1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Shiner Light - Spoetzl Brewery

Shiner LightShiner Light

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
71
okay

159 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 159
Reviews: 69
rAvg: 3.04
pDev: 18.75%


Brewed by:
Spoetzl Brewery visit their website
Texas, United States

Style | ABV
Light Lager |  4.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 09-01-2003)
View: Beers (22) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 159 | Reviews: 69 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of gtermi
gtermi

Texas

2.55/5  rDev -16.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

This beer came in a variety 6 pack of Shiner and I wish they would put something better. This beer is very bland and boring. I poured it out and it was a light yellow color with a medium head. The smell is of malt and some wheat. The taste is pretty watery to me. It has a little bit of malt and thats really it. The mouthfeel is pretty average. It is pretty crisp and a bot of carbonation. Overall this beer is not that good. I do not really care for light beers and this didnt help change my views.

Serving type: bottle

10-21-2011 05:47:18 | More by gtermi
Photo of PDXHops
PDXHops

South Carolina

3/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

12 ounce bottle poured into a shaker pint. The lack of resistance from the twist-off cap may have something to do with the near absence of head and lacing, although some lazy visual carbonation bubbles up through the amberish gold body.

Nose is mild, yet pleasantly malty, roughly equal parts sweet and bready. Some tealike hop notes. Tastes more or less like it smells. Pretty tasty, and not bad at all, especially when compared to it's macro counterparts. The body approaches medium heft, but a jolt of carbonation would vastly improve things; again, the loose cap may be to blame here.

Overall impression: Doesn't look like much and kinda flattish, but definitely a solid choice for the style. I may give this one another shot sometime and see if a better cap seal improves things.

Serving type: bottle

04-23-2011 18:37:40 | More by PDXHops
Photo of midwestbrewers
midwestbrewers

Kansas

2.85/5  rDev -6.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

This review is short and sweet. This is a typical light beer with some more flavor. If you don't like lights don't drink this one it's no different. Nice look with a puffy white head. Smell is sort of malty and sweet. Mild malt flavor kind of like corn. Decent carbonation and very, very smooth and drinkable. Low ABV and the $ of Shiner(especially the variety pack) make for a good choice for macro drinkers to jump into the world of craft brewing. Most of Shiner beers are not too over the top and this is no exception. Good beer Spoetzl Brewery

Serving type: bottle

02-17-2011 22:52:26 | More by midwestbrewers
Photo of Lemke10
Lemke10

Wisconsin

3.78/5  rDev +24.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I bought a single bottle of this at Woodman's in Rockford, IL for about $1.30 in Winter 2010.

Probably one of the better "Light" beers I've had. Pours a plae amber color with a decent head as the slight scent of malts tickle your nose. Upon drinking there is complex malt taste which leaves the beer weaker in taste but still has a rather indepth texture to it that finishes rather smooth. Something better to try than the ol' Miller Lite and Bud Light.

Serving type: bottle

01-04-2011 21:05:33 | More by Lemke10
Photo of mdwalsh
mdwalsh

Iowa

4.1/5  rDev +34.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A: Brilliant Clarity with a golden hue and a ton of active carbonation. The head started out as about a finger and a half, but it's quickly fading. That head really hurts it, but otherwise it's a good looking beer for sure. 4.0

S: Sort of bready malts, and no hops. Less of the generic "beeriness" than I expected, which is nice. It's not phenomenal, but for a light beer, it's pretty robust and nice. 4.0

T: Hmmm, not really anything going on here. I'm getting a little sharp bite, and not much else. There's nothing wrong, it's super clean and completely free of off flavors. I'm really having trouble finding words for this beer. I wish there was a little something, but I don't think that's what they're going for. It's like sex in a canoe. 4.0

M: Light bodied, but not as light as a BMC light beer. 4

D: 4.5

Serving type: bottle

12-20-2010 14:39:06 | More by mdwalsh
Photo of mothman
mothman

United Kingdom (Wales)

2.63/5  rDev -13.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours ½ finger of white head. Has active carbonation on class. Color is a clear golden yellow.

Aroma: Grains, corns, grassy hops. Fairly basic.

Taste: Bland, grassy hops, corn, and grains. Pretty much mimics the nose. Simple.

Mouthfeel: Crisp and a bit creamy. Light bodied with a medium to high amount of carbonation. Ends dry and bland.

