Dismiss Notice

Site Performance Updates: We're aware of the nightly site outage, and working on resolving the issue.

Follow our progress ...

Shiner Bock | Spoetzl Brewery / Shiner

YOUR RATING = None |
BA SCORE
71
okay
1,059 Reviews
THE BROS
64
poor
Read the review
BEER STATS
Reviews:
1,059
Ratings:
3,848
Avg:
3.04
pDev:
39.47%
 
 
Wants:
71
Gots:
980
For Trade:
1
Shiner BockShiner Bock
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Spoetzl Brewery / Shiner
Texas, United States | website

Style: Bock

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.40%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by BeerAdvocate on 10-03-1999

View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 1,059 | Ratings: 3,848
Photo of MEWHA
3.5/5  rDev +15.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Solid beer, really more of a lager but doesn't really matter to me. Not the best I've had, but definitely not the worst. I would recommend to anyone thinking of trying it.

 173 characters

Photo of secondtooth
2.22/5  rDev -27%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2.25

Appearance: Pours a clean caramel amber, with off-white suds. No lace.

Aroma: Sweet and malty. Average to undesirable.

Taste: Mild and watery. A little caramelly and a tinge of nuttiness, but really it’s all overpowered by a wallop of sweetness. A slight bitterness to the finish. This seems a far cry from a traditional German bock. Misses the mark and remains average at best.

 382 characters

Photo of MACrist
3.22/5  rDev +5.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

APPEARANCE: A clear dark caramel in appearance. Finger + of creamy khaki head that slowly settles down to a thin layer. Plenty of bubbles rising. Very minor lacing.
AROMA: A little floral, slight sulfur, bready, husk, a little toffee.
TASTE: Drinking it quite cold. Mostly getting the caramel, and biscuit/bread notes. Slightly different aftertaste but I can't put my finger on what it reminds me of. Mildly funky but not offensive.
FEEL: Nice full carbonation, medium thin body, and a little slick but drying on finish.
OVERALL: Not bad. Slight aftertaste but no big deal. Be good for game night when you want to have a few, relax, and not analyze it.

 652 characters

Photo of 88caprice
3/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a bottle into a glass.

Overall: Enjoyable, but very basic and easy to throw back.
What makes this a Bock?
Maybe an Amber Lager in disguise?

An overly red/brown brew with some sparkly suds.
Light, tangy aroma with faint malt and little else.
Taste is just...light. A light malt taste, very subtle sweetness, barely there bitterness. One-dimensional and thin.
A sparkly, but thin mouthfeel.

 404 characters

Photo of PhilsPils
1.52/5  rDev -50%
look: 3 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

OK, if you want a beer really bad, here's a really bad beer. If we are going to consider this to be a Bock, it is a ridiculously inept effort because it has NONE of the attributes of a Bock other than a dark color (which is rumored to be from caramel coloring). Not strong, not malty sweet, not flavorful, not, not, not. It is a watery beer that has a perceived sweetness that I believe is not the result of caramel malts as much as the fact that there are no hops to provide any bitterness. What hops flavor there is is woody and boring. Maybe the weak flavor is a blessing because what flavor there is isn't pleasant, at least to me. Even if we put it in an adjunct category, it would still be bad. Texas is making some great beers these days...too bad so many people think of Shiner and Lone Star when they think of Texas.

 832 characters

Photo of The-Adjunct-Hippie
3.66/5  rDev +20.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.75

Re-re-review on 5/1/16 :

This time it's from a sweet looking 16 oz can. Pours caramel colored with hues of brown and dark amber. Head is towering and huge. 4 fingers, popcorn colored, doesn't quit. Nice work.

The aroma is actually very spiced here. I get a touch of coriander and cinnamon along with the basic toasted malts and damp hay. Very damp smelling overall.

Flavor is, in a word, good. It's heavy on the caramel and has a smooth profile with subdued hop character. Some plant going on, and a bit of charred wood, but mostly just a smooth caramel roasty malt flavor. I like.

Feel is creamy and has mild carbonation. Drinkable but a bit of a chore too.

Overall, Shiner Bock has redeemed itself again and my scores are going up accordingly.



(Edit ... re-review, 9/28/14, from same six pack. First overall was 3.16 out of the bottle. This one is poured.)

Brand new beer tonight. Picked up from Wally World. $7.28/6-pack. Lets see if this Bock rocks.

