1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Monty Python's Holy Grail Ale - Black Sheep Brewery PLC

Not Rated.
Monty Python's Holy Grail AleMonty Python's Holy Grail Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
76
okay

1,074 Ratings
THE BROS
87
very good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,074
Reviews: 586
rAvg: 3.33
pDev: 17.12%
Wants: 21
Gots: 60 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Black Sheep Brewery PLC visit their website
United Kingdom (England)

Style | ABV
English Pale Ale |  4.70% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: stcules on 05-24-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Monty Python's Holy Grail Ale Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 1,074 | Reviews: 586 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of t0rin0
3/5  rDev -9.9%

t0rin0, Aug 24, 2012
Photo of djrn2
2.5/5  rDev -24.9%

djrn2, Feb 01, 2014
Photo of zestar
3.25/5  rDev -2.4%

zestar, Wednesday at 11:19 AM
Photo of nmann08
4/5  rDev +20.1%

nmann08, Dec 14, 2011
Photo of acurtis
2.5/5  rDev -24.9%

acurtis, May 06, 2012
Photo of metter98
3.49/5  rDev +4.8%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

A: The beer is clear but dark mahogany in color and has a moderate amount of visible carbonation. It poured with a finger high dense off white head that died down, leaving a large patch of bubbles on the surface, a thick collar around the edge of the glass, and lots of lacy rings of bubbles down the sides of the glass.
S: Light aromas of apples, toffee and lemon citrus are present in the nose.
T: The taste has flavors of fruity yeast and toffee along with some hints of chocolate malts. Bits of sweetness are also perceptible.
M: It feels light-bodied on the palate and has a moderate amount of carbonation. A bit of dryness is noticeable towards the finish.
O: This beer is very easy to drink and can be considered sessionable. It's rather complex for a light-bodied beer.

metter98, Mar 29, 2013
Photo of brentk56
3.2/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Appearance: Pours a nice clear light amber body with a fluffy head that lasts quite some time and leaves a fair amount of lacing down the side of the glass

Smell: A fair amount going on - primarily grassy and herbacious with an undertone of caramel malt and a hint of diacetyl

Taste: This ale packs a fairly aggressive assault on the taste buds - starts out fairly bland, but that is followed quickly by a bitter hoppy punch that tastes of sour apples; dries out into the finish and is slightly phenolic but there is a touch of sweetness on the tip of the tongue that joins the other flavors

Mouthfeel: Medium bodied, a bit slick and moderately carbonated

Drinkability: Perhaps it is the "burning witches" but this one just doesn't come together well for me; the flavors are schizophrenic and while I prefer an ale that is full of flavor, I just can't see returning to this one anytime soon

brentk56, Apr 27, 2005
Photo of BuckeyeNation
3.05/5  rDev -8.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Dusty orange-gold with an abundance of fine, suspended bits. The pastel orange tinted, cream colored head is sticky enough to lay down a better than average amount of lace in chunky, concentric rings. A good look.

The nose, unfortunately, isn't so good. It smells like lightly musty grain with a subtle whiff of English hops. I'm not sure that I want it to be more aromatic because what's appreciated isn't all that wonderful.

Things start out promisingly enough on the palate with a fruity, spicy hoppiness. Because of undermalting, the flavor deteriorates quickly to become harsh and mineral-like with a ragged, unsupported bitterness. The beer doesn't feel flat in terms of carbonation, but flat in terms of flavor. There's an echo of reasonable hop flavor on the finish, but it's too little, too late.

While not exactly a joke beer without any redeeming qualities, Black Sheep Brewery could have made a better effort to put quality inside this classically (for fans) named and labeled bottle. The other Black Sheep offerings that I've had have been solid, but Holy Grail Ale is anything but. Buy it for the bottle, not the beer.

BuckeyeNation, Nov 23, 2004
Photo of Phyl21ca
3.1/5  rDev -6.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

500ml bottle - Amber colour brew with a nice generous head that stayed on for a while. This is a standard english ale with the usual bitter aftertaste and good hops taste. It is a good brew but nothing out of the usual or to distinguish himself from the pack.

Phyl21ca, Oct 14, 2003
Photo of BEERchitect
3.15/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

It's what you'd expect from an English Pale Ale. Pours a golden-to-copper color, with some haze. Nice carbonation and retention. Soft barley grain aromas, lightly bready, yeasty, and modestly spicy. Flavors are similar with emphasis on grain flavor from barley. Lower body than normal brings out more hop flavor, leading to grassy or herbal flavors. Body starts off medium, but becomes watery durring the finish. Easily drinkable. A nice beer, but not one I'll be craving soon.