Overall, a typical lager. Very macro like. Nothing out of the ordinary here. Easy drinking on a hot summer day but that's about it.

Serving type: bottle

11-30-2010 02:29:32 | More by mothman
Photo of marc956
marc956

Texas

3.1/5  rDev +2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I don't like light beer - but this is better than Coors Light, Bud Light, Busch Light and any other light beer I've tried. Lighter abv (4.0%) than the before mentioned consequently a bit smoother. Can't give drinkability a higher score as I got it in a Shiner Family multi-pack, there4 haven't drunk it enough to know how drinking it as a session beer would affect me.

Serving type: bottle

11-12-2010 04:47:31 | More by marc956
Photo of chilidog
chilidog

Ohio

3/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Thisones light all the way, but not bad.

Pours a golden straw, white well carbonated head. Faded yes, lace some but faded as well.

From here on its just alittle typical and bland. Aroma of grass, pine and hay.
Taste is thin along with the mouthfeel of watered grass. little malt sweetness, little hop crispness.

Overall its ok to drink and at 4%abv, not a problem there.

Serving type: bottle

11-07-2010 16:57:21 | More by chilidog
Photo of mjurney
mjurney

Texas

3.1/5  rDev +2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Appearance:
Amber-golden color, clear. Nice amount of carbonation. Small soapy head that disappears really quick, no lacing.

Smell:
Very clean aroma, but I get some grainy, touch of caramel.

Taste/Mouthfeel:
Dry grainy up front, a little toffee/caramel notes. Hop character is very mild, a little touch of grass. I notice there's some green apple in the midway. Clean finish with very dry aftertaste. Body is light-medium, much heavier than most light beer. Carbonation is medium, not over powering.

Drinkability:
Fairly good. A little too dry, but not bad for a light beer.

Serving type: bottle

10-18-2010 02:25:59 | More by mjurney
Photo of generallee
generallee

New York

3.48/5  rDev +14.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Presentation: It was poured from a brown 12oz bottle into a shaker pint glass. The label has a brief description of the beer but no ABV or freshness date.

Appearance: This beer has a very clear straw yellow color with a light soapy head on top that quickly dissipates. Only a small ring of bubbles is left and lacing is nil.

Smell: The aroma is light clean and a little bready with the slightest hint of grassy hops.

Taste/Palate: It's simple, clean and light bodied. Light bready maltiness brings mild sweetness for the light hops to balance. The texture is light and well carbonated but not overly fizzy.

Notes: For a Light Lager this one is not bad at all just a little boring but so is the style really.

Serving type: bottle

09-28-2010 14:55:29 | More by generallee
Photo of Mora2000
Mora2000

Texas

2.8/5  rDev -7.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

The beer pours a clear yellow color with a white head. The aroma is strong grain with nothing else being present. The flavor is better than the aroma, but is still nothing special. I get some grain and wheat, as well as some sweet malt and some grassy hops. Medium carbonation and light mouthfeel. Not terrible, but nothing worth seeking out unless you really like light lagers.

Serving type: bottle

09-17-2010 05:06:42 | More by Mora2000
Photo of htomsirveaux
htomsirveaux

Texas

3/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12 oz. bottle tried 17 Jul 2009.

Served in the 0.4 L Hutthurmer mug. Small white head quickly dissipates. Well carbonated. Brass colored, clear. Aroma is lightly sweet and bready. Fizzy, some corn to start. Quite light in flavor. Light body. Somewhat sweet finish.

Like washing down a piece of white bread with mineral water.

Serving type: bottle

09-02-2010 04:45:22 | More by htomsirveaux
Photo of burnerfinger
burnerfinger

Texas

2.78/5  rDev -8.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

poured from the 12 oz bottle into my new belgium goblet

a straw color brew, off white head that dissipates quick

s not nice at all, metallic a bit

t like tin, just a bit better than the macros

m extra fizzy. think budweiser

d: watery. very drinkable, that's its best attribute.

Serving type: bottle

07-04-2010 05:34:02 | More by burnerfinger
Photo of ZAP
ZAP

Minnesota

4.43/5  rDev +45.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 5 | overall: 4.5

This is a pretty good light beer....one of the better one's I've had. It has that similar bready maltiness their main lager does...it is lighter in body but not thin like most in this style...smooth, rounded finish....

