1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Shiner Blonde - Spoetzl Brewery

Not Rated.
Shiner BlondeShiner Blonde

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
69
poor

761 Ratings
THE BROS
72
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 761
Reviews: 281
rAvg: 2.96
pDev: 18.24%
Wants: 3
Gots: 48 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Spoetzl Brewery visit their website
Texas, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Lager |  4.40% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: kbub6f on 11-19-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Shiner Blonde Alström Bros
Ratings: 761 | Reviews: 281 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of aggiearcher13
aggiearcher13

Texas

2.78/5  rDev -6.1%

From a shiner mix-six a few weeks ago...

A: Pale and clear. Not overly impressive. Not much head or lacing.

S: Kind of corny-barley. Some indistinguishable hops.

T: Bland. I find it better when straight from the bottle. Overall, not too impressive. Maybe better than most for the style.

M: Light. Highly carbed, not impressive, but not terrible.

D: It is what it is.

11-08-2009 05:46:10 | More by aggiearcher13
Photo of maleman
maleman

Mississippi

2.28/5  rDev -23%

poured from a 12oz bottle into a pint glass. no freshness dating.

A - aptly named as it poured as pale as green tea. thin white bubbly one-finger head that receded quickly. thin lacing.

S - barley is dominant. a bit of spice of some kind. something almost like burnt grass.

T - having a hard time describing the taste...not much there to hang onto.

M - extremely light-bodied, medium carbonation. not much of a finish, nor any aftertaste.

D - not much to get excited about with this swill. will not purchase again.

11-06-2009 00:33:32 | More by maleman
Photo of Phyl21ca
Phyl21ca

Quebec (Canada)

3/5  rDev +1.4%

Bottle: Poured a golden blond color lager with a medium pure white foamy head with average retention and some lacing. Aroma of light sweet floral malt with light crisp hops notes. Taste is more enjoyable then I had expected with floral and dry notes well balanced. Body is about average with OK carbonation. Better then I had expected - nothing bad just a bit too subdued.

10-30-2009 00:34:55 | More by Phyl21ca
Photo of wahhmaster
wahhmaster

Virginia

2.23/5  rDev -24.7%

Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a 0.5L Krušovice-branded pilsner glass.

Appearance: Pours a pale yellow color with a small, fizzy head that dissipates almost immediately and leaves no lacing. Lots of carbonation bubbles as well. Looks as yellow as your palest macros.

Smell: Smells like corn. This smells almost as bad as some light beers.

Taste: Really light on taste. Just grainy, corny flavors. Once again, just tastes like your typical adjunct lager. I really expected more from a Shiner beer.

Mouthfeel: Like over-carbonated water. Very little body to it.

Drinkability: Go elsewhere. While I could down a few of this in short order, there are cheaper beers out there that do the job just as well. If you're looking more for a tasty drink, go elsewhere too; there's very little of that here.

10-27-2009 21:59:35 | More by wahhmaster
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

3.1/5  rDev +4.7%

A nice alternative to the industrial light lagers out there. Add a touch of fruitiness and more substantial maltiness without sacrificing emptiness and blandness, here we go.

A standard yellow straw color has brilliant clarity. Medium head formation leads to a moderate retention except for the lace around the class that holds 'til the end. Lively carbonation keeps the foam comming.

A part-grain, part-malt balance gives a light bready, cracker-like malt character while the grains give a bit of sharpness and acidity- much needed with the low levels of herbal hops. Somewhat floral at times; could be hops, could be soft esters. Light sulfurs keep the beer from being as clean as it could be.

Fairly light and crisp in texture with a fleeting body that matches the flavor. Quite clean in the end with a short-lived linger of grain breads and sweetness.

Compared to Budweiser, this is a beer that is better in quality, complexity, and cleanliness.

Thanks Exiled!

10-26-2009 18:23:28 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of tjwarren
tjwarren

Ohio

3.95/5  rDev +33.4%

Poured from bottle into pint glass although I am thinking it is better out of the bottle.

Appearance - very pale yellow with slight white head.

Smell - not my strong point but smell was faint to say the least.

Taste - not a lot of taste but that is not what it is for, it is to refresh and it does that well.

Mouthfeel - smooth with enough carbonation to make it interesting.

Drinkability - this one goes down way too easy. Can only imagine what it would be like on a hot summer day. At 4.4% abv this is very drinkable.

Surprised how much I liked it considering that it is rather light in the taste department. But I like the beers from Shiner and this one is no exception.

10-19-2009 23:24:23 | More by tjwarren
Photo of emsroth
emsroth

New York

2.45/5  rDev -17.2%

12oz bottle

App: Light gold/straw. Pefect clarity. small frothy white head.