BEERchitect, Sep 01, 2005
Photo of mikesgroove
3.28/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured a clear nice amber with a huge white head, very slow fade to leave a nice half inch lace filled head. Lots of carbonation. No real gooey glass clinging lace on this. Left a clean glass. Not a whole lot of smell here, what is there is a bready, yeasty smell from the malts, but again not real strong. Pretty typical for the style. Taste fared the same, not strong, not bad at all, pretty average. Some bready and grain tastes, but that was about it, nothing to make it stand out in a crowd. It did have a nice smooth feel, crisp, light, dare I say refreshing, and excellent session beer. All and all this was a typical sessionable english brown ale, more notable for the name then whats in the bottle. A good one off try for the novelity if nothing else.

mikesgroove, Feb 22, 2007
Photo of kylehay2004
3.25/5  rDev -2.4%

kylehay2004, Apr 06, 2014
Photo of jaydoc
3.5/5  rDev +5.1%

jaydoc, Oct 26, 2013
Photo of ChainGangGuy
1.43/5  rDev -57.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

Appearance: Gusher upon popping the cap, leave it to a beer named after Monty Python to play a joke on me. Pours a clear, orange-gold body with a tall, though short-lived, white head.

Smell: Vaguely malty, fruity, but there's a strong stink in here, some plasticy, chemical-like odor present and oh I find it displeasing.

Taste: Pale malts with a treacle sweetness and a kick of palate-ruining lacquer. Slight spicy bitterness, but at this point you're just trying to get that taste out of your mouth. Peculiar, downright icky aftertaste that sends the drinker in search of a tall glass of water. In fact, BRB!

Mouthfeel: Medium-bodied. Medium carbonation after the initial gushing.

Drinkability: Not recommended. Save yourself the drain pour and dodge this one, folks.

ChainGangGuy, Nov 13, 2008
Photo of Knapp85
3.73/5  rDev +12%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I had been a fan of the Monty Python since I was in 7th grade, so when I came across this I had to try it. The beer poured out as a typical golden color with soapy white head on top. The smell of the beer smell like an ESB, lots of malts and grains on the nose. The taste of the beer has a solid bitterness to it with a semi-sweet flavor in the mix too. The mouthfeel was nice, had a pretty good amount of carbonation to it and was just a bit lighter than medium bodied. Overall I found this ale to be enjoyable and would probably have it again one day.

Knapp85, Jul 20, 2011
Photo of oberon
3.73/5  rDev +12%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Drinking an English ale on inpedendance day how ironic,anways pours a golden color with a little orange tint with a pretty nice frothy head that settles pretty well into a soapy-like consistancy.Aroma is a little herbal with some toffee notes,taste is pretty mild and restrained but good with some light brown sugar and mint intertwining nicely.A respectable ale very easy to drink and pretty good even in the heat,I passed this beer up alot thinking it was just a gimmick but I actually liked it.

oberon, Jul 04, 2004
Photo of westcoastbeerlvr
1.75/5  rDev -47.4%

westcoastbeerlvr, Oct 17, 2013
Photo of TMoney2591
3.73/5  rDev +12%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Served in a Lagunitas mason jar.

Now why aren't more beers tempered over burning witches?? Anyway, this stuff pours a clear copper topped by a finger of off-white foam. The nose comprises biscuit, dry grass, light honey, light flowers, and a touch of cedar. The taste holds notes of caramel, light biscuit, grass, and a pinch of vanilla and powdered sugar for the sake of it. The body is a light medium, with a light moderate carbonation and a fluid feel. Overall, a nice EPA, one that's mild without being boring, and one that lends itself to a high degree of drinkability.

TMoney2591, Nov 14, 2012
Photo of largadeer
1.75/5  rDev -47.4%

largadeer, Oct 17, 2013
Photo of zeff80
3.65/5  rDev +9.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A - Poured out a clear, dark orange color with a one-finger, off-white head of foam. It left thin wisps of foam on the glass.

S - It smelled grassy and earthy. What'd you know...it smells like all English Pale Ales that make it across the pond.

T - It was malty with some sweet caramel. It had a mild grassy hop bite.

M - It was crisp, sharp and smooth. A light bodied ale with a dry finish.

D - This is an okay ale. Fairly typical to the style. Not amazing but tastes good.

zeff80, Oct 13, 2010
Photo of biboergosum
2.83/5  rDev -15%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

I have to admit, amongst the plethora of English ales available here, the marketing shtick on this one won my "I Fart in Your General Direction"-addled brain over.

