1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Shiner Blonde - Spoetzl Brewery

Not Rated.
Shiner BlondeShiner Blonde

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
69
poor

759 Ratings
THE BROS
72
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 759
Reviews: 281
rAvg: 2.96
pDev: 18.24%
Wants: 3
Gots: 47 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Spoetzl Brewery visit their website
Texas, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Lager |  4.40% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: kbub6f on 11-19-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Shiner Blonde Alström Bros
Ratings: 759 | Reviews: 281 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Bitterbill
Bitterbill

Wyoming

3.33/5  rDev +12.5%

This pours a really pale yellow with a very small head of foam that fades quickly. Surprisingly, there's some lacing.

The smell is *very* light so I can't sense anything other than a bit of sweet malt and very light citrus. Wow. What a hard task it is to smell this one.

The taste is a bit more assertive but only just. Light notes of some sweet malt and grain with a smidgeon of some hop bitterness. This is definitely a beer intended to drink cold as warming it up does nothing for it.

Light bodied with brisk carbonation, it finishes with a decidedly corny flavour.

Drinkability? It's not a bad drinker at all, despite my comments above. The abv is perfect for sessioning and it has enough flavour not to bore you to death. ;^)

04-16-2009 23:26:36 | More by Bitterbill
Photo of lanechaffin
lanechaffin

Texas

3.1/5  rDev +4.7%

I notice a lot of people selecting this brew, but I can't really understand why..it does nothing for me. The finish is starkly brisk and it doesn't taste like much. I was expecting much better. This is easily the worst beer in a case of Shiner family reunion- including the lights. I'd probably reach for an Old Milwaukee before this. It's not undrinkable though, but it damn sure isn't my favorite.

04-16-2009 21:25:37 | More by lanechaffin
Photo of hiikeeba
hiikeeba

Texas

3.48/5  rDev +17.6%

Part of the Shiner Family 6-pack

A - Poured up pale yellow with golden highlights and thin white head that dissipates to nothing fairly quickly.

S - Sweet malt aroma to start, hops cutting through in the finish.

T - Nice hint of malt graininess, with some hop bitterness on the side of the tongue, but otherwise nothing too spectacular.

M - Moderate mouthfeel

D - When I drink pale yellow fizzy lager, I prefer Shiner Blonde.

04-03-2009 20:11:33 | More by hiikeeba
Photo of nhudson
nhudson

Alabama

3.23/5  rDev +9.1%

Received this in a mixed 6-Pack from Whole Foods for a Birthday present. I have never had anything from Shiner except the Bock, which I hated.

a- Very clear with no head. Other reviewers say it looks like a watered down lemonade and I have to agree. Its very golden/yellow but clear.
s- Smell is of light skunk with an adjunct lager aroma. I get no hop aroma at all.
t- This beer tasted nothing like I thought it would. It has a citrus/adjunct lager taste, but the citrus rounds everything off in the finish
m- Smooth mouthfeel with little carbonation.
d- For what I would normally consider a "Crappy" beer its very drinkable. If I hold my nose I could down a few six packs.

04-02-2009 14:58:45 | More by nhudson
Photo of 1fastz28
1fastz28

Illinois

3.05/5  rDev +3%

pours an insanely pale color, it looks like watered down lemonade, not even sure if i have seen a beer with this little color before, has no head either, pretty boring overall. smell is decent, has more of a belgian wit aroma to it than a lager, but it is pretty decent overall. taste is alot like the smell, closer to wit than a lager, but its pretty average. drinkability is the best part, its light and relatively refreshing, so having a few of these is no problem

03-29-2009 04:05:43 | More by 1fastz28
Photo of TexIndy
TexIndy

Texas

3.5/5  rDev +18.2%

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a pint glass. No dating info but know it's fresh since came in a mixed pack that has a just released beer. Was a clear very pale yellow. Good carbonation and no lacing. It had a good sized very fizzy white head that quickly settled into a barely there partial collar.

The aroma was standard larger - malty and grainy. Not much hops. Not bad but not good either. Same with the taste. Typical lager. Middle of the road. Very drinkable so could be a mindless session beer if all you want it to get f'ed up with not much taste.