Smell: Sweet, biscuity malt with perhaps a touch of hops. The scent has hints of sour apple and honey that mask the biting aroma of alcohol. A rather complex scent for a simple beer.

Taste: Really not much going on. The strongest flavor is a bit of mineral bitterness. Ends with a husk that lingers for a while. Tastes like a full barley brew, but rather lacking in flavor.

Crisp and refreshing with a nice medium-low carbonation. The mouthfeel, however...I'm not sure if it's unpleasant, or if it's somehow linked to the taste which makes it unpleasant. Either way I'm not liking it.

10-07-2009 04:10:46 | More by emsroth
Photo of Slatetank
Slatetank

Pennsylvania

3.65/5  rDev +23.3%

I picked this up at Outlet Liquors in Rehoboth Beach, DE. Poured chilled in a mug.

A - Golden straw w/ refulgent appearance and clarity. 2 fingers of pure white w/ a tiny bead. The effervescence is noticeable in multiple streams of pin sized bubbles and wisps of lace form around the collar

S - Gentle malt w cereal accented nose and mild herbal hop tinge the odor is light w/ toasted grain

M - Light refreshing and mild w/ subtle sweetness and moderate carbonation as a blonde should be. Semi sweet as it finishes on the clean side

T - A grainy malt taste w/ subtle toasted corn flavors and hints of light hopping in the flavor w/ mild sweet taste as it finishes the yeast gives no off flavor, but really does nothin' to help either w/ a light toast & spice on the last sip

D - I could tak or leave this honestly but it is true to the style and has many qualities I expect from a blonde-mainly refreshment and it is a quencher foremost

09-17-2009 22:21:22 | More by Slatetank
Photo of TeeCee
TeeCee

Louisiana

2.65/5  rDev -10.5%

Quick review - BMC American Lager made by a craft brewery.

Color - yellow beer with a tinge of honey. I poured it hard and it built a bit of pure white head which dissipated to a little foam with no lacing.

Smell - this smells like a BMC American Lager. I get a little bit of malt at the tail end.

Taste - this tastes like a BMC American Lager. Not much else. It's a bit smooth, maybe slightly malty for the type.

Mouthfeel - medium thin but thicker than expected.

Sessioning - extremely. This is a lawnmower beer.

08-23-2009 00:40:51 | More by TeeCee
Photo of civilizedpsycho
civilizedpsycho

Michigan

2.78/5  rDev -6.1%

Poured bottle into pint glass.

Appearance: Very pale golden color that is very clear. Had a small head.

Smell: This had what I would call a funky malt aroma. Not very pleasing.

Taste: Fairly sweet malt flavor with very little bitterness. Smooth, but pretty plain.

Mouthfeel: A pretty modest body, but not too thin.

Drinkability: It's not horrible, but it's not all that great. There's better beers within this style.

08-21-2009 01:25:28 | More by civilizedpsycho
Photo of gmfessen
gmfessen

Michigan

2.6/5  rDev -12.2%

Poured from the bottle into a pint glass, beer looks like an American macro lager, being a clear golden-straw color with a fizzy white head and millions of bubbles rising to the top of the glass. The nose is pretty non-descript; a bit of grainy malt and weak, faded hops - slightly skunky. The taste reveals more of the skunkiness. Tastes like many generic pale euro lagers I've had, skunkiness and all. Grainy and one dimensional (two if you count the skunk), I have nothing positive to say about the taste. The mouthfeel is light in body with just a touch of tongue-burning carbonation. Overall, a beer that would be easy to drink if you wanted to but as the flavor stands I'm not sure why you would. Stick with Shiner Bock - a much better beer!

07-25-2009 19:56:39 | More by gmfessen
Photo of Thur123
Thur123

Georgia

2.55/5  rDev -13.9%

bottle into a stella glass.

A: Golden kind of yellow. or wheat if you like.
The head was very white and about a quarter inch high. Fizzled out nicely with no lacing.

S: Whoa...wheat and yeast.

glug glug glug
Tatse - The first thing I get is alot of grains, which then fades into a more bitter grassy taste. ends on the malty notes. i want to say there are adjucts in this but i dont know.

mouthfeel - pretty good, a little on the thin side, too watery. the fizz is fine but seems to fade quickly.

drinkability - i feel like the flavor comes in like two unbalanced notes. its not horrible, and this is not my style of choice but this is really just middle of the road. sessionable, but i doubt i would choose it.