I'm impressed...nice slightly sweet bready flavor...decent body...nice finish...no cheapness to it...what more do you need for this style to rate it high?

Scores are per style.

Serving type: bottle

07-02-2010 04:09:25 | More by ZAP
Photo of JMad
JMad

Texas

2.93/5  rDev -3.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I poured a 12oz bottle into a chilled pint glass.

Has good light copper color, especially for a light beer. Had a thin head that didn't last long.
Smells light a little malty.
Tastes better than most light beers too. A little metallic, kind of fruity.
Drinks good, not overcarbonated, but there's really not much here...
Would drink this again if it was offered to me, won't be buying this stuff.

Serving type: bottle

06-06-2010 04:00:06 | More by JMad
Photo of Soilworker
Soilworker

Idaho

3.15/5  rDev +3.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Presentation: Poured from a 12oz twist-top bottle into a globe glass.

A: Light golden brown with a one finger thick head with minimal head retention. Practically no lacing going on here.

S: Sort of a hard beer to put a lot of smelling notes for, just not enough going on. Seems to be right along the lines of a standard light lager: moderate semi-sweet maltiness, a hint of sweet corn and cereal grains, and minimal hoppiness.

T: Quite light! Not much malt or hoppiness going on here. I would describe the flavor as a watered-down sweet maltiness with practically no hops. The finish is just a watery malty finish.

M: As mentioned in the taste this is quite watery though there is a pleasant amount of carbonation here.

D: I could personally pound these all night, its very watery. I'm knocking it down a bit though because I don't think I would want to drink just this.

Notes: I may come off a bit critical here but I do think they hit on the style just fine. Its quite refreshing but really just tastes like a light malty carbonated soda in my opinion. Still its definitely better than some of the standard offerings for the style.

Serving type: bottle

05-20-2010 01:22:33 | More by Soilworker
Photo of mralphabet
mralphabet

Virginia

3.25/5  rDev +6.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

12 oz bottle poured into pint glass

A: Light orange color & clear about a fingers worth of head that settles to a nice layer of foam and ring, little to no lacing. This one of the darker light beers I've seen plus a head that holds on thought the session. Very surprising, in a good way.

S: Little straw, malt and a hint of hops... another surprise for a light beer.

T: I'm getting no straw in the taste, just a balance of malt and hops. The overall flavors are on the light side. Aftertaste just a little bitter, but light.

M: Light to Med, heavier than other light beers I've had. Carbonation very nice, not to much or to little.

D: Low ABV, does not look like a light beer and has good flavors.... A very drinkable light beer.

Best light beer I've had so far... Give it a try if you are looking for a light beer.

Serving type: bottle

05-19-2010 03:56:30 | More by mralphabet
Photo of budgood1
budgood1

Minnesota

3.9/5  rDev +28.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

pours out a perfect gold colour with a respectable head reducing to a smattering of lace. a light, husky and sweet aroma. a lot more aroma than a majority of light beers. the flavour isn't too bad...lots of residual sweetness...a bit corny but that's alright. it actually has just enough character to be enjoyable. a bit of hop bitterness stings the back end to balance the sweetness. all this is supported by a crisp mouthfeel that is just watery enough to pass as a light beer. the overall body is about right, and if were to drink this blind, i would have trouble recgnizing this as a light beer. nice drinkability, i can see why this would be a good choice in the Texas heat.

for a light beer, this is pretty impressive. keep it on the cold side. rates high within it's style.

Serving type: bottle

03-08-2010 23:17:29 | More by budgood1
Photo of brownbeer
brownbeer

Missouri

2.38/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

It has a tinted gold look to it, which is nice for a light beer.

The aroma is vague and distant. Corn, cereal grain, honey.

It has a sweet maltiness to it with a comfortable light flavor. Overall though, I can't taste much at all from this. Prickly hops try to come around in the finish.

It's clean with good carbonation but i'm going to have to take the calories over this. Bland.

Serving type: bottle

01-23-2010 02:19:12 | More by brownbeer
Photo of maleman
maleman

Mississippi

2.9/5  rDev -4.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

poured from a 12oz bottle into a pint glass. no freshness dating noted on bottle.

A - poured a light amber. much darker than i had expected for a light beer. it started with a creamy one-finger head that quickly receded into a thin cap. stickly lacing down the sides.