This beer poured an attractive clear golden-brown hue, with a substantial head. The nose on this beer was more queer than Michael Palin's sense of humour. It's fruity, to be sure, of the fermented variety, but the type is hard to pin down. It is reminiscent of perry, so I'll say pears. It actually smells quite good. The taste is quite a divergence - malty, but bitter, and not in a good hoppy manner. It's thin, with a funky vegetal flavour, and a bland cereal character. The carbonation is also on the high side. The finish is moderately astringent, not particularly pleasant.

There are too many weird, non-complementary things going on in this brew, which may work for its label namesakes, but not for the stuff in the bottle.

biboergosum, May 19, 2008
Photo of NeroFiddled
3.9/5  rDev +17.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Clear, light to deep copper in color throughout the length of an Imperial Pint glass - let's just call it tawny. It has a light cream colored, massive, rocky head which dies down but holds a very good collar and whisp across the glass. Immense lace at the top of the glass, although it receeds as it lowers in the glass. The aroma is herbal (and I mean Ganja), somewhat metallic, grassy, with some light caramel malt at the back (and possibly some very light diacetyl butterscotch). There are surely some Fuggles in here. Quite an interesting and complex aroma, but not necessarily more than pleasing. The body is light-medium, but with a gentle creaminess. The flavor is quite metallic in nature, but has more of a mineral-like quality as opposed the the "bloodiness" of Bateman's XXX for example. This beer needs to be served at cellar temperature to be enjoyed, otherwise this becomes the leading note of the beer. Combined with a slight fruity character (that reveals itself quite readily on the lips but not so well in the mouth), there is also a dryish, woody maltiness that is quite enjoyable as it lays itself across the mouth and tongue. This is the flavor that represents the beer in the finish, along with a nice dose of bitterness and a dull, lightly tart note. Extremely English. So much so that I believe it will be misinterpereted by most. I don't think alot of tasters will be able to find the complexity here.

NeroFiddled, Aug 13, 2002
Photo of Jason
4.4/5  rDev +32.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

16.9 oz brown bottle with some humor on the label. No freshness date. Awesome head, looks like the top of a meringue pie and sticks all over the place. Mildly hazed pale copper colour.

Grassy herbal hop aroma with some malt sweetness in the back that is breadier than anything else. Faint diacetyl and fruitiness in the nose also.

Impeccably smooth with a slick and flowing mouth feel. Big tea-like hop character is herbal and lemony with a ghost like tobacco flavour. Bitterness is modest but stern. Touch of musty diacetyl and some vague fruitiness also. Grain with a bread crust like flavour, malt sweetness provides a good base yet is seldom seen. Finishes slightly with lingering aleish flavours.

Ohh yeah, this is a beauty. I love English ales like this, pack with flavour and complexities yet very quaffable at the same time. This was worth every penny of the $3.50 I spent.

Jason, Aug 08, 2002
Photo of TheManiacalOne
3.88/5  rDev +16.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

16.9oz. bottle poured into a pint glass.

A: Color is slightly hazy, deep amber. It starts with a large, white head, but it fades a bit quickly and doesn't leave very much lace.

S: Honey is the first thing you smell. Some caramel, malt & wheat follow.

T: The taste is a lot sweeter that I expected. Malty, honey & caramel as was in the smell. As the sweetness fades, you start to get a little bit of hops flavor mixed, but not a heck of a lot.

M: Very smooth, medium/heavy body. I would compare the texture to the APWA's that I've had. Medium/heavy carbonation, someone had told me that the carbonation was too much, but while I agree it's a bit above average, I think the carbonation is just right for this particular beer.

D: Although the beer is smooth and flavorful, it is a little bit more filling than most other beers, which might not make it as drinkable. However, since it goes down easy and it's not very strong, it might take a while before you notice that you're full.

It was the "Monty Python" name that made me try the beer and I'm sure that's what the company was going for. It wasn't quite what I expected, but it was certainly a pleasant surprise, especially since I got the bottles on a "buy one, get one free" special. I think this beer may be more conducive to being consumed with a meal rather than by itself, but I think this is a very good beer.

TheManiacalOne, Feb 04, 2006
Photo of WVbeergeek
3.28/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Amber hue nice sized cream colored head leaves nicely spread fine formed lacing. Aroma: Sweet grains with a touch of fruity malt characteristics some hop nose is also present painfully English balance going on. Taste: Rolling malt sweetness with a weird twang of tartness seems a bit off almost acidic there's a nutty edge here as well not too uniform flavor finishes with a blunt bittereness. Mouthfeel: Thin bodied watery texture light carbonation. Drinkability: Next time I will pass on this novelty beer, it was a decent English ale but somewhat mediocre for me I was hoping for something great from an ale based off of one of my favorite movies.

WVbeergeek, Mar 23, 2004
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Monty Python's Holy Grail Ale from Black Sheep Brewery PLC
76 out of 100 based on 1,074 ratings.