Appearance (3.5) - pours a cranberry/currant red color with an almond colored two finger head. The head disperses pretty quickly and is soon only one finger, and soon after that just a ring. Leaves no lacing on the sides of the glass. The bubbles in the head are not very tightly knit so it's not really a creamy head. It's pretty carbonated.

Smell (3.25) - Caramel, yeast, toasted malts. Lots of toasted and yeast aromas. The bouquet is about medium strength. A faint hop character as well that seems to be appropriately balanced for this style. Out of the bottle it's got a sour funk. Not sure what that's all about.

Taste (3.5) - Toasted grain, malt, a little straw, some toffee notes. Some muted hops appear towards the finish but very balanced and in check. Aftertaste is of malted grains and biscuit.

Mouthfeel (3.25) - Carbonated but subdued. Swishing yields a creamy feel. Finish is semi-dry.

Overall (3.29) - Yeah, I'd buy it again. It's not bad. I always pour my beer into glasses now anyways, and this one tastes much better poured. A decent beer - although not really an appropriate representation of a traditional Bock. Still good, a great lager to have. Try it!

 2,148 characters

Photo of gandres
2.23/5  rDev -26.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

12 ounce bottle to wine glass dark amber color, hazy, tan head that disappears quickly Nose: no aroma easily sense light bitterness medium body, fizzy, good beer, ok to repeat, not to look for
drank April 29, 2016

 216 characters

Photo of plumberman63
4.25/5  rDev +39.8%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25

A nice medium/ dark brown with a good tan head
has a rich malty sweet aroma. with a sweet malty caramel taste.
A nice medium body feel.
This is good mild sweet, not bitter. Will get again.
one of my favorites.

 210 characters

Photo of FriedSlug
3.43/5  rDev +12.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.25

The beer pours a crystal clear brown with a reddish hue. The slightly off white head leaves specks of lacing. The aroma is slightly sweet, earthy, with a yeasty smell. All are faint and none are super appealing. This beer seems like it wants to taste like something and then changes its mind. It is a little of everything. A little malty, a little sweet, barely bitter and it almost has flavor. It isn't horrible but it feels like a decent beer is hiding in there just waiting to get out.

 488 characters

Photo of Squire123
3.41/5  rDev +12.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Blue collar Bock.

This is good, no, let me rephrase that, this is quite good for what it is. It isn't a German Bock, it's a variation of AAL, and has met with wide acceptance because people like the flavor. Attractive brownish redish color, malt/hops appear in enough volume to be heard, texture is thinner than Euro styles but still medium, taste leaves a sense of sweetness without actually being sweet. Remarkably consistent, I get the impression this beer was designed to compete with the Vienna style lagers from South of the River. As a crossover from AALs this one performs admirably and the lack of roasted malt bitterness makes it an easy drinker. Works well with food, most any occasion, most any company.

Is popularity reason enough to buy it? Well, yeah.

 774 characters

Photo of CJanders
4.04/5  rDev +32.9%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.75 | overall: 4.5

Nice dark look, smells malty, good taste but a little watery, good feel. My go-to beer when going to a family event or party where half the people drink macrobrews and the other half only drink craft brews. Its a great middle ground.

 233 characters

Photo of RobertDBrase
4.02/5  rDev +32.2%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a reddish copper color with a bone colored soapy head. Lots of streaming bubbles throughout.

Slightly sweet smell of barley with notes of some breadiness.

Tastes like it looks with a nice rich malty sweetness. The sweet is just the right amount and does not overpower.

Mouth feel borders on medium yet is very wet and refreshing with a crisp finish.

This is a very tasty beer that has that bit of sweet that hits it just right. I found this to be a very nice easy drinking beer and with a light ABV this would be great as a nice sessionable beer when hanging with your friends.

 588 characters

Photo of mdfb79
3.43/5  rDev +12.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.25

From 03/22/16 notes. 12 oz. pour in a mason jar.

Pours a somewhat clear bright orange color with one inch of white head and moderate carbonation evident. Citrus nose, fruity and bready malts, and light resin. Medium body and moderate carbonation.

Overall a decent beer; not super hoppy but easy to drink.

 306 characters

Photo of bryanlindsey12345
4/5  rDev +31.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Yeah, should be rated higher. An easy drinking bock, though it will be considered weak by many hard core beer folks. If you are already a fan of bocks, you will be disappointed, but this is a great gateway beer to your friends who only drink Bud and Corona.