07-22-2009 01:33:56 | More by Thur123
Photo of tobymugg
tobymugg

Texas

4.1/5  rDev +38.5%

I believe that all Pilsner style lagers should be judged on their own turf. If you compare them to exotic, dark, heavy, expensive, bottle conditioned, or other whooplah beers, they invariably can be described as piss-coloured, blandish, fizzy and boring. However these beers are the most popular and best-selling beers in the world, for the simple reason that they are refreshing, drinkable, and pair well with many common dishes. They have no distinct outstanding flavor notes, but their flavor can be an excellent and very balanced blend of those notes we most savor in a fine lager. This being said, I see a few Pilsner style lagers being notably better than the rest, and Shiner Blonde fits in the category of a good specimen Blonde beer.

A: A good looking pale lager.

S: Grains, yeast.

T: Sweet, pleasant, slightly hopped, light bitterness. My only complaint with Shiner Blonde and Shiner Bock alike is their lack of the characteristic biscuity aftertaste that makes a good pale lager so wonderful. The flavor is very good, but it ends abruptly instead of echoing pleasant grain notes to finish.

M: Very normal carbonation.

D: Drinkability is the strength of this beer. It can be enjoying in large amounts without hangovers. But don't. Drink two or three at a barbecue in Alpine or Marfa in may, or have a few during your stay in Big Bend National Park. This is a great Texas backyard beer.

07-20-2009 03:42:05 | More by tobymugg
Photo of DeathbySexyBT
DeathbySexyBT

Texas

3/5  rDev +1.4%

A: Straw yellow. No relevant head or lacing.

S: Hint of grass and cloves. I say hint, because you really have to try to smell this beer. It has almost no smell at all.

T: Think macro-brewery lager, but a hair better. Lightly carbonated. Hints of malt. Hints of hops.

M: The carbonation is ok, but there is just nothing going on with this beer.

D: This is the high point of the beer. I would call this a lawnmower beer as this is more of a refreshing drink on a hot day than anything.

07-16-2009 13:42:36 | More by DeathbySexyBT
Photo of blackearth
blackearth

Minnesota

3.05/5  rDev +3%

Pours light yellow with no head. Aroma of pilsner malt, clove and a little fruity. Light bodied and crisp with pale flavors and light hops. Thinking that this was the same as Spoetzl's first brew from 1919 makes it a bit more interesting, but it's not much different from a macro lager. A good alternative to BMC.

07-13-2009 17:09:26 | More by blackearth
Photo of Mosstrooper
Mosstrooper

California

3.13/5  rDev +5.7%

Poured from 12oz bottle into 19oz pilsner glass.

Appearance: Pale golden color with almost no head.

Smell: Lots of grain and corn, with a bit of malt and hints of hops.

Taste: Starts sweet with a bit of a corny flavor, and finishes off with a pleasant bit of hops at the end.

Mouthfeel: Pretty thin and heavily carbonated, but also crisp and refreshing.

Drinkability: Overall not too impressive. It tastes pretty good, but isn't too great for much else. Is a good choice for outdoor Texas barbecue, though. I'd drink it again, although probably not regularly.

07-07-2009 17:24:29 | More by Mosstrooper
Photo of Tone
Tone

Missouri

2.85/5  rDev -3.7%

Pours a clear, pale yellow color. One inch head of a white color. Decent retention and poor lacing. Smells of yeast, grain, and slight citrus. Fits the style of an American Pale Lager. Mouth feel is smooth and crisp with a high carbonation level. Tastes of yeast, grain, and a hint of citrus. Overall, not an exciting blonde at all - more of a regular lager. Nothing to go out of your way to get.

06-24-2009 05:30:14 | More by Tone
Photo of Fnord
Fnord

Texas

2.63/5  rDev -11.1%

Shiner Blonde

Appearance - Very clear, very pale yellow with almost no head.

Smell - Almost nothing. Maybe a hint of sweetness, a barest whiff of grass.

Taste - Very underwhelming. A bit of grass to start with, closely followed by caramel malts When it warms up a little, some pale malts begin to peek out of hiding in the aftertaste.

Mouthfeel - Medium body, very low carbonation. I think this is the least carbonated pale lager I've ever had.

Drinkability - Less refreshing than a lot of pale lagers, but it's really easy to drink. I'm already 2/3 of the way through this one by the time I'm writing this.

Notes - The lack of carbonation combined with the light flavors is a little weird. I can see this being a summer beer in the Yukon. Mainly, though, I think this is a beer intended to appeal to people who don't drink beer. In fact, I've known people who disliked all beer but this one. I suppose it fills a useful market niche, but it's really not for the beer geek.

06-18-2009 15:34:45 | More by Fnord
Photo of BeanBone
BeanBone

Texas

3.25/5  rDev +9.8%

Appearance: A crystal-clear, pale straw body with half a finger of fizzy white head that burns out rapidly leaving no lacing. Blonde is certainly an appropriate name for this beer.

Aroma: Grainy, pale malt with some grassy hops mixed in. Reminiscent of a macro lager, but not quite as soulless.

