1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Smuttynose Wheat Wine (Big Beer Series) - Smuttynose Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Smuttynose Wheat Wine (Big Beer Series)Smuttynose Wheat Wine (Big Beer Series)

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
86
very good

685 Ratings
THE BROS
90
outstanding

(view ratings)
Ratings: 685
Reviews: 464
rAvg: 3.84
pDev: 12.76%
Wants: 53
Gots: 52 | FT: 3
Brewed by:
Smuttynose Brewing Company visit their website
New Hampshire, United States

Style | ABV
Wheatwine |  10.70% ABV

Availability: Spring

Notes/Commercial Description:
Smuttynose Wheat Wine Ale is a unique hybridization of two well-known beer styles, combining the rich, voluptuous taste of a traditional barleywine with the subtle, tart flavors of an American wheat ale, topped off with a healthy dose of crisp, herbaceous hops.

2007 - 11.4%
2008 - 10.3%
2009 - 11.4%
2010 - 12.0%

(Beer added by: Bierman9 on 04-13-2005)
View: Beers (54) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Smuttynose Wheat Wine (Big Beer Series) Alström Bros
Ratings: 685 | Reviews: 464 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Crosling
Crosling

Colorado

4.13/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Bright crimson hued. It is lacking aroma, unfortunately and I wonder why. Light hints of fruit and coconut, but it’s very subtle overall. Flavor is very rich and enjoyable, with coconut flavors so authentic, it makes you think it was aged in some barrel. White pepper, butter toffee and cream flavor, with a soft, succulent smooth texture. Wish the aroma was better, but this is still a very nice, enjoyable beer.

Serving type: bottle

04-01-2006 04:15:30 | More by Crosling
Photo of ghostwalker
ghostwalker

Massachusetts

3.2/5  rDev -16.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Clear reddish-orange body. Very small and thin head, almost none really.

Smell is fruity with very light malt and quite boozy.

Flavor is sharp acidic fruit and boozy. Orange, apricot, maybe a little lemon, there seem to be many estery fruit flavors here. Hop bitterness on the finish. Alcohol flavor and burn is present, I sense a quiet evening on the couch coming up. It's interesting, but kind of a one trick pony.

Mouthfeel is thin, acidic and maybe slightly oily.

Drinkability is moderate to low, a little trouble finishing the bomber.
12 oz would have been plenty.

Serving type: bottle

03-28-2006 23:20:36 | More by ghostwalker
Photo of horshack7
horshack7

Massachusetts

4.28/5  rDev +11.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Appearance: Pours an orange copper clor with slight red hues not any head yet still a very nice looking beer.

Aromas: Lots of dried fruits rather pleasant.

Taste: A little tart but more towards to hoppy side medium bodied with hints of dried fruits and cherries.

Mouthfeel: Slightly bubbly.

Notes: A certainly unique style of beer very enjoyable.

Serving type: bottle

03-22-2006 02:38:41 | More by horshack7
Photo of ILiveOffHops
ILiveOffHops

New Hampshire

4.05/5  rDev +5.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Smutty's wheat wine pours a hazy amber red-orange. Very nice color. Thin head dissapates to nice ring of bubbles. Leaves nice lacing. Aroma is sweet and vanilla. Taste is sweet syrupy vanilla, fluffy wheat, and a slight sherry, fruity flavor with a strong alcohol warmth. Nice thick, full body. A rare and delicious treat.

Serving type: bottle

03-20-2006 04:43:53 | More by ILiveOffHops
Photo of Bierman9
Bierman9

New Hampshire

3.9/5  rDev +1.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Have had a few of these in the past, but now finally getting around to a review.... From a 22oz bomber, pours a clear, glowing, deep golden color. Thin to no head, basically; just a smidge of fine, white bubbles at the rim. Nose is similar to their Barleywine - fruitiness and hops melding into a pleasing aroma. Little maltiness noted, though. Bier passes with minimal roughness over the palate... with a solid, medium body present.

Flavor has some light, toasty character, along with a crisp wheatiness. Hops are solidly in the fruity class, with some light tropical notes and perhaps a touch of something akin to vanilla. Alcohol is not overly pronounced, yet still quite evident in its warming abilities. Interesting, to say the least.

Prosit!

overall: 3.9
appearance: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | mouthfeel: 4 | drinkability: 4

888

Serving type: bottle

03-10-2006 00:05:30 | More by Bierman9
Photo of sloejams
sloejams

California

3.53/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

22 oz. provided by HogHill, helluva guy

I really dig the label. If you are reading my review you can click and see it up there in the corner. Nice huh?

