

09-23-2010 15:16:12 | More by John_M
Photo of tdm168
tdm168

North Carolina

3.5/5  rDev +11.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - clear amber with a soft, thin cap of white, fizzy heaed that fades quickly

S - grains, caramel, apple, faint toast

T - bread, caramel, apple, sweet, sticky, clean bitter finish

M - crisp, medium bodied, a bit overcarbonated

This is a nice, easy to drink beer. the flavor is a bit unbalanced between malty and hoppy, bitter and sweet. It's also a bit overcarbonated. It's not bad, but at this time of year I'm looking for a more balanced Marzen.

Serving type: can

09-29-2012 16:33:08 | More by tdm168
Photo of glid02
glid02

Georgia

2.65/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Bottle purchased from 1 West in Washington DC.

Pours a hazy copper-brown color with a half-finger white head. The head recedes into a wispy layer on top leaving light lacing.

Smells of slightly sour fruit, herbal hops, and light caramel malts.

Tastes not so great. Light caramel malt flavors up front fight to stay relevant after the sour fruit flavors enter into things midway through the sip. Right before a muddled and slightly bitter ending a small amount of leafy hop flavors come out.

Mouthfeel is alright. It's a bit on the thin side but with solid carbonation.

Drinkability isn't so good. I didn't finish.

Overall this was not a very good beer and one I won't revisit again.

Serving type: bottle

10-13-2009 02:59:44 | More by glid02
Photo of billab914
billab914

Virginia

2.17/5  rDev -30.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Poured from a 12oz bottle into my Dogfish shaped pint glass. It poured a cloudy, dull, amber/copper color with a frothy white head filling about an inch of the glass.

The aroma shows some caramel, malty flavors to it but they are almost overshadowed by a tart, slightly fruity flavor to it.It had a bit of an apple cidery tartness to it that didn't fit at all.

The taste unfortunately picks up even more of what the aroma hinted at. A tart, fruity, apple cidery flavor dominates the flavors. It also has a very slight hint of sourness to it as well. There is a moderate caramel, maltyness to it but it's nearly hidden. The flavors just don't fit the style at all.

The mouthfeel is light and carbonation is moderate. Drinkability isn't good, it was close to a drain pour. I thought it might be old but the bottle has a best by date 5 months from now so it must be pretty fresh. Something wasn't right at all with it though. The flavors were not what I expect for the style at all.

Serving type: bottle

09-30-2010 19:37:41 | More by billab914
Photo of Rhettroactive
Rhettroactive

District of Columbia

2/5  rDev -36.3%

07-23-2013 04:31:55 | More by Rhettroactive
Photo of tone77
tone77

Pennsylvania

3.73/5  rDev +18.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Once again a thanks to woodychandler for another canned beer. Poured from a 12 oz. can. Has a copper color with a 1/2 inch head. Smell is of caramel malts. Taste is also malty, refreshing, a touch of caramel. Feels medium bodied in the mouth and overall is an enjoyable brew.

Serving type: can

09-03-2011 14:00:54 | More by tone77
Photo of Bierman9
Bierman9

New Hampshire

3.2/5  rDev +1.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

From a 12oz bottle brought to me from C'Ville by ol' Bro Artied2.

Poured into a nonic, this Märzen is, surprisingly, slightly cloudy though still a bright golden color. Carbonation is slow and scattered. The head is creamy and fine, slightly off-white and clings well in the glass. There's some bready malt here, but it's pretty mild overall. The body is almost in the medium range, and the feel is fairly smooth, with only light prickle on the tongue.

Has some mild sweetness and hint of bready, crackery malt. There's actually some light fruitness here, almost bordering on an off, sourish character. Floral hoppiness does make an appearance in the finish, and the aftertaste does suggest that this is, indeed, a Märzen. In the big scheme, though, this falls short of being even a decent Fest-type bier. It's still drinkable, but not what I was expecting. Thnx, Bro!

3.2 rDev +2.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

1408

Serving type: bottle

11-13-2011 20:45:36 | More by Bierman9
Photo of atrocity
atrocity

Virginia

2.5/5  rDev -20.4%

04-29-2014 20:29:19 | More by atrocity
Photo of AgentMunky
AgentMunky

California

3.15/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Served in a rocks glass at Mellow Mushroom. From notes. Reviewed 2 July 2011.