Overall, a decent beer. For me, this is the classic beer for showing someone what is the next step up from the BMC's. Not bashing them but not much flavor in them. This one is mild enough to start someone on their journey to better beers. For me, it's a very rare change-up beer if I'm at a place with limited selection or if I'm having beer newbies over.

03-21-2009 00:39:21 | More by TexIndy
Photo of champ103
champ103

Texas

2.33/5  rDev -21.3%

A: Pours a clear straw yellow. A white head forms, but recedes in an instant. No lace.
S: Cooked veggie aroma and musk. A very light sweet and grainy malt aroma with a faint hop twang.
T: Follows the nose with a cooked veggie flavor. Just a light touch of sweet malt and a clean finish.
M/D: A light body with a good amount of carbonation. Very thin and watery. Easy enough to drink, but I would not want another.

Blah. After being somewhat surprised with Shiner Light, I thought this could be enjoyable. Nothing I will revisit when Shiner light is much better.

03-17-2009 20:30:04 | More by champ103
Photo of BrewsCrewSA
BrewsCrewSA

Texas

2.63/5  rDev -11.1%

Well, after just having reviewed Shiner Light, maybe this is my least favorite Shiner.

A - straw yellow, about a half-inch whitish head that dissolved very quickly.

S - a bit skunky, not appealing at all. It's a strange aroma for a golden lager.

T - Nothing special. It's actually like a Bud Light or Miller, but that's more of an insult to Shiner and a credit to the big three.

D - it's drinkable, not something I'd often come back to, but let it sit in the freezer for a bit and it'll refresh you.

Hmm...Shiner isn't hit or miss, it's hit all the time for me, but tasting this again is a little weird. I found a Shiner I wasn't crazy about...

03-08-2009 23:58:19 | More by BrewsCrewSA
Photo of jwc215
jwc215

Wisconsin

2.88/5  rDev -2.7%

Thanks to armock for this.

Pours light straw yellow - very light - white a thin white head that has brief retention before becoming a patch, then disappears. It has some trailing lace at first, but leaves a clean glass.

The smell is of light cereal, lighter than some macros. Very faint hops, if at all.

There is a touch of grainy sweetness with a slight touch of non-descript washed-out hop presence, enough to give it a dry finish. There is a touch of salt. It's pretty much bland and fairly tasteless, though nothing particularly "off".

The feel is seltzery and prickly, though not more than most macros, maybe a hair less. It is thin. Crisp, if nothing else.

This could be mixed in with a typical American macro lager, as it's on that level.

03-06-2009 02:05:32 | More by jwc215
Photo of jpaltan
jpaltan

Texas

2.63/5  rDev -11.1%

Golden yellow, quite translucent. head pours big and foamy then is gone in seconds. some bubbles keep coming up from the bottle of the glass. if it weren't for them, i'd guess the beer was flat. smell is lemon. more cleaner-like than fresh lemon though. taste is humdrum with corn flavors that blend into a mild bitterness. some of that lemon is still there too. mouthfeel is quite lacking. very little carbonation, really thin. i think the macros have better mouthfeel. drinkability is not too good. i think i'll keep these in the fridge for friends.

02-27-2009 22:17:40 | More by jpaltan
Photo of bmwats
bmwats

Louisiana

3.08/5  rDev +4.1%

Poured into a pilsner.

A: Golden color. Low carbonation pours into a 1 finger bubbly white head which quickly dissipates leaving no remaining head to speak of. Light carbonation continues to rise. No lacing to speak of.

S: Light malt, yeast, hint of lemon.

T: Subdued malty character. A little yeast.

M: Light but hearty. Malt and then a pungent aftertaste follows. A little diluted.

D: Pretty solid. Light feel, decent flavor.

Atmosphere is, okay. Flavor is decent, yet subdued. Feel is pretty generic. All this makes for a light, but somewhat flavorful, drinkable brew. Decent quaff.

01-25-2009 01:41:29 | More by bmwats
Photo of Bagman007
Bagman007

Texas

3.35/5  rDev +13.2%

Served in a bottle poured into a pint glass.

A- Very clear pale yellow coloring with a thin layer of white head.