 257 characters

Photo of adamhdg
2.79/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

L: beautiful amber but with no head to speak of
S: nonexistent
T: mildly hoppy with slight caramel flavor that was tasty
F: weak and watery with little carbonation
O: weak but not bad. Easy drinkability

 204 characters

Photo of SaltofOH
2.21/5  rDev -27.3%
look: 2 | smell: 1 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.25

Bottle dated 274 15 (October 1?). There is also a 2 18 16 stamped on the front. Is this past date? That might explain a lot. DFH Tulip.

Appearance: Pours a dark amber/light brown with 1/4 finger of off-white head that quickly fades. Pretty near clear, just a little chill haze (straight out of the fridge). No visible carbonation, which is quite a surprise from my memory of the one other time I have had this beer. It doesn't have any head, doesn't have any visible carbonation. Retained nothing, barely a white ring around the edge of the glass. Even Coors Light gets me more excited about drinking a beer than this.

Aroma: Trying to smell anything on this beer I literally sucked it up my nose. No aroma whatsoever. Can I give it a zero?

Taste: Here goes - Lightly sweet, somewhat adjuncty arrival. Slightly malty mouthfeel, some hints of roast here and there. Exceptionally clean finish. Wouldn't be bad with barbecue, actually. Good darker food-pairing beer, I'd say. So I expected a bock to be sweet, and this is actually less sweet than many adjunct lagers. So in that respect, I'd actually say it's a fairly refreshing dark adjunct lager.

Mouthfeel: Midweight. Slightly slick which is weird for a lager. True to its appearance, pretty light on carbonation.

Overall: This is caramel-colored dark adjunct lager that's not overly sweet. For what it is, it's not bad, but leaves a lot to be desired; I'd much rather drink a Yuengling (and I' still take Bud Heavy over that). Even my memory of Michelob Amber Bock is better than this. This is not a fair representation of the style; the only real reason I'm drinking it is to tick of the box for "Bock. " Negra Modelo kills this. Will not be having again anytime soon.

 1,742 characters

Photo of edward_boumil
3.34/5  rDev +9.9%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

L: Ruby red beer, poured a small head that disapears. Some carbonation apparent.
S: Smells nice to me, caramel and toffee like, very sweet and inviting, if not a bit thin and 1 dimensional
T: Somewhat thin flavor. Repeats the nose, is a bit thin with a touch of dryness on the finish (its very minimal).
F: Smooth and very refreshing.
O: Leaves a little to be desired, though it is certainly not a bad beer. Its an easy drinker that is certainly not offensive and actually quite tasty, but not something to knock your socks off.

 532 characters

Photo of Beginner2
3.35/5  rDev +10.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3.25

I've had at least 6 of their offerings including the Bock, but this is my first BA review.

In my lifetime (and I'm now eligible for Social Security), I never thought I would come to the defense of anything from Texas (except maybe LBJ, who historians treat almost as a scoundrel.)

So here I am defending a Bock that has a 71 rating.
This beer is far more flavorful than that. Its subtle blend of malts is atypical brewers from warm climes who tend to use more quenching hops.

And if this beer still is not to your taste, consider that this is one of the biggest sellers of the 5th largest craft brewer in the country.

On the other hand the 71 may have a point: MJ's 1999 edition gave this 1.5 stars of 4.
Roger Probst selected Shiner Bock as among the "300 More Beers To Try Before You Die."
So, you decide.

 811 characters

Photo of mistaya
4.19/5  rDev +37.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25

Don't know why it isn't rated higher. And fits the profile for a Bock, though called different things, in the various BJCP style guidelines. Mine, draft, in chilled mug from a keg. Nice dark amber color, mild malt smell, low hopping but with slight German hop flavor, no alcohol taste, a bit of lacing but holds the light brownish head throughout my drinking it. Nice mouth feel, moderately malty, with a little sweetness, very enjoyable. More an American lager than a German one, tho'. Better than I remember it from the old days. Helps me look forward to Spring.

 569 characters

Photo of dar482
3.04/5  rDev 0%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

The beer comes in a deep amber color, clear.

The flavor hits of low malty sweetness, with hints of floral and spicy hops, with corn, biscuity and caramel malt flavor, driving the beer with a light hop finish and a dry finish. A beer light on flavor, but leaning on the malts.