Taste: A mildly sweet, grainy pale malt body with a few hints of grassy hops around the edges. A grainy, cereal-like aftertaste. This is a very straightforward beer.

Mouthfeel: Crisp and medium bodied with good carbonation. Dry finish.

Drinkability: Certainly a very drinkable beer, though just a little boring if I'm honest.

Verdict: Blonde is certainly not the most complex or exciting beer in the Shiner lineup, but I don't think it was ever meant to be. This is pretty much Shiner's take on the American macro-style Lager, and the result is certainly a little more interesting than the offers from the big three. This works well as a gateway beer for the Bud/Miller/Coors set.

06-16-2009 23:58:44 | More by BeanBone
Photo of Daybis
Daybis

Mississippi

2.95/5  rDev -0.3%

Poured into a pint glass.

A- Pale yellow in color. Crystal Clear. 1/4in head that quickly dissipates.

S- Clean, but not a whole lot of smell.

T- Weak up front, but a slight grainy taste upfront. Bitter aftertaste and a sweetness that lingers long after swallowed.

M- Watery, the carbonation also helps add a bit of a bite up front.

D- Is drinkable. Great for sitting by the pool or enjoying outdoor activities.

06-10-2009 23:50:26 | More by Daybis
Photo of smibroncos
smibroncos

New York

2.55/5  rDev -13.9%

A. Poured a clear light blonde, with a short white head. The head did not last and almost no lacing on the glass.

S. Corn, grain, grass

T. Slightly bitter,I thought maybe like a cross between a kolsh and a pilsner. Soapy.

M. Lightly carbonated with small bubbles. Slight dryness. Light bodied, light flavored.

D. I did not care too much for this beer. Below average.

06-01-2009 23:57:32 | More by smibroncos
Photo of Kromes
Kromes

Georgia

2.88/5  rDev -2.7%

Pours a crystal clear straw color with a thin line of bubbles for a head. Looks rather thin. A standard american lager smell, some sweet honey malt and hop. A sweet malt flavor and earthy hop finish. A slightly bitter finish from the hop. Not too bad. Mouthfeel is a little thin before the carbonation kicks in. Drinkability is ok.

05-25-2009 21:56:15 | More by Kromes
Photo of twiggamortis420
twiggamortis420

Texas

3/5  rDev +1.4%

Pours a perfectly clear medium yellow color with a fairly small white head that fades a shade slower than most macros.

The nose is comprised of pale malt graininess and a very faint grassy hop aroma. Nothing offensive here at all, but nothing especially noteworthy either.

The flavor is extremely light and unsubstantial. A few hints of light malt are about the only things I can taste. It has less flavor than the Shiner Light. It is crisp, smooth and refreshing. Absolutely no off flavors are present, it's a well crafted beer...but the lack of body and flavor are disappointing.

05-23-2009 17:56:38 | More by twiggamortis420
Photo of drunkboxer1
drunkboxer1

Texas

3.13/5  rDev +5.7%

Very pale yellow. Thin white head that disappears real quick like, although it does leave some thin lace. Smells faintly of corn and grain. Very thin malt profile with a really crisp finish. The mouthfeel puts this above BMC, but it really doesn't taste like much. Fairly high carbonation. Actually as it warms there is a bit more maltiness to this than I thought. This would make one hell of a lawnmower beer, but there are cheaper lawnmower candidates out there.

05-11-2009 02:18:35 | More by drunkboxer1
Photo of BlankFrank
BlankFrank

Oklahoma

3.15/5  rDev +6.4%

Poured from the bottle into a glass, showing it's extremely light gold color. The clean, white head makes the briefest appearance, and it leaves almost no lacing.

Very light and vague smells of sweetness combine with an even lighter whiff of hops at the end. Nothing bad comes out, but then again almost no smells are noticeable.

This has a very clean cut taste. It's perfect in that there is no "bad" flavor, but because there is really no interesting flavor to set it apart I couldn't really call it great. Dry and crisp with the standard grainy malty taste and whisper of hops that define so many of the lighter American lagers, Shiner doesn't really produce anything special with this beer. Though there isn't anything bad to say about it, there's nothing that makes the Blonde's taste great.

I do like the feel of this beer; it's very appropriate for the style. Lots of action with the carbonation, but you can get a good sense of body, particularly at the beginning of the sip. A clean finish with a good bitterness brings it together very well at the end.

Especially during a hotter day, this beer is hard to beat for drinkability. It's perfectly quenching and easily sessionable. The lack of interest, though, doesn't really entice me to drink more.

05-08-2009 07:07:15 | More by BlankFrank
Shiner Blonde from Spoetzl Brewery
69 out of 100 based on 761 ratings.