1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Sierra Nevada Pale Ale - Sierra Nevada Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Sierra Nevada Pale AleSierra Nevada Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
90
outstanding

8,117 Ratings
THE BROS
92
outstanding

(view ratings)
Ratings: 8,117
Reviews: 2,666
rAvg: 4.04
pDev: 11.63%
Wants: 111
Gots: 606 | FT: 3
Brewed by:
Sierra Nevada Brewing Co. visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  5.60% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Generous quantities of premium Cascade hops give the Pale Ale its fragrant bouquet and spicy flavor.

37 IBU

(Beer added by: kbub6f on 07-05-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Sierra Nevada Pale Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 8,117 | Reviews: 2,666 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of ZinFanDave
ZinFanDave

Georgia

2.25/5  rDev -44.3%

05-19-2012 01:58:10 | More by ZinFanDave
Photo of CraftDanny
CraftDanny


2.26/5  rDev -44.1%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.25

I've seen this bottle coming in many pubs in London so I decided to try it. Looks great, shinny orange, nice bubbles. The taste is very strong, really bitter but fresh, fruity, there is ginger everywhere, smells acid, mouthtaste stays for few seconds. It took me long to finish the glass, not very used to this kind of flavor but was ok.

Serving type: bottle

07-12-2014 16:03:21 | More by CraftDanny
Photo of Crosling
Crosling

Colorado

2.28/5  rDev -43.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

Amber color with a large covering cream. Stinky, doughy and sweaty yeast aroma, which hints of medicine and vitamins, unsuccessfully attempts to disguise itself with a lightly aromatic, herbaceous and floral hop scent. Light caramel in the nose as well, but pretty much just stinky yeast and dulled hops. I still find the yeast character to be obtrusive upon tasting, though not as bad as the aroma. The malt flavor is very light and grainy and to me, doesn’t blend well at all with the mildly aggresive hop flavor and bitterness. The hops which shift from herbaceous, to floral to piney (on the finish) are moderately pleasing, but overall, this is just a poorly balanced beer, plus the yeast stinks or something.

Serving type: bottle

03-29-2006 07:34:23 | More by Crosling
Photo of BlackAngus
BlackAngus

Indiana

2.3/5  rDev -43.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A - Light copper color, crystal clear. Nice fluffy head that lasted a while.

S - Citrus and floral aroma, but there's a subtler note of something unpleasant. I smells, I swear, like sweat. Not sure why. And not just this bottle. Every time I've had this beer, I've smelled this musky sweaty funk just below the hops. No malt aroma whatsoever.

T - Meh. Yeah, there are hops here, but nothing else. Maybe some very light sweetness.

M - Light body, extremely clean.

D - I can drink it, but there are many, many better beers out there. The best thing I can say about this beer is that it's the best thing Wal-Mart carries in the beer aisle.

Serving type: bottle

01-09-2007 18:39:01 | More by BlackAngus
Photo of Kooz
Kooz

New York

2.3/5  rDev -43.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Lots of high ratings for this beer. Makes me wonder if I got a bad batch. I didn't enjoy it nearly as much as everyone else seemed to.

Taste was just too hoppy. I get it, people like Pale Ales to be hoppy, but this was so overly hoppy that I had trouble getting past it. This goes for both the smell and the taste.

Appearance was nice. It was a light, nut brown. And the mouthfeel was okay, but a bit too bubbly. Over-carbonation is never a plus. But I wouldn't say the mouthfeel was bad.

As for drinkability, I wouldn't have more than one.

Serving type: on-tap

10-30-2009 14:31:14 | More by Kooz
Photo of ivanwatling
ivanwatling

United Kingdom (England)

2.38/5  rDev -41.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Appearance: Wonderful rich, deep amber. No head whatsoever which is a negative for me.

Smell: Delicate floral notes with undertones of citrus fruit.

Taste: First taste is fruity, a bit like a soft drink. Biterness then takes over and becomes almost too much.

Mouthfeel: Dry, sharp bitter aftertaste like lemon rind. Carbonation feels like very small bubbles, akin to pop.

Drinkability: Too bitter for me, not balanced. Will not try again, might not even finish the whole bottle.

Serving type: bottle

12-26-2010 21:29:20 | More by ivanwatling
Photo of VietPong
VietPong

Connecticut

2.38/5  rDev -41.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

I found this beer to be super bitter. I do like beers with a slight bitterness, but this definitely seemed overpowering. It wasn't as crisp as i expected and the aftertaste was bitter in combination with the beer. I traded it for something new and couldn't finish the first one

Serving type: bottle

08-16-2010 18:24:45 | More by VietPong
Photo of acemaverick
acemaverick

West Virginia

2.38/5  rDev -41.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

A: Nice label. Color of beer is dark yellow and looks ok to me.
S: Smells alright, nothing special. A bit tangy.
T: Very bitter. Hoppy as f*ck! Strong bitter aftertaste. This beer is not enjoyable to drink.
M: Sharp, lots of carbonation.
O: Overall I did not enjoy this beer. It is way over hyped. I would not buy this beer on purpose.