I poured this into a tulip glass – a brown amber color with a creamy head, maybe too much of a head , as I didn’t pour it very well. Tulip glasses kinda fuck me up. It had a interesting aroma: sweet and citrus with a hop lingering. And alcohol – I could definitely smell booze was in there in abundance. It tasted fruity with a lot of malt going on. Hops were around too. It was a bit like a barleywine but not as intense – even though they have similar alcohol levels – this seemed lighter, more subdued.

The alcohol was very much kickin’ it. It gave that nice warmth in the medium body, but it also was a bit much. I struggled to make it through the whole 22 oz.

Interesting beer, my first wheat wine – I’m up for more.

Serving type: bottle

02-24-2006 02:10:58 | More by sloejams
Photo of akahn
akahn

Massachusetts

3.6/5  rDev -6.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

22oz bottle with a nice neo-classical painting of a woman holding a bushel of wheat wrapped in scarlet cloth. Nice label as usual from these guys.

Pours a deep red-tinged gold color. Quickly sinking head remains as a collar and some skim. Not much lacing. A nice color, clearly much lighter than a barley wine.

Sweet aroma of alcohol and caramel., with a pungent wheaty overtone.

Hoo boy has this got flavor! Sweet, potent alcohol flavors. What sets this apart from a barley wine is a sort of clear, clean candy sweetness, rather than a dark sweetness I've experienced with the handful of barley wines I've tried. Interesting peach and apricot ester notes, as well as some raisin-plum flavors too. Not much identifiable wheat flavor, despite wheat making up 53% of the grain bill here -- the alcohol flavor dominates.

Carbonation stands up to the alcohol at first, making an interesting hot finish, but this fades away. This beer also has very little hop character, making this not a very balanced beer. For how sweet it is, this is fairly drinkable -- I took my time through the 22 ounces over a movie.

This beer is interesting but not spectacular. I'd like to try Smuttynose's Barley Wine for comparison.

Serving type: bottle

02-19-2006 19:53:38 | More by akahn
Photo of orsulacp
orsulacp

Pennsylvania

3.33/5  rDev -13.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured a very cloudy brunt orange-amber color with a small white collar. I could see the glycerin sticking to the side of the glass as I poured it. Fruity nose - orange, lemon, some cloves sneaking in and some alcohol.
Taste is also fruity at first with orange flavors, then a bit of bread, then the alcohol bomb, very astringent. The alcohol bomb made me think of almond extract, I don't know why but it did. The low carbonation and medium mouthfeel didn't do much for me. I didn't enjoy this beer that much, I need to try more beers in this style to get a good baseline.

Serving type: bottle

02-14-2006 01:19:18 | More by orsulacp
Photo of mntlover
mntlover

Tennessee

2.33/5  rDev -39.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 1.5

Pours an amber brownish mixture with a small foamy white head, not head really just foam, that falls to a ring.

Aroma is wheat and malt some citrus and well sort of subdued nose on this one.

Taste woo nelly lots of strong astringent flavors mixed with wheat and caramel but too much alcohol in the mix to be masked. Some citrus flavors try to rise but are soon drowned out by alcohol. This is way out of balance needs some major help or lots of cellaring not quite sure.

Mouthfeel is ok bright spot, nice light carbonation with right of medium feel.

Drinkability is well horrible wouldn't want to try again unless they fix it or its 5 years old maybe. Want to thank Sam (merlin48)anyway for sharing this one it was at the end of our review session so had good buzz but didn't help this poor brew one bit.

Serving type: bottle

02-10-2006 12:07:30 | More by mntlover
Photo of canucklehead
canucklehead

British Columbia (Canada)

4.1/5  rDev +6.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

What amazed me about this beer( my first wheat wine) was the smoothness and drinkability at less than one year old. The hops were there and so was a background complexity but unlike many barley wines there was instant drinkability. Not sure how aging would benefit this beer but at 11 % it probablyt won't hurt either. All in all a real smooth operator at a dangerously high ABV.

Serving type: bottle

02-06-2006 21:16:38 | More by canucklehead
Photo of feloniousmonk
feloniousmonk

Minnesota

3.58/5  rDev -6.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Hazy orangeish, solid cream-toned head. Nice looking.

Aroma, sweet, rosy, lightly spicy, cherries and melons, a bit perfumey.