S - not much noted. some hops there, but little else.

T - a little bit of grass...maybe some hint of banana?

M - light-bodied, less than average carbonation, no pop, no aftertaste.

D - could probably sit around and drink these one after another...but don't know why i'd choose to do that?

Serving type: bottle

12-09-2009 23:31:05 | More by maleman
Photo of TheManiacalOne
TheManiacalOne

Rhode Island

3.65/5  rDev +20.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Acquired via trade from gramatton, so a big "Thank you" goes out to him. Poured from a 12oz bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a deep gold color with a large white head that fades slowly and leaves a thick lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is of light malts, grain and a decent amount of hops for the style.

T: The taste starts out bready with flavors of grain and barley. Then there's a mild caramel sweetness that comes in along with a stronger than average hops bitterness for a light beer creating a pretty good balance. The after-taste is slightly sweet.

M: Smooth and crisp, light-to-medium body, medium carbonation, finish is clean and dry.

D: Tasty, goes down very easily, not too filling, very mild kick, very good representation of style, normally when you see "light" on a beers label you anticipate it to be a shadow of anything good, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that this beer is well-worth pounding down for a long time.

Serving type: bottle

11-14-2009 21:24:45 | More by TheManiacalOne
Photo of rdub
rdub

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a bottle in a mixed six pack into my favorite pint glass. The light straw color and one inch head was pretty nice for a light brew. Smell was bright with not much offensive typical adjunct smell. Taste was right down the middle as well. Mouthfeel was light and drinkability was there. All in all not bad for a light. Lawnmower quality for sure.

Serving type: bottle

11-10-2009 03:01:27 | More by rdub
Photo of wahhmaster
wahhmaster

Virginia

2.7/5  rDev -11.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a Krušovice-branded pilsner glass.

Appearance: Pours a tan-ish amber color, a lot darker than you'd expect from a light beer. The head is large and fizzy and takes its time dissipating leaving some spotty lacing.

Smell: Smells slightly malty with mostly a corny/grainy smell. Smells better than most macros but is definitely still a light lager.

Taste: Really light on taste but that's expected from a light beer. Has a grainy sweetness that's typical of adjunct lagers.

Mouthfeel: Like carbonated water. Enough said.

Drinkability: A surprisingly decent light beer. While certainly not a stand-out in any way, this beer is pretty refreshing and really drinkable. You could do FAR, FAR worse in a light beer.

Serving type: bottle

10-26-2009 20:23:00 | More by wahhmaster
Photo of bilyboy65
bilyboy65

Colorado

3.4/5  rDev +11.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

As far as light beers go, this one is pretty good. It definitely out ranks the major 3 light beers.

A: is a a decent copper, but seems to really try to force a head with a lot of carbonation out of the gate that fizzles quickly. Nothing remains after a minute or so.

S: Some hops some malts, basically a light beer. Nothing shocking here.

T: Same as the nose. It does surprise me though that there is actually a taste to this beer. Is why I think it out ranks the major 3. No unwanted harsh after taste either.

M: Light bodied, and lets be honest would you really have expected anything else. No unwanted feelings left behind.

D: Easily could drink a lot more than one.

Serving type: bottle

10-22-2009 23:39:46 | More by bilyboy65
Photo of wheatyweiss
wheatyweiss

Wisconsin

2.75/5  rDev -9.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured from a bottle into a standard tumbler. No freshness date.

Pours a light to medium straw with a two finger head that recedes to a cap and fades to nothing.

Aroma is tannic acid malt and sweetness. Funny, TX beer smells like sweet tea. Malt is slightly husky and yeast is a bit dank.

Flavor is caramel malt, loads of caramel, followed by sweet tea tannic acids and diacetyl, loads of diacetyl. The middle is butter scotch weak with a mix of husky grain. Finishes with a hint of sweet grain and an oh so light touch of hop.

Mouthfeel is thin and bubbly, OK for a light type macro. It is crisp enough that's for sure.

If not for the diacetyl flavor, this would be a decent beer. Unfortunately the predominant flavor shouldn't really be the show stealer it is.

Serving type: bottle

09-11-2009 22:59:18 | More by wheatyweiss
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Shiner Light from Spoetzl Brewery
71 out of 100 based on 159 ratings.