A: Some head, about a finger and a half, with prefigures the great lacing to come. The colour is an off-putting orange. Clearish.

S: Buttery. Malts; hints of caramel.

T: Lots of malt, and butter appears here too. Decent. The endtaste is forgettable and generic. Nothing stands out in the taste except a biscuity breadiness.

M: Pretty okay. Full-bodied and compelling, even if it's not great.

O: Goodish beer, mediocre compared to some of Starr Hill's other offerings. *Very* drinkable. Not recommended, but I'd have another.

Serving type: on-tap

09-08-2011 20:07:17 | More by AgentMunky
Photo of msubulldog25
msubulldog25

Oregon

2.5/5  rDev -20.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

My first taste of this East Coast O'fest and first from Starr Hill Brewery. A 12 oz. twist-capped bottle, notched at 'FEB' in the 'For Brewery-Fresh Taste, Purchase Before...' area.

'Life is a Carnival' proclaims the label.

A: Well, it's got a nice color: a fine-looking copper-acorn. Pours with a flourish of fizzy whitish head, dwindles in seconds, completely disappears within a couple minutes. Unfiltered haziness, a few streaking carbonation bubbles and a patch sticking at the base; only the smallest flecks of lace. A rather sad-looking brew to be honest...

S: A light touch of caramel, a wheaty spice and a trace of sweet fruit. Not the malty sweetness typical of better examples of the style - just some subdued floral honey.

T: Flavor-wise, not a bad O'Fest: decent maltiness (a wort-like grain), a round semi-sweetness, toasted bread, hint of orange candy. Spiced hop mellowness. If there's one positive note so far, flavor is it.

M: Bad - really bad. Slick and viscous, light body, barely any carbonation. Lifeless feel, drastically attenuation issues. A little dry spicing tingles for moments on the tongue, a dull grainy sweetness lasts longer.

D: Hardly a 'carnival': really didn't have much fun with any part this beer. Lackluster in most every category, it's not even worth a try. My sincere hope is that the 'Purchase Before FEB' was actually for 2009, not 2010, which would explain some things - though I know my buddy Metalmonk just picked this up weeks ago and I received earlier this week. Many thanks for the try, Jeff, but I'll pass next time...but thanks for the pre-written apologies below! :)

Serving type: bottle

10-29-2009 00:23:44 | More by msubulldog25
Photo of Darkmagus82
Darkmagus82

Virginia

3.5/5  rDev +11.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from bottle into pint glass

Appearance – Pours an orange-amber color with a two finger white head. The head has huge carbonation bubbles entrapped within, which pop over a short amount of time to leave some rather nice lacing.

Smell – The aroma is strongest of a roasted malt and caramel sweet smell. Mixed with this are lighter notes of a bready and light fruit aroma.

Taste – The taste begins of lightly roasted malt and some light fruit sweetness. The fruit flavors are a mix of citrus and some pear and peach. As it advances further some hop flavors of a citrus and earthy nature come to the tongue. The fruits other then the citrus fade more toward the end. While the other fruit flavors fade, the citrus flavors intensify and, when mixed with the hop flavors that came more toward the middle of the taste, a lightly hoped citrus and earthy malt flavor finish out the taste.

Mouthfeel – Quite light bodied with a average level of carbonation. Very easy drinking and god for the style and flavor profile.

Overall – A very easy to drink beer. While not super flavorful and rather light, it is a great choice for a nice session brew.

Serving type: bottle

09-08-2012 00:49:06 | More by Darkmagus82
Photo of Metalmonk
Metalmonk

North Carolina

2.23/5  rDev -29%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Pours a hazy orange-rust color with a head that was big and billowy for about 10 seconds but then withered away to almost nothing (it's a clean glass!). A few dabs of lace slide slowly down the sides with each tilt of the glass.

Where I was hoping for that big bread-and-caramel nose of the great Oktoberfests, I was treated to a rather flat aroma that offers faint cooked veggies and tangy fruit. Only a ghost of what my nose was nosin' around for appears. "Judge it for what it is," right? Okay: it's severely lacking.

Flavor-wise it's no better. There might be a good beer here, but what I mostly get is a fruit-candy sweetness and a tart-to-sour jab middle, back, and into the finish. Luckily there's no real finish here at all, so the bad impressions don't last.