Interesting texture here, a littlesour, a little spice, clovey, fruity...very odd.

Nothing wrong...just weird...nothing wrong with weird.

Medium bodied, tannic finish, a bit tangy. But the flavor bottom out too quickly, there's nothing for the tongue to play with after a while, and it all drifts off faster than it ought to.... Fruit + wheat + booze, is the simple formula. While an interesting experiment, a novel take on a new style, I feel it misses the mark just a touch.

11%? Hoo, boy...it's creeping up on me...

Serving type: bottle

01-31-2006 07:41:43 | More by feloniousmonk
Photo of jmz62565
jmz62565

Connecticut

3.73/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This pours a cloudy golden red with a small tan head. A very different color. The smell is very sweet with some fruit,raisins? The taste is very bold with some fruit tastes and carmel aftertones. This does have a wine/brandy fell to it. This m/f is heavy and pretty well balanced,but you can taste the alcohol. This is a pretty good beer,with some flaws,but you can do worse.

Serving type: bottle

01-30-2006 22:42:25 | More by jmz62565
Photo of mrasskicktastic
mrasskicktastic

New Jersey

4.18/5  rDev +8.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 5 | overall: 4

A - Tea colored, cloudy with a one finger tan head that dissipates slowly leaving no lacing. Not surprising with the abv.

S - Predominantly caramel odors, although there are some fruits - pineapple, passion fruit and dates predominantly - that appear in the odor faintly. Alcohol is well masked.

T - Delicious, caramel malt sweetness with an accompanying fruitiness, again faint pineapples, dates and passion fruit, maybe grapefruit as well? The beer has a bitter finish that is meshed with the sweetness. The flavor is quite good. Alcohol isn't really noticeable. Maybe it is as it warms, but by the time it did I was certainly feeling the 11% from the other 2/3 of the beer.

M - Thick, silky smooth and very refreshing. A strong beer never tasted so smooth!

D - Again outstanding! I am not a heavy drinker, I cannot handle that much, but this was easy to drink. I finished the bomber myself and survived with no ill effects. It proved delectable at all temperatures. A bomber of this is a session! I would not try to match foods with this beer. I might have it again, although not soon (a volume issue more than anything). However, it has inspired me to try more of the big beer series.

Serving type: bottle

01-28-2006 08:13:53 | More by mrasskicktastic
Photo of NeroFiddled
NeroFiddled

Pennsylvania

4.08/5  rDev +6.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

I really enjoyed this beer. I was expecting something a little big bigger with more body and more malt to it, but as it is, it's very drinkable. And although the 11% alcohol is there, it's not really too distracting (although I guess that knowing it's there helps you to prepare for it). It's got a very nice appearance with a hazy reddish-orange-copper body, but there's little head and even less lacing, which I thought was odd for a beer with 53% wheat (even if it does have a high alcohol content). Hops are noticeable in the nose, along with some very nice yeasty fruitiness and a flicker of alcohol, and it's quite welcoming. It's smooth across the palate with a very fine bubbled, restrained carbonation and medium body. In the flavor it's lightly sweet and somewhat candyish, but still well-balanced, and the malt and hop bitterness seem to have a tug of war going on until the finish where the bitterness overcomes. The alcohol is more apparent here than in the nose, and it rises up at mid-palate, and remains a bit in the finish. However, it does lend a bit of pepperiness that helps to balance the malt and give it greater depth of character. Overall, an interesting tipple.

Serving type: bottle

01-25-2006 02:22:27 | More by NeroFiddled
Photo of merlin48
merlin48

Kentucky

3.3/5  rDev -14.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Bottle provided by Brewfan. Many Thanks! Pours a cloudy apricot body that seems to glow. No real head or lacing, not unexpected for this style. Aroma was surprisingly subdued, featuring notes of wheat malt, cedar, stale wine, and vague fruits. Mouthfeel is medium ot light medium bodied with low carbonation. Taste is slightly vinous, with notes of dry white wine. Mild wheat wafer notes become toasty wheat as it warms. A bit phenolic and hot. Fruity notes are vague and understated. Felt like I was drinking rocket fuel, at times. Alcohol is upfront and in your face with this one. A decent wheat wine that I wish I had cellared for a couple of years.

Serving type: bottle

01-24-2006 20:26:46 | More by merlin48
Photo of juzy
juzy

Alaska

3.48/5  rDev -9.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

bottled 2005

Poured this from the bottle into a big bowled wine glass. Straight up I notice the color, a hazy copper with a tinge of gold around the edges. Quite interesting and a bit mesmerizing. There is a very thin head that is gone almost instantly.