S- Doesn't really have a very strong scent, but what you can smell is a mixture of wheat and hops.

T- Very bland taste, but somewhat sweet at the same time. Very watery beer.

M- Extremely smooth, not very bitter. Somewhat sweet taste.

D- Extremely drinkable. Very smooth beer.

Overall not as bad of a beer as I thought it would be. Definitely a little watery and bland, but not a terrible beer.

01-15-2009 03:21:10 | More by Bagman007
Photo of ghebel
ghebel

Iowa

3/5  rDev +1.4%

A - Clear, straw colored.

S - Grainy, malty.

T - Not much new here. Tastes like a pale lager.

M - Like carbonated water.

D - Could drink a lot of them. If you just want the effects of the alcohol or to drink on a hot day without much taste, this is it. It has more taste than some of the American light beers, but is that really saying much?

Overall - A good example of an American lager. Nothing else.

01-05-2009 23:29:01 | More by ghebel
Photo of meatmallet
meatmallet

Illinois

2.35/5  rDev -20.6%

Appearance: Clear yellow color with a thin white head.

Smell: Smells like malt and grain but not very strong at all.

Taste: Starts off with a bit of a wheat flavor but finishes like a glass of water.

Mouthfeel/drinkability: I heard a lot of good things about Shiner but this beer falls well short of what I expected.

12-19-2008 02:17:33 | More by meatmallet
Photo of jujubeast6000
jujubeast6000

Texas

2.55/5  rDev -13.9%

Reviewed 1/14/2006 (12oz bottle):

Pours a light golden yellow color body, with virtually no head, white. Has a slightly skunky malty aroma. A very light skunky taste. Fizzy malty taste, fresh tasting, slightly dusty palate, not too complex of a flavor.

12-02-2008 03:32:18 | More by jujubeast6000
Photo of beveritt
beveritt

Ohio

3/5  rDev +1.4%

Presentation: Poured from a 12 oz brown bottle into a standard pint glass. Label is blue and depicts two guys standing in front of a brewing vessel. No clear freshness date. I do like the comment, "Swing by the brewery in Shiner, we'll pour you a cold one and talk about blondes." My wife grabbed this at a local beer place that may need to be added to BeerFly.

Appearance: Pours with one finger of pure white head. This settles to just a ring around the glass. The beer itself is very pale yellow and perfectly clear. Moderate activity. No sediment in the bottle.

Smell: Mild vegetal aroma with semi-sweet malt. Slight metallic note.

Taste: Very sharp carbonation bite almost overpowers the mild flavors which follow. Malt sweetness with notes of artichoke with a very, very slight hint of mint.

Mouthfeel: Carbonation level is through the roof. Body is okay.

Drinkability: Pretty bland and unexciting, but that is what this style is all about. Easy drinking and certainly wouldn't scare off any macro drinkers.

11-24-2008 23:33:55 | More by beveritt
Photo of MutualAid
MutualAid

Texas

2.42/5  rDev -18.2%

A - Pours very pale with a fizzy white head that quickly dissipates.

S - All yeast with a bit of malt, no appreciable hop bouquet.

T - A bit of sweet malt with a hint of banana that quickly gives way to . . . water; no hop flavor but a bit of bitterness pops up in the finish.

M - Very thin body with a finish so clean you could convince yourself you haven't tasted it yet!

D - This beer is drinkable in the way water is drinkable. To some people that is a good thing but I am not one of them.

Overall, like an American light beer in the worst way possible. No thanks.

11-08-2008 00:25:33 | More by MutualAid
Photo of jsprain1
jsprain1

Minnesota

2.9/5  rDev -2%

A- A very pale golden with minimal head and lacing. Lots of carbonation
S-Smells of musty grass and alcohol.
T-Tastes better than it smells. Still has a musty grassy taste but finishes decently.
M- watery and overcarbonated.
O- It's quite drinkable for its style. Not great not poor. It would be good if it had more body to it. Not Shiner's best product but is actually a good beer for a grill out and a good choice for an intro into craft beers.