Serving type: bottle

06-17-2014 06:28:40 | More by acemaverick
Photo of Sixpack595
Sixpack595

Michigan

2.4/5  rDev -40.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Tastes like an overhopped macro. If your only complaint about Bud is the lack of hops, try this beer. If you like a full bodied beer with a strong malty backbone skip it. Very floral aroma, strong hop flavor, but not much else to it. American Pale Ales like this seem to much like a 1 trick pony. Try to back up that hop with some malt.

Serving type: bottle

09-01-2003 07:30:29 | More by Sixpack595
Photo of dunit697
dunit697

California

2.45/5  rDev -39.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

I saw on Beer advocate that this was an A- so I was pretty excited, after tasting it I really couldn't see why. I also judge beers quite a bit on the balance of alcohol. I want it to be there but not so obvious, this beer did not mask its alcohol very mask it alcohol very well making it less enjoyable for me personally, especially considering it was only 5.6%. I think there is plenty of better stuff out there, but its not a bad beer.

Serving type: on-tap

12-13-2011 19:30:01 | More by dunit697
Photo of bcgoldtoe
bcgoldtoe

Michigan

2.48/5  rDev -38.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

As one of the highest rated pale ales, I looked forward to a great balanced beer. I was, however, disappointed to see that the complexity I seeked was sorely lacking.

A= Solid, beautiful golden color with hints of amber

S= Better than a macrobrew but this was the first hint something wasn't right

T= Way overhopped. Needs more malt and fewer hops. Bitterness does fade into slight sweetness but does it have to take so long?

M= Excellent, one of the better balanced mouthfeels. Not too thick, not too thin

D= It's ok, once you get past the overpowering hops.

If you're not a fan of strong hops, avoid this beer. I do agree with the comment about this being Budweiser with hops. If you want a great microbrew pale ale without huge amounts of hops, I recommend Dogfish Head amber ale or Fat Tire.

Serving type: bottle

08-20-2007 19:14:29 | More by bcgoldtoe
Photo of jbweld
jbweld

Nevada

2.49/5  rDev -38.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 2

WTF pale ale!?!

I am writing this review because I am concerned about Sierra Nevada. I am a huge supporter of craft beer especially Sierra Nevada, but today I noticed something... Earlier today I enjoyed a pale ale in the can and it tasted great just as I would expect. Hoppy, balanced, a typical SN pale ale. Later in the day I had a pale ale in the bottle (bottling code 319311014) which was totally different. It was malt forward and sweet. The hop character was subdued. It almost tasted like fat tire or Sam Adams. What's going on Sierra Nevada? I have heard that Sierra Nevada was adjusting some of its recipes... I hope this is not the future of the beer I love.

Serving type: bottle

12-07-2013 22:03:31 | More by jbweld
Photo of tallfellapgh
tallfellapgh

Pennsylvania

2.5/5  rDev -38.1%

12-07-2012 21:58:11 | More by tallfellapgh
Photo of epicus
epicus

Kentucky

2.5/5  rDev -38.1%

11-28-2012 18:26:57 | More by epicus
Photo of beerformyhorses34
beerformyhorses34

Wisconsin

2.5/5  rDev -38.1%

05-20-2014 22:07:15 | More by beerformyhorses34
Photo of LJWalker
LJWalker

Alabama

2.5/5  rDev -38.1%

02-06-2012 20:57:31 | More by LJWalker
Photo of BGsWo22
BGsWo22

New York

2.5/5  rDev -38.1%

01-30-2013 19:50:37 | More by BGsWo22
Photo of jmccullough108
jmccullough108

Missouri

2.5/5  rDev -38.1%

01-04-2013 07:25:15 | More by jmccullough108
Photo of hurley41
hurley41


2.5/5  rDev -38.1%

04-19-2014 15:47:55 | More by hurley41
Photo of evbro
evbro

California

2.5/5  rDev -38.1%

03-08-2014 06:53:58 | More by evbro
Photo of J2t645
J2t645

Michigan

2.5/5  rDev -38.1%

02-17-2014 01:54:54 | More by J2t645
Photo of mwbrady12
mwbrady12

North Carolina

2.5/5  rDev -38.1%

07-29-2013 01:36:54 | More by mwbrady12
Photo of Jenessa
Jenessa

Ohio

2.5/5  rDev -38.1%

01-05-2013 03:59:40 | More by Jenessa
Photo of texasMade281
texasMade281

Texas

2.5/5  rDev -38.1%

02-18-2012 03:46:25 | More by texasMade281
Photo of AWA
AWA

California

2.5/5  rDev -38.1%

07-25-2014 05:04:58 | More by AWA
Sierra Nevada Pale Ale from Sierra Nevada Brewing Co.
90 out of 100 based on 8,117 ratings.