I clear my nose for my first scent...fruity, apples maybe? It's bright with a hoppy scent and a hint of alcohol.

Not exactly love at first sip, but I think I had expected something different. So I go on and sip a few more times, swishing it around each time, trying to find what stands out. I get citrusy hops and grassy notes right up front. No sweetness, I think there should be more malt sweetness to balance this out a bit, but it is a wheat wine so I'll roll with it. It finishes with a touch of malt and a bitter alcohol bite, phenolic notes on the finish and in the aroma (I forgot to mention that).

The mouthfeel was interesting, a bit oil or creamy, if you prefer. Reminds me of the mouthfeel of a good cabernet.

As for drinkability, I had to score it average, it's a hard one to get down on ones own.
I found myself in the rare position of having to drink this bottle by myelf. One glass would be more than enough of this big beer on any given night. I drank the whole bottle and found myself in bed and asleep by 9pm. Seems a tad sharp and the alcohol is not well hidden. Other than that I find it interesting, I've never had this style before so wasn't really sure what to expect.

Serving type: bottle

01-19-2006 17:11:40 | More by juzy
Photo of Bighuge
Bighuge

Minnesota

3.13/5  rDev -18.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Scarlet red-orange body. Thin light beige head. Recedes to a thin collar that leaves sporadic lace. Aroma is alcohol and fruits and more alcohol. Passion fruits mostly. Kiwi and mango come to mind. Oh, and a little pepper as well. Upon tasting, I find out that this beer packs a little punch. Well, maybe a big punch. Alcohol is hidden in no way whatsoever. Spicy and hot. And lingering. There are some good qualities to go along with that. The fruits are there. And some rich barleywine-esque malt characteristics. Just not enough to make this taste any better than average to me. Besides the heat, the mouthfeel is also lightly carbonated and close to medium in body.

Serving type: bottle

01-12-2006 04:06:14 | More by Bighuge
Photo of Manosbeeroffate
Manosbeeroffate

Maine

3.93/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pretty powerful stuff, 22oz bottle. Pours a deep orange color. My nose is stuffed up but can taste well. What I do taste? Hops galore, very citrusy is flavor, slight alcohol warmth balanced by the hops. Mouthfeel is really nice. Not something you can knock back one after the other but something to enjoy over a long period of time. That's what I'm doing here!! :)

Serving type: bottle

01-12-2006 01:16:28 | More by Manosbeeroffate
Photo of deciding39
deciding39

Massachusetts

3.85/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

22 oz brown bottle, served in a snifter.

A: Pours a golden-amber, with a half-finger white head. It disappears rather quickly, leaving a thin white collar around the glass. Minimal lacing.

S: Strong whiff of alcohol and orange, followed by sweet malted barley and wheat. Citrus hop notes also pull through.

T: Caramel malts and wheat, with assertive, citrusy hops. A smooth, but warm and alcoholic finish. Surprisingly well-balanced.

M & D: Medium/full body. A smooth, yet formidable brew. Drinkability is good, despite the well-disguised alcohol content. It was quite a challenge to knock one back by myself. I haven't had any wheat wines before that I can compare it to, but this was definately satisfying. Try it out.

Serving type: bottle

01-06-2006 03:51:25 | More by deciding39
Photo of hopsaplenty
hopsaplenty

Virginia

2.93/5  rDev -23.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A modest tan head of small and large bubbles tops a new penny copper colored liquid. There are a handful of carbonation streamers lazing their way to the surface. The smell is big and hoppy; piney and sappy with hints of malt sweetness. The first taste is medicinal in a high alcohol way. Finishes astringent, almost whiskey-like with its alcohol heat. It has a big body and is only somewhat malty, but the alcohol dominates, and it is not well integrated or balanced. I could not find a hint of the wheat notes I expected. Barely drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

01-04-2006 18:15:07 | More by hopsaplenty
Photo of mmmbeer
mmmbeer

Massachusetts

3.98/5  rDev +3.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

22 oz., bottle conditioned - served in a snifter. Pours an amber with hints of red and a 1 finger white head that leaves a collar and some lacing. It smells of citric and herbal hops, apricots, pine, pineapple, and some tingly alcohol. The first taste reveals the tart/tangy characters and a thick body with low carbonation. It's followed with citric/herbal hops, pineapple, apricot, sweetness, vinous malts, tobacco?, and a pretty good bitterness - essentially a barley wine with a wheat kick and tanginess. Fairly good, but could be better. I'm gonna try to find other examples of the style though.