09-23-2008 07:41:23 | More by jsprain1
Photo of Jyubei
Jyubei

New Mexico

2.58/5  rDev -12.8%

A. A pale yellow brew, 1/2 finger white head and minimal lacing.

S. Very light aroma of hops and wheat with a floral hint.

T. Hops, water, and a sour wheat at the tip of the tongue. Not much to taste here. Has a water and hops aftertaste.

M. Watery and smooth.

D. Nothing much is really here. I'd drink it at a party if it was the best of a poor selection, but I won't buy it.

09-12-2008 05:24:55 | More by Jyubei
Photo of thekevlarkid
thekevlarkid

Maryland

2.75/5  rDev -7.1%

Knowing this breweries rep for poor looking brews I gave this one an aggressive pour out of the bottle. Still, very little head, no retention and no lacing. The liquid itself was a clear, bleached golden color. The nose was weak, pilsner-like malt and a mineral-like quality similar to what one gets out of canned beer. For an "all-Malt" Lager this was rather washed out, pale malts and some bread but no hops balance and not enough punch. The mouthfeel was ok however, the higher carbonation helped to fill in the thin body. Typical overall for a macro lager but their original bock beer is better.

09-09-2008 20:05:22 | More by thekevlarkid
Photo of jake87
jake87

Texas

2.13/5  rDev -28%

L.Very light wheat with a thin white head
S. Light biter yet floral hop smeel with a little wheat
T. Pretty watery with a light wheaty sourness followed by a very light citrus and malt flavor
F. Heavy carbonation, feels like water down the throat

Watery, that just about explains this beer, if it weren't so watered down it might be ok, but definately not a good showing from Spoetzl.

08-31-2008 19:20:20 | More by jake87
Photo of Goliath
Goliath

Illinois

2.95/5  rDev -0.3%

Pours a clear, pale golden color with a one inch bright white head. Poor retention and no lacing.

The aroma is fairly weak, and pretty typical. Some pale pils malt dominates giving a slight bready character. A bit of grain and not much else.

The taste is really not that great. Some pale malts giving a bit of bread. Not much else.

Mouthfeel is medium bodied with plenty of carbonation.

Drinkability is moderate. Flavor isn't too great, but it's not repulsive either. There are plenty of other lagers that I would much prefer before this one though.

08-28-2008 02:52:47 | More by Goliath
Photo of EnojysAnyBeer
EnojysAnyBeer

Colorado

3.65/5  rDev +23.3%

This is damn good for an All-Malt lager. A bit watery, but nonetheless solid.

A- Looks good with an almost-amber/gold color, decent carbonation, but weak head

S- Smells like a macro but with better malts

T- Tastes better than any all-malt I've ever had. I could swear I almost tasted some hoppiness.

M- Feels mmm-mmmalty good. Smooth

D- Drinks down quick and easy for when you wanna drink something light that isn't offensive

08-16-2008 07:45:00 | More by EnojysAnyBeer
Photo of pmcadamis
pmcadamis

Illinois

1.68/5  rDev -43.2%

I bought a sixer of this stuff to enjoy while hanging out on my deck with friends.

A - No head, no lace, no haze, no love. This looks like any pale yellow macro lager.

S - Hints of metallic mineral notes and a faint twinge of spicy hops.

T - Tastes like any bland lager...albeit with a bit more assertive mineral and copper tones. Not really tasty.

M - Thin, weak, and overcarbonated.

D - This could have passed for Coors in a blind taste test. Very bland and boring stuff really.

07-14-2008 18:28:40 | More by pmcadamis
Photo of orangemoustache
orangemoustache

Illinois

2.38/5  rDev -19.6%

Pours the palest of pale yellows with a thin finger of head that hangs for all of five second before leaving no lacing.This has some skunky aromas along with some mild grassy notes.The taste is even more bland than the nose.It taste of wimpy malts and some wierd mineral flavors(like licking a dry rock),some hoppy bitterness on the tail,but not enough to get excited about.The body is thin and is ok for a blonde,but then there is this overpowering wave of carbonation that is borderline offensive,very dry finish that does'nt suit this very well.On to somthing better I hope.

07-05-2008 04:30:53 | More by orangemoustache
Shiner Blonde from Spoetzl Brewery
69 out of 100 based on 759 ratings.