Mouthfeel is just fine, with zippy carbonation and a good slick glide. If I try and turn off the taste buds, it feels like a good example of the real deal.

This is all over the place, way off-style, and not a good beer in any category. The exact opposite of "spot-on." There's always a chance it's been ruined somehow since leaving the brewery, but I can only take it at face value.

[Threw a couple of these into a couple different trade boxes as a "bonus" the other day...they're already on the way! Good thing I've already traded with the recipients a few other times--they'll forgive me I hope--but guys: I AM SORRY.]

Serving type: bottle

10-22-2009 22:18:35 | More by Metalmonk
Photo of argock
argock

Virginia

3.28/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from 12oz brown bottle into a clear pint glass. Freshness date notched on label.

A: Amber lager appearance with reasonable but quickly dissapating off white head with a few spittles of lace.

S: Sour leather smell with lots of grain.

T: Grain is the dominant flavor with a slightly sour, tart flavor that is not wholly unpleasant but is a bit strange for this style. It seems like an overly sharp marzen hops flavor with more grain than usual.

M: Medium and solid for a lager -- there is clearly a lot of malt in this brew. Carbonation is spicy. The aftertaste is very pleasant with sweet and tart aspects.

D: Not Starr Hill's best offering, but not a terrible take on a marzen-style lager.

Serving type: bottle

09-15-2008 02:33:45 | More by argock
Photo of GbVDave
GbVDave

Illinois

2.38/5  rDev -24.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a 20oz imperial pint. Thanks to Metalmonk for this extra in our most recent trade!

FEB notched on the label.

A: Pours a hazy/cloudy gold with about 1 1/2 fingers of off white foam on top. Head retention is poor as it melts away in less than a minute. No lace is left behind.

S: Boiled vegetables, tangy fruit, and maybe (just maybe) a slight hint of sourdough bread. The smell is pretty off-puting.

T: More of the same as above. I too was hoping for bread and biscuits and instead got sweet tarts and fruit.

M: Decent enough. Restrained bitterness with a slightly dusty finish.

D: Hmmm. Seems like this beer wasn't totally thought through. Thanks Jeff :)

Serving type: bottle

10-29-2009 23:29:00 | More by GbVDave
Photo of Hanzo
Hanzo

Virginia

3.75/5  rDev +19.4%

03-03-2012 22:58:41 | More by Hanzo
Photo of ktrillionaire
ktrillionaire

Florida

3.33/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A - Pours a reddish amber hue; the head is off-white and scant. No lace.

S - Not too much aroma here. Vaguely vegetal hops and sweet cracker-y malt is about all I can manage to dig out.

T - The brew is unusually flavored, evoking a certain flavor that is common to baked confections such as piroulina, wafer cookies, or almond bark. There is also a discernible hint of vanilla and hazelnut. A very slight bitterness is contributed by a subdued citric-piney hop.

M - Pretty average here. Decent, mediocre, common.

D - It is drinkable based on a certain very nice aspect of the flavor. It is not a complete or tremendously inspiring offering, but it has a serviceable quality (or two).

Serving type: bottle

11-02-2010 05:16:41 | More by ktrillionaire
Photo of KevMo84
KevMo84

California

2.5/5  rDev -20.4%

06-09-2014 00:21:43 | More by KevMo84
Photo of bigfnjoe
bigfnjoe

Pennsylvania

3.5/5  rDev +11.5%

10-28-2012 01:54:43 | More by bigfnjoe
Photo of JayQue
JayQue

Virginia

3.6/5  rDev +14.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A nice session beer, not necessarily a great Marzen. Pours a slightly cloudy orange/amber with a small off white head that fades fast. Leaves some lacing on the glass. Mild malty aroma, pleasant enough.

Taste is crisp and malty. Marzen bitterness in the finish is lacking. The only bitterness is in the balance - the beer is not overall too sweet.

Mouthfeel is rich enough for the style. Drinkability is pretty good if you are looking for a nice crisp, malty beer. I wouldn't turn down a pitcher of this stuff, but wouldn't go looking for it as an Oktoberfest beer either.

Serving type: bottle

10-22-2008 23:31:47 | More by JayQue
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Festie from Starr Hill Brewery
73 out of 100 based on 131 ratings.