Serving type: bottle

12-27-2005 00:06:02 | More by mmmbeer
Photo of pentathlete
pentathlete

Virginia

2.7/5  rDev -29.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Popped this open because the spouse fried up a panful of oysters. The wife enjoyed this with these succulent shellfish. But let's look at it on the individual merits. This pours a dirty orange, cloudy, and no head to speak of. Nose is a chalky sugar odor with no malts or hops discernible. Taste follows with another chalky sugar soaked alcohol bath of the tongue. There is an abrupt cherry prune flavor but it isn't all that pleasant. Mouthfeel is medium but the taste gets in the way. To be sure I've tried this after having two stouts and a tripel, but I expected much more from this.

Serving type: bottle

12-23-2005 03:23:26 | More by pentathlete
Photo of NEhophead
NEhophead

Massachusetts

4.25/5  rDev +10.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

A thin white head that fades almost on impact. Minor ringed lacing. A semi-hazy bright copper in color.

An arry of alcohol soaked fruity esters: apple, orange, pear, peach, apricot. A candied sweetness; honey, light vanilla. A touch of floral hops with a whaff of light lemon.

A big honey sweetness to start the sip that leads to ripe fruit flavors: peach, apricot, and a hint of sour lemon. The alcohol presence is not only evident, but woven throughout every flavor in this concoction. A moderately intense hop bitterness; an oily hop profile, prior to a honey sweetened, alcohol felt aftertaste.

Medium bodied; smooth, gaseous, and slick on the palate. Very warming for such a big brew.

Not quite a session beer, but this is a wonderfully unique ale that should be sought after. Well crafted and very unique...exactly what I've come to expect from my bros in NH.

Serving type: bottle

12-16-2005 15:34:32 | More by NEhophead
Photo of arguemaniac
arguemaniac

Virginia

3.55/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a hazy orange amber. A head never really forms nor is there even a thin lace left in the glass. Sweet, fruity malt, alcohol, and citrus hops in the aroma. The palate is dominated by an alcohol bite and a sweet fruitiness (cherry, esp.) along with a generally grainy flavor. Pine and citrus hops make themselves noticed, adding a great hop spice to this brew, but they are a bit out-matched by the malt character. Caramel maltiness also makes a strong appearance, especially towards the dry finish. The smooth mouthfeel is medium-bodied, with moderate carbonation.

Never had this style before and it wasn’t too bad. Apparently is a hybrid between a barely wine and a wheat ale and, in some ways, it’s the best of both worlds; hoppier and more drinkable than your average barely wine, but tastier and richer than many wheat ales. Certainly worth a try, though I bet that some aging would be a good idea. Recommended.

Serving type: bottle

12-12-2005 05:38:18 | More by arguemaniac
Photo of Foxman
Foxman

New Jersey

4/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

It pours a hazy golden amber, very mich like iced tea in hue. A short finger of beige head drops promptly to whirly-gigs of fine froth. Flits of lacing flatten against the glass.

The aroma fluffed a pillow of caramel malt propping a tart wheaty pop and a citrusy swirl of hops and berry flashes. A mild alcohol note lofts lightly.

Upon tasting, the earthy cherry sweetness of barley and the dusky tanginess of wheat pair to lay a grainy groundwork. Citrus notes of hops punch through the middle, and as the flavor progresses the melding of grain and hops yield a spread of creamy pineapple. A current of alcohol is more poignant here, lending an ehtery vapor. A toasted grain character slides in toward the close, and the finish dries to a lingering hop and wheat crisp dryness. A quenching quaff, it's big and bold, but also buoyant.

Medium bodied, the hops and grain join to feel almost chewable, with the lingering dry bitterness a pleasant palatal memory.

It's sinewy and slinky, saucy and sassy, and intriguing blend of grain and hops. It is large, flexing strong ABV muscles that kick quite stoutly. While that imits things slightly, the sweet and snappy nature stand tall and make each sip a treat. The only downside is that, as part of the brewery's Big Beer series, the availability will be limited, but anticipation becomes a good thing indeed in the hands of Smuttynose.

Serving type: bottle

12-11-2005 18:50:18 | More by Foxman
Smuttynose Wheat Wine (Big Beer Series) from Smuttynose Brewing Company
86 out of 100 based on 685 ratings.