 276 characters

Photo of HorseheadsHopHead
3.24/5  rDev +6.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

Look: Clear, bubbly reddish brown with thin eggshell white head that leaves rings of lacing.

Smell: Sweet grains, canned corn, caramel, toast, and grass.

Taste: Caramel, roasted corn, toast, grains, and grass; and a crisp, clean, lager finish.

Feel: Fizzy, chuggable, filling mouthfeel, crisp and clean.

Overall: A decent everyday chugging lager. Very comparable to Yuengling of the East. A nice beer for a warm evening or drinking in mass quantities.

 459 characters

Photo of nbaker290
4.6/5  rDev +51.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

Some may criticize this beer for not being a true "bock." But I don't care about that. I know what this beer is and what it is supposed to be: and easy drinking darker lager with a solid amount of malts, but not too much, a beer that can be liked by damn near anyone. I love the dark reddish brown tint. The off-white head. The lacing on the glass. The way I can drink it out of a glass with a steak and potato, or out of the bottle with some buds and some burgers. I love this beer. It may not be a perfect in every or any aspect, but damnit it is a perfect beer because of the many ways it is drinkable. I can drink it while mowing, while working on the truck/car, after a long ride, after a long day at work, with lunch or dinner (hell, breakfast), while grilling, while watching a game or race. Out of the bottle is my preferred way to drink this beer (like most), but I do use glass on the occasion. Overall, one of my favorites.

 935 characters

Photo of SometimesIfart
3.21/5  rDev +5.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Shiner Bock.

This is one of those beers I've seen a thousand times but never bought because it simply didn't appear to me. Today, I saw one of these sitting on a gas station counter for a mere 89 cents and decided I needed to rid myself of some excess ones before getting paid tonight anyway. So yeah, here we go.

Look - From the twist off twelve ounce bottle hard poured into a pint glass. Brew was actually fairly attractive at first. Displaying a deep though crystal clear amber body with a two finger bubbly deep off white head sitting amongst the top. But the head was gone in q matter of ten seconds leaving a few islands to float amongst the top along side a thin bubbly ring on the outskirts. Carbonation appears to be quite high. No lacing or stick amongst a finished glass.

Smell - The nose is quite small. A noticeable nuttiness with some apparent cheaper adjunct levels and that's pretty much the whole show here. Since I didn't expect much, and since it isn't offensive I shall give this category a 3.

Taste - Alright. This is the part where I stop rating this as just a Bock and start rating it as something adjunct filled as well. Due to this beers identity crisis, the numbers may be a but skewed but my final overall opinion should bring it all together. There is a small bit of that nutty flavor I mentioned along side a fair amount of caramel malts but it keeps a very apparent adjunct presence though the aforementioned flavors keep it from becoming corny in the least.

Feel - The body is actually moderate with a boat load of carbonation. You can somewhat tell this is a darker beer as it sits in the mouth but the corn it was able to defeat prior to this becomes present though it is still mostly blocked out by the other flavors. Swallows easily.

Overall - It's hard to really rate a beer like this. If you're rating it as a bock, it isn't very good. But if you're rating it as something a bit more regular and found in every tall boy cooler across America, it is pretty good. Can this stuff, go down on the price a bit,and you've got yourself a winner amongst frat boys everywhere. This is not an offensive beer in the least. If you guys made this about $6 and some change a sixer I might even buy it for drunken occasions with friends.

 2,266 characters

Photo of taters21
2.51/5  rDev -17.4%
look: 2.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2

Pours a cola brown, super carbonated, very little head.
Smells of caramel, metal, and sweet malt.
Tastes of bread followed by earthy hops, weird.
Mouthfeel I nonexistent, poor for the style.
Overall, can't see what some people see in this beer.

 244 characters

Photo of JustLikeMyDad
1.84/5  rDev -39.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Picked up a single at my local Meijer, was something new and I like trying new.
Poured it into a beer glass, poured with little to no foam head and no lacing to speak of. Dark brown, almost caramel color, a little darker. Looks good.
Smell: Water, mild malt.
Taste: Water and weak almost undetectable hop flavor. Roasted malty flavor, but still watery.
Feels like water, very mild carbonation, very smooth.
Overall, I wasn't sure what to expect but I was disappointed, it's just too watery for me and not enough distinct flavors.

 530 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Shiner Bock from Spoetzl Brewery / Shiner
71 out of 100 based on 1,059 ratings.